One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Conservatives claim America founded on God, history says. .....
Page <<first <prev 8 of 8
Sep 6, 2017 15:10:33   #
jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Your ignorance of spiritual matters is noted, Nik, so the sermonizing of the descendant of an amphibian is meaningless.



Good references Blade, and as you said...there are many, many more documents of scribes and historians of that time. Even secular experts agree, joesephus, and Luke are known for accuracy and unenpeachable integrity

Reply
Sep 6, 2017 15:28:41   #
Raylan Wolfe Loc: earth
 
jack sequim wa wrote:
Good references Blade, and as you said...there are many, many more documents of scribes and historians of that time. Even secular experts agree, joesephus, and Luke are known for accuracy and unenpeachable integrity



Reply
Sep 6, 2017 15:51:01   #
Weewillynobeerspilly Loc: North central Texas
 
Raylan Wolfe wrote:




but, but, but, but...you have a 100 threads on how much Trump lies......now you use his words to back up your stupidity.......Punk!

Me thinks you are the idiot here.........Trump lies, he's your source...hahahahahahahahahaha Dumbass, it would be funny, except you do stupid shit like that daily, so it's a little worn out....like your mom.........Punk!


Damn, it would be hard to make up the stupidity you display daily........Punk!

Reply
Check out topic: border illegals who got away
Sep 6, 2017 15:55:46   #
Raylan Wolfe Loc: earth
 
Weeweeny proves he has no balls again!

Fact: Trump has been proven to lie 76% of the time!

https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2015-12-21/fact-checking-website-donald-trump-lies-76-percent-of-the-time



Weewillynobeerspilly wrote:
but, but, but, but...you have a 100 threads on how much Trump lies......now you use his words to back up your stupidity.......Punk!

Me thinks you are the idiot here.........Trump lies, he's your source...hahahahahahahahahaha Dumbass, it would be funny, except you do stupid shit like that daily, so it's a little worn out....like your mom.........Punk!


Damn, it would be hard to make up the stupidity you display daily........Punk!

Trump has been proven to lie more than any politician in History!
Trump has been proven to lie more than any politic...

Reply
Sep 6, 2017 16:07:37   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
I quoted Mark Twain.


Authentic Text: Holy Bible

Many powerful men over the centuries have tried to discredit or destroy the Bible. All have failed. There is more evidence for the authenticity and accuracy of the Scriptures than for any other ancient book. No one who has studied these issues doubts the genuineness of the Bible.

The Manuscripts

There is more evidence for the Bible’s authenticity than for any literature of antiquity. Textual analysis begins with historical investigation, beginning with the latest documents and working backward. As evidence develops, the data is evaluated against other sources. The record is then checked for consistency of information, and the claims are analyzed as if it were a legal case, looking for credible testimony with cross-examination. There is an enormous amount of evidence for authenticity of the biblical manuscripts.

The New Testament was written in first century A.D. There are some 25,000 early manuscripts in existence, almost 6,000 of which (many being only recognizable fragments) are Greek texts and the others being early translations of the Greek New Testament. The earliest textual evidence we have was copied not long after the original. In contrast:

Caesar’s Gallic Wars was written in the first century B.C. There are only 10 manuscripts in existence. The earliest textual evidence we have was copied 1,000 years after the original.
Aristotle’s Poetics was written in the fourth century B.C. There are only 5 manuscripts in existence. The earliest textual evidence we have was copied 1,400 years after the original.

There are many more writings of the Church Fathers quoting sections of Scripture; we could reconstruct the entire New Testament from their writings alone. There were millions of man-hours spent in cross-checking the manuscripts. There remains only 1 percent of all New Testament words about which questions still exist; no questionable passage contradicts any Bible teaching.

The Old Testament has been more accurately transmitted to us than any other ancient writing of comparable age. The textual evidence is greater for both the Old and New Testaments than any other historically reliable ancient document. The ancient scribes were very meticulous. There were only 1,200 variant readings in A.D. 500.

The Masorites produced an official text in A.D. 500. There are other versions that confirm the accuracy of the Masoritic Text.

Samaritan Pentateuch: 400 B.C.
Septuagint Greek: 280 B.C.
Dead Sea Scrolls: 0 A.D.
Latin Vulgate: 400 A.D.

