One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Alabama Farmer. If you want to get rid of illegal immigrants...quit eating!
Page <<first <prev 5 of 7 next> last>>
Sep 8, 2018 14:29:40   #
JoyV
 
PeterS wrote:
Where are you trying to drive this Truck Joy? Are you trying to argue that whites make up the majority of farm labor or what? I don't know what to argue when you change the subject with each post...simply from the business point of view farmers have to prepare to have their field harvested even if there might be some outbreaks. Of course, if farmers were smart they would provide port-a-potty's and fire any laborers who were found pissing or defecating in the fields. That would eliminate the e-coli but that is too simple a solution when doing nothing has worked so well...
Where are you trying to drive this Truck Joy? Are ... (show quote)


If you look at whichever post I am responding to in each of my posts, you will see it is not I who am changing the subject. I am responding to what is stated in the posts whether the subject has previously been changed or not.

I posted it to make the point that whites are not opposed to working in the fields. Sorry but that figure is not broken down into categories. It includes such things as farmers who own and work on their their own farms, family members of the owners who work on the farm, and those that lease farms or fields, as well as seasonal white agricultural workers. It does not include working with livestock. So no ranches, chicken farms, or dairy farms. I have so far not found any numbers which identify only white seasonal agricultural workers. So for comparing to illegals in seasonal agriculture; it is close to meaningless.

Reply
Sep 8, 2018 14:41:11   #
Fit2BTied Loc: Texas
 
Bad Bob wrote:
Sounds to me like your Reflublican govment should do something about it.
They're working on it Bad Bob. If it hadn't been "nothing to see here" for all those years we wouldn't still have so much to do.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/06/05/ice-raids-ohio-lawn-and-garden-business-arrests-114.html
https://video.foxnews.com/v/5828333264001/
https://www.wkbn.com/news/local-news/ice-releases-video-of-raid-at-salem-business/1250493729
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/02/02/ice-raid-hits-77-businesses-in-northern-california.html
http://time.com/5361860/ice-nebraska-minnesota-raids/
https://theintercept.com/2018/04/10/ice-raids-tennessee-meatpacking-plant/
Many more can be easily found...of course many of your cohorts are doing all they can to thwart ICE. The sarcasm in your statement is obvious. But you did admit to the problem, so that's something.

Reply
Sep 8, 2018 14:44:28   #
JoyV
 
PeterS wrote:
New Mexico ranks 49th in terms of poverty for the 51 states. SNAPs they are third highest in the nation. Medicaid/Medicare they rank 51

https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/personalfinance/2015/01/17/cheat-sheet-states-with-most-food-stamps/21877399/
https://www.fns.usda.gov/ops/snap-community-characteristics-new-mexico
https://talkpoverty.org/state-year-report/new-mexico-2017-report/

I'm not going to bother with Arizona since you so badly flunked New Mexico...


NM is a blue state. AZ is a red state.

There can be problems in ranking poverty by state.
1) Does the ranking include illegals?
2) Do a lot of people live rurally and live off of farm or ranch work? This lifestyle will not show a large income especially if they own and work the farm or ranch. Yet they would not be considered to be living in poverty by themselves or their community. When you have large urban populations along with low median income; then their is a real reflection of how much poverty there is.

Reply
 
 
Sep 8, 2018 14:45:00   #
JoyV
 
old marine wrote:
I am curious about this 51th State you are talking about.

🤔


That is probably DC.

Reply
Sep 8, 2018 14:45:58   #
JoyV
 
old marine wrote:
The DITRICT OF COLUMBIA is not considered state but a district.


Yes it is a district. But for purposes of statistical rankings, it is treated the same as a state.

Reply
Sep 8, 2018 14:52:42   #
JoyV
 
kemmer wrote:
Umm.... Aren't you forgetting California, the LARGEST producer?


California USE to be the largest producer. Now-a-days they have been surpassed by AZ and NM. Yet they have far more illegals who settle in the state even.

Reply
Sep 8, 2018 14:57:41   #
JoyV
 
CDM wrote:
This report is from 1980. It includes all agriculture employment such as owners, managers, supervisors, etc. So it follows that the majority of participants is white. This report does say that immigrant workers numbered around 400,000 in the 60's and declined to 200,000 in the 70's.

Here is a more current report from 2016 with data collected under government contract.

http://www.ncfh.org/uploads/3/8/6/8/38685499/naws_ncfh_factsheet_demographics_final_revised.pdf

Something obviously changed in almost 40 years.

I found it interesting too that technically, we don't treat these people any better than their own country; they are all held well below the poverty line, citizen or not.

Makes one appreciate those cheap sweet potato's that much more, eh?
This report is from 1980. It includes all agricul... (show quote)


I saw that report. While is covers a lot of demographic info in concise easy to understand outline, it gives no numbers on white agriculture workers.

Reply
 
 
Sep 8, 2018 15:16:54   #
PeterS
 
PeterS wrote:
District of Columbia...

So shoot me...

