One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
HEY PETER S…How’s this for ‘loving’ Muslims?
Page 1 of 2 next>
Nov 21, 2018 12:06:21   #
mwdegutis Loc: Illinois
 
Newly Elected Democrat Rep. Who Wants to Blow Israel Off the Map
PITN ~ November 21, 2018
The media has been conducting some somewhat clever misdirection in the wake of the horrific mass shooting at a Pittsburgh synagogue last month.

They have blamed President Trump for a rise in antisemitism…while blatantly ignoring the raging antisemitism on the left.

This is, of course, the same mainstream media who will turn around and hail the election of the first Palestinian-American Muslim to Congress, completely failing to mention she’s about as antisemitic as they come.

Rashida Tlaib was just elected to represent Michigan’s 13th District in Congress, a district which includes parts of Detroit and some of the surrounding areas.

Here’s a video of Tlaib’s victory party where, although there is a Palestinian flag wrapped around her like a regular Hamas “protester”, there isn’t an American flag in sight.

https://youtu.be/0MApuNGH-NE

The Washington Examiner published an opinion piece this week decrying her election to the US House of Representatives and shedding light on her staunch anti-Israel position and association with known antisemites.

For one, the piece noted, Tlaib is a proponent of the “one-state solution” in the Middle East which would deny the Israeli people a right to their own sovereign country.

She is also a strong supporter of the “Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions” movement, once heading a BDS rally in 2014 with a man named Dawud Walid, who has openly blamed “the Jews” for bringing the “wrath of Allah” upon themselves.

Tlaib also rubs elbows with Women’s March co-founder Linda Sarsour, who is an open antisemite, supporter of Sharia Law, and admirer, along with Tlaib, of Palestinian terrorist Rasmea Odeh, who is a convicted murderer.

During the Michigan Democratic primary, Jewish outlet The Algemeiner dug up even more dirt on Tlaib and her anti-Israel agenda.

Odeh, who Tlaib so admires, was convicted in 1969 for carrying out a terrorist bomb attack that killed to American students at a grocery store in Jerusalem. While she was sentenced to life in prison in Israel, she was released in a prisoner exchange a short 10 years later. She then moved to the US, where after being lionized as a great freedom fighter by the left, she was convicted of immigration fraud in 2014 and deported.

Tlaib is also an open fan of Islamic Relief, a Muslim Brotherhood-linked group that was classified by the UAE as a terrorist group in 2014.

This newly-elected Muslim congresswoman is so radical, in fact, that she’s openly criticized members of her own party for being too friendly with Israeli interests. Imagine that.

In Tlaib’s view, California Senator Kamala Harris is “racist” for having met with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and worked with the Israeli government on a number of issues.

She also voiced support earlier this year for a Palestinian girl who was detained temporarily for violent attacking an Israeli soldier.

And, perhaps most damning of all, Tlaib has called for the virtual elimination of the Israeli state, to be replaced by Palestine.

She’s also vocalized her intention to take the oath of office on a Quran.

Far-left progressives like those running the Democratic party right now are bad enough. A woman who pledges allegiance to a religion that pledges the destruction of the Jewish people and Christians is straight-up treason, and completely inconsistent with American values.

Reply
Nov 21, 2018 12:17:10   #
RT friend Loc: Kangaroo valley NSW Australia
 
mwdegutis wrote:
Newly Elected Democrat Rep. Who Wants to Blow Israel Off the Map
PITN ~ November 21, 2018
The media has been conducting some somewhat clever misdirection in the wake of the horrific mass shooting at a Pittsburgh synagogue last month.

They have blamed President Trump for a rise in antisemitism…while blatantly ignoring the raging antisemitism on the left.

This is, of course, the same mainstream media who will turn around and hail the election of the first Palestinian-American Muslim to Congress, completely failing to mention she’s about as antisemitic as they come.

Rashida Tlaib was just elected to represent Michigan’s 13th District in Congress, a district which includes parts of Detroit and some of the surrounding areas.

Here’s a video of Tlaib’s victory party where, although there is a Palestinian flag wrapped around her like a regular Hamas “protester”, there isn’t an American flag in sight.

https://youtu.be/0MApuNGH-NE

The Washington Examiner published an opinion piece this week decrying her election to the US House of Representatives and shedding light on her staunch anti-Israel position and association with known antisemites.

For one, the piece noted, Tlaib is a proponent of the “one-state solution” in the Middle East which would deny the Israeli people a right to their own sovereign country.

