One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Anyone watching hearing?
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Sep 4, 2018 09:46:54   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Not much longer. Liberals of course shouting and acting stupid in the balcony. Senator Booker did his usual song and dance. 300 decisions by Kavenaugh to look at, more than any other nominee. What a dog and pony show. Could Grassley speak any slower?

Reply
Sep 4, 2018 10:00:47   #
vernon
 
JFlorio wrote:
Not much longer. Liberals of course shouting and acting stupid in the balcony. Senator Booker did his usual song and dance. 300 decisions by Kavenaugh to look at, more than any other nominee. What a dog and pony show. Could Grassley speak any slower?



I watched the DemoRATS show there stupidity for about min. and turned it off.If i was grassley I would just call a vote and shut that bs down.Maybe The RATS would learn how to behave.This has been going on far too long and should be stopped.

Reply
Sep 4, 2018 10:03:45   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
JFlorio wrote:
Not much longer. Liberals of course shouting and acting stupid in the balcony. Senator Booker did his usual song and dance. 300 decisions by Kavenaugh to look at, more than any other nominee. What a dog and pony show. Could Grassley speak any slower?


What a bunch of fing idiots these scumbags are!!!!!...I hope Chuck Grassley is NOT going to give in to these assholes!!!

Reply
 
 
Sep 4, 2018 10:16:39   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
proud republican wrote:
What a bunch of fing idiots these scumbags are!!!!!...I hope Chuck Grassley is NOT going to give in to these assholes!!!
I think we're safe.

Grassley knows the Democrats have to feign outrage to pacify the haters that are running their party.

Nobody thinks there is a justifiable bitch about future SCOTUS Assoc. Justice Kavanaugh.

Reply
Sep 4, 2018 10:18:41   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
Super Dave wrote:
I think we're safe.

Grassley knows the Democrats have to feign outrage to pacify the haters that are running their party.

Nobody thinks there is a justifiable bitch about future SCOTUS Assoc. Justice Kavanaugh.


I feel bad for his family to listen to these scumbags....These Rats just signes their death sentence when it comes to midterms!!!!Great job,Rats!!!....Keep on obstructing!!!

Reply
Sep 4, 2018 10:19:55   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
proud republican wrote:
I feel bad for his family to listen to these scunbags....


If the Democrats gain control these very shouting idiots will run the country.

Reply
Sep 4, 2018 10:21:40   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
proud republican wrote:
I feel bad for his family to listen to these scunbags....

Fascism works by terrorizing innocent people to stop future prospective nominees from taking the job.

Reply
 
 
Sep 4, 2018 10:23:13   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
JFlorio wrote:
If the Democrats gain control these very shouting idiots will run the country.


After this fiasco, i dont think they stand a chance.....Republicans will come in droves this midterms!!!

Reply
Sep 4, 2018 10:30:00   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
proud republican wrote:
After this fiasco, i dont think they stand a chance.....Republicans will come in droves this midterms!!!

I hope so.

But their objective is to inspire their base by vomiting hate down their throats. So far it seems to be working.

Reply
Sep 4, 2018 10:32:25   #
slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
 
Super Dave wrote:
I think we're safe.

Grassley knows the Democrats have to feign outrage to pacify the haters that are running their party.

Nobody thinks there is a justifiable bitch about future SCOTUS Assoc. Justice Kavanaugh.

There was no justifiable reason for not having given Merrick Garland a hearing after his nomination, either. One could argue the upcoming election is just as vital to making such a SCOTUS decision as it was in 2016. The treatment that both Garland received and Kavanaugh is receiving after their nominations were/are based on pure partisanship. Such politicization of SCOTUS nominee's and/or appointments will only end when one side or the other (God forbid both doing so ) quits playing partisan games.

Reply
Sep 4, 2018 10:33:09   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
Super Dave wrote:
I hope so.

But their objective is to inspire their base by vomiting hate down their throats. So far it seems to be working.


I dont think its working....Because we will still have cofirmations....

Reply
 
 
Sep 4, 2018 10:36:24   #
karpenter Loc: Headin' Fer Da Hills !!
 
JFlorio wrote:
Not much longer. Liberals of course shouting and acting stupid in the balcony. Senator Booker did his usual song and dance. 300 decisions by Kavenaugh to look at, more than any other nominee. What a dog and pony show. Could Grassley speak any slower?
And These Sen.s Try To Filibuster As Soon As Their Mouths Open

Reply
Sep 4, 2018 10:43:55   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
slatten49 wrote:
There was no justifiable reason for not having given Merrick Garland a hearing after his nomination, either. One could argue the upcoming election is just as vital to making such a SCOTUS decision as it was in 2016. The treatment that both Garland received and Kavanaugh is receiving after their nominations were/are based on pure partisanship. Such politicization of SCOTUS nominee's and/or appointments will only end when one side or the other (God forbid both doing so ) quits playing partisan games.
There was no justifiable reason for not having giv... (show quote)
I agree that Garland should have been voted down instead of being ignored down.

Garland wasn't bad for a lib, but should be held to a higher standard.

Kagan was bad, Sotomayor is a buffoon.

Partisanship is on both sides, but Republicans are JV compared to libs.

Estrada was in limbo over 2 years without a hearing. A document surfaced showing Sen. Lehey was ordered by a contributor to kill the nomination because Estrada was Hispanic.

Reply
Sep 4, 2018 10:45:42   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Two completely different situations.
https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/it-doesnt-matter-garland-didnt-get-hearing/

slatten49 wrote:
There was no justifiable reason for not having given Merrick Garland a hearing after his nomination, either. One could argue the upcoming election is just as vital to making such a SCOTUS decision as it was in 2016. The treatment that both Garland received and Kavanaugh is receiving after their nominations were/are based on pure partisanship. Such politicization of SCOTUS nominee's and/or appointments will only end when one side or the other (God forbid both doing so ) quits playing partisan games.
There was no justifiable reason for not having giv... (show quote)

Reply
Sep 4, 2018 10:55:58   #
padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al
 
slatten49 wrote:
There was no justifiable reason for not having given Merrick Garland a hearing after his nomination, either. One could argue the upcoming election is just as vital to making such a SCOTUS decision as it was in 2016. The treatment that both Garland received and Kavanaugh is receiving after their nominations were/are based on pure partisanship. Such politicization of SCOTUS nominee's and/or appointments will only end when one side or the other (God forbid both doing so ) quits playing partisan games.
There was no justifiable reason for not having giv... (show quote)


Don't you think that the feigned outrage surfaced only after Hillary's surprised loss? Democrats were confident they would ultimately choose the next Justice and it would have been Hillary's choice. Their behavior today is nothing less than a continuation of their disgusting "resist" movement.

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.