jack sequim wa wrote:
Do you really believe Europeans have a better quality of life than Americans?
China is third world wages, under regulated which is why? China wants world manufacturing domination, china's fastest growing economy in the world has been retracting the last several years with major economic woes far greater than many troubled European countries and doing there measures of QE which is failing the same as every other country has.
Have you asked the question, if the Europeans are doing so wonderful, why move manufacturers to China?
If America is so bad, why are manufacturers moving back? Could poor previous political policies and now changed policies have something to do with it?
Capitalism has and is the best in the world's history, flawed but still the best. Our poor have a better quality of life with more opportunities to not be poor than any country.
The greatest problem with those against capitalism is ignorance and poor facts being pushed by socialist. Ignorance to the difference in crony capitalism and capitalism.
Do you really believe Europeans have a better qual... (
show quote)
The US is no longer a capitalist society. What we have is "crony" capitalism accelerated during the reagan-clinton era. The "great recession" was a direct result of Reagan and clinton economics. The only reason clinton got away with the things he did was because he was a democrat. Both bushie and obammy never strayed from the economic policy of crony capitalism. And like clinton, obammy got away with it because he was a demcrat.
This crony capitalism and its effects is what is now causing this backlash against capitalism itself. For the poor and middle class it is a feeling that the system is rigged and they are right. Because it is!
Reagan completed the transition to crony capitalism with his bullshit "trickle down" economics and every other President has employed in some fashion this myth of "trickle down" economics. Similar to communism it works in theory but not in reality. The reason why communism and "trickle down" doesn't work is because the both ignore human greed and sloth. The 2 catalysts driving the switch to crony capitalism is so-called cold war and steered by the military industrial corporations that Eisenhower warn about.
Examples of crony capitalism are Reagans deregulation, Clinton repeal of Glass-Steagall and his Telecommunications Act of 1996. You see, a true capitalistic economic system requires certain regulations. Regulations that do not stifle growth or too little regulation like that which created the great recession. What we have seen is regulation that created crony capitalism and the resulting massive corruption of the system.
When Clinton erased the line separating , banking, investment and INSURANCE greed took over. The housing bubble resulted from the greed of lenders, builders, and buyers aided by a government emboldened by the fact that so many people are realizing the American dream of home ownership and anxious to take credit, encouraged the risky loans in a variety of ways. Here we get our “toxic assets/debt, housing stocks and bundled mortgages. But that’s not all, folks. The banks know that they have a lot of risky mortgages in their bundles. So they insure this risk with an insurance company. Enter the biggest of all, AIG. Then the bottom falls out!
Bearn Stearns fails and has to be bailed out by the government, fannie and freddie are nationalized, Lehman Brothers fails, just a AIG stumbles. In the end, more than $700 billion of taxpayer dollars are dished out free of condition. Free of condition, and why? Because, if there were restrictions on the bailout money, the fucking banks would not have taken it.
So they continued to pay out huge bonuses and salaries, they did not loan it out to Americans, as the government wanted.
That was a lot of fucking up, all made possible by Reagan's deregulation and clinton's repeal of Glass Steagall.
Who was adversely affected by the "great recession?" It damn sure wasn't the richest 1%! Those bastards profited from it. Who took the big hit? The middle class, of course. The middle class started and continues to vanish. Gone are the days of the good union jobs and single breadwinner homes.
Who would benefit the most from the undoing of the Reagan/clinton "trickle down" crony capitalism economics/ Obviously that would be the poor and what is left of the middle class.
First, we need to STOP giving so much of out tax dollars to the military industrial corporations to waste on $640 toilet seats in the Pentagon.
http://www.thenation.com/article/only-the-pentagon-could-spend-640-on-a-toilet-seat/ http://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/pentagon-buries-evidence-of-125-billion-in-bureaucratic-waste/2016/12/05/e0668c76-9af6-11e6-a0ed-ab0774c1eaa5_story.html?utm_term=.7e191fbb66fcAnd this DoD Inspector General report they don't want you to see--
http://www.dodig.mil/pubs/report_summary.cfm?id=7034There is enough tax money spent on so-called defense to guarantee every American citizen housing, food, water, good education through college, and healthcare. Never mind this is the humane thing to do; it’s also good policy that benefits all except the 1%. After guaranteeing these things, then we go full capitalism.
You want to create jobs? This is the way to do it. Make it so people don’t have to worry about spending money on the necessities. How many new businesses will sprout up? How many new artists will discover their talents? How many new people will be called to professions such as teaching, policing, fire-fighting, things we need but have a hard time attracting people to because the pay is so little? The benefits are boundless
And the best part is we do not need to take from anyone other than the military industrial corporations. There is more than enough tax money there.
True Capitalism properly regulated works for everybody, not just the well connected 1%. Crony capitalism sucks and its policies of the last 30 years need to be undone.