One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
once again the 5 year old in the WH leaks senistive informatoin
Jan 18, 2019 12:55:19   #
Lonewolf
 
UPDATE: Unbelievably, the story gets worse for Trump. Hammill, Pelosi’s spokesman, released a statement Friday morning that read in part: “After President Trump revoked the use of military aircraft to travel to Afghanistan, the delegation was prepared to fly commercially to proceed with this vital trip to meet with our commanders and troops on the front lines.” The statement continued: “In the middle of the night, the State Department’s Diplomatic Security Service provided an updated threat assessment detailing that the President announcing this sensitive travel had significantly increased the danger to the delegation and to the troops, security, and other officials supporting the trip." He added, “This morning, we learned that the Administration had leaked the commercial travel plans as well.” Hammill concluded,"In light of the grave threats caused by the President’s action, the delegation has decided to postpone the trip so as not to further endanger our troops and security personnel, or the other travelers on the flights."

Reply
Jan 18, 2019 13:17:45   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
Lonewolf wrote:
UPDATE: Unbelievably, the story gets worse for Trump. Hammill, Pelosi’s spokesman, released a statement Friday morning that read in part: “After President Trump revoked the use of military aircraft to travel to Afghanistan, the delegation was prepared to fly commercially to proceed with this vital trip to meet with our commanders and troops on the front lines.” The statement continued: “In the middle of the night, the State Department’s Diplomatic Security Service provided an updated threat assessment detailing that the President announcing this sensitive travel had significantly increased the danger to the delegation and to the troops, security, and other officials supporting the trip." He added, “This morning, we learned that the Administration had leaked the commercial travel plans as well.” Hammill concluded,"In light of the grave threats caused by the President’s action, the delegation has decided to postpone the trip so as not to further endanger our troops and security personnel, or the other travelers on the flights."
UPDATE: Unbelievably, the story gets worse for Tru... (show quote)



Reply
Jan 18, 2019 14:08:18   #
Common_Sense_Matters
 
Lonewolf wrote:
UPDATE: Unbelievably, the story gets worse for Trump. Hammill, Pelosi’s spokesman, released a statement Friday morning that read in part: “After President Trump revoked the use of military aircraft to travel to Afghanistan, the delegation was prepared to fly commercially to proceed with this vital trip to meet with our commanders and troops on the front lines.” The statement continued: “In the middle of the night, the State Department’s Diplomatic Security Service provided an updated threat assessment detailing that the President announcing this sensitive travel had significantly increased the danger to the delegation and to the troops, security, and other officials supporting the trip." He added, “This morning, we learned that the Administration had leaked the commercial travel plans as well.” Hammill concluded,"In light of the grave threats caused by the President’s action, the delegation has decided to postpone the trip so as not to further endanger our troops and security personnel, or the other travelers on the flights."
UPDATE: Unbelievably, the story gets worse for Tru... (show quote)



Source?

Reply
 
 
Jan 18, 2019 14:34:28   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
Source?


Are you living off the grid?

Reply
Jan 18, 2019 14:37:50   #
Lonewolf
 
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
Source?


https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/politics/donald-trump-nancy-pelosi-afghanistan/index.html

Reply
Jan 18, 2019 15:27:52   #
Common_Sense_Matters
 
Bad Bob wrote:
Are you living off the grid?



Making statements without showing corroborating evidence comes off as questionable at best and gives your opponent fodder for tossing bias claims back at you. It is always best to offer up backing sources, but then there is the other side of the coin, the fact that regardless of the validity of the claim or the reliability of the supporting evidence, true Trump supporters will not be swayed.

Still, I say including backing sources is the best practice, even if it has no chance of swaying the opposition, it will go a long way towards cementing support among your side and can help sway the fence riders like myself.

Reply
Jan 18, 2019 15:40:29   #
Common_Sense_Matters
 
Lonewolf wrote:
https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/politics/donald-trump-nancy-pelosi-afghanistan/index.html



Thank you, i have looked into that article and further researched a linked article, source is mildly left leaning but tends to back their claims with fact and limits the use of "loaded" words (meant to sway opinions) and is considered a reliable source (except for those at the extremes, left wing nut jobs as well as right wing nut jobs).

Here is one thing that stood out to me in the linked article I followed from your link (also a CNN story):

Quote:
Now, to be clear, this is an allegation made by Pelosi without corroboration to date. And, the White House denies it. "When the Speaker of the House and about 20 others from Capitol Hill decide to book their own commercial flights to Afghanistan, the world is going to find out," a White House official told CNN's Sarah Westwood and Kevin Liptak. "The idea we would leak anything that would put the safety and security of any American at risk is a flat out lie."

