Lesbian denied a haircut by male Muslim barbers (Page 10): When you brought this up earlier, I had a problem with it. I'm consistent. You are trying to pick and choose.

skott Loc: Bama

bdamage wrote:

Then why doesn't anyone do anything about this guy... (show quote)

When you brought this up earlier, I had a problem with it. I'm consistent. You are trying to pick and choose.

Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

I will send you a PM on the story. Yes, there are differences in Jew, I am from what you say orthodox. We have our services in the morning. Although this is not an orthodox, it will help you in seeing and understanding some of what you can expect to see. This video is more of the middle of the road. http://www.interfaithfamily.com/spirituality/synagogue/What_To_Expect_At_A_Synagogue_-_Video.shtml

bahmer wrote:

Again being ignorant I have heard that there are v... (show quote)

bahmer

ginnyt wrote:

I will send you a PM on the story. Yes, there are differences in Jew, I am from what you say orthodox. We have our services in the morning. Although this is not an orthodox, it will help you in seeing and understanding some of what you can expect to see. This video is more of the middle of the road. http://www.interfaithfamily.com/spirituality/synagogue/What_To_Expect_At_A_Synagogue_-_Video.shtml

Thank you very much ginnyt this was both informative as well as enlightening. I presume that all males have to wear the headpiece on there head. I will look forward to the other. I am patiently waiting for the weather to warm here as we just had snow last Saturday night and some last night with more expected tonight. I will be so happy when winter finally leaves and spring returns. Oh wait according to the liberals we are in global warming what could be wrong with me to think that below zero is cold and not warm.

skott Loc: Bama

bahmer wrote:

Thank you very much ginnyt this was both informati... (show quote)

Yeah Liberals and about 95% of all scientists worldwide. I know that you understand science when you think no global warming because you had snow.

Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

You are entirely welcome. Keep in mind that this was not an orthodox, but middle of the road. Most things are the same, but there are some differences. Go, you will be glad you did. Yes, all men cover their heads.

Global warming, do you not know that term is not PC anymore? It is now "climate change" as though that has not been happening on earth for the past few million years! Bundle up, stay warm.

bahmer wrote:

Thank you very much ginnyt this was both informati... (show quote)

bahmer

ginnyt wrote:

You are entirely welcome. Keep in mind that this was not an orthodox, but middle of the road. Most things are the same, but there are some differences. Go, you will be glad you did. Yes, all men cover their heads.

Global warming, do you not know that term is not PC anymore? It is now "climate change" as though that has not been happening on earth for the past few million years! Bundle up, stay warm.

Thank you and I am waiting to see the answer to the story you have intrigued me with it.

Constitutional libertarian Loc: St Croix National Scenic River Way

LAPhil wrote:

ginny, the types of discrimination mentioned here appear to pertain only to the Canadian federal government. I don't see any restrictions on private businesses in this quote. So I guess, yes, we are back to square one.

Well maybe this is the answer to such a truly interesting question. That our gov be that local state or fed should be held to a standard that does not discrimate based on race religion or gender. But as individuals you have the right to practice your believes as you see fit.

LAPhil Loc: Los Angeles, CA

Constitutional libertarian wrote:

Well maybe this is the answer to such a truly interesting question. That our gov be that local state or fed should be held to a standard that does not discrimate based on race religion or gender. But as individuals you have the right to practice your believes as you see fit.

Exactly, and that's the argument that's usually made in cases like this to distinguish between the responsibility of a government entity and a private business. An entity which is paid by the taxpayers has a responsibility to forgo personal feelings and serve everyone because it's public, whereas a private business owner should have no such obligation in my opinion.

skott Loc: Bama

LAPhil wrote:

Exactly, and that's the argument that's usually made in cases like this to distinguish between the responsibility of a government entity and a private business. An entity which is paid by the taxpayers has a responsibility to forgo personal feelings and serve everyone because it's public, whereas a private business owner should have no such obligation in my opinion.

I live in Alabama, we tried not serving blacks, but it was disallowed to discriminate by law.

LAPhil Loc: Los Angeles, CA

skott wrote:

I live in Alabama, we tried not serving blacks, but it was disallowed to discriminate by law.

Yes, that's the exception to the rule. Racial discrimination is prohibited even in a private business under the federal civil rights law.

skott Loc: Bama

LAPhil wrote:

Yes, that's the exception to the rule. Racial discrimination is prohibited even in a private business under the federal civil rights law.

I see a pattern here. I know most of you think its different, but its not.
Let's find a way to treat people differently. I'm sure that people in the south were offended because they had do deal with blacks, so much so that they found biblical reasons to discriminate. It was wrong then and its still wrong now.

LAPhil Loc: Los Angeles, CA

skott wrote:

I see a pattern here. I know most of you think its different, but its not.
Let's find a way to treat people differently. I'm sure that people in the south were offended because they had do deal with blacks, so much so that they found biblical reasons to discriminate. It was wrong then and its still wrong now.

Here's a case of what you might call reverse discrimination:
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/christinerousselle/2014/03/04/new-mexico-gov-denied-haircut-due-to-gay-marriage-stance-n1803989?utm_source=thdailypm&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl_pm

skott Loc: Bama

LAPhil wrote:

Here's a case of what you might call reverse discrimination:
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/christinerousselle/2014/03/04/new-mexico-gov-denied-haircut-due-to-gay-marriage-stance-n1803989?utm_source=thdailypm&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl_pm

Its not reverse discrimination, its straight forward discrimination. I'm, against that, too, as I've said three times already. One discrimination doesn't make it ok to do it again.

LAPhil Loc: Los Angeles, CA

skott wrote:

Its not reverse discrimination, its straight forward discrimination. I'm, against that, too, as I've said three times already. One discrimination doesn't make it ok to do it again.

I know, and I applaud for you being consistent.

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

I have been wondering if any people here have seen the signs on food suppliers' doors in Kansas. The message is "No shirt, No Shoes, No Service. That has always seemed a bit discriminatory to me since many young people just don't wear those articles of clothing during the summer months. State law says that is ok since it has to do with germs in the business place.