moldyoldy wrote:
That happens to be one of the selling features of the M-16, it tumbles around in the body creating more damage than a straight threw shot.
Moldy,
this tumbling and lose of accuracy was pointed out by an old gunny sgt. in Veitnam..
It seem this was a feature in the original design.. had 1;16 twist in the rifling. changed a bit later to 1;12.. For the military..
commercial AR-15, which are M-16 made cheaper, often still have the tumbling problem..
If you look at a gun site on line you can find endless argument about it..
My opinion---I using an older version or a newer cheap version of the rifle. Tumbling will be common and has been found in several of the killings..
Use a modified military or high end version, then not so much..
My thinking is that both you and Dr. Evil are right.. and I think that most users are at the cheap end of the scale.. So, yes, the tumbling makes the round more devastating..
Sample from---
https://thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=587626Tumbling bullets in the AR-15
Following the shooting in Virginia, before it was clear what weapon was used, another fellow surmised it was an AR15 and related the devastating wound was probably due to the bullet "tumbling."
It is my impression that "tumbling" dates back to the Vietnam era and the introduction of the AR15 with a 1:14 twist that stabilized a 55gr bullet until it hit the target, then tumbled due to yaw and instability. At greater distances the accuracy was poor and the twist was changed to 1:12. I have a 1:7 twist and I don't see any keyholes at any distance. So my position was if the shooter used a modern AR15, tumbling was not part of the equation.
But the other fellow says he has both a 1:7 and 1:8 twist and both rifles tumble his bullets of ALL weights.
What do you other shooters think?