Hammill countered with a tweet, saying, "Multiple admin sources were telling Hill reporters early this morning that the Speaker Pelosi delegation was flying commercially."
Now, to be clear, this is an allegation made by Pe... (show quote)


Each poster will have to decide for themselves the meaning of that quote from the CNN article I followed from Lonewolf's link, either Pelosi is using tried and true Trumpian tactics of making unsupported claims that later turn out to be false but Trump supporters continue to believe despite them being proven to be fallacies/lies, or she has sufficient cause to KNOW they did it but can't reveal how she KNOWS.

Reply
 
 
Jan 18, 2019 16:53:13   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
Lonewolf wrote:
UPDATE: Unbelievably, the story gets worse for Trump. Hammill, Pelosi’s spokesman, released a statement Friday morning that read in part: “After President Trump revoked the use of military aircraft to travel to Afghanistan, the delegation was prepared to fly commercially to proceed with this vital trip to meet with our commanders and troops on the front lines.” The statement continued: “In the middle of the night, the State Department’s Diplomatic Security Service provided an updated threat assessment detailing that the President announcing this sensitive travel had significantly increased the danger to the delegation and to the troops, security, and other officials supporting the trip." He added, “This morning, we learned that the Administration had leaked the commercial travel plans as well.” Hammill concluded,"In light of the grave threats caused by the President’s action, the delegation has decided to postpone the trip so as not to further endanger our troops and security personnel, or the other travelers on the flights."
UPDATE: Unbelievably, the story gets worse for Tru... (show quote)


Just like causing American deaths in Syria...................by tweeting major policy change and announcing that ISIS is defeated.

Reply
Jan 18, 2019 19:49:02   #
emarine
 
lpnmajor wrote:
Just like causing American deaths in Syria...................by tweeting major policy change and announcing that ISIS is defeated.




Exactly & I'm sure it made Putin's day...

Reply
Jan 19, 2019 17:26:45   #
Fit2BTied Loc: Texas
 
Lonewolf wrote:
UPDATE: Unbelievably, the story gets worse for Trump. Hammill, Pelosi’s spokesman, released a statement Friday morning that read in part: “After President Trump revoked the use of military aircraft to travel to Afghanistan, the delegation was prepared to fly commercially to proceed with this vital trip to meet with our commanders and troops on the front lines.” The statement continued: “In the middle of the night, the State Department’s Diplomatic Security Service provided an updated threat assessment detailing that the President announcing this sensitive travel had significantly increased the danger to the delegation and to the troops, security, and other officials supporting the trip." He added, “This morning, we learned that the Administration had leaked the commercial travel plans as well.” Hammill concluded,"In light of the grave threats caused by the President’s action, the delegation has decided to postpone the trip so as not to further endanger our troops and security personnel, or the other travelers on the flights."
UPDATE: Unbelievably, the story gets worse for Tru... (show quote)
What you won't hear from the left is how many servicemen and women would like to thank the President for preventing what, as I recall, was one of the worst ways to spend a few days...in other words, the dreaded VIP visit by someone you couldn't care less about. Everything has to be squared away to the Nth degree and those "lucky enough" to be selected to take part in the photo-op portion have to spend time learning proper protocol/etiquette for the event. I remember during basic training at Fort Ord CA, we had a visit from the Secretary of the Army. We spent 2 days working 20 hrs a day cleaning, painting rocks, manicuring the lawns, double waxing every floor, and making the place look better than it had in 50 years. We even cleaned UNDER the temporary buildings. There wasn't a cigarette butt in a 5 block radius of our barracks. When the day came, the chopper landed, the group walked into the BACK of the building (didn't see ANYTHING we did) into the mess hall, took pictures for about 15 minutes, asked a couple of specially selected soldiers (the photogenic ones) a question or two, then back on the chopper and gone. Secretary Resor - you, Sir, are still a very bad memory. For the troops who were saved from that, the President says "You're Welcome".

Reply
Jan 19, 2019 17:29:42   #
Lonewolf
 
Fit2BTied wrote:
What you won't hear from the left is how many servicemen and women would like to thank the President for preventing what, as I recall, was one of the worst ways to spend a few days...in other words, the dreaded VIP visit by someone you couldn't care less about. Everything has to be squared away to the Nth degree and those "lucky enough" to be selected to take part in the photo-op portion have to spend time learning proper protocol/etiquette for the event. I remember during basic training at Fort Ord CA, we had a visit from the Secretary of the Army. We spent 2 days working 20 hrs a day cleaning, painting rocks, manicuring the lawns, double waxing every floor, and making the place look better than it had in 50 years. We even cleaned UNDER the temporary buildings. There wasn't a cigarette butt in a 5 block radius of our barracks. When the day came, the chopper landed, the group walked into the BACK of the building (didn't see ANYTHING we did) into the mess hall, took pictures for about 15 minutes, asked a couple of specially selected soldiers (the photogenic ones) a question or two, then back on the chopper and gone. Secretary Resor - you, Sir, are still a very bad memory. For the troops who were saved from that, the President says "You're Welcome".
What you won't hear from the left is how many serv... (show quote)


yes the good old days hurry up and waite

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.