old marine Loc: America home of the brave

I think you forgot to add.

"And the truth shall send Demon-Rats swamp dwelling traitors to prison for their crimes of false witness against a legally elected President.


God bless America and the President

old marine Loc: America home of the brave

Each state has a certain number of electoral votes based on citizens. Illegal immigrants are not citizens and do not count.

This is to prevent three or four highly populated cities from denying smaller states from being represented. Example some states have only 4 electoral votes and say California has 20.

This way if say California has 10 million registered voter's and 14 million illegal criminal aliens vote making the total popuar vote 24 million popular votes California will only receive 20 electoral votes. (These are only estimates to show how the total is tabulated.)


God bless America and the President

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

What have you convicted our President Donald J Trump of?

Bug58

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/brady_rule

Brady Rule

The Brady Rule, named after Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), requires prosecutors to disclose materially exculpatory evidence in the government's possession to the defense. A "Brady material" or evidence the prosecutor is required to disclose under this rule includes any evidence favorable to the accused--evidence that goes towards negating a defendant's guilt, that would reduce a defendant's potential sentence, or evidence going to the credibility of a witness.

If the prosecution does not disclose material exculpatory evidence under this rule, and prejudice has ensued, the evidence will be suppressed. The evidence will be suppressed regardless of whether the prosecutor knew the evidence was in his or her possession, or whether or not the prosecutor intentionally or inadvertently withheld the evidence from the defense.

Further, in cases subsequent to Brady, the Supreme Court has eliminated the requirement for a defendant to have requested a favorable information, stating that the Prosecution has a constitutional duty to disclose, that is triggered by the potential impact of favorable but undisclosed evidence See Kyles v. Whitley 514 U.S. 419, 434 (1955); United States. v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985).

The defendant bears the burden to prove that the undisclosed evidence was both material and favorable. In other words, the defendant must prove that there is a “reasonable probability” that the outcome of the trial would have been different, had the evidence been disclosed by the prosecutor. See Kyles, 514 U.S. at 433 (1955). Bagles and Kyles Court further defined the “materiality” standard, outlining the four aspects of materiality. First, the “reasonable probability” of a different result is not a question of whether the defendant would more likely than not have received a different verdict with the evidence, but whether the government’s evidentiary suppression undermines the confidence in the outcome of the trial. The second aspect is that it is not a sufficiency of evidence test, and the defendant only has to show that the favorable evidence could reasonably be taken to put the whole case in such a different light as to undermine the confidence in the verdict. Third aspect is that there is no need for a harmless error review, because a Brady violation, by definition, could not be treated as a harmless error. Fourth and final aspect of materiality the Kyles Court stressed was that the suppressed evidence must be considered collective, not item by item, looking at the cumulative effect to determine whether a reasonable probability is reached. See Kyles, 514 U.S. at 433-438.

Bug58

Bug58

You mean like the Obama admin did w/ the IRS? And the FBI towards those who disagreed with them politically??

Marsinah

I did read a headline in the ABQ Journal, yesterday or the day before, I believe, saying Trump wants to investigate both the FBI and DOJ.

And so I wonder, as did Bertrand Russell, with the barber: "If the FBI investigates everybody in the country who doesn't investigate themselves, who investigates the FBI"? (You know, paraphrasing "If the barber shaves every man in town who doesn't shave himself, who shaves the barber"?

And if you tell me Trump can appoint a "Special Prosecutor", then who prosecutes Trump?

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

And thus, we spiral down the toilet!

buffalo Loc: Texas

Who gets to pull the handle? All the crooked, greedy, self-serving s61theads need to go down the toilet.

Marsinah

I think you mean, FURTHER down the toilet !!! (Take note, Rodney: space, three exclamation points!)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qf_TDuhk3No

Victor Borge.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

I like that. Who's Rodney?

Marsinah

Don't ask, don't tell.

PeterS

I asked you this before and I don't think you answered. Once Trump became president for Obama to be able to coordinate what is going on in the FBI he would have had to know that 1) Sessions would recuse himself, that 2) Trump would nominate Rosenstein and that 3) Rosenstein would hire Mueller after Trump fired Comey to put an end to that Russer thang.

If anything failed anywhere in that link we wouldn't have the investigation that we now have. Since Obama doesn't have the power to see into the future how could he execute such a plan and have it come into futrition?

It's one thing to entertain a conspiracy and fully another when it becomes laughable...

PeterS

Trump is just trying to muddy the water and sow as much distrust as possible. If we can't trust the FBI or DoJ then we can't trust anything that they say. It's a form of ad hominem where you attack the institution in order to discredit any findings.

Who shaves the barber? After you destroy the credibility of everyone else to save your sorry ass you just grow a beard and laugh at the fools who put you in power...

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Dude, it's not the entire FBI but rather, their leading elites, like Comey, who has essentially described how, at least with him, his decisions as FBI head, were politically motivated. That and stupid.