She is also a strong supporter of the “Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions” movement, once heading a BDS rally in 2014 with a man named Dawud Walid, who has openly blamed “the Jews” for bringing the “wrath of Allah” upon themselves.

Tlaib also rubs elbows with Women’s March co-founder Linda Sarsour, who is an open antisemite, supporter of Sharia Law, and admirer, along with Tlaib, of Palestinian terrorist Rasmea Odeh, who is a convicted murderer.

During the Michigan Democratic primary, Jewish outlet The Algemeiner dug up even more dirt on Tlaib and her anti-Israel agenda.

Odeh, who Tlaib so admires, was convicted in 1969 for carrying out a terrorist bomb attack that killed to American students at a grocery store in Jerusalem. While she was sentenced to life in prison in Israel, she was released in a prisoner exchange a short 10 years later. She then moved to the US, where after being lionized as a great freedom fighter by the left, she was convicted of immigration fraud in 2014 and deported.

Tlaib is also an open fan of Islamic Relief, a Muslim Brotherhood-linked group that was classified by the UAE as a terrorist group in 2014.

This newly-elected Muslim congresswoman is so radical, in fact, that she’s openly criticized members of her own party for being too friendly with Israeli interests. Imagine that.

In Tlaib’s view, California Senator Kamala Harris is “racist” for having met with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and worked with the Israeli government on a number of issues.

She also voiced support earlier this year for a Palestinian girl who was detained temporarily for violent attacking an Israeli soldier.

And, perhaps most damning of all, Tlaib has called for the virtual elimination of the Israeli state, to be replaced by Palestine.

She’s also vocalized her intention to take the oath of office on a Quran.

Far-left progressives like those running the Democratic party right now are bad enough. A woman who pledges allegiance to a religion that pledges the destruction of the Jewish people and Christians is straight-up treason, and completely inconsistent with American values.
b Newly Elected Democrat Rep. Who Wants to Blow I... (show quote)


The trick is to compete, not deny, if you try to deny and don't succeed you end up dead, your children have then no place in life either.

This post is denial, simple as that.





Reply
Nov 21, 2018 12:41:57   #
Esley
 
mwdegutis wrote:
Newly Elected Democrat Rep. Who Wants to Blow Israel Off the Map
PITN ~ November 21, 2018
The media has been conducting some somewhat clever misdirection in the wake of the horrific mass shooting at a Pittsburgh synagogue last month.

They have blamed President Trump for a rise in antisemitism…while blatantly ignoring the raging antisemitism on the left.

This is, of course, the same mainstream media who will turn around and hail the election of the first Palestinian-American Muslim to Congress, completely failing to mention she’s about as antisemitic as they come.

Rashida Tlaib was just elected to represent Michigan’s 13th District in Congress, a district which includes parts of Detroit and some of the surrounding areas.

Here’s a video of Tlaib’s victory party where, although there is a Palestinian flag wrapped around her like a regular Hamas “protester”, there isn’t an American flag in sight.

https://youtu.be/0MApuNGH-NE

The Washington Examiner published an opinion piece this week decrying her election to the US House of Representatives and shedding light on her staunch anti-Israel position and association with known antisemites.

For one, the piece noted, Tlaib is a proponent of the “one-state solution” in the Middle East which would deny the Israeli people a right to their own sovereign country.

She is also a strong supporter of the “Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions” movement, once heading a BDS rally in 2014 with a man named Dawud Walid, who has openly blamed “the Jews” for bringing the “wrath of Allah” upon themselves.

Tlaib also rubs elbows with Women’s March co-founder Linda Sarsour, who is an open antisemite, supporter of Sharia Law, and admirer, along with Tlaib, of Palestinian terrorist Rasmea Odeh, who is a convicted murderer.

During the Michigan Democratic primary, Jewish outlet The Algemeiner dug up even more dirt on Tlaib and her anti-Israel agenda.

Odeh, who Tlaib so admires, was convicted in 1969 for carrying out a terrorist bomb attack that killed to American students at a grocery store in Jerusalem. While she was sentenced to life in prison in Israel, she was released in a prisoner exchange a short 10 years later. She then moved to the US, where after being lionized as a great freedom fighter by the left, she was convicted of immigration fraud in 2014 and deported.

Tlaib is also an open fan of Islamic Relief, a Muslim Brotherhood-linked group that was classified by the UAE as a terrorist group in 2014.