The quotations from pre-Christian writing confirm the text. The New Testament accepts the Old Testament as authentic, confirming the traditional authors, quoting from at least 320 different passages, and confirming the supernatural events cited in the Old Testament.


Among all texts that prove the authenticity of the Holy Bible, none surpass the Dead Sea Scrolls.

Reply
Sep 6, 2017 18:22:38   #
debeda
 
Raylan Wolfe wrote:


Oh gosh my mistake. Of course your videos carry more weight than United States law. Silly me.

Reply
Sep 7, 2017 03:04:29   #
Steve700
 
debeda wrote:
Oh gosh my mistake. Of course your videos carry more weight than United States law. Silly me.

Where is your self-awareness. How do you sleep at night, knowing what a dishonest scumbag you are???. You come up with all this technical shit thinking that is going to make people think you're smart. Who you think you're fooling??? Not a single bit of that crap you put out proves that the fall of those buildings weren't planned demolition. Your a self-deluded fraud, a degenerate and an idiot. What kind of a punk do you think you are that you can just ignore valid questions and then insult other people. Grow up, have some self-awareness and Be a MAN.
Your just a wast of everyone's time who is stupid enough to listen to you STOPS WITH THE BULL SHIT & SHOW THE PICTURES or AERIAL VIDEO FOOTAGE PROVING YOUR ASSERTIONS or ADMIT YOU JUST DON'T KNOW

Reply
 
 
Sep 7, 2017 07:20:39   #
debeda
 
Steve700 wrote:
Where is your self-awareness. How do you sleep at night, knowing what a dishonest scumbag you are???. You come up with all this technical shit thinking that is going to make people think you're smart. Who you think you're fooling??? Not a single bit of that crap you put out proves that the fall of those buildings weren't planned demolition. Your a self-deluded fraud, a degenerate and an idiot. What kind of a punk do you think you are that you can just ignore valid questions and then insult other people. Grow up, have some self-awareness and Be a MAN.
Your just a wast of everyone's time who is stupid enough to listen to you STOPS WITH THE BULL SHIT & SHOW THE PICTURES or AERIAL VIDEO FOOTAGE PROVING YOUR ASSERTIONS or ADMIT YOU JUST DON'T KNOW
u Where is your self-awareness. How do you sleep... (show quote)


Huh? Were you replying to someone else?

Reply
Sep 9, 2017 20:34:08   #
Rainrider Loc: Lovington NM
 
Loki wrote:
Hell, I know that. I just enjoy yanking their chain and watching them wiggle.


Sorry I have not answered any post on here as of late. I have spent that time pondering weather to even bother. In that time I have found that my time is better spent in other endeavors. So once more I will be leaving this sight. If I do return to it, it will a year or longer. I hope that will give folks time to grow up.
Though I can't see it my self. Libtareds are so stuck sucking the dicks of their leaders, that to take a breath would be seen as not doing their jobs.

Reply
Sep 10, 2017 05:59:29   #
Steve700
 
debeda wrote:
Huh? Were you replying to someone else?

Yes, Sorry.

Reply
Sep 10, 2017 06:02:11   #
Steve700
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Authentic Text: Holy Bible

Many powerful men over the centuries have tried to discredit or destroy the Bible. All have failed. There is more evidence for the authenticity and accuracy of the Scriptures than for any other ancient book. No one who has studied these issues doubts the genuineness of the Bible.

The Manuscripts
The New Testament was written in first century A.D. There are some 25,000 early manuscripts in existence, almost 6,000 of which (many being only recognizable fragments) are Greek texts and the others being early translations of the Greek New Testament. The earliest textual evidence we have was copied not long after the original. In contrast:

Caesar’s Gallic Wars was written in the first century B.C. There are only 10 manuscripts in existence. The earliest textual evidence we have was copied 1,000 years after the original.
Aristotle’s Poetics was written in the fourth century B.C. There are only 5 manuscripts in existence. The earliest textual evidence we have was copied 1,400 years after the original.

There are many more writings of the Church Fathers quoting sections of Scripture; we could reconstruct the entire New Testament from their writings alone. There were millions of man-hours spent in cross-checking the manuscripts. There remains only 1 percent of all New Testament words about which questions still exist; no questionable passage contradicts any Bible teaching.

