FOX news is a joke for many, but I think that is a mistake..

It is rather, a serous problem.. to have the legitimate media blocked for face to face with the president, while one greatly biased has exclusive access and also advise this
orange sack...... Is as the man says, scandalous..

so, in the words of another outrage person...

Let the man speak...

from quora....



How is the liberal press rewarded for their anti-Trump biased reporting?
Guy Campbell
Guy Campbell
Updated 1h ago
Well, Anonymous, I feel I should point out that all studies prove that CNN is the most accurate and truthful cable news source and Fox News is the least honest and accurate by some distance.

So how are Fox News rewarded for their Pro-Trump biased reporting?

All interviews with the President are on Fox News. This is not just unusual, not even just unprecedented, it is scandalous.

Fox News employees don’t just have dinner with the President and play golf with the President, they advise him and in some cases, get hired to work for him.

Sean Hannity held an interview with Trump lawyer Michael Cohen about how terrible the raid on his offices were, how innocent he was and how he never went to Prague to meet with Russians in 2016.

Days later it was revealed the Sean Hannity was Cohen’s mystery third client.

The problem isn’t so much that Fox News is Pro-Trump. It’s that Fox News is actively involved in covering up Trump’s screw-ups and crimes and lying about his accomplishments. And they profit from their support by getting POTUS interviews and government paid jobs.

Fox News are not just biased and dishonest, they are complicit and corrupt.

I will answer that for you. Because compared to Democrats. We are all about righteousness and we hold Truth, Honesty & Integrity as our prime values. Well we realize all human beings are flawed, we want somebody who will uphold our traditional Christian values, not immerse us in Marxism the early stages of which is designed to tear down the very moral fabric that is the foundation of a nation, so as to create a Marxist revolution.

You are really quite full of crap about right-wing politicians being on the way to present, (haven't you noticed that that investigation was began on criminally inspired documents and has been of total failure unless you consider small indiscretions the better part of 10 years ago by people that were on the Trump team for a very short time a big success) Mark My Words: it's your subversive corruption traitorous globalist lefties that will be from March job to prison. It has begun, but is still moving slowly because 1st Trump had to be given time to consolidate his power.

quora

Liberals accuse Fox News of very poor journalistic integrity. Is this warranted or just politically motivated?

In the UK, we have a thing called OfCom - the Office of Communications. You can think of it as our version of the FCC; it’s a bit more complicated than that, but that’s the basic idea.
Fox News shows hosted by both Sean Hannity and Tucker Carlson have been censured by OfCom - in official findings - for failing to meet basic standards of journalistic impartiality: they were found to have:
allowed insufficient airtime for differing opinions,
packed contributor lists to ensure support for the Republican party line,
openly mocked and belittled people holding opinions contrary to the Republican party line, and
failed to represent accurately the actions and positions of those they criticised.
It’s particularly telling that OfCom acknowledged that Fox News viewers would expect the channel to present matters from a Republican perspective - but deemed it to have failed even by that partisan standard of journalistic integrity.
This may well be why so few people in the UK chose to get their US news from Fox; those low viewing figures were the avowed reason for the channel’s being pulled from UK broadcast. It is also widely believed, however, that this level of overt bias made Fox News an embarrassment to owners trying to secure UK government approval for a major takeover bid.

“Fair and balanced”? Wonder why they dropped that?

quora

Liberals accuse Fox News of very poor journalistic integrity. Is this warranted or just politically motivated?

In the UK, we have a thing called OfCom - the Office of Communications. You can think of it as our version of the FCC; it’s a bit more complicated than that, but that’s the basic idea.
Fox News shows hos ted by both Sean Hannity and Tucker Carlson have been censured by OfCom - in official findings - for failing to meet basic standards of journalistic impartiality: they were found to have:
allowed insufficient airtime for differing opinions,
packed contributor lists to ensure support for the Republican party line,
openly mocked and belittled people holding opinions contrary to the Republican party line, and
failed to represent accurately the actions and positions of those they criticised.
It’s particularly telling that OfCom acknowledged that Fox News viewers would expect the channel to present matters from a Republican perspective - but deemed it to have failed even by that partisan standard of journalistic integrity.
This may well be why so few people in the UK chose to get their US news from Fox; those low viewing figures were the avowed reason for the channel’s being pulled from UK broadcast. It is also widely believed, however, that this level of overt bias made Fox News an embarrassment to owners trying to secure UK government approval for a major takeover bid.

“Fair and balanced”? Wonder why they dropped that?

These lefties are beyond a doubt, absolutely crazy. The English lefties, not only hate Trump but they hate Winston Churchill as well in spite of the fact that he warned the English people of what Hitler was gonna do way in advance, and they called him nuts at the time, and then ultimately, he wound up saving England from the Nazis. It just demonstrates the level of defiant opposition disorder and immunity to education these godless nincompoop lefties have, regardless of what country they live in