This newly-elected Muslim congresswoman is so radical, in fact, that she’s openly criticized members of her own party for being too friendly with Israeli interests. Imagine that.

In Tlaib’s view, California Senator Kamala Harris is “racist” for having met with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and worked with the Israeli government on a number of issues.

She also voiced support earlier this year for a Palestinian girl who was detained temporarily for violent attacking an Israeli soldier.

And, perhaps most damning of all, Tlaib has called for the virtual elimination of the Israeli state, to be replaced by Palestine.

She’s also vocalized her intention to take the oath of office on a Quran.

Far-left progressives like those running the Democratic party right now are bad enough. A woman who pledges allegiance to a religion that pledges the destruction of the Jewish people and Christians is straight-up treason, and completely inconsistent with American values.
b Newly Elected Democrat Rep. Who Wants to Blow I... (show quote)

Anyone who takes the oath of office should be jailed or deported.

Reply
 
 
Nov 21, 2018 12:45:21   #
Esley
 
Should have said, take the oath of office on the Quran should be jailed or deported.

Reply
Nov 21, 2018 13:33:03   #
RT friend Loc: Kangaroo valley NSW Australia
 
Esley wrote:
Should have said, take the oath of office on the Quran should be jailed or deported.

You just said freedom of religion should be a crime.


Reply
Nov 21, 2018 13:35:59   #
mwdegutis Loc: Illinois
 
RT friend wrote:
You just said freedom of religion should be a crime.


The only problem is that taking the oath of office on the Q'ran to defend the Constitution cannot be done because according to Islam, there is only Sharia law,

Reply
Nov 21, 2018 14:03:23   #
RT friend Loc: Kangaroo valley NSW Australia
 
mwdegutis wrote:
The only problem is that taking the oath of office on the Q'ran to defend the Constitution cannot be done because according to Islam, there is only Sharia law,

I don't know about that, probably not, if you really wanted to make a better point you could have said if that way inclined, "because Islam prevents apostasy it should be outlawed", that's probably not true either unless a Muslim is a Salafist which I am, so it makes perfect sense to me, staying is living leaving is dying anyway, so why shouldn't everyone else have to stay also, Bui I agree that would be a violation of the US Virginia Bill of Rights, which to us down under is the Magna Carta.


Reply
 
 
Nov 21, 2018 15:07:54   #
mwdegutis Loc: Illinois
 
RT friend wrote:
I don't know about that, probably not, if you really wanted to make a better point you could have said if that way inclined, "because Islam prevents apostasy it should be outlawed", that's probably not true either unless a Muslim is a Salafist which I am, so it makes perfect sense to me, staying is living leaving is dying anyway, so why shouldn't everyone else have to stay also, Bui I agree that would be a violation of the US Virginia Bill of Rights, which to us down under is the Magna Carta.

I don't know about that, probably not, if you real... (show quote)

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.” U.S. Constitution, Article VI, clause 3

Oath of Office
I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.

Reply
Nov 21, 2018 16:15:26   #
RT friend Loc: Kangaroo valley NSW Australia
 
mwdegutis wrote:
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.” U.S. Constitution, Article VI, clause 3

Oath of Office
I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.
i The Senators and Representatives before mention... (show quote)


That's the way it is but maintaining that is only OK if nothing ever changes, however things do change, in fact if I may "purloined" a something from Montesquieu a French Judge, ; the family is "undifferentiated unity" and contrary wise the State is "differentiation without unity".

So the State can't function like a family, if you believe in the independence of the individual, because an individual can't be independent of his mother, the father might very well be independent in certain situations, such as the immaculate conception which can not really become common place, if it did so daddy would be slippery rubber on a wet road, always an accident.

The Constitution is the wrong thing to cling too, it's being undermine by the high court anyway, but why should authority be concentrated, if a judge make a determination based on jury decision that should stand or fall in accordance with what is socially considered viable at the time.

Law by precedent has always been the way it goes because that is the only way it can go rationally and be accepted by the individual logically.

In order to get that and move away from the obscene plea bargain the worst thing in the world is to have everyone forced to consider, as absolute, what someone though about specific situations 250 years ago.

The Constitutional Amendments are not principles their edicts about contemporary circumstances that no longer exist.

A Bill of Rights is not really the Amendments.

The Virginia Declaration of Rights or Thomas Jefferson's Declaration of Independence Church and Religious Liberty is the real bill of rights, that's where the mistake is made the Virginia Declaration of Rights is what officials should swear too.


