old marine Loc: America home of the brave

Republicans did not put the TRAITOR in the White House the Socialist Democrats put Obama in the white house twice and tried to put another one to take his place BUT loyal American Patriots put a real president in the white house.

So for President Trump is doing just what the people that elected him to do. Inspite of the sore loosers attempt to ruin him.

old marine Loc: America home of the brave

Fact is 90% of all the wars Americans have been in were began during a Democtats Presidency. The majority were ended with a Republican President.

old marine Loc: America home of the brave

Check your facts. 90% of the operating coal mines in America are owned by Democrats.

Lonewolf

No one needs or should ruin trump he's more than qualified to ruin himself!

Lonewolf

Yep that's why trumps willing to lower water and air quality to help the democrats lol

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

"Clarence had to prove he didn't have anything to do with the black pubic hair left somewhere?"

You remember!!! Few do. A puby on a Coke bottle or can?
3rd Person in Room During ‘Kavanaugh Attack’ Comes Forward and Blows Story Apart
https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/author/malachi-bailey/?ff_source=push&ff_medium=conservativetribune&ff_campaign=manualpost&ff_content=2018-09-20

The left’s characterization of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh is falling apart after another individual identified as being present during the alleged sexual assault by Kavanaugh has come forward and rejected the accuser’s story.

In a letter sent to Sen. Dianne Feinstein, California professor Christine Blasey Ford said there were four people besides herself at the party when she was allegedly assaulted by Kavanaugh.

One of those four people, Patrick J. Smyth, a high school classmate of Kavanaugh, provided the Senate Judiciary Committee with a letter rebutting Ford’s allegations against Kavanaugh, according to CNS News.

“I understand that I have been identified by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford as the person she remembers as ‘PJ’ who supposedly was present at the party she described in her statements to the Washington Post,” Smyth said in his statement published by CNN.

Smyth went on to claim “no knowledge” of the party Ford described.

“I am issuing this statement today to make it clear to all involved that I have no knowledge of the party in question; nor do I have any knowledge of the allegations of improper conduct she has leveled against Brett Kavanaugh.”

Smyth also commented on Kavanaugh’s character and his treatment of women.

“Personally speaking, I have known Brett Kavanaugh since high school and I know him to be a person of great integrity, a great friend, and I have never witnessed any improper conduct by Brett Kavanaugh towards women,” Smyth said.

Smyth’s statement makes him the third person to deny Ford’s claims out of the four individuals Ford said were present at the party....

debeda

She took a lie detector test? Who administered this test? When? Why? What were the specific questions asked? What results were published?

pafret Loc: Northeast

From what has appeared in the news about pollution of water sources, rivers and streams, the main polluter seems to be the incompetents at the EPA. Whenever they decide private industry isn't doing a good job and they take over, they create a disaster. The main difference is that they are the Government so those affected have no legal recourse, which they would have against private industry.

Your interpretation of net neutrality seems reasonable but I have heard many other conflicting opinions as to what it really means. At this point it is a follow the money game and that will determine what my stance should be.

crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island

And the one who does remember says it didn't happen.

Science is finding that memory of crimes, even by victims, is often very unreliable. Three people will swear that an assailant had blond hair, brown hair or was bald, even right after the crime. After 36 years, it's a joke.

Immediately after John F. Kennedy's assassination, the Crime of the Twentieth Century, some people swore there were three shots and other four.

Some claim she passed a lie detector test. She may told herself that it was Kavanaugh so often that she actually believes it in her heart.

Anyone remember Jimmy Durante's sign off, "Good night, Mrs. Calabash, wherever you are?" Mrs. Calabash may not have existed and some people maintain that Durante spoke about her so often that he began to believe she existed himself.

I've seen people recall a scene where they weren't even there. Sometimes police have found people provide first hand witness accounts and later found the person miles away.

George Patton read so much about ancient battles and became so familiar with them that he began to think he was re-incarnated.

You can't trust memory, especially after so many years. If there's no corroboration, it likely didn't happen.

Of course, liberals would love to believe it, so don't be surprised if one of these liberal harpies comes forward to claim she was there & she found out about it through 'recovered memory,' a process that psychologists claimed was reliable and convicted some people.

