One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Real reason for hating Obama
Page <<first <prev 7 of 69 next> last>>
Mar 10, 2014 12:44:15   #
Btfkr Loc: just outside the Mile High City
 
ginger wrote:
The problem with your thought is, it is the hospital that puts out the birth announcement. They don't come from home. Home births don't get published. At least not around here. And back in the 60's home births only happened if you couldn't get to the hospital in time, extremely rare.
And his is in a list of all births for a weeks time. Can't fake that.


:thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Mar 10, 2014 12:48:35   #
Blacksheep
 
Glaucon wrote:
There are so many false charges against Obama that are easily refuted with evidence: Benghazi, the IRS thing, Obama's birth certificate, Obama is a Muslim, Obama hates America, and other nonsense that distract us from the fact that Obama has taken some actions that are real and do seriously harm America. Read this:

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2014/03/03

I will be interested in your comments.


No comment for Glaucon but I do have one for the rest of you. Glaucon is a deliberate troll and by that I mean he isn't just some brainwashed liberal who robotically repeats the mantra, but one who puts out his tripe for the explicit purpose of baiting people into refuting him so he can respond with insults. He's an instigator, pure and simple.

So "simple" also applies to anyone who actually responds to anything he posts. The only way to get rid of jerkoffs like this is to totally ignore them. If you're going to insist on getting into these irate discussions with him then you're just one more pig that likes to roll in the mud. See the light.

Reply
Mar 10, 2014 12:51:52   #
Btfkr Loc: just outside the Mile High City
 
teaman wrote:
Well now, you were doing, some what, ok until you used the word "MENTAL", but now you are just another dissatisfied Obama annual droll that is truly mentally ill and here is the proof, which I have posted before and will continue to post;

Just when liberal-leftists thought it was finally "their time" to lead center-right America, kicking and screaming, into a stifling socialist "utopia," a veteran psychiatrist is making a powerful case that the "hope-and-change" ideology motivating them is actually a mental disorder.

For more than 40 years, Rossiter has diagnosed and treated over 1,500 patients as a board-certified clinical psychiatrist and examined more than 2,700 civil and criminal cases, both state and federal, as a board-certified forensic psychiatrist retained by numerous public offices, courts and private attorneys. He received his medical and psychiatric training at the University of Chicago.

Rossiter explains with great clarity why the kind of liberalism being displayed by Barack Obama can only be understood as a psychological disorder."Based on strikingly irrational beliefs and emotions, modern liberals relentlessly undermine the most important principles on which our freedoms were founded," says Rossiter. "Like spoiled, angry children, they rebel against the normal responsibilities of adulthood and demand that a parental government meet their needs from cradle to grave." "A social scientist who understands human nature will not dismiss the vital roles of free choice, voluntary cooperation and moral integrity - as liberals do," he says. "A political leader who understands human nature will not ignore individual differences in talent, drive, personal appeal and work ethic, and then try to impose economic and social
equality on the population - as liberals do. And a legislator who understands human nature will not create an environment of rules which overregulates and overtaxes the nation's citizens, corrupts their character and reduces them to wards of the state - as liberals do."

Dr. Rossiter says the liberal agenda preys on weakness and feelings of inferiority in the population by:

a.. creating and reinforcing perceptions of victimization;

b.. satisfying infantile claims to entitlement, indulgence and compensation;

c.. augmenting primitive feelings of envy;

d.. rejecting the sovereignty of the individual, subordinating him to the will of the government.

"The roots of liberalism - and its associated madness - can be clearly identified by understanding how children develop from infancy to adulthood and how distorted development produces the irrational beliefs of the liberal mind," he says. "When the modern liberal mind whines about imaginary victims, rages against imaginary villains and seeks above all else to run the lives of persons competent to run their own lives, the neurosis of the liberal mind becomes painfully obvious."

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=3D116644#ixzz1PI7TEb6w
Well now, you were doing, some what, ok until you ... (show quote)


I NEVER thought I'd quote Vernon, but...yawn hohummmmmmmmm

Reply
 
 
Mar 10, 2014 12:56:07   #
stan3186
 
ibKelly wrote:
A man's character and his word depicts the kind of person he is inside...If he has no character then his word isn't worth a darn - anything he does, is totally meaningless.

To me... and possibly ONLY to me... when Obama was too lazy to walk a few steps more when he was in college to keep from getting a jillion parking tickets which he had 'no intentions' of paying... shows the Character of the man. Only when he WANTED something did he go and pay them.. otherwise.. they would have remained unpaid.

When a man deceives the people of the country he lives in... by having a SS number from a State he never resided in... tells me volumes. When a man can get up before the world and say... "If you like you plan... you can keep your plan... PERIOD... If you like your Doctor.. you can keep your Doctor... PERIOD... knowing full well that was a LIE..... there goes his Character!!!!

