One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Some Facts for the Democrats
Page <prev 2 of 2
May 27, 2018 18:00:23   #
roy
 
Morgan wrote:
It's all about blame and it's always the bad Democrats, maybe you should look at who puts protections in place for the people, such as SS. Let me ask you this, where would millions of people be right now without SS, and what would happen to them right now without it? Have you considered that?

The Republicans have had control of Congress before as they have now so where are these changes you want and what changes do you want?

I agree SS should be in a trust account, and not be touched.

People who are self-employed probably have a higher percent due to possibly "not" having funds met by a company employer.

As far as annuities I'm sure it is just a percentage and an immigrant has nothing because of their cheap American employer avoiding paying taxes. The immigrant is not self-employed he works for someone.
It's all about blame and it's always the bad Democ... (show quote)


Which party just changed the cpi so that people will get even less raise.Remember trump promised he would not touch ss.But i guess as trump will say he didnt do it,but it was his tax plan where this was added on.So with inflation sky rocketing,when it comes time for ss raise and you see very little who you going to blame?

Reply
May 27, 2018 18:21:45   #
roy
 
Mike Easterday wrote:
Social Security has become nothing but a Ponzie scam !


Well when people who need it get on ss they dont care if its a ponzie scam or not.Its there for them for now.

Reply
May 27, 2018 18:33:08   #
maryjane
 
Drpete wrote:
I wasn't exaggerating when I said there only one thing I found that was correct and it's just one line of Al Gore being the deciding vote. Everything else I checked, which was a lot, is false or actually the opposite with Republicans being the ones enacting increases or Nixon a republican enacting not Jimmy Carter. Oh yeah, the giving immigrants social security benefits without paying in to it seemed ludicrous and it's, you guessed it, "false"... I feel that both sides want to make the other look so bad and will spend so much time with hurtful negative endeavors instead of positive action. So please understand that I am neither republican or democrat and vote both parties depending on the individual morals and ethics which has been a tough choice the last 30 years... But please, a little due diligence. This information society is great for both fact checking as well as spreading rumors that will go unchecked and as you so shared it with others who will also take it as gospel and do the same and say look at these "facts" that are anything else but...
I wasn't exaggerating when I said there only one t... (show quote)


Are you saying it is NOT true that Congress has, more than once, taken money from the SS fund , used it for other purposes, and never replaced it?? Is my statement true or not??

Reply
 
 
May 27, 2018 22:45:09   #
debeda
 
Morgan wrote:
Not sure where you got that info from but it's incorrect, I know I've received a statement from the SS office of my earnings record to date.

This from the SS office:

Then Social Security calculates your average indexed monthly earnings during the 35 years in which you earned the most. We apply a formula to these earnings and arrive at your basic benefit, or “primary insurance amount.” ... You choose to get benefits before your full retirement age.

http://www.ssa.gov/pubs/EN-05-10070.pdf
Not sure where you got that info from but it's inc... (show quote)


Yes I actually found out it's been changed to 35 years today at my brother's birthday party. 35 years is new ( within the last 5 years) used to be 10.

Reply
May 27, 2018 22:47:24   #
debeda
 
Drpete wrote:
I wasn't exaggerating when I said there only one thing I found that was correct and it's just one line of Al Gore being the deciding vote. Everything else I checked, which was a lot, is false or actually the opposite with Republicans being the ones enacting increases or Nixon a republican enacting not Jimmy Carter. Oh yeah, the giving immigrants social security benefits without paying in to it seemed ludicrous and it's, you guessed it, "false"... I feel that both sides want to make the other look so bad and will spend so much time with hurtful negative endeavors instead of positive action. So please understand that I am neither republican or democrat and vote both parties depending on the individual morals and ethics which has been a tough choice the last 30 years... But please, a little due diligence. This information society is great for both fact checking as well as spreading rumors that will go unchecked and as you so shared it with others who will also take it as gospel and do the same and say look at these "facts" that are anything else but...
I wasn't exaggerating when I said there only one t... (show quote)


Immigrants actually do get social security money in a round about way because they get welfare. Which is paid by the social security fund

Reply
May 28, 2018 00:09:56   #
itsmyjob
 
I just hate everyone equally it's easier that way. I'm not Republican or democrat I'll remain independent.

