The following article was sent to me by a good friend, and although there are spelling errors and typos, it's a great essay. Thought you might enjoy it.
The Democrats are right, there are two Americas. The America that works, and the America that doesn't.
The America that contributes, and the America that doesn't.
It's not the haves and the have not's, it's the dos and the don'ts. Some people do their duty as Americans, obey the law, support themselves, contribute to society, and others don't. That's the divide in America.
It's not about income inequality, it's about civic irresponsibility. It's about a political party that preaches hatred, greed and victimization in order to win elective office. It's about a political party that loves power more than it loves its country. That's not invective, that's truth, and it's about time someone said it.
The politics of envy was on proud display a couple weeks ago and also in his State of the Union Address, when President Obama pledged the rest of his term to fighting "income inequality." He noted that some people make more than other people, that some people have higher incomes than others, and he says that's not just. That is the rationale of thievery. The other guy has it, you want it, Obama will take it from you. Vote Democrat.
That is the philosophy that produced Detroit. It is the electoral philosophy that is destroying America.
It conceals a fundamental deviation from American values and common sense because it ends up not benefiting the people who support it, but a betrayal. The Democrats have not empowered their followers, they have enslaved them in a culture of dependence and entitlement, of victimhood and anger instead of ability and hope.
The president's premise - that you reduce income inequality by debasing the successful - seeks to deny the successful the consequences of their choices and spare the unsuccessful the consequences of their choices.
Because, by and large, income variations in society is a result of different choices leading to different consequences. Those who choose wisely and responsibility have a far greater likelihood of success, while those who choose foolishly and irresponsibly have a far greater likelihood of failure. Success and failure usually manifest themselves in personal and family income.
You choose to drop out of high school or to skip college and you are apt to have a different outcome than someone who gets a diploma and pushes on with purposeful education. You have your children out of wedlock and life is apt to take one course, you have them within a marriage and life is apt to take another course.
Most often in life our destination is determined by the course we take. My doctor, for example, makes far more than I do. There is significant income inequality between us. Our lives have had an inequality of outcome, but our lives also have had an inequality of effort. While my doctor went to college and then devoted his young adulthood to medical school and residency, I got a job in a restaurant. He made a choice, I made a choice, and our choices led us to different outcomes. His outcome pays a lot better than mine.
Does that mean he cheated and Barack Obama needs to take away his wealth?
No, it means we are both free men in a free society where free choices lead to different outcomes. It is not inequality Barack Obama intends to take away, it is freedom. The freedom to succeed, and the freedom to fail. There is no true option for success if there is no true option for failure.
The pursuit of happiness means a whole lot less when you face the punitive hand of government if your pursuit brings you more happiness than the other guy. Even if the other guy sat on his ass and did nothing. Even if the other guy made a lifetime's worth of asinine and shortsighted decisions. Barack Obama and the Democrats preach equality of outcome as a right, while completely ignoring inequality of effort.
The simple Law of the Harvest - as ye sow, so shall ye reap - is sometimes applied as, "The harder you work, the more you get." Obama would turn that upside down. Those who achieve are to be punished as enemies of society and those who fail are to be rewarded as wards of society. Entitlement will replace effort as the key to upward mobility in American society if Barack Obama gets his way. He seeks a lowest common denominator society in which the government besieges the successful and productive to foster equality through mediocrity.
He and his party speak of two Americas and their grip on power is based on using the votes of one to sap the productivity of the other. America is not divided by the differences in our outcomes, it is divided by the differences in our efforts. It is a false philosophy to say one man's success comes about unavoidably as the result of another man's victimization.
What Obama offers is not a solution, but separatism. He foments division and strife, pitting one set of Americans against another for his own political benefit. That's what socialists offer. Marxist class warfare wrapped up with a bow.
Two Americas, coming closer each day to proving the truth to Lincoln's maxim that a house divided against itself cannot stand.
Mark Twain once said: "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled."