Reply
Nov 21, 2018 19:34:44   #
pafret Loc: Northeast
 
RT friend wrote:
That's the way it is but maintaining that is only OK if nothing ever changes, however things do change, in fact if I may "purloined" a something from Montesquieu a French Judge, ; the family is "undifferentiated unity" and contrary wise the State is "differentiation without unity".

So the State can't function like a family, if you believe in the independence of the individual, because an individual can't be independent of his mother, the father might very well be independent in certain situations, such as the immaculate conception which can not really become common place, if it did so daddy would be slippery rubber on a wet road, always an accident.

The Constitution is the wrong thing to cling too, it's being undermine by the high court anyway, but why should authority be concentrated, if a judge make a determination based on jury decision that should stand or fall in accordance with what is socially considered viable at the time.

Law by precedent has always been the way it goes because that is the only way it can go rationally and be accepted by the individual logically.

In order to get that and move away from the obscene plea bargain the worst thing in the world is to have everyone forced to consider, as absolute, what someone though about specific situations 250 years ago.

The Constitutional Amendments are not principles their edicts about contemporary circumstances that no longer exist.

A Bill of Rights is not really the Amendments.

The Virginia Declaration of Rights or Thomas Jefferson's Declaration of Independence Church and Religious Liberty is the real bill of rights, that's where the mistake is made the Virginia Declaration of Rights is what officials should swear too.

That's the way it is but maintaining that is only... (show quote)


Why don't you mind your own business and try running the Aussie government. We like our Bill of Rights nd our Constitution as they are and we don’t need any Australian criminals telling us how to run our nation.

Reply
Nov 21, 2018 20:49:00   #
timofrock
 
RT friend wrote:
That's the way it is but maintaining that is only OK if nothing ever changes, however things do change, in fact if I may "purloined" a something from Montesquieu a French Judge, ; the family is "undifferentiated unity" and contrary wise the State is "differentiation without unity".

So the State can't function like a family, if you believe in the independence of the individual, because an individual can't be independent of his mother, the father might very well be independent in certain situations, such as the immaculate conception which can not really become common place, if it did so daddy would be slippery rubber on a wet road, always an accident.

The Constitution is the wrong thing to cling too, it's being undermine by the high court anyway, but why should authority be concentrated, if a judge make a determination based on jury decision that should stand or fall in accordance with what is socially considered viable at the time.

Law by precedent has always been the way it goes because that is the only way it can go rationally and be accepted by the individual logically.

In order to get that and move away from the obscene plea bargain the worst thing in the world is to have everyone forced to consider, as absolute, what someone though about specific situations 250 years ago.

The Constitutional Amendments are not principles their edicts about contemporary circumstances that no longer exist.

A Bill of Rights is not really the Amendments.

The Virginia Declaration of Rights or Thomas Jefferson's Declaration of Independence Church and Religious Liberty is the real bill of rights, that's where the mistake is made the Virginia Declaration of Rights is what officials should swear too.

That's the way it is but maintaining that is only... (show quote)


" The Constitution is the wrong thing to cling too " you'll lose all, right there Mate, Piss Off !!!!
STAY DOWN UNDER !

Reply
 
 
Nov 22, 2018 06:55:33   #
bggamers Loc: georgia
 
mwdegutis wrote:
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.” U.S. Constitution, Article VI, clause 3

Oath of Office
I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.
i The Senators and Representatives before mention... (show quote)


So I have heard that the government has turned over something that has been in place for 180 yrs if so what was it???? And is it they are letting her swear in on the Quran which to me is not right if she is an American then swear in on the bible.

Reply
Nov 22, 2018 09:25:37   #
promilitary
 
Esley wrote:
Should have said, take the oath of office on the Quran should be jailed or deported.



Should never be allowed to take the oath, period. Any Muslim who does take the
oath is lying, as they are taught to do.

Reply
Nov 22, 2018 10:42:19   #
johnsorrell7
 
you get what you vote for, sometimes. Every one of you that voted for this woman will rue the day. She will cause more trouble thatn Ocasio-Cortez ever thought about causing. But that's what you voted for so you will have to live with it.......

Reply
Nov 22, 2018 10:44:02   #
johnsorrell7
 
She, like all Muslims, hate Americans and the infidels, or the world. She won't be a whole of help to the Israelis...

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.