One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Muslim Nurse Beheads 7 year old boy in New York
Page <<first <prev 4 of 16 next> last>>
Apr 7, 2018 19:04:27   #
eden
 
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>>

Wrong Answer, you do the research on whatever you like I dont care...

My focus is on Scumbag Muslims who were banned from coming to this land long ago twice !

We have laws on the Books by Congress that outlaws them to be here... do you understand ?

You’ve been misled
You’ve been brainwashed into apologizing and sympathizing with this invader and other illegal scumbags.
You’ve been duped like the rest of the nation
You’ve been propagandize by the Deep State NWO and United Nations Refugee Sham

I can go on and on so you go do mental problem research on whatever scumbag invaders you like I no longer care...

I already know about the mental state of our citizens... STOP Chaning the damn subject marine !
>>>> br br Wrong Answer, you do the r... (show quote)


Muslims were banned from entering the country by Congress? I believe that would violate the Constitution.

Reply
Apr 7, 2018 19:07:22   #
Sicilianthing
 
eden wrote:
Islam, Christianity and Judaism are known as the Abrahamic Trifecta, meaning they all acknowledge Abraham as one of the pillars of their faith. I thought you knew that. Very little daylight between these three in terms of bloodlettting, genocide and hatred for each other.


>>>>

I’m quite aware of that in some vague terms... but I’ll research further... the problem is the Muslims got bushwhacked and brainwashed by some guy they call Mo who was smarter in combat than the rest... and down the rabbit hole we go.

Would you like a 5minute Video Education on the Entire Sham history of Islam, Mo and how we got here ?

Why and Who are you to justify their false ideologies and Wreckage upon humanity ?

This Topic is about a Crazy Scumbag Muslim who doesn’t belong here -never did and she murdered a Boy in a method only their Religion and Koran lunacy teaches...

What part of that are you struggling with ?

Reply
Apr 7, 2018 19:09:29   #
eden
 
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>>

Huh ? Who are you talking to ?


Anybody who justifies genocide by saying the target group are pagan unbelievers.

Reply
Apr 7, 2018 19:12:40   #
Sicilianthing
 
eden wrote:
Muslims were banned from entering the country by Congress? I believe that would violate the Constitution.


>>>>

Wrong Answer... See Here, this is the earliest record... the next reply is Part 2 ...


__________________

Muslims Were Banned From the Americas as Early as the 16th Century

Long before today’s anxiety about terror attacks, Spain and England feared that enslaved Africans would be more susceptible to revolt if they were Muslim

On Christmas Day, 1522, 20 enslaved Muslim Africans used machetes to attack their Christian masters on the island of Hispaniola, then governed by the son of Christopher Columbus. The assailants, condemned to the grinding toil of a Caribbean sugar plantation, killed several Spanish and freed a dozen enslaved Native Americans in what was the first recorded slave revolt in the New World.

The uprising was quickly suppressed, but it prompted the newly crowned Charles V of Spain to exclude from the Americas “slaves suspected of Islamic leanings.” He blamed the revolt on their radical ideology rather than the harsh realities of living a life of slavery.

By the time of the Hispaniola revolt, Spanish authorities had already forbidden travel by any infidel, whether Muslim, Jewish, or Protestant, to its New World colonies, which at the time included the land that is now the United States. They subjected any potential emigrant with a suspicious background to intense vetting. A person had to prove not just that they were Christian, but that there was no Muslim or Jewish blood among their ancestors. Exceptions were granted solely by the king. Catholic Europe was locked in a fierce struggle with the Ottoman Empire, and Muslims were uniformly labeled as possible security risks. After the uprising, the ban applied even to those enslaved in the New World, writes historian Sylviane Diouf in a study of the African diaspora.

“The decree had little effect,” adds historian Toby Green in Inquisition: The Reign of Fear. Bribes and forged papers could get Jews to the New World with its greater opportunities. Slave traders largely ignored the order because West Africa Muslims often were more literate and skilled in trades, and therefore more valuable, than their non-Muslim counterparts. Ottoman and North Africans captives from the Mediterranean region, usually called Turks and Moors, respectively, were needed to row Caribbean galleys or perform menial duties for their Spanish overlords in towns and on plantations.