To be born a free man is an accident;
To live one a responsibility;
To die one an obligation.
hprinze wrote:
The following article was sent to me by a good friend, and although there are spelling errors and typos, it's a great essay. Thought you might enjoy it.
The Democrats are right, there are two Americas. The America that works, and the America that doesn't.
The America that contributes, and the America that doesn't.
It's not the haves and the have not's, it's the dos and the don'ts. Some people do their duty as Americans, obey the law, support themselves, contribute to society, and others don't. That's the divide in America.
It's not about income inequality, it's about civic irresponsibility. It's about a political party that preaches hatred, greed and victimization in order to win elective office. It's about a political party that loves power more than it loves its country. That's not invective, that's truth, and it's about time someone said it.
The politics of envy was on proud display a couple weeks ago and also in his State of the Union Address, when President Obama pledged the rest of his term to fighting "income inequality." He noted that some people make more than other people, that some people have higher incomes than others, and he says that's not just. That is the rationale of thievery. The other guy has it, you want it, Obama will take it from you. Vote Democrat.
That is the philosophy that produced Detroit. It is the electoral philosophy that is destroying America.
It conceals a fundamental deviation from American values and common sense because it ends up not benefiting the people who support it, but a betrayal. The Democrats have not empowered their followers, they have enslaved them in a culture of dependence and entitlement, of victimhood and anger instead of ability and hope.
The president's premise - that you reduce income inequality by debasing the successful - seeks to deny the successful the consequences of their choices and spare the unsuccessful the consequences of their choices.
Because, by and large, income variations in society is a result of different choices leading to different consequences. Those who choose wisely and responsibility have a far greater likelihood of success, while those who choose foolishly and irresponsibly have a far greater likelihood of failure. Success and failure usually manifest themselves in personal and family income.
You choose to drop out of high school or to skip college and you are apt to have a different outcome than someone who gets a diploma and pushes on with purposeful education. You have your children out of wedlock and life is apt to take one course, you have them within a marriage and life is apt to take another course.
Most often in life our destination is determined by the course we take. My doctor, for example, makes far more than I do. There is significant income inequality between us. Our lives have had an inequality of outcome, but our lives also have had an inequality of effort. While my doctor went to college and then devoted his young adulthood to medical school and residency, I got a job in a restaurant. He made a choice, I made a choice, and our choices led us to different outcomes. His outcome pays a lot better than mine.
Does that mean he cheated and Barack Obama needs to take away his wealth?
No, it means we are both free men in a free society where free choices lead to different outcomes. It is not inequality Barack Obama intends to take away, it is freedom. The freedom to succeed, and the freedom to fail. There is no true option for success if there is no true option for failure.
The pursuit of happiness means a whole lot less when you face the punitive hand of government if your pursuit brings you more happiness than the other guy. Even if the other guy sat on his ass and did nothing. Even if the other guy made a lifetime's worth of asinine and shortsighted decisions. Barack Obama and the Democrats preach equality of outcome as a right, while completely ignoring inequality of effort.
The simple Law of the Harvest - as ye sow, so shall ye reap - is sometimes applied as, "The harder you work, the more you get." Obama would turn that upside down. Those who achieve are to be punished as enemies of society and those who fail are to be rewarded as wards of society. Entitlement will replace effort as the key to upward mobility in American society if Barack Obama gets his way. He seeks a lowest common denominator society in which the government besieges the successful and productive to foster equality through mediocrity.
He and his party speak of two Americas and their grip on power is based on using the votes of one to sap the productivity of the other. America is not divided by the differences in our outcomes, it is divided by the differences in our efforts. It is a false philosophy to say one man's success comes about unavoidably as the result of another man's victimization.
What Obama offers is not a solution, but separatism. He foments division and strife, pitting one set of Americans against another for his own political benefit. That's what socialists offer. Marxist class warfare wrapped up with a bow.
Two Americas, coming closer each day to proving the truth to Lincoln's maxim that a house divided against itself cannot stand.
Mark Twain once said: "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled."
To be born a free man is an accident;
To live one a responsibility;
To die one an obligation.
