Liberty's Advocate wrote:
Bush '43 unfortunately was one of these globalists as was his father, Bush '41. What the U.N. fears most about the United States is what is represented by the Constitution of the United States and NOT found in the U.N. Constitution for the NWO: Natural Law being the origin of the Rights of Man where the Creator is the source of our Rights - the Creator created Man, Man created government. But Government (especially WORLD government) has no power over 'Acts of God', which explains why it is so important for them to change the hierarchy to Government (the peoples' NEW religion, in effect replacing God as the source of our Rights), ending then with Man (secular Humanist view) with religion playing little or no part in our lives.
Whereas Christianity, its moral teachings, rules and precepts, had the primary role (a foundation of love and mutual respect, one for another) which underlies the tolerance that is BUILT IN to our system of self-government, and provides the boundaries for the proper exercise of our individual Rights within those boundaries while not favoring one religion over another, the secular view of government says those boundaries are prescribed BY government (laws forcing tolerance and Politically Correct beliefs on the people) with individual Rights replaced by "Group Think" and the elimination of any sense of personal responsibility for our actions.
Without the acceptance of personal responsibility for our actions, freedom cannot long exist because someone or something must be there to indemnify a person or group that suffers a loss at the hand of another. That "something" will be government, which must grow ever larger to accommodate those losses. FEMA now is helping to rebuild lives for those suffering losses from natural disasters. But have you noticed how the courts are gradually ignoring the responsibility of perpetrators to victims to restore them financially through restitution, and where a life is taken to ignore the value of that life by GRANTING continued life to the perpetrator in incarceration at the expense of and additional risk to society?
So you see, some of these "tragic impacts on our lives, the safety of our loved ones and our liberty" we have already inflicted on ourselves. You are correct in saying that this movement toward "no borders" would "bring down the curtain" on what is left of America and freedom, but getting people to see and understand what is beyond their nose is a difficult challenge when so many "short sighted" people are that way because they willingly focus on entertainment, whatever slanted opinion is presented to them as news and "education" designed to keep them ignorant, historically and contemporaneously. More than that, it explains why Trump is such a threat to the Deep State and the NWO.
Bush '43 unfortunately was one of these globalists... (
show quote)
Very well said!
In your first paragraph what you laid out pretty much infers, and I believe correctly, that the UN and, since their mutual thinking goes hand-in-hand, the EU, while both having been seemingly opposed to Communism, have adopted some of it's most oppressive elements.
The USSR/ Marxism saw religion as an enemy because they didn't believe in G-d standing between the State and the People. The State had to be the absolute authority.
The UN more than obviously has it's own embedded deep state, and just as obviously this deep state has its own globalist ambitions, ie the UN being accepted as THE central world government.
Globalists in various countries would have no reservations about jumping on to that bandwagon. This would benefit them, since most are "captains of industry" whose wealth would shield them from the milieu of the "unwashed masses."
Looking downwards from the vantage point of these ambitions/positions, the removal of national borders and sovereignty would be a logical step toward homogeniety of the global marketplace, one set of trade regulations that they have a say in drafting, etc.
This could actually be "achieved" as long as the global media, essentially as malleable and naive as are most "progressives" in our own society, continues to be utilized as a propaganda arm for the globalists behind all this. It's hard to choose between these globalists and garden variety leftists, since they essentially want the same things, which would be the end result of their getting what they want.
President Trump is indeed their worst nightmare, because he represents a sovereign America with an America First policy, and despite the portrayal of Trump by the leftist mainstream media as dumb, he's actually a lot smarter than the sum total of their entire collective. His adherence to items such as the Bill of Rights undoubtedly frustrates those people to no end, because, like his respect for national sovereignty, it acts as a barrier to any arguments they might mount to render him receptive to their, from an American viewpoint, oppressive menu of offerings.