Reply
May 28, 2018 09:48:14   #
Drpete
 
That's so true they, both parties, have borrowed, taken, never paid back, re apportioned, invested, reduced, SS.
not to mention the obvious national debt.. etc.etc. ...
I'm not saying it's an easy fix but with all these investigations, Everytime I turn around, something or someone is being investigated. To the tune of millions. Some or dare I say most come up with something minor or nothing at all. Hence the voter fraud commission. Anyone remember that? Absolutely minor things with no huge 3-5 million illegal votes that we're or should have been relatively easy to find if true. It was disbanded, with for some reason, nothing to report. Millions wasted. 7-14 million wasted on a military parade... Not to mention the golf.. Trump criticised Obama for playing golf a total of 38 times in 8 years. It's been just over a year and the average tally for Trump's golf outings is in the mid 50s. The reason for the ambiguity is that on more than one occasion he was spotted golfing (with pictures), even though the official daily schedule didn't mention it.. costing millions to tax payers..each outing.. travel and security alone. The swamp has been spending tax payers money like water. Pruitt's travel and security??.. 11 separate investigations there. Carson's office table custom made for $35,000. I could spend all day (punn intended). Unfortunately. Please add you're own government spending waste to this thread. And both parties are responsible so please don't make it one sided as mine seems to be. I was just mentioning the most recent abuses. Oh and even when they find out something. Does anything really happen. When you look into it you will see what I mean. Please fact check... thanks

Reply
 
 
May 28, 2018 09:59:27   #
debeda
 
Drpete wrote:
That's so true they, both parties, have borrowed, taken, never paid back, re apportioned, invested, reduced, SS.
not to mention the obvious national debt.. etc.etc. ...
I'm not saying it's an easy fix but with all these investigations, Everytime I turn around, something or someone is being investigated. To the tune of millions. Some or dare I say most come up with something minor or nothing at all. Hence the voter fraud commission. Anyone remember that? Absolutely minor things with no huge 3-5 million illegal votes that we're or should have been relatively easy to find if true. It was disbanded, with for some reason, nothing to report. Millions wasted. 7-14 million wasted on a military parade... Not to mention the golf.. Trump criticised Obama for playing golf a total of 38 times in 8 years. It's been just over a year and the average tally for Trump's golf outings is in the mid 50s. The reason for the ambiguity is that on more than one occasion he was spotted golfing (with pictures), even though the official daily schedule didn't mention it.. costing millions to tax payers..each outing.. travel and security alone. The swamp has been spending tax payers money like water. Pruitt's travel and security??.. 11 separate investigations there. Carson's office table custom made for $35,000. I could spend all day (punn intended). Unfortunately. Please add you're own government spending waste to this thread. And both parties are responsible so please don't make it one sided as mine seems to be. I was just mentioning the most recent abuses. Oh and even when they find out something. Does anything really happen. When you look into it you will see what I mean. Please fact check... thanks
That's so true they, both parties, have borrowed, ... (show quote)


Very true. One fake news, sorta, is Carson's expensive table. Yes, it was ordered, but NOT by Dr Carson, and it was also returned. Another current abuse is the Obama family jet setting all over (still) on our dime. Most expresidents lay low for awhile in their own homes. No this one, or his family. Sorry, they lost me fiscally when Michelle went to Spain with her retinue for her birthday at a cost of millions to the taxpayers when we were in a deep recession.....and then let's talk about government pensions for Congress and others. Wrong, lavish and unsustainable!!

