Just some questions for now.
Jan 31, 2019 21:48:34 #
1. Why did Loretta Lynch met openly with Bill Clinton on the tarmac? How could such a meeting not be construed as an attempt to quash the Hillary investigation? Yet, if meant for that purpose, why be so stupid as to make it plain for the public and reporters to see? Whether innocent or corrupt, that meeting was extremely bizarre politically. No possible upside for them. Then why? https://www.cbsnews.com/news/president-bill-clinton-loretta-lynch-meet-on-tarmac-in-phoenix/
2. What happened to thousands of Hillary emails and why did she use a private server? Comey's eventual soft touch on that investigation, drafting his statement exonerating Hillary Clinton for her use of a private email server months before several key interviews, including with Clinton herself, was inviting, welcoming, begging a charge of favoritism or even obstruction—and why do it, and why do it badly? Totally lacking in protocol or reason.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/hillary-clinton-deleted-33000-emails-secretary-state/story?id=42389308
3. Why did supposed “deep state” operative for the Left Comey release days before the Election, October 28th, that the FBI had “learned of the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to the investigation” into the private email server that Clinton used as secretary of state? This information upended the news cycle and soon halved Clinton’s lead in the polls, imperiling her position in the Electoral College. And why were there absolutely no leaks from him or the FBI regarding the facts that the Trump campaign was presently under investigation for possible collusion with Russia? It makes zero sense. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-comey-letter-probably-cost-clinton-the-election/
4. Why so many secret meetings with Putin, excluding the protocol of having aides and translators being present and notes on any sort to record what was said? Why not secret meetings with allies? What makes those meetings worth concealing? And why just the exception to an adversary of this country? Nothing like this has happened with May, Macron, Trudeau, Merkel, or any other such leaders of our tried, trusted, and true allies for decades.
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/trump-had-yet-another-secret-163626044.html
5. The Very Big Why:
First lets take it that one of the liars about Russian contacts in Trump's circle, Manafort, is just a bad guy. He had plenty to hide about illegal activity and was found guilty of those offenses. That said, none of the others that lied to Congress or the FBI, needlessly opening themselves to federal criminal charges, had the slightest reason not to tell the truth about their contacts. Flynn, Kushner, Sessions, Papadopoulos, Page, and others had every right to met with Russian officials, but they lied. Why? Their job description entitled them to such meetings. If any of them had an answered a simple yes to contact with Russians, there may have been follow up questions but no harm no foul. So why?
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/2/20/17031772/mueller-indictments-grand-jury
6. Throughout his campaign and as president, Trump had said he had no dealings with Russia. As a private citizen, according to the law, he had every right to pursue his business interests in Russia or anywhere. All Trump had to say was that his company was looking at some property in Moscow for a possible business venture but it was just one of many worldwide ventures. That was his business! Yet he did not. He continued to insist he had “no dealings with Russia.” Cohen had him change his tune on “having no dealings with Russia.” In a tweet: “Oh, I get it! I am a very good developer, happily living my life, when I see our Country going in the wrong direction (to put it mildly). Against all odds, I decide to run for President & continue to run my business-very legal & very cool, talked about it on the campaign trail...” He never once “talked about it on the campaign trail.” If it was indeed “ very legal & very cool,” why repeatedly declare, nine times at public rallies and when questioned by reporters, “we’re not involved in Russia”? https://www.vox.com/2018/11/30/18119421/trump-russia-contacts-cohen-deals-statements
2. What happened to thousands of Hillary emails and why did she use a private server? Comey's eventual soft touch on that investigation, drafting his statement exonerating Hillary Clinton for her use of a private email server months before several key interviews, including with Clinton herself, was inviting, welcoming, begging a charge of favoritism or even obstruction—and why do it, and why do it badly? Totally lacking in protocol or reason.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/hillary-clinton-deleted-33000-emails-secretary-state/story?id=42389308
3. Why did supposed “deep state” operative for the Left Comey release days before the Election, October 28th, that the FBI had “learned of the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to the investigation” into the private email server that Clinton used as secretary of state? This information upended the news cycle and soon halved Clinton’s lead in the polls, imperiling her position in the Electoral College. And why were there absolutely no leaks from him or the FBI regarding the facts that the Trump campaign was presently under investigation for possible collusion with Russia? It makes zero sense. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-comey-letter-probably-cost-clinton-the-election/
4. Why so many secret meetings with Putin, excluding the protocol of having aides and translators being present and notes on any sort to record what was said? Why not secret meetings with allies? What makes those meetings worth concealing? And why just the exception to an adversary of this country? Nothing like this has happened with May, Macron, Trudeau, Merkel, or any other such leaders of our tried, trusted, and true allies for decades.