The Old Testament has been more accurately transmitted to us than any other ancient writing of comparable age. The textual evidence is greater for both the Old and New Testaments than any other historically reliable ancient document. The ancient scribes were very meticulous. There were only 1,200 variant readings in A.D. 500.

The Masorites produced an official text in A.D. 500. There are other versions that confirm the accuracy of the Masoritic Text.

Samaritan Pentateuch: 400 B.C.
Septuagint Greek: 280 B.C.
Dead Sea Scrolls: 0 A.D.
Latin Vulgate: 400 A.D.

The quotations from pre-Christian writing confirm the text. The New Testament accepts the Old Testament as authentic, confirming the traditional authors, quoting from at least 320 different passages, and confirming the supernatural events cited in the Old Testament.[/i]

Among all texts that prove the authenticity of the Holy Bible, none surpass the Dead Sea Scrolls.
url=http://www.icr.org/bible-authentic/ Authentic... (show quote)

Where is your self-awareness. How do you sleep at night, knowing what a dishonest scumbag you are???. You come up with all this technical shit thinking that is going to make people think you're smart. Who you think you're fooling??? Not a single bit of that crap you put out proves that the fall of those buildings weren't planned demolition. Your a self-deluded fraud, a degenerate and an idiot. What kind of a punk do you think you are that you can just ignore valid questions and then insult other people. Grow up, have some self-awareness and Be a MAN.
Your just a wast of everyone's time who is stupid enough to listen to you STOPS WITH THE BULL SHIT & SHOW THE PICTURES or AERIAL VIDEO FOOTAGE PROVING YOUR ASSERTIONS or ADMIT YOU JUST DON'T KNOW

Reply
Jan 26, 2019 14:43:00   #
Rainrider Loc: Lovington NM
 
Though it has been a year and a 1/2 or so, I found myself looking back at some threads I followed. I found this, and seen I didn't reply to it in a proper manner, so it is.

When you use any part of the Constitution it is always wise to understand it's true meaning. The separation of church state, (or at lest the idea) comes from the first amendment it reads as follows.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
A fast read of this doesn't show any sign of removing religion from government, rather it does remove the right of the government to restrict, deny, or mandate any one religion. Nor do they have the power to remove religion, or any part there of that they disagree with.
I can go on to explain the whole thing if you like, though it is clear that you will seek some way around the truth of the facts. Just as you used a quote from Reagan taking into account the words and his meaning nor intent.
Funny how I left in hopes that some people grow up. Only to re-tune and find that many still live a fantasy world, were the rules only apply to Liberals. That is to say, they make them up as they go along, and even when they are flat out wrong, they are right.
Lies and deceit are their way of life.

Reply
Jan 26, 2019 15:05:16   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
Rainrider wrote:
Though it has been a year and a 1/2 or so, I found myself looking back at some threads I followed. I found this, and seen I didn't reply to it in a proper manner, so it is.

When you use any part of the Constitution it is always wise to understand it's true meaning. The separation of church state, (or at lest the idea) comes from the first amendment it reads as follows.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
A fast read of this doesn't show any sign of removing religion from government, rather it does remove the right of the government to restrict, deny, or mandate any one religion. Nor do they have the power to remove religion, or any part there of that they disagree with.
I can go on to explain the whole thing if you like, though it is clear that you will seek some way around the truth of the facts. Just as you used a quote from Reagan taking into account the words and his meaning nor intent.
Funny how I left in hopes that some people grow up. Only to re-tune and find that many still live a fantasy world, were the rules only apply to Liberals. That is to say, they make them up as they go along, and even when they are flat out wrong, they are right.
Lies and deceit are their way of life.
Though it has been a year and a 1/2 or so, I found... (show quote)


I have tried to explain this to Liberals, but I simply cannot dumb it down any further and still get the point across.
In the 18th century, the Roman Catholic Church in France and Spain, and to a lesser degree the Church of England, had become de facto arms of government. Nothing moved without their say so. The Founders had first hand experience with this and their aim was to prevent any state sponsored religion as obtained in the three countries I mentioned. (Make that four; I forgot Portugal.)
At no time did Freedom of Religion mean freedom FROM religion.
As for the claim that most of the Founders were Deists, or some such nonsense, 52 of the 55 delegates to the Constitutional Convention identified as either some denomination of Protestant or a handful of Catholics. Many of them were what was known as "non-Clerical Christians;" which meant that they considered themselves Christians but eschewed the trappings of church and clergy. This was a much more common practice in the 1700's than most realize.

