One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
the US constitution
Page <<first <prev 4 of 5 next>
Feb 27, 2014 04:21:26   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
rhomin57 wrote:
Yeah they do. This last Presidential voting process was all wrong. the black and Mexicans voted in Obama, and the Mormons voted Romney as the presidential challenger. Most of the Christian and non religious Caucasian voters took a break and didn't vote at all.
Even if you don't like the Candidates, everyone needs to vote and try to vote for the lesser of the two evils.
'16 will be the Voting Process of History. A big one. The True season of change for America will be in the hands of the Voters on this upcoming one.
Yeah they do. This last Presidential voting proces... (show quote)


Keep rewarding the Republicans for running Establishment candidates and all you'll get is an Establishment president. Who cares if he/she is Republican or Democrat? They're all taking us in the same direction.

Reply
Feb 27, 2014 07:07:40   #
Al Barrs Loc: Northwest Florida U.S.A.
 
Yes I agree and I have been suggesting changes to who can legally vote in the U.S.A. and how to verify who can vote for many years. People just don't realize that our "fair" election process is the only thing that prevents, or stands in the way of, open and armed revolution when a government goes bad...from the fair election process of the Constitution to the 2nd Amendment of the Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence. A life prison term or death penalty might in the long run save thousands if not millions of American lives if real deadly civil war breaks out in the U.S.A. The fairness of our U.S. election process is key to preventing open warfare of we, the people, against an oppressive, tyrannical and over taxing government...

Reply
Feb 27, 2014 07:11:57   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
Al Barrs wrote:
Yes I agree and I have been suggesting changes to who can legally vote in the U.S.A. and how to verify who can vote for many years. People just don't realize that our "fair" election process is the only thing that prevents, or stands in the way of, open and armed revolution when a government goes bad...from the fair election process of the Constitution to the 2nd Amendment of the Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence. A life prison term or death penalty might in the long run save thousands if not millions of American lives if real deadly civil war breaks out in the U.S.A. The fairness of our U.S. election process is key to preventing open warfare of we, the people, against an oppressive, tyrannical and over taxing government...
Yes I agree and I have been suggesting changes to ... (show quote)


Howdy sir! Please hit the "quote reply" button prior to posting so we know to whom you are speaking.

Reply
Feb 27, 2014 08:14:50   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
Weyner wrote:
Skott, I don't agree with you about guns,now we need them more than ever,guns do make people safer,if some thugs breaks into your home armed and ready to use it what are you going to do? throw something at them? I know what I would do they would not like it.


One of the biggest reasons, other than Constitutional, that I oppose gun control is the fact that it falls under the purview of the BATFE, whose agents routinely commit crimes worse than those they usually prosecute, secure in the knowledge that they will never be convicted of anything other than a minor indiscretion, and under both Clinton and Obama, never even charged with the crime.

Reply
Feb 27, 2014 08:28:26   #
Al Barrs Loc: Northwest Florida U.S.A.
 
banjojack wrote:
One of the biggest reasons, other than Constitutional, that I oppose gun control is the fact that it falls under the purview of the BATFE, whose agents routinely commit crimes worse than those they usually prosecute, secure in the knowledge that they will never be convicted of anything other than a minor indiscretion, and under both Clinton and Obama, never even charged with the crime.


Just remember that the 2nd Amendment regarding American citizen's right to keep and bear arms uninfringed from government meddling or direct intervention was not to protect our right to hunt, target shoot or even self-defense, which were understood God-given rights in the times of our Founders, but to protect we, the people, from another tyrannical government like Great Britain and King George III... See Declaration of Independence...

Reply
Feb 27, 2014 11:00:22   #
vernon
 
Weyner wrote:
Skott, I don't agree with you about guns,now we need them more than ever,guns do make people safer,if some thugs breaks into your home armed and ready to use it what are you going to do? throw something at them? I know what I would do they would not like it.


skott you just tripled the gun deaths.we never had that many but if you see a gang aproaching be sure and tell them something nice.

Reply
Feb 27, 2014 11:56:59   #
Al Barrs Loc: Northwest Florida U.S.A.
 
vernon wrote:
skott you just tripled the gun deaths.we never had that many but if you see a gang approaching be sure and tell them something nice.


I just received this related e-message about anti-gun diehards, except when it comes to their self-defense...

ANTI-GUN SENATOR (D-NC) SHOOTS INTRUDER

...YA GOTTA LOVE IT!

Long time Anti-Gun Advocate State Senator R.C. Soles, 74, DEMOCRAT, shot one of two intruders at his home just outside Tabor City , N.C. about 5 p.m. Sunday, the prosecutor for the politician's home county said.

The intruder, Kyle Blackburn, was taken to a South Carolina hospital, but the injuries were not reported to be life- threatening, according to Rex Gore, district attorney for Columbus, Bladen and Brunswick counties..

The State Bureau of Investigation and Columbus County Sheriff's Department are investigating the shooting, Gore said. Soles, who was not arrested, declined to discuss the incident Sunday evening.

"I am not in a position to talk to you," Soles said by telephone. "I'm right in the middle of an investigation."