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/trump-had-yet-another-secret-163626044.html
5. The Very Big Why:
First lets take it that one of the liars about Russian contacts in Trump's circle, Manafort, is just a bad guy. He had plenty to hide about illegal activity and was found guilty of those offenses. That said, none of the others that lied to Congress or the FBI, needlessly opening themselves to federal criminal charges, had the slightest reason not to tell the truth about their contacts. Flynn, Kushner, Sessions, Papadopoulos, Page, and others had every right to met with Russian officials, but they lied. Why? Their job description entitled them to such meetings. If any of them had an answered a simple yes to contact with Russians, there may have been follow up questions but no harm no foul. So why?
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/2/20/17031772/mueller-indictments-grand-jury
6. Throughout his campaign and as president, Trump had said he had no dealings with Russia. As a private citizen, according to the law, he had every right to pursue his business interests in Russia or anywhere. All Trump had to say was that his company was looking at some property in Moscow for a possible business venture but it was just one of many worldwide ventures. That was his business! Yet he did not. He continued to insist he had “no dealings with Russia.” Cohen had him change his tune on “having no dealings with Russia.” In a tweet: “Oh, I get it! I am a very good developer, happily living my life, when I see our Country going in the wrong direction (to put it mildly). Against all odds, I decide to run for President & continue to run my business-very legal & very cool, talked about it on the campaign trail...” He never once “talked about it on the campaign trail.” If it was indeed “ very legal & very cool,” why repeatedly declare, nine times at public rallies and when questioned by reporters, “we’re not involved in Russia”? https://www.vox.com/2018/11/30/18119421/trump-russia-contacts-cohen-deals-statements
Feb 1, 2019 00:05:40 #
Here's another question:
What did Obama mean when he said to the President of Russia over an open mic: "This is my last election. After the election I'll have a lot more flexibility." To which the Russian President responded: "I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladamir and I stand with you."
What did Obama mean when he said to the President of Russia over an open mic: "This is my last election. After the election I'll have a lot more flexibility." To which the Russian President responded: "I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladamir and I stand with you."
Feb 1, 2019 00:47:44 #
cSc61 wrote:
Here's another question:
What did Obama mean when he said to the President of Russia over an open mic: "This is my last election. After the election I'll have a lot more flexibility." To which the Russian President responded: "I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladamir and I stand with you."
What did Obama mean when he said to the President of Russia over an open mic: "This is my last election. After the election I'll have a lot more flexibility." To which the Russian President responded: "I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladamir and I stand with you."
Elephants never forget. Shame on you. Somebody may be offended for being shown their hypocrisy.😝
Feb 1, 2019 02:29:52 #
flash wrote:
Elephants never forget. Shame on you. Somebody may be offended for being shown their hypocrisy.😝
Too funny and sadly predictable. Comment on the questions presented or diddle yourself, like your comment.
Feb 1, 2019 12:14:29 #
rumitoid wrote:
1. Why did Loretta Lynch met openly with Bill Clin... (show quote)
What a hypocrite! First remove the beam out of your own eye, and then you can see clearly to remove the speck out of your brother's eye.
You focus on gossamers in the republican party yet overlook the beams of outright, overt criminal activity by Hillary, Obama, Comey, Lynch, Clapper, Brennan Ohr, Strozk, Page, etc. for which they should be serving long prison sentences. Draining the swamp isn't easy work. I'm hoping that by the end of 2024 and Trump's second term we'll finally begin to see the results of his hard work.
Feb 2, 2019 00:06:14 #
waltmoreno wrote:
What a hypocrite! First remove the beam out of you... (show quote)
You guys are so predictable and tiresome. Not worth the effort to engage. Just answer the questions presented, if you can, or keep banging your head against the wall.
Feb 2, 2019 13:56:13 #
rumitoid wrote:
You guys are so predictable and tiresome. Not worth the effort to engage. Just answer the questions presented, if you can, or keep banging your head against the wall.
Dude, these questions have all been asked and answered long ago. You either aren't paying attention or you just don't like the answers and have chosen to ignore them.
Seems to me your problem might be your news sources ... all liberal leaning, all proven to have longstanding anti-Trump agendas.
Asking conservatives, libertarians, or patriots to respond to something you've read in VOX, Salon, Buzzfeed ... or heard from CBS, ABC, etc. ... is akin to asking a room full of Christians to respond to accusations made by the devil. The answer is always going to be the same: "He's the devil ... he lies!"
Feb 2, 2019 15:38:05 #
cSc61 wrote:
Dude, these questions have all been asked and answ... (show quote)
Great response cSc61! rumitoid is always baiting people here on OPP with his left wing sources. They're just not credible sources.
Feb 3, 2019 19:36:17 #
waltmoreno wrote:
Great response cSc61! rumitoid is always baiting people here on OPP with his left wing sources. They're just not credible sources.
They are not credible sources only if you show that they are not credible sources. Calling your baby brother a liar that it was not you who took the last cookie from the jar, is not evidence.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.