Reply
May 28, 2018 11:42:27   #
Morgan
 
roy wrote:
Which party just changed the cpi so that people will get even less raise.Remember trump promised he would not touch ss.But i guess as trump will say he didnt do it,but it was his tax plan where this was added on.So with inflation sky rocketing,when it comes time for ss raise and you see very little who you going to blame?



Considering the Republicans have complete control, I would have to say they are to blame. Trump said he wanted full transparency as things are, he's going to get it. Trump's "word" means nothing to me, why should it, the only thing he has proven is what a liar he is.

Reply
May 28, 2018 15:08:53   #
Morgan
 
debeda wrote:
Immigrants actually do get social security money in a round about way because they get welfare. Which is paid by the social security fund


Where did you get that from? SS is a separate fund from general federal spending.

Reply
May 28, 2018 17:30:58   #
debeda
 
Morgan wrote:
Where did you get that from? SS is a separate fund from general federal spending.


You're sadly mistaken Morgan. Look it up. I bet you'll be as incensed as I was a few years back when I found this out.

Reply
 
 
May 28, 2018 19:13:33   #
Morgan
 
debeda wrote:
You're sadly mistaken Morgan. Look it up. I bet you'll be as incensed as I was a few years back when I found this out.


Well that's what I did and found this by SS office

Debunking Some Internet Myths- Part 2

(See also, MYTHS AND MISINFORMATION ABOUT SOCIAL SECURITY- Part 1)

http://www.ssa.gov/history/InternetMyths2.html

There has never been any change in the way the Social Security program is financed or the way that Social Security payroll taxes are used by the federal government. The Social Security Trust Fund was created in 1939 as part of the Amendments enacted in that year. From its inception, the Trust Fund has always worked the same way. The Social Security Trust Fund has never been "put into the general fund of the government."

Most likely this question comes from a confusion between the financing of the Social Security program and the way the Social Security Trust Fund is treated in federal budget accounting. Starting in 1969 (due to action by the Johnson Administration in 1968) the transactions to the Trust Fund were included in what is known as the "unified budget." This means that every function of the federal government is included in a single budget. This is sometimes described by saying that the Social Security Trust Funds are "on-budget." This budget treatment of the Social Security Trust Fund continued until 1990 when the Trust Funds were again taken "off-budget." This means only that they are shown as a separate account in the federal budget. But whether the Trust Funds are "on-budget" or "off-budget" is primarily a question of accounting practices--it has no effect on the actual operations of the Trust Fund itself.

Reply
May 29, 2018 02:30:00   #
debeda
 
Morgan wrote:
Well that's what I did and found this by SS office

Debunking Some Internet Myths- Part 2

(See also, MYTHS AND MISINFORMATION ABOUT SOCIAL SECURITY- Part 1)

http://www.ssa.gov/history/InternetMyths2.html

There has never been any change in the way the Social Security program is financed or the way that Social Security payroll taxes are used by the federal government. The Social Security Trust Fund was created in 1939 as part of the Amendments enacted in that year. From its inception, the Trust Fund has always worked the same way. The Social Security Trust Fund has never been "put into the general fund of the government."

Most likely this question comes from a confusion between the financing of the Social Security program and the way the Social Security Trust Fund is treated in federal budget accounting. Starting in 1969 (due to action by the Johnson Administration in 1968) the transactions to the Trust Fund were included in what is known as the "unified budget." This means that every function of the federal government is included in a single budget. This is sometimes described by saying that the Social Security Trust Funds are "on-budget." This budget treatment of the Social Security Trust Fund continued until 1990 when the Trust Funds were again taken "off-budget." This means only that they are shown as a separate account in the federal budget. But whether the Trust Funds are "on-budget" or "off-budget" is primarily a question of accounting practices--it has no effect on the actual operations of the Trust Fund itself.
Well that's what I did and found this by SS office... (show quote)


Thanks for this info. I got mine also from a reliable source, without the "historical data" disclaimer. I'll have to research further and get back to this when I'm not exhausted and burned to a crisp. It was a GOOD memorial day in the pool with the grandchildren

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.