In the strategic port of Cartagena, in what is now Colombia, an estimated half of the city’s slave population were transported there illegally and many were Muslim. In 1586, the English privateer Sir Francis Drake besieged and captured the town, instructing his men to treat Frenchmen, Turks, and black Africans with respect. A Spanish source tells us “especially Moors deserted to the Englishman, as did the blacks of the city.” Presumably they were promised their freedom, although Drake was a notorious slave trader. A Spanish prisoner later related that 300 Indians—mostly women—as well as 200 Africans, Turks, and Moors who were servants or slaves boarded the English fleet.

En route to the English colony on Roanoke Island, Drake and his fleet raided the small Spanish settlement of St. Augustine, on Florida’s Atlantic Coast, and stripped it of its doors, locks and other valuable hardware. With the pirated slaves and stolen goods aboard, Drake intended to bolster Roanoke, situated on the Outer Banks of North Carolina and the first English effort at settling the New World. “All the Negroes, male and female, the enemy had with him, and certain other equipment which had taken…were to be left at the fort and settlement which they say exists on the coast,” a Spanish report states.

Drake sought to help his friend, Sir Walter Raleigh, who had settled Roanoke the year prior with more than 100 men and the goal of establishing a base for privateering and extracting the wealth that made Spain the richest and most powerful nation on Earth. Among them was a German metallurgist named Joachim Gans, the first Jewish-born person known to have set foot on American soil. Jews were forbidden to live or even visit England then—the ban lasted from 1290 to 1657—but Raleigh needed scientific expertise that could not be found among the Englishmen of his day. He won for Gans today’s equivalent of an H-1B visa so that the accomplished scientist could travel to Roanoke and report on any valuable metals found there. Gans built a workshop there and conducted extensive experiments.

Shortly after Drake’s fleet arrived off the Carolina coast, a fierce hurricane pummeled the island and scattered the ships. The English colonists abruptly chose to abandon their battered fort and return home with the fleet. Had the weather been more fortunate, the fragile settlement on Roanoke might have emerged as a remarkably mixed community of Christian, Jewish and Muslim Europeans and Africans, as well as Indians from both South and North America. The Drake fleet returned safely to England, and Elizabeth I returned 100 Ottoman slaves to Istanbul in a bid to win favor with the anti-Spanish sultan.

The fate of the Moors, Africans and the Indians, however, remains an enduring mystery. There is no record of them reaching England. “Drake thought he was going to find a flourishing colony on Roanoke, so he brought a labor supply,” says New York University historian Karen Kupperman. She and other historians believe that many of the men and women captured in Cartagena were put ashore after the storm.

Drake was always eager to make a profit from human or material cargo, and not inclined to liberate a valuable commodity, but there was little market in England for enslaved persons. To make room for the Roanoke colonists, he may well have dumped the remaining men and women on the Carolina coast and sailed away. Some of the refugees may have drowned in the hurricane.

Less than a year later, a second wave of English settlers sailed to Roanoke—the famous Lost Colonists--but they made no mention of meeting hundreds of refugees. The Cartagena captives might have scattered among the local Native American population to avoid detection by the slave raiders who prowled the North American coast in the 16th century. The new colonists were themselves abandoned in the New World and never heard from again—including Virginia Dare, the first English child born in America.

The Jamestown settlement that followed adopted a policy similar to that of the Spanish with regards to Muslims. Christian baptism was a requirement for entering the country, even for enslaved Africans, who first arrived in Virginia in 1619. In 1682, the Virginia colony went a step further, ordering that all “Negroes, Moors, mulattoes or Indians who and whose parentage and native countries are not Christian” automatically be deemed slaves.

Of course, suppressing “Islamic leanings” did little to halt slave insurrections in either Spanish or British America. Escaped slaves in Panama in the 16th century founded their own communities and fought a long guerilla war against Spain. The Haitian slave revolt at the turn of the 19th century was instigated by and for Christianized Africans, although whites depicted those seeking their freedom as irreligious savages. Nat Turner’s rebellion in Virginia in 1831 stemmed in part from his visions of Christ granting him authority to battle evil.

The real threat to peace and security, of course, was the system of slavery itself and a Christianity that countenanced it. The problem wasn't the faith of the immigrants, but the injustice that they encountered on their arrival in a new land.

