First you must know the LAW, because the judge does NOT know the LAW.
Here is a letter I received in an e-mail from a friend.

"230 years of criminal activity by high placed federal, state and county government employees is now ready for public exposure, and recent news stories prove two facts;
1) American People know their government employees ARE the problem,
2) American People do not know how the problem continues to fester.

To understand the 'how the problem continues to fester', the American People, including 'trump' (lower case letters as he is not actually America's president yet), must first learn for understanding and application the single greatest document written to prevent the current government cancer.
For starters......if you do not know why 'trump' is not actually the president, this lack of knowledge is exactly what criminal government employees rely upon for their existence.

I am sending this message to shine light on others recently in the news, that do not understand the federal constitution as exposed in the articles linked.

The first link reports a federal judge ruled 'trump' can be sued for constitutional emolument(s) violations which is absolute bull-shit no other American has reported as of this writing. The bull-shit 'IS'.......

1) As 'trump' is still our president elect, and not actually president yet, he has not violated a single emolument clause found in America's federal constitution stated to be in effect by the judge ruling. The bull-shit goes much further, so read on.

2) Now that the judge confirmed the constitution is the 'LAW', notice the reference to British legal crap. This British legal crap comes straight from the bill of rights which was added to the American People's back in 1791 for instances like last Friday's judge ruling.

Last Friday's legal ruling is based upon British legal theory the colonist fought the revolutionary war to throw off, by preventing all individuals with titled foreign government executive appointment, any position in any American government subdivision without congressional consent. The judge holds a british executive appointment without congressional consent to be an American federal judge. The judge is guilty of treason defined in the constitution confirmed to be valid in the article, and I can easily prove this. Here is the article.

Judge: Democrats in Congress can sue Trump over emoluments



Judge: Democrats in Congress can sue Trump over emoluments
ABC News
A federal district judge in Washington ruled Friday that a group of nearly 200 Democratic senators and represent...



Then....Kanye West got on the constitutional band wagon a couple days ago knowing something is wrong, but not what is wrong or by who's action(s).

He is correct in saying the current 13th must be abolished, as I prefer to say repealed which is also not actually correct either, but the current 13th is actually the current 14th as per several government law books I either own or have certified copy of, along with copy of and access to the original Lincoln signed document exposing Lincoln's treason thus removing the slavery document by nullification due to constitutional fraud, Mr. West knows is a constitutional violation, but cannot prove the violation. Here is a weak report.

Kanye West calls for the abolition of the 13th amendment while wearing MAGA hat


Kanye West calls for the abolition of the 13th amendment while wearing M...
Kanye West has been having a very Kanye West 24 hours. West posted a message and photo to his Twitter account S...



I have been out of the fight for a few months while busy working, but am slowly getting back up to speed for another push for a meeting with president elect 'trump' before he is killed.

This morning I received messages of the supreme court crap, and of some ford gal pictured with Soros. This is all to keep the American People distracted from their truth that......with 'trump's' attention America's problems can be easily remedied. How you might ask, well part of the answer is found in a recent article in IMPRIMUS.

Since 1791, many of America's government positions have been filled by Americans holding British title of nobility and not a single one of these thousands of individuals received congressional consent. These individuals have slowly, but methodically moved America away from a sovereign Nation position with closed borders as required in the constitution above confirmed to be America's 'LAW', to a Globalism position of a 'border less world' for unrestricted love and compassion.

All criminals employed by America's government(s), both past and present, work for distance from the document that allows the People to control their government employees, by removing criminals from positions when the employee are found guilty of treason.

This is confirmed by learning treason is the only crime defined in America's constitution because the crime of government employees simply involves altering 'LAW' for individual gain which defines treason. The simplicity of the crime is why criminals put great effort into preventing the People from accessing 'trump', while the People continue to state something is wrong without access to 'LAWFUL' enforcement of the constitution.

LeVoy Finicum gave his life knowing something is wrong, being killed by government employees altering 'LAW' for individual gain.