If a man has no Character... again ----- his worth/word is meaningless... let alone the country he resides in other that what he can achieve through lies, betrayals, and insincerity... If you can't believe any part of what he is reading from his tele-prompter [[which he can't speak without words written for him]].....what good is he to anyone? He's not the magical speaker everyone says he is... he stutters, stammers and pauses constantly when not reading from it.

A man who bought a mansion for millions... yet doesn't even have his name on the deed, but has 3 other names.... thus avoiding paying the taxes on it... Nor does he ever vacation there either..... Why??? What's he hiding? Is he waiting to become so famous he can sell it later and get jillions from it then? Probably !!!! A 'shyster' comes to mind here ~ !

He's a man on a mission.... 'his mission'... one of deceit and greed. How can you trust a liar? How can one trust one who campaigns constantly... how can you trust one who lies every time he opens his mouth.... how can you trust one who spends millions of taxpayers money on 'failed projects'.... how can you trust one who doesn't want to stay in the Oval Office -- who does no work yet collects $400,000 plus expenses a year to circle the globe spreading his cheer.

He was furnished a BRAND NEW limo... costing millions .... a brand new ultra reinforced bus, and is furnished with a non stop plane flying all over the globe... one who flies his barber from Chicago to cut his curly locks every two weeks... who has extremely lavish parties at the White House while the country suffers... and who had rather play golf than sit in the 'Chair' he won for 8 years... and one who has raised spending in 5 short years more than Bush did in 8 years.... His greed hath no limit....His character is flawed as well as anything that comes out of his mouth... yet no one seems to care who they put in the White House as long as he gives them things.... Obama is their RobinHood via the Government's purse... if it came out of his pocket... they wouldn't be getting a thing!!!
A man's character and his word depicts the kind of... (show quote)


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Mar 10, 2014 13:06:47   #
Btfkr Loc: just outside the Mile High City
 
It is my opinion that the U>S> has been breaking international both covertly and overtly law for FOREVER, so why blame Obama more or less than anybody else? The old "might makes Right" mentioned in the article about says it all and that as a rule is more of a right wing mantra, but both sides are guilty. I do find it amazing and humorous though that here is a left leaning article that clearly gives the wingies ammo on some really pertinent issues, and where do they go? All the same old talking points Benghazi, IRS, birth cert whatever, that again in my opinion PALE in comparison.

Reply
Mar 10, 2014 13:08:18   #
Don DeHoff
 
For all commenters, here is some real "stuff" to open your eyes about our President. It is a book, by Aaron Klein and Brenda Elliott, entitled, "Impeachable Offenses: The Case For Removing Barack Obama From Office". WND normally sells it for about $25.00 but have it on sale for $4.99. WND sent a free copy to all in congress. I did not find any significant errors or omissions in it and highly recommend it. I seriously recommend if the President is impeached that he also be charged with "gross poor judgment". Then, if he realizes some of the other charges may result in criminal charges and jail, he might "cop-a-plea" for the judgment charge and resign. And while I would hate for him to get off "scot-free", doing so might prevent widespread "blood in the streets" by his followers. Of course, the "process" should require him appeal to his supporters, not to participate in any acts of violence.

Reply
Mar 10, 2014 13:16:41   #
Homestead
 
Don DeHoff wrote:
I am 82 years "young" and I advise no one to "hate" anybody---that requires serious emotional involvement and energy, of which both could be more effectively applied in solving the problem(s). Also, hate is very contagious, especially for children and the uninformed---and if you are "wrong", you will have contaminated many "others".


Yeah, look at Hitler's rise to power, nobody hated him and look at how well that worked out for the world.


Compare that to our mean and hateful founding fathers that took a stand against the king.

They wanted free speech and the right to pursue their own happiness and the king didn't want to give it to them so they had to take their freedom by the gun, bleed and die for it.

Now look at the mess we’re in, all this freedom and liberty, what a mess.

And none of this would have happened if they hadn't spread their very contagious hatred of tyranny among the children and the uninformed. They contaminated many "others" with their sense of freedom and liberty, how disgusting is that?

They should have learned to love their role as peasant and graciously excepted the role of economic slave for the nobility and the king.

Reply
 
 
Mar 10, 2014 13:43:02   #
Homestead
 
Glaucon wrote:
Your insults are duly noted.

I explained this issue to rickdri on this page, so I won't repeat it.



I'm sorry, but:
Denying reality and keeping yourself ignorant of facts is not an explanation.

Reply
Mar 10, 2014 13:49:48   #
Retired669
 
Blacksheep wrote:
No comment for Glaucon but I do have one for the rest of you. Glaucon is a deliberate troll and by that I mean he isn't just some brainwashed liberal who robotically repeats the mantra, but one who puts out his tripe for the explicit purpose of baiting people into refuting him so he can respond with insults. He's an instigator, pure and simple.

