woodguru

That sounds like QAnon quips, interpret it however you want

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

voter id laws can seem so logical.. but then the law makes the driver lic, or any easy to obtain id, unusable for the purpose of getting the voter id card.. that is limiting access to the right to vote.

they also minimize the access to voting locations.. the net result is 1000s of specific people unable to vote..

gerrymandering was made an effective science the the "redmap" process used by the Republicans in 2010.. very effective in controlling state level and representation levels..

Pure republican doing... sleazy in the extreme..

a cost in involved getting those IDs.. in money.. few wetbacks can pay for those things..

Loki Loc: Georgia

Concerning birthright citizenship, I have posted the following link numerous times. It contains the actual statements made by the actual Congressmen who wrote the damn amendment. Maybe someday a Liberal will read it.



http://www.libertylawsite.org/2015/08/21/what-did-the-14th-amendment-congress-think-about-birthright-citizenship/

Loki Loc: Georgia

If few wetbacks can pay for those things, why do at least 1.3 million, according to the IRS and Social Security Administration, have them? The actual number is certainly much higher as neither of these alphabet agencies pursue these criminals very aggressively.

PJT

Hundreds of illegal votes? Try many thousands many many.
And NO you don't have to show a birth certificate to register to vote. Not in Calif. Or Indiana.
Why are leftist. democrats so afraid of voters showing I.d.s.? Why do leftist Democats like sanctuary cities counties and states. Visit your paradise and enjoy the stench and filth. Revere the universities where you lefties see freedom of speeches suppressed and trashed.
Maybe its ok to hate Pres. Trump with total self-righteous abandon. Perhaps your parents and grandparents taught you hate. If you have to hate--hate the haters. And tell them so!

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birthright_citizenship_in_the_United_States

Birthright citizenship in the United States is acquired by virtue of the circumstances of birth. It contrasts with citizenship acquired in other ways, for example by naturalization. Birthright citizenship may be conferred by jus soli or jus sanguinis. Under United States law, U.S. citizenship is automatically granted to any person born within and subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. This includes the territories of Puerto Rico, the Marianas (Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands), and the U.S. Virgin Islands, and also applies to children born elsewhere in the world to U.S. citizens (with certain exceptions).[1][2]

The aspect of birthright citizenship conferred by jus soli (Latin: right of the soil) is regarded as controversial by some U.S. political figures, particularly those associated with right-wing populism, due to its application to the native-born offspring of illegal immigrants.[3] The policy stems from the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The 1868 text states, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."[4]

The Pew Hispanic Center estimates that approximately 7.5% of all births in the U.S. (about 300,000 births per year) are to illegal immigrants.[5] The Pew Hispanic Center also estimates that there are 4.5 million children who were born to illegal immigrants that received citizenship via birth in the United States; while the Migration Policy Institute estimates that there are 4.1 million children. Both estimates exclude anyone eighteen and older who might have benefited.[5]

Current U.S. law
Citizenship in the United States is a matter of federal law, governed by the United States Constitution.

Since the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution on July 9, 1868, the citizenship of persons born in the United States has been controlled by its Citizenship Clause, which states: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."[6]

Statute, by birth within U.S.
United States Federal law (8 U.S.C. § 1401) defines who is a United States citizen from birth. The following are among those listed there as persons who shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:

"a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof" or
"a person born in the United States to a member of an Indian, Eskimo, Aleutian, or other aboriginal tribe" (see Indian Citizenship Act of 1924).
"a person of unknown parentage found in the United States while under the age of five years, until shown, prior to his attaining the age of twenty-one years, not to have been born in the United States"
"a person born in an outlying possession of the United States of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year at any time prior to the birth of such person"

Legal history
Throughout the history of the United States, the fundamental legal principle governing citizenship has been that birth within the United States grants U.S. citizenship; although enslaved persons and children of enslaved mothers, under the principle of partus sequitur ventrem, were excluded.[24] The United States did not grant citizenship after the American Civil War to all former slaves until the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which was subsequently confirmed by the Fourteenth Amendment. American Indian tribal members are not covered specifically by the constitutional guarantee. Those living in tribes on reservations were generally not considered citizens until passage of the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924, although by that time nearly two-thirds of American Indians were already citizens.

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

We are not afraid of ID laws..

We are however opposed to the ID laws which are written in such a way that they exclude some segment of the population from voting..

Historically, that has been the majority of these voter ID laws...

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

Sanctuary cities exist because the federal government, the orange part, want local police to do the job of immigration..

Local forces do not have the funding or personnel to do so.. If it is an immigration issue, let immigration handle it..

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

YES, But I remind them they voted for a lying POS adulterer con man.

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

I do not hate trump, he is not that important in my life..

I do detest the useless piece of orange s***...

He is doing more damage to America then we have seen since Reagan ran around with his henchmen..

You babble the usual right wing stupidity.. do you ever read anything other the Brietbart or listen to anyone but Jones?

get a clue to what is going on before your eyes..

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

Radiance3

================
Lying dems and libs always try to deny and lie to cover up their fraud.
What you just presented is the CNN Google reports fabricated lies in order to cover the crimes of the democrat voting results.

Democrat voter fraud was massive in 2016. Hillary Clinton received more than 3 million voter fraud in 2016. This Nov. 2018, election, voting must be heavily guarded because democrats have so many schemes to commit FRAUD again. Fraud is the expertise of the democrat party. They are dishonest, liars, crooked and fraudulent.

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

You live in an orange colored world don`t you...