LaVoy Finicum




LaVoy Finicum
Robert LaVoy Finicum (January 27, 1961 – January 26, 2016) was an American spokesman for the militia group Citiz...



I attempted to stop the action causing LaVoy's death before the action started, but People turned a deaf ear to my offer, so the battle continues.

Today, criminals operating America's government require globalism and open borders simply because treason carries the death penalty. Treason is a citizen committing a crime against their nation, so with globalism and no nations, there will be no prosecution for treason, and thus no exposure to a death penalty.

In 1791, John Adams was the leading American individual behind the push for British legal crap to be added to America's federal constitution, while John Adams enjoyed a British title of nobility without American congressional consent. This is easily proven as no consent could have been granted 'BEFORE' the first congressional session was called to order, with John Adams being the senate president.

THEN......once Adams got away with the original crime, he was then part of the federalist conspiracy to replace 'LAW' with British legal bull-shit through the addition of the unconstitutional bill of rights containing the 7th amendment containing the words common law, which is not 'LAW' by any stretch of the imagination, but the rule allowing the judge last week to rule sue 'trump', and Mr. West to claim abolish the 13th.

To go further, the slavery amendment was required by government criminals because of the fraud of the bill of rights which then required the original 13th amendment to prevent to prosecution of treason in a nation with closed borders as America enjoyed in 1812. The words cease to be a citizen are the key to knowing if not a citizen, the definition of treason cannot be made, so......

From the time just before April 30, 1812, this original 13th was listed in American Law books, and for decades until the government criminals could get a civil war started to be ended with another amendment, this amendment was not referred to in a single case I can find in any state history. The original 13th only protects titled government criminals, and due to it's none-use, the importance of this amendment must be questioned. Then.....

As I have American government published law books showing both T.O.N.A. listed as the 13th amendment, AND slavery as the 14th amendment in the same book, by simply getting me to president elect 'trump', we can expose America's problem to insure nationalism with closed borders as 'trump' wants, with the protection from treason as written in 1787/88 by American People after America's Revolutionary War.

In 1776, America's Declaration to the world stated the America People "are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown" making the evidence clear that the People rejected/reject today British theory common law which does not insure citizenship, but rather authorizes the theory of human beings labeled as subjects, thus inferior to the British ruler."

Written by Jim Porter

https://www.politicususa.com/2018/09/29/judge-gives-green-light-to-lawsuit-claiming-trump-is-violating-the-constitution.html

A federal judge on Friday gave a green light to a lawsuit filed by 200 Democrats in Congress against President Donald Trump. The lawsuit claims that Trump has repeatedly and continuously violated the U.S. Constitution by doing business with foreign governments while in office.
The lawsuit is based on the Constitution’s emoluments clause, which prohibits presidents from taking payments from foreign governments without the consent of Congress. Trump still owns the business which has been the site of many foreign embassy events at its downtown D.C. hotel. In addition, many foreign government officials stay at his D.C. hotel in order to gain favor with the president.Attorneys for the Democratic Members of Congress said that Friday’s ruling in their favor was a very significant victory for their side.
“By recognizing that Members of Congress have standing to sue, the court proved to all in America today that no one is above the law, not even the President,” wrote Elizabeth Wydra, of the Constitutional Accountability Center, in a statement.
When Trump became president he reportedly gave up day-to-day management of his businesses. He has residential, office, hotel and golf properties in the United States and throughout the world. He still owns these properties and he can withdraw money from them at any time. Therefore when foreign governments pay money to these businesses it is like they are paying the money directly to him. The foreign emoluments clause prohibits payments from foreign governments, which it says cannot be accepted “without the consent of Congress.”
Trump did not ask Congress’s permission to take payments from foreign governments, which is a central point of the lawsuit. Trump’s attorneys claim he doesn’t need to seek permission from Congress. They claim that the business transactions don’t meet the Founding Fathers’ definition of “emoluments.” They are business deals, they claim, not payoffs from foreign governments.
In his ruling, Federal Judge Emmet G. Sullivan agreed with the Democratic Members of Congress. He said that they have legal standing to sue and their case can proceed.-----MORE------