Reply
Sep 8, 2018 15:23:08   #
padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al
 
PeterS wrote:
So shoot me...


Heavens no! No quick end for you Pete, you've got to be made to suffer.

Reply
Sep 8, 2018 16:53:20   #
CDM Loc: Florida
 
JoyV wrote:
I saw that report. While is covers a lot of demographic info in concise easy to understand outline, it gives no numbers on white agriculture workers.


Try this one; https://www.doleta.gov/agworker/report9/chapter1.cfm.

I think it's pretty telling when 80% of the workers come from someplace other than the U.S. and 75% of them claim to be Mexican ... Notice that in this report when asked about race half the sample didn't answer and 40 odd percent said white. That doesn't work because Latino's are white by the standard used. Well, you don't need a degree to figure this one out. It becomes very apparent very quickly that there are no white field workers to speak of today.

Actually, we should be focused on native-born American workers of any race, not necessarily white. All reports come up short on that group as well.

Here's another spin on the whole issue from the NY Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/07/us/suit-cites-race-bias-in-farms-use-of-immigrants.html. A little dated but still works today.

Reply
Sep 8, 2018 17:11:51   #
CDM Loc: Florida
 
Bad Bob wrote:
Sounds to me like your Reflublican govment should do something about it.


Hey Bad; I am NOT a Republican. A Republican is someone who dives under their desk when a Democrat enters the room. John Boehner and Paul Ryan are Republicans

And you don't understand what I said. Clearly, both sides of the magical aisle want this situation to exist - BUT, I reiterate, BUT - for very different reasons. The issues of law, crime, and punishment in this travesty unquestionably belong to the entire government who allowed it to happen and who permit it to continue.

Reply
 
 
Sep 8, 2018 17:12:01   #
SilentGeneration Loc: Michigan
 
Fit2BTied wrote:
The whole "they're just doing jobs Americans don't want to do" is like many lefty subterfuges (undocumented workers, unindicted co-conspirator, etc.). The insidious part is that it plays into the hands of unscrupulous employers who aren't inclined to provide jobs that pay what they should in a proper work environment. That's how they get support from the business community.


Why aren't Americans applying for these jobs? Maybe because the low wages don't support a family. Why aren't teenagers applying for these jobs? Low wages aren't as big a problem unless they have a family.
Perhaps we need to direct our attention to the employers. Better yet, we could help small farmers be more profitable. We could also do a better job of teaching the public about the real (unsubsidized) cost of producing the food we take for granted.

Reply
Sep 8, 2018 17:21:12   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
CDM wrote:
Hey Bad; I am NOT a Republican. A Republican is someone who dives under their desk when a Democrat enters the room. John Boehner and Paul Ryan are Republicans

And you don't understand what I said. Clearly, both sides of the magical aisle want this situation to exist - BUT, I reiterate, BUT - for very different reasons. The issues of law, crime, and punishment in this travesty unquestionably belong to the entire government who allowed it to happen and who permit it to continue.
Hey Bad; I am NOT a Republican. A Republican is ... (show quote)


OK, "our" Reflublican govment

Reply
Sep 8, 2018 17:32:58   #
CDM Loc: Florida
 
SilentGeneration wrote:
Why aren't Americans applying for these jobs? Maybe because the low wages don't support a family. Why aren't teenagers applying for these jobs? Low wages aren't as big a problem unless they have a family.
Perhaps we need to direct our attention to the employers. Better yet, we could help small farmers be more profitable. We could also do a better job of teaching the public about the real (unsubsidized) cost of producing the food we take for granted.


From the American perspective what you say is very true. That notwithstanding though, the low wages in this 'industry' do support many Mexican families. For them, the key is 'family'... It is not uncommon to see them pool their resources so to speak and work as a unit contributing the income to a pot. So while the individual might work below the poverty line, the combined income is not too bad. Americans gave up on this concept eons ago.

This argument becomes problematical when one considers the holy hell the Leftists raised over low wages in the fast food industry not being sufficient to support a family ... Obviously, somebody thought McDonald's is a career on which to base a family. So why not picking fruit? Why I ask only rhetorically, are we not clamoring for $15/hour field wages?

It is unclear to me how farm subsidies, the government fly so to speak, will ever make small farms more profitable but that aside you are right; there is no question that someday probably sooner than later the fictitiously low prices we see at the old Super are going to rise up an bite us.

Reply
Sep 8, 2018 18:54:16   #
Nickolai
 
mwdegutis wrote:
Hey Pete, I live in the middle of corn and soybean country and I seem to remember kids working on farms in the summer helping with the crops. And if that guy is paying $100 a day that would make a nice little chunk of money for an illustrious kid. Oh wait, I forgot that your leftie ways in today's schools have turned most kids into lazy, video game playing, participation trophy, wanting everything given to them on a silver platter, sniveling, and complaining leeches.





It's not the schools its the culture. When Americans look for a job the first thing they want to know is how much they will get paid and the next is how much time they will get off. When an Latino is looking for work they want to know how much work you have for them.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 7 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.