padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al

Kerry should have been run over by a swift boat. He's much like yourself. You are a rabid radical. It's actually hilarious that you know nothing of the many successes Trump has accomplished. This is proof that your only source of data input is from the Trump hating, anti-American, media support wing of the Progressive Marxist party.

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

Padre what do you do to repent after you lie and slander? How many times a day do you ask forgiveness for lying?

padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al

Perplexing question you ask! How can one slander Satan's workers? I never intentionally lie.

I never miss a day seeking forgiveness for my sins. To do so would show great disrespect towards Jesus and the sacrifice He paid for me. Many of my sins I commit here on the OPP. I normally live a very insulated, quiet and contemplative life and my exposure to people like you, and others like you on the OPP, is very limited. My instinct is to resist everything you stand for and yet wrestling with you makes me dirty. Conversely, BAD Bob, how often do YOU sincerely seek forgiveness for your sins many of which we witness, side by side, with my own here on the OPP? Waiting..........

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

Waiting..........Yes again. no answer. "Satan's workers" "I never intentionally lie." "wrestling with you makes me dirty." Your lies and hate makes you dirty and sinful.

padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al

You lie! I answered you. Obviously you're either not smart enough to understand or devious enough to continue to deflect. Either way, you're dishonest. You didn't tell us, Wormwood, how often you confess your sins?

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

This is no answer to my question.


Bad Bob wrote:
Padre what do you do to repent after you lie and slander? How many times a day do you ask forgiveness for lying?


Perplexing question you ask! How can one slander Satan's workers? I never intentionally lie.

"I never miss a day seeking forgiveness for my sins. To do so would show great disrespect towards Jesus and the sacrifice He paid for me. Many of my sins I commit here on the OPP. I normally live a very insulated, quiet and contemplative life and my exposure to people like you, and others like you on the OPP, is very limited. My instinct is to resist everything you stand for and yet wrestling with you makes me dirty. Conversely, BAD Bob, how often do YOU sincerely seek forgiveness for your sins many of which we witness, side by side, with my own here on the OPP? Waiting.........."


Bad Bob wrote:
Padre what do you do to repent after you lie and slander? How many times a day do you ask forgiveness for lying?


Perplexing question you ask! How can one slander Satan's workers? I never intentionally lie.

I never miss a day seeking forgiveness for my sins. To do so would show great disrespect towards Jesus and the sacrifice He paid for me. Many of my sins I commit here on the OPP. I normally live a very insulated, quiet and contemplative life and my exposure to people like you, and others like you on the OPP, is very limited. My instinct is to resist everything you stand for and yet wrestling with you makes me dirty. Conversely, BAD Bob, how often do YOU sincerely seek forgiveness for your sins many of which we witness, side by side, with my own here on the OPP? Waiting..........

padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al

OK Bob, stop your childish deflection and answer the question, "how often do you seek forgiveness?" If I answered your question, which was not asked in good faith, you can certainly answer my question that was asked in good faith. But I suspect you won't because you're the sort of disgusting creepy little man who charges others with his own secret sins. But isn't this behavior typical of most all progressives? You charge conservatives with your own thoughts, words and deeds. And so, Bob, we begin another day.

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

[quote=padremike]"OK Bob, stop your childish deflection and answer the question, "how often do you seek forgiveness?" Seek is the key word. Every hour of the day.

"If I answered your question, which was not asked in good faith, you can certainly answer my question that was asked in good faith." Only a pious ass could say that.

"But I suspect you won't because you're the sort of disgusting creepy little man who charges others with his own secret sins." Very disgusting words from a religious zealot Padre.

"But isn't this behavior typical of most all progressives?" Maybe typical in the mind of a hateful conservative fanatic.

"You charge conservatives with your own thoughts, words and deeds." Yes, I vote, donate to PP and post my views. So

And so, Padre we begin another beautiful day.

padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al

[quote=Bad Bob]

Still won't answer the question, "how often do you confess?" Squirm you little worm! You asked me in derision and yet I gave you an honest answer. C'mon you little weasel show us your own soul? It's show time, Bob! Stand up and be counted or forever sit down and shut up.

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

[quote=padremike]"Still won't answer the question, "how often do you confess?" Are you so feeble minded you can't remember your own question? Your question was "how often do you seek forgiveness?" And I answered every hour of the day.

Your new question "Still won't answer the question, "how often do you confess?"

My answer is only when I do a crime, the last time was when I got caught doing 35 in a 25.

padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al

[quote=Bad Bob]

Bob, you're a total and complete fraud. You're a moral coward. Here is how we sin every day: by thought, word or deed and the good we fail to do. In the future do not ask Christians questions you are not prepared to answer yourself.

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

I can see that you have serious problems and I answered all your silly questions. Christian my ass, wacko yes.

padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al

I could care two hoots in hell what a degenerate thinks if me. Your words are nothing. Your thoughts are even less.

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

Your answers are even less.

Turk182

First you must know the LAW, because the judge does NOT know the LAW.
Here is a letter I received in an e-mail from a friend.

"230 years of criminal activity by high placed federal, state and county government employees is now ready for public exposure, and recent news stories prove two facts;
1) American People know their government employees ARE the problem,
2) American People do not know how the problem continues to fester.

To understand the 'how the problem continues to fester', the American People, including 'trump' (lower case letters as he is not actually America's president yet), must first learn for understanding and application the single greatest document written to prevent the current government cancer.
For starters......if you do not know why 'trump' is not actually the president, this lack of knowledge is exactly what criminal government employees rely upon for their existence.