Reply
Apr 7, 2018 19:15:54   #
Sicilianthing
 
eden wrote:
Muslims were banned from entering the country by Congress? I believe that would violate the Constitution.


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


Here is the Latest Law banning Muslims and Islam from 1952....


___________________________


Muslims Not Allowed
lslam Banned From the USA in 1952

No Muslims Allowed:
Nationality Act June 27, 1952

ISLAM WAS BANED from the USA in "1952, but Obama didn’t want you to know that nor does he respect or uphold US law.

The Immigration and Nationality Act passed June 27, 1952 revised the laws relating to Immigration, naturalization, and nationality for the United States.

That act, which became Public Law 414, established both the law and the intent of Congress regarding the immigration of Aliens to the US and remains in effect today" Among the many issues it covers, one in particular, found in
Chapter 2 Section 212, is the prohibition of entry to the US if the Alien belongs to an organization seeking to overthrow the government of the United States by "force, violence, or other unconstitutional means,"

This, by it's very definition rules out Islamic Immigration to the United States, but this law is being ignored by the White House, Islamic Immigration to the US would be prohibited under this law because the Koran, Sharia Law and the
Hadith all require complete submission to Islam, which is antithetical to the US government, the Constitution, and to the Republic.

All Muslims who attest that the Koran is their life's guiding principal subscribe to submission to lslam and its form of government. Now the political correct crowd would say that Islamists cannot be prohibited from entering the US because lslam is a religion.

Whether it is a religion is immaterial because the law states that Aliens who are affiliated with any "organization" that advocates the overthrow of our government are prohibited""

ISLAM:
" A Doctrine masquerading as a Religion for millennia based upon Laws ( Shari'a) , a Constitution ( the Qur'an) and an ideology that DEMANDS the death of ALL Jews, Christians and other infidels and is the most misogynistic society in the history of the world"- author unknown


It is time for the government to uphold it's written laws.

Muslims Were Banned From the Americas as Early as the 16th Century
Long before today’s anxiety about terror attacks, Spain and England feared that enslaved Africans would be more susceptible to revolt if they were Muslim

Reply
Apr 7, 2018 19:18:55   #
Sicilianthing
 
eden wrote:
Anybody who justifies genocide by saying the target group are pagan unbelievers.


>>>>

Great so it has been said, so now it is written, So LET IT BE DONE !

I no longer care, I seriously don’t think you understand how serious I am about these people getting the F out of my country... and I mean all 6 million will be leaving one way or the hard way.

Reply
Apr 7, 2018 19:38:20   #
emarine
 
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>>

Wrong Answer, you do the research on whatever you like I dont care...

My focus is on Scumbag Muslims who were banned from coming to this land long ago twice !

We have laws on the Books by Congress that outlaws them to be here... do you understand ?

You’ve been misled
You’ve been brainwashed into apologizing and sympathizing with this invader and other illegal scumbags.
You’ve been duped like the rest of the nation
You’ve been propagandize by the Deep State NWO and United Nations Refugee Sham

I can go on and on so you go do mental problem research on whatever scumbag invaders you like I no longer care...

I already know about the mental state of our citizens... STOP Chaning the damn subject marine !
>>>> br br Wrong Answer, you do the r... (show quote)





Extreme Islam is a problem as well as extreme anything... Your post clearly left out the fact the lady was mentally unstable... providing half truths is the same as lying in my book... maybe you could post your sources so readers can see if they are also extreme... if not your just another propagandist with an axe to grind...

Reply
Check out topic: Susan Collins (Maine)
Apr 7, 2018 19:45:46   #
Sicilianthing
 
emarine wrote:
Extreme Islam is a problem as well as extreme anything... Your post clearly left out the fact the lady was mentally unstable... providing half truths is the same as lying in my book... maybe you could post your sources so readers can see if they are also extreme... if not your just another propagandist with an axe to grind...


>>>>

Wrong Answer again, in this fight for civilization and to restore our Republic away from stealth enemy combatants already in the wire and those advancing on our Sovereignty and way of life.... we

DO

NOT

MAKE

Accommodations for individual Circumstances...

You will Default back to the origins of this problem, they Do NOT belong here and never did... GAME OVER !