Look at Barry Scheck's Innocence Project.

jimpack123 Loc: wisconsin

of course they are gonna say that follow the money trail from this oops the FBI wont investigate boy Trump sure is draining the swamp more like filling it just wait till November

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Game-Changer: Kavanaugh Accuser Linked to Anita Hill Hit Job on Clarence Thomas
https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/author/cillian-zeal/?ff_source=push&ff_medium=conservativetribune&ff_campaign=manualpost&ff_content=2018-09-20
When NeverTrump pundit Erick Erickson suggested that the accusation against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh by Christine Blasey Ford was the result of a PR job, there was both laughter and disdain from the left.
There isn’t much mirth or contempt now that it’s been revealed who Judge Kavanaugh’s accuser has retained.
According to Politico, Christine Blasey Ford — the 51-year-old California psychologist who says the Supreme Court nominee sexually assaulted her while they were in high school in Maryland — is receiving advice from Democrat activist Ricki Seidman.
“Seidman, a senior principal at TSD Communications, in the past worked as an investigator for Sen. Ted Kennedy, and was involved with Anita Hill’s decision to testify against Supreme Court Nominee Clarence Thomas,” Politico reported.
“She also worked as Joe Biden’s communications director during the 2008 general election campaign, after he was named Barack Obama’s running mate. In 2009, according to her online biography, she helped the White House manage the confirmation of Obama’s Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor. Before that, she worked in the Clinton White House as deputy communications director,” the report said.
And that’s not all. When President Ronald Reagan appointed Judge Robert Bork to the nation’s highest court, Seidman played a key role helping kill the appointment.
“As legal director for Norman Lear’s People for the American Way, she was responsible for the infamous attack-ad on the judicial record of Supreme Court nominee Robert Bork,” The Weekly Standard reported in 1996. “She next moved to Senator Edward Kennedy’s office shortly after Clarence Thomas was nominated to the Supreme Court, and she is credited with pressuring the reluctant Anita Hill to come out with her harassment story. When the Judiciary Committee failed to listen, according to David Brock’s‘The Real Anita Hill,’ Seidman helped leak the story to the press.”
That’s a lot of juice — but, according to the Politico report, Seidman was merely “brought in to offer personal advice to Ford, a California-based psychologist who has no experience living in the spotlight of a national story, or in the crosswinds of Washington politics.”
“I believe her and I think she’s very courageous for coming this far,” Seidman said.
But — of course — this isn’t linked to any wider effort on the part of the Democrats, and they’re trying very hard to assure you that any evidence to the contrary is just a filthy lie.
“Democratic operatives in Washington, D.C. have been cautious about linking Ford and her claims to partisan activists working on her behalf over concerns about further politicizing an already complicated case,” Politico reported.
“(Ford) didn’t come at this through anyone political and needs to keep her distance from it,” one party apparatchik is quoted as saying.
Of course.
It’s impossible not to notice that Ford’s story has had the most carefully controlled of rollouts, designed to do maximum damage to Kavanaugh’s reputation while maintaining the possibility that the filling of Justice Anthony Kennedy’s soon-to-be-vacant seat might happen after the November midterms and even after a new Congress is sworn in.Like finding a watch on the beach is an argument for an intelligent watchmaker behind it, so such a precise rollout of an allegation seems to imply someone behind the precision of that rollout.
Are we truly to believe that, after confirmation hearings for a Supreme Court nominee wrapped up, the existence of Ford’s letter just happened to get leaked and that things built to the point where she just so happened to come forward in the Sunday edition of The Washington Post?
And lo and behold — it’s just like the Anita Hill case 27 years ago! But the fact that one of the architects of that circus is involved (again) shouldn’t make you think there’s any coincidence. Ford “didn’t come at this through anyone political,” and don’t you forget it. She just has a lot of political people around her (like two prominent Democrat attorneys, for instance)....

Comment Loc: California

Conservatives: Look @ the attitudes & bias of liberals on this site. They are so prejuditial in that hey believe in "guilty until proven innocent", instead of "innocent until proven guilty. If I were every to come before a trial by jury I would excuse every Dumorat prospective juror. Dumorats are are not my peers. I would ashamed to be one of them.

jimpack123 Loc: wisconsin

spell check lol this is a court of public opinion and the public opinion will be decided in November of 2018 and November of 2020

debeda

peg w

How can anyone say anything about being at this party when she dosen't remember whear or when it happened.