Sodomites are mentally ill people who need to be Institutionalized immediately. They have the right to the best electroshock therapy that money will purchase.
Sodomites want to ruin your children and should never be allowed near children.
This woman should be immediately arrested for child abuse of the worst kind.
This woman should have all parental rights removed and be sterilized so we wouldn’t have to ever hear of her doing this to any other child again.

Sodomites are found in straight people; true blue Christians are found in LGBTQ people. Most child abusers are straight! That quote by Bryan Fischer highlights why LGBTQ people are so vocal: the Constitution provides that equal rights should be shared by all citizens; not just former slaves. As to the couple on which this is about I bet neither of them is LGBTQ! We have a Supreme Court whose job is to interpret our Constitution: their makeup is not leftist or rightist. Anthony Kennedy, the writer of the opinion on same-sex marriage, is a Republican appointed by Ronald Regan. A LEFTIST???

I can certainly agree with your first statement. However, I'm not sure about the second. IMHO the leftist MSM that you imply are are not "dependable" sources are very dependable. They can be depended upon to ignore anything President Trump does that might improve our country. They can also be depended upon to twist anything conservative into appearing in a "bad light" in order to promote their agitprop.

The thread however was along the lines of homosexuality, which IMHO is "unnatural." When I was much younger someone had come up with the word "queer" to describe this malady; queer meant "different" or "not normal" and fit the situation pretty well, and still does. Now they have added branches to the tree and are referred to as LGBT or LGBTQ to differentiate the variations, but they are still "unnatural." I believe "unnatural" is the better term because in nature nearly all living life forms are composed of male and female types, different at birth to propagate their particular species. The orgasm was included to entice the humans to reproduce in the beginning, but now it seems to be mostly just for the "fun of it!"

A true homosexual doesn't desire sexual intercourse with the opposite sex for whatever reason, which gives me no heartburn unless they attempt to draw me, my family members, or impressionable children into their activities. Consequently a true homosexual would not reproduce or propagate the human species, and would normally die out naturally. They would be a dying breed similar to a tobacco smoker. However, they seem to have developed some idea that they are "something special," and they are not. In order to propagate their particular type and life style, since they wouldn't bear children, they must recruit similar life types in order to gratify their desire for orgasms and other erotic feelings, and the most readily available and easily attracted partners happen to be children, and they should never be allowed near a child nor be allowed to adopt one to satisfy their "parental" urges some of them still seem to have.

Sex changes among adults doesn't bother me either, until they try to force the government to use my tax dollars to perform their unnatural elective surgeries, hormonal treatments, and etc. This tax based elective surgery benefit restriction should also include any elective surgery to enhance, reduce, or change one's appearance, with the exception of something resulting from an accident or a birth defect.

This is the way I see it, and homosexuals and the liberal progressives seem to believe differently. I can't help them, nor do I hold it against them, but I don't happen to like their life style or their agenda to force feed the USA as a whole to accept their unnatural, or queer, agenda. They simply are not anything special, nor do they deserve any special benefits or recognition. What they do in their private lives should be kept private, not flaunted.

This mom is suing her son’s father for child abuse for this outrageous reason
November 27, 2018
12

LGBT activists want everyone to accept their radical views, or pay the price.

They will stop at nothing – even using their own children as political pawns.

And this mom is trying to take away parental rights form her son’s father for this crazy reason.

In Texas, a mother is taking her son’s father to court trying to take his parental rights away.

She says he is committing child abuse by “not affirming” the 6-year-old boy as transgender.

She also wants him to “pay for the child’s visits to a transgender-affirming therapist and transgender medical alterations.”

The Daily Wire writes:

A Texas father is fighting for his son in court after pushing back on his ex-wife’s claim that their six-year-old is a transgender girl.

According to court documents, the young boy only dresses as a girl when he’s with his mother, who has enrolled him in first-grade as a female named “Luna.” The father, however, contends that his son consistently chooses to wear boys’ clothes, “violently refuses to wear girl’s clothes at my home,” and identifies as a boy when he is with him.

The Federalist reports that the mother has accused the father of child abuse in their divorce proceedings “for not affirming James as transgender” and is looking to strip the dad of his parental rights. “She is also seeking to require him to pay for the child’s visits to a transgender-affirming therapist and transgender medical alterations, which may include hormonal sterilization starting at age eight,” the report adds.

The father has been legally barred from speaking to his child about sexuality and gender from a scientific or religious perspective and from dressing his son in boys’ clothes; instead, he has to offer both girls’ and boys’ outfits. The boy consistently refuses to wear dresses, according to the father.

The boy was diagnosed with gender dysphoria by a gender transition therapist the mother, a pediatrician, chose for her son to see. According to the therapist’s notes, the boy chose to identify as a girl when he was in sessions alone with his mother; alternatively, he chose to identify as a boy when he was in sessions alone with his father.

This 6-year-old boy is obviously just very confused, because he is, surprise, 6 years old.

Most people don’t even remember anything from their 6-year-old lives, so how can we expect the boy to fully understand what gender even is?

The mother is clearly just a radical so-called “progressive” that is using her own son to make a political point and spite the father.

Sadly, children are the LGBT activists’ new target.

As we reported, this 11-year-old boy was paraded on Good Morning America as a “model drag queen.”

The radical left doesn’t care about the well-being of our youth.

Is it any surprise that a lot of 6 year old children identify as transgender. After all, it is the IN THING TO BE, isn't it?