So "simple" also applies to anyone who actually responds to anything he posts. The only way to get rid of jerkoffs like this is to totally ignore them. If you're going to insist on getting into these irate discussions with him then you're just one more pig that likes to roll in the mud. See the light.
No comment for Glaucon but I do have one for the r... (show quote)


Baa aaa aaa aaa yourself. Don't like his posts or replies DON'T READ THEM!....... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Reply
Mar 10, 2014 13:49:59   #
rickdri
 
Glaucon wrote:
The many politically motivated investigations of Benghazi revealed that there was a lot of politically motivated efforts to prove several versions of what happened. To summarize the results of the investigations, it is safe to say that all of the political interests agreed the findings supported their original beliefs and assumptions. We don't know what Obama knew or what he thought and we have absolutely no evidence that he lied about anything.

It is true the investigations found that the IRS targeted conservative groups....and they were targeting liberal groups and groups with other labels if they appeared from their titles to be political. Is it possible that a group titled, Tea Party Action Group would be non political? No evidence was found that there was any political motivation in the actions of the IRS.
The many politically motivated investigations of B... (show quote)


No evidence that he lied? 2 weeks after the attacks, after all the main stream news channels that support Obama reported that there was no demonstration outside the Embassy, after these same news channels stated that this had nothing to do with the video, that this was a planned attack, he goes before the United Nations and blames the video again. Stop the double talk. He knew and so did everyone else in his administration. To say he did not know what happened would be to say he is incompetent since everyone else in the country knew what happened.
As for the IRS, yes they did target some liberal groups. However there were very few of these groups and each one was given their tax exempt status in a very short time. All of the conservative groups were put through a vigorous inspection and held up for months. Some did not receive their status until it was too late to campaign. You say there is no evidence of political motivation? Why is Lois Lerner still claiming the 5th? Their actions alone show there was political bias. You are only making excuses up for Obama. Just as someone that supported a conservative president that behaved as Obama did would.
When will people stop supporting these stupid political parties and their inept leaders. I'm talking about both parties. All you are doing Glaucon is providing excuses for people that don't deserve your support. Neither party is worth supporting as there are criminals and idiots leading both parties at this time. If I offended you please except my apology. I did not mean too. We deserve better people leading this country than what both parties are putting before us now!

Reply
Mar 10, 2014 13:56:51   #
Don DeHoff
 
Homestead wrote:
Yeah, look at Hitler's rise to power, nobody hated him and look at how well that worked out for the world.


Compare that to our mean and hateful founding fathers that took a stand against the king.

They wanted free speech and the right to pursue their own happiness and the king didn't want to give it to them so they had to take their freedom by the gun, bleed and die for it.

Now look at the mess we’re in, all this freedom and liberty, what a mess.

And none of this would have happened if they hadn't spread their very contagious hatred of tyranny among the children and the uninformed. They contaminated many "others" with their sense of freedom and liberty, how disgusting is that?

They should have learned to love their role as peasant and graciously excepted the role of economic slave for the nobility and the king.
Yeah, look at Hitler's rise to power, nobody hated... (show quote)


Sir, you still "don't get it". Your hateful ranting and raving has made you part of the problem. And, you can rest assured, our Founding Fathers, for the most part, acted, using logic, deductive reason and common sense---there was no room for hate as that interferes with those processes.

Reply
 
 
Mar 10, 2014 14:09:44   #
Btfkr Loc: just outside the Mile High City
 
I'm loving it that 2 on the same side are fighting like cats. And they call us leftys troublemakers!

Reply
Mar 10, 2014 14:15:02   #
Don DeHoff
 
[quote=Retired669]Baa aaa aaa aaa yourself. Don't like his posts or replies DON'T READ THEM!....... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:[/quote

The above post is a classical case of off-subject "mental masturbation", a common affliction among those who feel they must comment, but have no valid civil "on-subject"
information to put forth.

Reply
Mar 10, 2014 14:15:03   #
alex Loc: michigan now imperial beach californa
 
jimahrens wrote:
You better get your head out of the sand. This kind of thinking is exactly why Obama gets away with what has happened. He is the President. The buck stops there.


where he keeps his head smells a lot worse than sand

Reply
Mar 10, 2014 14:20:41   #
Blacksheep
 
Retired669 wrote:
Baa aaa aaa aaa yourself. Don't like his posts or replies DON'T READ THEM!....... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Another stupid ass troll who's been on my list...

*Never said I read it. In fact, dumbass troll, I didn't. Back under your rock now.

I don't understand why some people actually beg to be derided. Masochism is so sick.........

Reply
Page <<first <prev 7 of 69 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.