The Senator, who has made a career of being against gun ownership for the general public, didn't hesitate to defend himself with his own gun when he believed he was in immediate danger and he was the victim.

In typical hypocritical liberal fashion, the "Do as I say and not as I do" Anti-Gun Activist Lawmaker picked up his gun and took action in what apparently was a self-defense shooting. Why hypocritical you may ask? It is because his long legislative record shows that the actions that he took to protect his family, his own response to a dangerous life threatening situation, are actions that he feels ordinary citizens should not have if they were faced with an identical situation.

It has prompted some to ask if the Senator believes his life and personal safety is more valuable than yours or mine.

But, this is to be expected from those who believe they can run our lives, raise our kids, protect our families better than we can, disarm us and overthrow our Nation...

Reply
Feb 27, 2014 16:33:35   #
Weyner
 
Al Barrs wrote:
I just received this related e-message about anti-gun diehards, except when it comes to their self-defense...

ANTI-GUN SENATOR (D-NC) SHOOTS INTRUDER

...YA GOTTA LOVE IT!

Long time Anti-Gun Advocate State Senator R.C. Soles, 74, DEMOCRAT, shot one of two intruders at his home just outside Tabor City , N.C. about 5 p.m. Sunday, the prosecutor for the politician's home county said.

The intruder, Kyle Blackburn, was taken to a South Carolina hospital, but the injuries were not reported to be life- threatening, according to Rex Gore, district attorney for Columbus, Bladen and Brunswick counties..

The State Bureau of Investigation and Columbus County Sheriff's Department are investigating the shooting, Gore said. Soles, who was not arrested, declined to discuss the incident Sunday evening.

"I am not in a position to talk to you," Soles said by telephone. "I'm right in the middle of an investigation."

The Senator, who has made a career of being against gun ownership for the general public, didn't hesitate to defend himself with his own gun when he believed he was in immediate danger and he was the victim.

In typical hypocritical liberal fashion, the "Do as I say and not as I do" Anti-Gun Activist Lawmaker picked up his gun and took action in what apparently was a self-defense shooting. Why hypocritical you may ask? It is because his long legislative record shows that the actions that he took to protect his family, his own response to a dangerous life threatening situation, are actions that he feels ordinary citizens should not have if they were faced with an identical situation.

It has prompted some to ask if the Senator believes his life and personal safety is more valuable than yours or mine.

But, this is to be expected from those who believe they can run our lives, raise our kids, protect our families better than we can, disarm us and overthrow our Nation...
I just received this related e-message about anti-... (show quote)

He is what we call a two-faced S.O.B,I'm glad it happened to him!
maybe he will change his mind,Sorry for that last comment!

Reply
Feb 27, 2014 17:54:08   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
Weyner wrote:
He is what we call a two-faced S.O.B,I'm glad it happened to him!
maybe he will change his mind,Sorry for that last comment!


Why are you sorry? I was about to say the same thing.

Reply
Feb 27, 2014 18:04:40   #
Al Barrs Loc: Northwest Florida U.S.A.
 
banjojack wrote:
Why are you sorry? I was about to say the same thing.


Never, ever apologize for the truth!

Reply
Feb 27, 2014 18:10:47   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
Al Barrs wrote:
Never, ever apologize for the truth!


He was released from the hospital before I could find a "stay sick" card to send him.

Reply
Feb 27, 2014 19:32:34   #
Weyner
 
Al Barrs wrote:
Never, ever apologize for the truth!


I never meant to say I was sorry for my comment, I wanted to say I was sorry I said he had a mind.

Reply
Mar 3, 2014 07:50:40   #
Byran
 
Obama has signed more executive orders then the free

Reply
Mar 3, 2014 07:52:23   #
Byran
 
Obama has signed more executive orders then all three predecessors combineD

Reply
Mar 4, 2014 19:20:17   #
Bigmac495 Loc: Indiana
 
Homestead wrote:
The president is the executive branch. That is the branch that has executive powers.

I think your talking about executive orders, where do they come from?

Executive orders are the prerogative of the president, in executing his duties as president.

The congress is the legislative branch of the government, the branch that creates laws, and they don't always include the means for executing a law they've passed. Executing laws is not their jurisdiction.

So the president can issue an executive order that's needed to execute, (enforce,) a law passed by congress.

The problem comes in when the president issues executive orders, not to enforce the laws of the country, but, in fact creates new laws not passed by congress. That's legislating which the president is forbidden to do.

We have this muddy mess, because, the congress has transferred it's legislative powers to the bureaucracies it has created. The transfer of legislative powers to bureaucracies is unconstitutional, but, they've been doing it for decades now.

OSHA is created and given the power to make rules that have the force of law. This is legislating, by people that were not elected for that purpose and the public has no representation or any say in their creation.

This is unconstitutional.
The president is the executive branch. That is th... (show quote)


I agree 100% with you! I posted the exact same thing a while earlier . He has no right to issue E.O's to interoperate the law differently, No right to issue a E.O. to not enforce parts of the law he disagrees with.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 5 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.