To people who think we should let just anyone in......
proud republican wrote:
Well stupid is as stupid does......They didnt give an Oath of Citizenship like i did...So they are ILLEGALS!!!!...PERIOD!!1
Agree with your first statement.
However, the European immigrants apparently went with the initial blessings of the relevant governments...they opened their borders. Hence not illegal....maybe not good policy but that is a different discussion.
I know a great way to stop illegal immigration...stop focusing on the migrants and start throwing in jail those folks who entice them here by hiring them. Those folks are also breaking the law and some jail time would get the attention of the managers and owners of businesses doing so.
It's easy to go after the powerless.....
proud republican wrote:
Why dont you ask Germany or France or Italy how do they like all these illegals in their countries?????
Where did you get the Idea we have been letting anyone in.There has always been criteria to be met before anyone is granted admission .
dongreen76 wrote:
Where did you get the Idea we have been letting anyone in.There has always been criteria to be met before anyone is granted admission .
Nope,Don....Look at the Caravan....What criteria is met there???...We dont know who these people are and Dems screaming to let them in!!!
proud republican wrote:
Yes,you are right....I am bilingual..So one time when i was applying for a job that i liked and person said the only bilingual they would accept is Spanish...BS!!!!.....Is this America or Mexico??/
MEXICO !! And becoming more hispanic because of Mexico's willing help to those from CA to get to the US over the years AND today.
working class stiff wrote:
Agree with your first statement.
However, the European immigrants apparently went with the initial blessings of the relevant governments...they opened their borders. Hence not illegal....maybe not good policy but that is a different discussion.
I know a great way to stop illegal immigration...stop focusing on the migrants and start throwing in jail those folks who entice them here by hiring them. Those folks are also breaking the law and some jail time would get the attention of the managers and owners of businesses doing so.
It's easy to go after the powerless.....
Agree with your first statement. br br However,... (
show quote)
Did you read the prior post.It's a climate of profit first.loyalty to it's citizens second.The illegals come cheaper,Therefore they accommodate a lesser over head.They also will be more accommodating so far as to when business wants to ignore laws that they deem to be disingenuous to their turning a greater profit.
proud republican wrote:
Lets make a deal Lone....Once you have learned how... (
show quote)
I think he means "aparent bigits". Is a bigit anything like a beignet?
proud republican wrote:
Nope,Don....Look at the Caravan....What criteria is met there???...We dont know who these people are and Dems screaming to let them in!!!
The Dems are screaming that they not be massacred.
working class stiff wrote:
Agree with your first statement.
However, the European immigrants apparently went with the initial blessings of the relevant governments...they opened their borders. Hence not illegal....maybe not good policy but that is a different discussion.
I know a great way to stop illegal immigration...stop focusing on the migrants and start throwing in jail those folks who entice them here by hiring them. Those folks are also breaking the law and some jail time would get the attention of the managers and owners of businesses doing so.
It's easy to go after the powerless.....
Agree with your first statement. br br However,... (
show quote)
Yeah, and I don't understand why they are just focusing on the southern border.Can anyone explain this to me.
dongreen76 wrote:
The Dems are screaming that they not be massacred.
Why dont Dems talk to Angel Families and see how Americans are not getting massacred!!!1
proud republican wrote:
Why dont Dems talk to Angel Families and see how Americans are not getting massacred!!!1
Because they're not being massacred
dongreen76 wrote:
Yeah, and I don't understand why they are just focusing on the southern border.Can anyone explain this to me.
It's more of an immediate trouble spot -- the lion's share of our border jumper problems comes from the south. In fact, there is supposedly another incoming hoard expected sometime this month.
Mexico's announced that they are about to begin shoring up their southern border to stop mass "immigration" from Honduras and the other shitholes in its neighborhood, but until we see actual results from that -- it IS Mexico, which isn't all that confidence inspiring -- we have to plug the big leaks first.
If Trudeau didn't have the lemming-like "come one, come all" policy in place that the left is so fond of, for "refugees" from terrorism exporting countries, our northern border would be a much smaller concern, but that schmuck is populating the otherwise great country on our northern border with the makings of the same tragedy that's befalling most western European countries.
That proximity endangers Americans, so that toilet cake in Ottawa is forcing us to have to reevaluate our security apparatus on our northern border. In effect, he is potentially endangering Americans while pursuing policies that primarily endanger his own constituents.
So while we'd be unlikely to build a wall along the Canadian border, I'd readily bet that we'll eventually have a system in place that's geared toward lone or small groups of crossers, which would be infrequent, not like what we get at our southern border.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.