Stop justifying, rationalizing, sympathizing or any other ing you are doing in your approach to this conundrum.

Reply
Apr 7, 2018 20:19:30   #
eden
 
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>>

Wrong Answer... See Here, this is the earliest record... the next reply is Part 2 ...


__________________

Muslims Were Banned From the Americas as Early as the 16th Century

Long before today’s anxiety about terror attacks, Spain and England feared that enslaved Africans would be more susceptible to revolt if they were Muslim

On Christmas Day, 1522, 20 enslaved Muslim Africans used machetes to attack their Christian masters on the island of Hispaniola, then governed by the son of Christopher Columbus. The assailants, condemned to the grinding toil of a Caribbean sugar plantation, killed several Spanish and freed a dozen enslaved Native Americans in what was the first recorded slave revolt in the New World.

The uprising was quickly suppressed, but it prompted the newly crowned Charles V of Spain to exclude from the Americas “slaves suspected of Islamic leanings.” He blamed the revolt on their radical ideology rather than the harsh realities of living a life of slavery.

By the time of the Hispaniola revolt, Spanish authorities had already forbidden travel by any infidel, whether Muslim, Jewish, or Protestant, to its New World colonies, which at the time included the land that is now the United States. They subjected any potential emigrant with a suspicious background to intense vetting. A person had to prove not just that they were Christian, but that there was no Muslim or Jewish blood among their ancestors. Exceptions were granted solely by the king. Catholic Europe was locked in a fierce struggle with the Ottoman Empire, and Muslims were uniformly labeled as possible security risks. After the uprising, the ban applied even to those enslaved in the New World, writes historian Sylviane Diouf in a study of the African diaspora.

“The decree had little effect,” adds historian Toby Green in Inquisition: The Reign of Fear. Bribes and forged papers could get Jews to the New World with its greater opportunities. Slave traders largely ignored the order because West Africa Muslims often were more literate and skilled in trades, and therefore more valuable, than their non-Muslim counterparts. Ottoman and North Africans captives from the Mediterranean region, usually called Turks and Moors, respectively, were needed to row Caribbean galleys or perform menial duties for their Spanish overlords in towns and on plantations.

In the strategic port of Cartagena, in what is now Colombia, an estimated half of the city’s slave population were transported there illegally and many were Muslim. In 1586, the English privateer Sir Francis Drake besieged and captured the town, instructing his men to treat Frenchmen, Turks, and black Africans with respect. A Spanish source tells us “especially Moors deserted to the Englishman, as did the blacks of the city.” Presumably they were promised their freedom, although Drake was a notorious slave trader. A Spanish prisoner later related that 300 Indians—mostly women—as well as 200 Africans, Turks, and Moors who were servants or slaves boarded the English fleet.

En route to the English colony on Roanoke Island, Drake and his fleet raided the small Spanish settlement of St. Augustine, on Florida’s Atlantic Coast, and stripped it of its doors, locks and other valuable hardware. With the pirated slaves and stolen goods aboard, Drake intended to bolster Roanoke, situated on the Outer Banks of North Carolina and the first English effort at settling the New World. “All the Negroes, male and female, the enemy had with him, and certain other equipment which had taken…were to be left at the fort and settlement which they say exists on the coast,” a Spanish report states.

Drake sought to help his friend, Sir Walter Raleigh, who had settled Roanoke the year prior with more than 100 men and the goal of establishing a base for privateering and extracting the wealth that made Spain the richest and most powerful nation on Earth. Among them was a German metallurgist named Joachim Gans, the first Jewish-born person known to have set foot on American soil. Jews were forbidden to live or even visit England then—the ban lasted from 1290 to 1657—but Raleigh needed scientific expertise that could not be found among the Englishmen of his day. He won for Gans today’s equivalent of an H-1B visa so that the accomplished scientist could travel to Roanoke and report on any valuable metals found there. Gans built a workshop there and conducted extensive experiments.

Shortly after Drake’s fleet arrived off the Carolina coast, a fierce hurricane pummeled the island and scattered the ships. The English colonists abruptly chose to abandon their battered fort and return home with the fleet. Had the weather been more fortunate, the fragile settlement on Roanoke might have emerged as a remarkably mixed community of Christian, Jewish and Muslim Europeans and Africans, as well as Indians from both South and North America. The Drake fleet returned safely to England, and Elizabeth I returned 100 Ottoman slaves to Istanbul in a bid to win favor with the anti-Spanish sultan.