Reply
Jan 26, 2019 23:22:43   #
Rainrider Loc: Lovington NM
 
Good report. I say that as I have my-self looked this info up. If one looks at the church today, they will find that, (in the USA at lest), many are turning away from denominational teachings. Seeking in the pages of the Word it's truth. I give you that the number of believers has drop in the last 10-15 years. I am seeking to find a collection as to why this is, yet it seems to be many things working together.
Be nice to find a sight that is built on this study. If for no other reason that to see if what I have found fits with their findings.

Reply
Jan 27, 2019 03:40:30   #
jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Authentic Text: Holy Bible

Many powerful men over the centuries have tried to discredit or destroy the Bible. All have failed. There is more evidence for the authenticity and accuracy of the Scriptures than for any other ancient book. No one who has studied these issues doubts the genuineness of the Bible.

The Manuscripts

There is more evidence for the Bible’s authenticity than for any literature of antiquity. Textual analysis begins with historical investigation, beginning with the latest documents and working backward. As evidence develops, the data is evaluated against other sources. The record is then checked for consistency of information, and the claims are analyzed as if it were a legal case, looking for credible testimony with cross-examination. There is an enormous amount of evidence for authenticity of the biblical manuscripts.

The New Testament was written in first century A.D. There are some 25,000 early manuscripts in existence, almost 6,000 of which (many being only recognizable fragments) are Greek texts and the others being early translations of the Greek New Testament. The earliest textual evidence we have was copied not long after the original. In contrast:

Caesar’s Gallic Wars was written in the first century B.C. There are only 10 manuscripts in existence. The earliest textual evidence we have was copied 1,000 years after the original.
Aristotle’s Poetics was written in the fourth century B.C. There are only 5 manuscripts in existence. The earliest textual evidence we have was copied 1,400 years after the original.

There are many more writings of the Church Fathers quoting sections of Scripture; we could reconstruct the entire New Testament from their writings alone. There were millions of man-hours spent in cross-checking the manuscripts. There remains only 1 percent of all New Testament words about which questions still exist; no questionable passage contradicts any Bible teaching.

The Old Testament has been more accurately transmitted to us than any other ancient writing of comparable age. The textual evidence is greater for both the Old and New Testaments than any other historically reliable ancient document. The ancient scribes were very meticulous. There were only 1,200 variant readings in A.D. 500.

The Masorites produced an official text in A.D. 500. There are other versions that confirm the accuracy of the Masoritic Text.

Samaritan Pentateuch: 400 B.C.
Septuagint Greek: 280 B.C.
Dead Sea Scrolls: 0 A.D.
Latin Vulgate: 400 A.D.

The quotations from pre-Christian writing confirm the text. The New Testament accepts the Old Testament as authentic, confirming the traditional authors, quoting from at least 320 different passages, and confirming the supernatural events cited in the Old Testament.


Among all texts that prove the authenticity of the Holy Bible, none surpass the Dead Sea Scrolls.
url=http://www.icr.org/bible-authentic/ Authentic... (show quote)



Thanks for pulling out that tid bit so often ignored by the nay sayers.
We could add the mountains of evidence verifying historical biblical figures, cities, events with perfect accuracy in just the last decade, not to mention the previous several hundred years by archeology. For years the atheists claimed myths, fairy tales until Opps.... Empirical Evidence just exactly what the Bible said.

When we combine the accuracy of the Bible with archeology and as you put it "like a court case" it only takes the nay sayer to decide and be honest to thy self and themselves research the facts pro instead of researching to find negative information that has been proven time and time again to be either flat out lies, opinion published as fact or the uneducated, uninformed publishing information based on passed along bad information.

The God of Abraham, Issac and Jacob that created the universe was/is capable of preserving a book... Love letter to man, instruction manual.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 8 of 8
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.