One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Did THEY lie about Stevens' death at Benghazi?
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Feb 20, 2014 16:06:56   #
Greg Brady Loc: Phoenix
 
oldroy wrote:
You have old Greg by the shorthairs with this post. Too much truth is very hard for THEM to handle.


Don't count your chickens..............

Reply
Feb 20, 2014 16:11:19   #
Dave Loc: Upstate New York
 
Greg Brady wrote:
By whom you still done know???? you mean Hannity didn't tell you?, I was your REPUBLICAN CONGRESS that turned down the request for additional funding for more security, don't expect your media talking heads to tell you about that,

Point is, no one was pointing a gun to his head, he could have quit the post and got out if he really believed his life was in danger, the idea that Obama some how forced him to stay there is just plain stupid.


The suggestion that Congressional funding was the cause of this is the dumbest one I've seen yet. As to Obama forcing him to stay, I'm unaware of anyone who ever suggested that, so using that strawman in defense is also stupid.

Meanwhile, if you are objecting to what I wrote, object to what I wrote, not what I didn't. I said if Hillary Clinton wa unaware of Stevens' request for additional security at that time and location, she was either incompetent or her staff was - and if it was her staff they should have been held responsible. That is probably too complicated for someone who thinks the problem was funding to understand.

By the way, mentioning Hannity's name gives no credence to your point but does indicate further stupidity on your part - I made no mention of him and am completely unaware of what he says regarding this subject - just like I don't know what the MSNBC cast says.

Reply
Feb 20, 2014 16:36:04   #
Greg Brady Loc: Phoenix
 
Dave wrote:
The suggestion that Congressional funding was the cause of this is the dumbest one I've seen yet. As to Obama forcing him to stay, I'm unaware of anyone who ever suggested that, so using that strawman in defense is also stupid.

Meanwhile, if you are objecting to what I wrote, object to what I wrote, not what I didn't. I said if Hillary Clinton wa unaware of Stevens' request for additional security at that time and location, she was either incompetent or her staff was - and if it was her staff they should have been held responsible. That is probably too complicated for someone who thinks the problem was funding to understand.

By the way, mentioning Hannity's name gives no credence to your point but does indicate further stupidity on your part - I made no mention of him and am completely unaware of what he says regarding this subject - just like I don't know what the MSNBC cast says.
The suggestion that Congressional funding was the ... (show quote)


Not suggesting anything, just giving you a cold hard fact you haven't been exposed to, but of course you don't want to know anything that doesn't concur with what you already believe.

As for Hannity, give me a break, you're all Fox watchers, that's why you all believe the same lies.

Reply
Feb 20, 2014 17:41:33   #
Liberty Tree
 
Greg Brady wrote:
Steven was in charge of the thing, he decided to stay, he wasn't a prisoner, it was his call

facts are facts, if he knew all those things you said, he should have closed the thing down and got out, the only one playing the blame game is you and those talking heads on your radio moving your lips.


Still blaming the victim to cover for your god Obama. Pathetic.

Reply
Feb 21, 2014 02:46:41   #
rodulfo-tardo
 
The Benghazi attack was a well thought out Al'Qaeda operation,
the Arab Revolt/Spring was the catalyst to the current situation in the Islamic Maghreb, before Obama and his Muslim Brotherhood accomplices touched any of the region, it had enjoyed a relatively
stable existence, until Qatar, Turkey and Pakistan with Obama's physical support of weapons funding and logistical strategies, subverted the entire region, for the sole purpose of that "ascending global caliphate" a wet dream they've had since the Ottoman Empire dissolved, true that Fox news, as far as information suffer that 'terminal disease' of political correctness, a reporting style that borders on schizophrenia.
The point to this narrative, is the gun running from the 'compound' it is something that was not a part of the 'script' meant to go public, the weaponry was destined to reach the "rebels" that this government was arming, in a rage of retribution, for their refusal to be part of that 'Spring' this is not surprising, since Syria and Libya have been Secular, their repect for Christianity, made the avoidance of the shariah state imperative.
Refusal to reinforce the compound was made by the State Department, combine this with "Prerogative of the Leader" you have the same conditions so familiar to the Clinton Administration's own when the same requests for enforcement of the 'perimeters' in both Kenya and Tanzania these were also ignored, and death was the result, nothing new to the Clintons after all there was Somalia, the W.T.C. [2-23-93] and all those attacks, ending with the U.S.S. Cole, in October 2000, likely another reason why the 9-11-01 attacks fall on Clinton's lap.
Two things stand to question the reasons why Benghazi even happened, why was the Embassy Response Team, not even in the region given the date, circumstances and the chatter on the terror networks? General Carter Ham, Commander of AFRICOM put the response in motion, within minutes of the news reaching him. However the 'White House and State Department' gave a stand down order, that when Gen. Carter refused to follow he was replaced by General David Rodriguez, while the rescue mission was ongoing, there was also Gen. Petraeus, Gen. Allen,
Rear Admiral Gaoette, all were a part of that stand down, all these gentlemen were fulfilling their 'standing orders' to protect and defend not just the Embassies but American lives and assets, within three months all reponders had been sacked, a part of the ongoing purge, of from Top Brass to Enlisted men and women, all U.S. Armed Forces personnel who had anything to do with completion of a mission, stopped by their 'civilian boss' and other minions.
Fact is there over 87 people in that compound in Benghazi, some are still in hospitals, and have been served with "gag" orders. The last to see Ambassador Stevens, was the Turkish Delegation, no one hears about that is probably due to their complicity on 9-11-12, The cover up is obvious, but denied in every chance this "residency" gets, from a video to some rumor, it is better than the truth.
Stevens was aware of the dangers under normal circumstances
add to this a gun running operation, and the conditions change by the second. Benghazi goes far from just another jihadi, testing out his AK 47, add the R.P.G.'s and the night vision supplied by this administration, and it makes you wonder where the "man pads" went. [laser controlled missile systems] state of the art, and yet some 800 have found a home, but no one knows where.What would be the reason, why the attack was such a surprise to those people on the 'top' there had been emails, texts and cables, for at least three months when conditions stopped being controllable. Had the proper force been provided, Benghazi may not have happened, what the government agencies wont say, is how every asset we have was attacked, not only the Maghreb, but the U.K., India, Thailand, the Philippines, and too many others to make a list.
Deception within this Obama caliphate, only shows his collusion and collaboration with the enemy, his submission to the Brotherhood, denial of any terrorist threat, that is called Islamophobia, is there any explanation why since 2009, the K.I.A.'s in Afghanistan increased by more than 80% ?
Benghazi is more than a terrorist attack, it is the declaration of another war, but this time from within.

Reply
Feb 21, 2014 08:28:55   #
Dave Loc: Upstate New York
 
Greg Brady wrote:
Not suggesting anything, just giving you a cold hard fact you haven't been exposed to, but of course you don't want to know anything that doesn't concur with what you already believe.

As for Hannity, give me a break, you're all Fox watchers, that's why you all believe the same lies.


Greg - someone who believes he knows what TV programs a person that he never met watches is a person dumb enough to believe Benghazi was a funding issue.

Reply
Feb 21, 2014 15:14:15   #
rodulfo-tardo
 
There are people who fear the water, these will drown at low tide in a boat, while wearing flotation devices, sounds like most the revisionist "Progressives" with either a "D" or an "R".

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.