The fate of the Moors, Africans and the Indians, however, remains an enduring mystery. There is no record of them reaching England. “Drake thought he was going to find a flourishing colony on Roanoke, so he brought a labor supply,” says New York University historian Karen Kupperman. She and other historians believe that many of the men and women captured in Cartagena were put ashore after the storm.

Drake was always eager to make a profit from human or material cargo, and not inclined to liberate a valuable commodity, but there was little market in England for enslaved persons. To make room for the Roanoke colonists, he may well have dumped the remaining men and women on the Carolina coast and sailed away. Some of the refugees may have drowned in the hurricane.

Less than a year later, a second wave of English settlers sailed to Roanoke—the famous Lost Colonists--but they made no mention of meeting hundreds of refugees. The Cartagena captives might have scattered among the local Native American population to avoid detection by the slave raiders who prowled the North American coast in the 16th century. The new colonists were themselves abandoned in the New World and never heard from again—including Virginia Dare, the first English child born in America.

The Jamestown settlement that followed adopted a policy similar to that of the Spanish with regards to Muslims. Christian baptism was a requirement for entering the country, even for enslaved Africans, who first arrived in Virginia in 1619. In 1682, the Virginia colony went a step further, ordering that all “Negroes, Moors, mulattoes or Indians who and whose parentage and native countries are not Christian” automatically be deemed slaves.

Of course, suppressing “Islamic leanings” did little to halt slave insurrections in either Spanish or British America. Escaped slaves in Panama in the 16th century founded their own communities and fought a long guerilla war against Spain. The Haitian slave revolt at the turn of the 19th century was instigated by and for Christianized Africans, although whites depicted those seeking their freedom as irreligious savages. Nat Turner’s rebellion in Virginia in 1831 stemmed in part from his visions of Christ granting him authority to battle evil.

The real threat to peace and security, of course, was the system of slavery itself and a Christianity that countenanced it. The problem wasn't the faith of the immigrants, but the injustice that they encountered on their arrival in a new land.
>>>> br br Wrong Answer... See Here, ... (show quote)



I think you need to read your post through a little more thoroughly. Seems like the real villains here were the Christian slave holders.

Reply
Apr 7, 2018 20:22:39   #
eden
 
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>>

Great so it has been said, so now it is written, So LET IT BE DONE !

I no longer care, I seriously don’t think you understand how serious I am about these people getting the F out of my country... and I mean all 6 million will be leaving one way or the hard way.


If you hold your breath too long you will turn blue.

Reply
Apr 7, 2018 20:25:33   #
4522chief
 
Thanks to their religious leaders they are still living like 600 years ago.

Reply
 
 
Apr 7, 2018 20:25:56   #
Sicilianthing
 
eden wrote:
I think you need to read your post through a little more thoroughly. Seems like the real villains here were the Christian slave holders.


>>>>

Yes the Christians, Jews, CryptoJews and Muslims all were to blame for Slavery but nothing like the Scumbag Muslims.

Again, pivot and change your perspective or go live with them in Somalia, see how they rape you.

Reply
Apr 7, 2018 20:26:21   #
Sicilianthing
 
eden wrote:
If you hold your breath too long you will turn blue.


>>>>

Ha ! :)

Reply
Apr 7, 2018 20:26:46   #
Sicilianthing
 
4522chief wrote:
Thanks to their religious leaders they are still living like 600 years ago.


>>>>>

THERE it IS !

Bullseye

Reply
Apr 7, 2018 21:43:07   #
emarine
 
Pennylynn wrote:
I could not agree more! More and more we see Christians and whites blamed and raked over hot coals for every action taken by a nut, but people like the nurse in this story never makes the storyline for CNN and the other alphabet news channels. I am fed up with the Liberals attacking Christians and whites!

I could not agree more! More and more we see Chri... (show quote)




wow Penn...I'm a bit disappointed... http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5586921/Police-Mom-used-kitchen-knife-decapitate-7-year-old-son.html

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 16 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.