I am sending this message to shine light on others recently in the news, that do not understand the federal constitution as exposed in the articles linked.

The first link reports a federal judge ruled 'trump' can be sued for constitutional emolument(s) violations which is absolute bull-shit no other American has reported as of this writing. The bull-shit 'IS'.......

1) As 'trump' is still our president elect, and not actually president yet, he has not violated a single emolument clause found in America's federal constitution stated to be in effect by the judge ruling. The bull-shit goes much further, so read on.

2) Now that the judge confirmed the constitution is the 'LAW', notice the reference to British legal crap. This British legal crap comes straight from the bill of rights which was added to the American People's back in 1791 for instances like last Friday's judge ruling.

Last Friday's legal ruling is based upon British legal theory the colonist fought the revolutionary war to throw off, by preventing all individuals with titled foreign government executive appointment, any position in any American government subdivision without congressional consent. The judge holds a british executive appointment without congressional consent to be an American federal judge. The judge is guilty of treason defined in the constitution confirmed to be valid in the article, and I can easily prove this. Here is the article.

Judge: Democrats in Congress can sue Trump over emoluments



Judge: Democrats in Congress can sue Trump over emoluments
ABC News
A federal district judge in Washington ruled Friday that a group of nearly 200 Democratic senators and represent...



Then....Kanye West got on the constitutional band wagon a couple days ago knowing something is wrong, but not what is wrong or by who's action(s).

He is correct in saying the current 13th must be abolished, as I prefer to say repealed which is also not actually correct either, but the current 13th is actually the current 14th as per several government law books I either own or have certified copy of, along with copy of and access to the original Lincoln signed document exposing Lincoln's treason thus removing the slavery document by nullification due to constitutional fraud, Mr. West knows is a constitutional violation, but cannot prove the violation. Here is a weak report.

Kanye West calls for the abolition of the 13th amendment while wearing MAGA hat


Kanye West calls for the abolition of the 13th amendment while wearing M...
Kanye West has been having a very Kanye West 24 hours. West posted a message and photo to his Twitter account S...



I have been out of the fight for a few months while busy working, but am slowly getting back up to speed for another push for a meeting with president elect 'trump' before he is killed.

This morning I received messages of the supreme court crap, and of some ford gal pictured with Soros. This is all to keep the American People distracted from their truth that......with 'trump's' attention America's problems can be easily remedied. How you might ask, well part of the answer is found in a recent article in IMPRIMUS.

Since 1791, many of America's government positions have been filled by Americans holding British title of nobility and not a single one of these thousands of individuals received congressional consent. These individuals have slowly, but methodically moved America away from a sovereign Nation position with closed borders as required in the constitution above confirmed to be America's 'LAW', to a Globalism position of a 'border less world' for unrestricted love and compassion.

All criminals employed by America's government(s), both past and present, work for distance from the document that allows the People to control their government employees, by removing criminals from positions when the employee are found guilty of treason.

This is confirmed by learning treason is the only crime defined in America's constitution because the crime of government employees simply involves altering 'LAW' for individual gain which defines treason. The simplicity of the crime is why criminals put great effort into preventing the People from accessing 'trump', while the People continue to state something is wrong without access to 'LAWFUL' enforcement of the constitution.

LeVoy Finicum gave his life knowing something is wrong, being killed by government employees altering 'LAW' for individual gain.

LaVoy Finicum




LaVoy Finicum
Robert LaVoy Finicum (January 27, 1961 – January 26, 2016) was an American spokesman for the militia group Citiz...



I attempted to stop the action causing LaVoy's death before the action started, but People turned a deaf ear to my offer, so the battle continues.

Today, criminals operating America's government require globalism and open borders simply because treason carries the death penalty. Treason is a citizen committing a crime against their nation, so with globalism and no nations, there will be no prosecution for treason, and thus no exposure to a death penalty.

In 1791, John Adams was the leading American individual behind the push for British legal crap to be added to America's federal constitution, while John Adams enjoyed a British title of nobility without American congressional consent. This is easily proven as no consent could have been granted 'BEFORE' the first congressional session was called to order, with John Adams being the senate president.

THEN......once Adams got away with the original crime, he was then part of the federalist conspiracy to replace 'LAW' with British legal bull-shit through the addition of the unconstitutional bill of rights containing the 7th amendment containing the words common law, which is not 'LAW' by any stretch of the imagination, but the rule allowing the judge last week to rule sue 'trump', and Mr. West to claim abolish the 13th.

To go further, the slavery amendment was required by government criminals because of the fraud of the bill of rights which then required the original 13th amendment to prevent to prosecution of treason in a nation with closed borders as America enjoyed in 1812. The words cease to be a citizen are the key to knowing if not a citizen, the definition of treason cannot be made, so......

From the time just before April 30, 1812, this original 13th was listed in American Law books, and for decades until the government criminals could get a civil war started to be ended with another amendment, this amendment was not referred to in a single case I can find in any state history. The original 13th only protects titled government criminals, and due to it's none-use, the importance of this amendment must be questioned. Then.....

As I have American government published law books showing both T.O.N.A. listed as the 13th amendment, AND slavery as the 14th amendment in the same book, by simply getting me to president elect 'trump', we can expose America's problem to insure nationalism with closed borders as 'trump' wants, with the protection from treason as written in 1787/88 by American People after America's Revolutionary War.

In 1776, America's Declaration to the world stated the America People "are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown" making the evidence clear that the People rejected/reject today British theory common law which does not insure citizenship, but rather authorizes the theory of human beings labeled as subjects, thus inferior to the British ruler."

Written by Jim Porter