One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Professor Says Hurricane Michael Victims Are Reaping What They Sowed
Page <prev 2 of 2
Oct 13, 2018 11:36:23   #
pafret Loc: Northeast
 
bggamers wrote:
That or earthquake zone watched a news report some years back of an earthquake in the California hills this woman was crying and the new guy asked her if she had lost someone in the quake she said no just her house.It was a mansion lying at the bottom of a big mountain. The newscaster said well you had insurance she cried louder and he said YOU did have insurance right she said No when she picked the property the insurance refused to cover anything she built because it was a quake zone. He said you built there anyway and she said, of course, the view was to die for. She built a multimillion-dollar home not all on the mountain but most on the side when the quake hit it just broke loose and fell off was nothing but a pile of sticks.Talk about being dumb
That or earthquake zone watched a news report some... (show quote)


Brings up all kinds of questions. She gambled and lost, sooner rather than later. Now I wonder if she had a mortgage on that property and if so what kind of due diligence did the bank do before joining in her folly? Further, if she is in a Federally declared disaster area is she entitled to any FEMA funds? What would be justification for taking money from the rest of the populace, who did not build foolishly nor have the use of her property, to make her whole again? Is the local zoning going to be modified to prevent building on the sides of precipices, where any geological mishap will cause destruction and possible death?

I have opinions as to what the answers to these questions probably are or will be but more to the point, does anyone else ever wonder about or pose those questions?

Reply
Oct 13, 2018 13:19:06   #
Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX
 
bggamers wrote:
That or earthquake zone watched a news report some years back of an earthquake in the California hills this woman was crying and the new guy asked her if she had lost someone in the quake she said no just her house.It was a mansion lying at the bottom of a big mountain. The newscaster said well you had insurance she cried louder and he said YOU did have insurance right she said No when she picked the property the insurance refused to cover anything she built because it was a quake zone. He said you built there anyway and she said, of course, the view was to die for. She built a multimillion-dollar home not all on the mountain but most on the side when the quake hit it just broke loose and fell off was nothing but a pile of sticks.Talk about being dumb
That or earthquake zone watched a news report some... (show quote)


That's the real world... no safe spaces.


Reply
Oct 13, 2018 15:03:13   #
RoyinNC
 
May I remind everyone that hurricanes, even big hurricanes, have been going on forever, even before the industrial revolution, and it is not wise to build close to large bodies of water, such as oceans, gulfs, sounds. I grew up on the NC coast, 300 yds from a sound, 2 miles from the ocean. I experienced several hurricanes in my childhood and early adulthood, and today I live 100-110 miles further inland, in NC. Even now, I'm not immune to hurricanes, but they are now more of a nuisance, and much less than a threat. There is no place on earth that is disaster free and the rash of modern disasters in the US, has nothing to do with "climate change"!

Reply
 
 
Oct 13, 2018 15:31:02   #
Oldsailor65 Loc: Iowa
 
RoyinNC wrote:
May I remind everyone that hurricanes, even big hurricanes, have been going on forever, even before the industrial revolution, and it is not wise to build close to large bodies of water, such as oceans, gulfs, sounds. I grew up on the NC coast, 300 yds from a sound, 2 miles from the ocean. I experienced several hurricanes in my childhood and early adulthood, and today I live 100-110 miles further inland, in NC. Even now, I'm not immune to hurricanes, but they are now more of a nuisance, and much less than a threat. There is no place on earth that is disaster free and the rash of modern disasters in the US, has nothing to do with "climate change"!
May I remind everyone that hurricanes, even big hu... (show quote)

************************************************************
Roy what you are posting here is true and anyone with common sense would realize that. BUT---stupid liberals like steve above can not comprehend that.

Reply
Oct 13, 2018 15:37:51   #
steve metter
 
Far far from liberal dagwood, trump , are you ADHD or something. Hurricane man made enhanced , no question, great loss of life, i have s hard time with leveling intelligence, too many standard deviations downward. Sad.

Reply
Oct 13, 2018 16:09:48   #
son of witless
 
BigMike wrote:
Seriously unhinged!

To be fair, though, I wouldn't build on the water anywhere for love or money. It's a bad idea.


I think if you are filthy rich then you can because you have the money to keep rebuilding. For the rest of us I agree with you. How about make the coast lines giant travel trailer parks ? You remove your trailer when a storm comes, then move it back later.

Reply
Oct 13, 2018 22:12:10   #
ExperienceCounts
 
son of witless wrote:
I think if you are filthy rich then you can because you have the money to keep rebuilding. For the rest of us I agree with you. How about make the coast lines giant travel trailer parks ? You remove your trailer when a storm comes, then move it back later.


Scientists told the folks in NC years (maybe decades) ago, Not to build on the Outer Banks or Emerald Isle in NC. At the time the area had mostly camping, either tent or mobile campers. There was supposed to be rules preventing permanent buildings. Somehow, that timely advice was ignored (probably money greased palms).

Build at your own risk in flood plains or erosion areas, etc, taxpayers and other insured shouldn't have to pick up the tab for your bad judgement.

Reply
Oct 13, 2018 22:28:08   #
bggamers Loc: georgia
 
ExperienceCounts wrote:
Scientists told the folks in NC years (maybe decades) ago, Not to build on the Outer Banks or Emerald Isle in NC. At the time the area had mostly camping, either tent or mobile campers. There was supposed to be rules preventing permanent buildings. Somehow, that timely advice was ignored (probably money greased palms).

Build at your own risk in flood plains or erosion areas, etc, taxpayers and other insured shouldn't have to pick up the tab for your bad judgement.


what gets me they keep on rebuilding in the same space and the insurance keeps covering the whats up with that

Reply
Oct 13, 2018 22:51:59   #
steve metter
 
11
ExperienceCounts wrote:
Scientists told the folks in NC years (maybe decades) ago, Not to build on the Outer Banks or Emerald Isle in NC. At the time the area had mostly camping, either tent or mobile campers. There was supposed to be rules preventing permanent buildings. Somehow, that timely advice was ignored (probably money greased palms).

Build at your own risk in flood plains or erosion areas, etc, taxpayers and other insured shouldn't have to pick up the tab for your bad judgement.


Deep state technology,, all fabricated with humofers in deep oven platforms withbharp

Reply
Oct 13, 2018 22:52:47   #
Seth
 
The worst part of the issue at hand is that this Professor John Abraham is characteristic of the left wing hacks they pay to "teach" today's young people, "shaping the minds of their generation."

Reply
Oct 14, 2018 09:50:51   #
son of witless
 
ExperienceCounts wrote:
Scientists told the folks in NC years (maybe decades) ago, Not to build on the Outer Banks or Emerald Isle in NC. At the time the area had mostly camping, either tent or mobile campers. There was supposed to be rules preventing permanent buildings. Somehow, that timely advice was ignored (probably money greased palms).

Build at your own risk in flood plains or erosion areas, etc, taxpayers and other insured shouldn't have to pick up the tab for your bad judgement.


Exactly. Why should your and my insurance rates subsidize building in areas that get flattened every decade or three? The same thing about building in flood plains. Years ago you simply did not build in certain places. Now that is not the case. In fairness, I have vacationed on the Outer Banks a couple of times and I think it is great. Some of those homes seem to have been there a fairly long time, although underneath the cottages the pressure treated structures seem to be replaced pretty often. About 3 years ago if I would've had a truck I could have brought home a lot of new pressure treated 2by4s and other nice pieces of lumber floating in the surf where I was trying to swim.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.