The following article was sent to me by a good fri... (
show quote)
Wonderful.essay. I think I will pagerize this one. Cannot wait to see the lefturds run from this. They know it is.true.
hprinze wrote:
The following article was sent to me by a good friend, and although there are spelling errors and typos, it's a great essay. Thought you might enjoy it.
The Democrats are right, there are two Americas. The America that works, and the America that doesn't.
The America that contributes, and the America that doesn't.
It's not the haves and the have not's, it's the dos and the don'ts. Some people do their duty as Americans, obey the law, support themselves, contribute to society, and others don't. That's the divide in America.
It's not about income inequality, it's about civic irresponsibility. It's about a political party that preaches hatred, greed and victimization in order to win elective office. It's about a political party that loves power more than it loves its country. That's not invective, that's truth, and it's about time someone said it.
The politics of envy was on proud display a couple weeks ago and also in his State of the Union Address, when President Obama pledged the rest of his term to fighting "income inequality." He noted that some people make more than other people, that some people have higher incomes than others, and he says that's not just. That is the rationale of thievery. The other guy has it, you want it, Obama will take it from you. Vote Democrat.
That is the philosophy that produced Detroit. It is the electoral philosophy that is destroying America.
It conceals a fundamental deviation from American values and common sense because it ends up not benefiting the people who support it, but a betrayal. The Democrats have not empowered their followers, they have enslaved them in a culture of dependence and entitlement, of victimhood and anger instead of ability and hope.
The president's premise - that you reduce income inequality by debasing the successful - seeks to deny the successful the consequences of their choices and spare the unsuccessful the consequences of their choices.
Because, by and large, income variations in society is a result of different choices leading to different consequences. Those who choose wisely and responsibility have a far greater likelihood of success, while those who choose foolishly and irresponsibly have a far greater likelihood of failure. Success and failure usually manifest themselves in personal and family income.
You choose to drop out of high school or to skip college and you are apt to have a different outcome than someone who gets a diploma and pushes on with purposeful education. You have your children out of wedlock and life is apt to take one course, you have them within a marriage and life is apt to take another course.
Most often in life our destination is determined by the course we take. My doctor, for example, makes far more than I do. There is significant income inequality between us. Our lives have had an inequality of outcome, but our lives also have had an inequality of effort. While my doctor went to college and then devoted his young adulthood to medical school and residency, I got a job in a restaurant. He made a choice, I made a choice, and our choices led us to different outcomes. His outcome pays a lot better than mine.
Does that mean he cheated and Barack Obama needs to take away his wealth?
No, it means we are both free men in a free society where free choices lead to different outcomes. It is not inequality Barack Obama intends to take away, it is freedom. The freedom to succeed, and the freedom to fail. There is no true option for success if there is no true option for failure.
The pursuit of happiness means a whole lot less when you face the punitive hand of government if your pursuit brings you more happiness than the other guy. Even if the other guy sat on his ass and did nothing. Even if the other guy made a lifetime's worth of asinine and shortsighted decisions. Barack Obama and the Democrats preach equality of outcome as a right, while completely ignoring inequality of effort.
The simple Law of the Harvest - as ye sow, so shall ye reap - is sometimes applied as, "The harder you work, the more you get." Obama would turn that upside down. Those who achieve are to be punished as enemies of society and those who fail are to be rewarded as wards of society. Entitlement will replace effort as the key to upward mobility in American society if Barack Obama gets his way. He seeks a lowest common denominator society in which the government besieges the successful and productive to foster equality through mediocrity.
He and his party speak of two Americas and their grip on power is based on using the votes of one to sap the productivity of the other. America is not divided by the differences in our outcomes, it is divided by the differences in our efforts. It is a false philosophy to say one man's success comes about unavoidably as the result of another man's victimization.
What Obama offers is not a solution, but separatism. He foments division and strife, pitting one set of Americans against another for his own political benefit. That's what socialists offer. Marxist class warfare wrapped up with a bow.
Two Americas, coming closer each day to proving the truth to Lincoln's maxim that a house divided against itself cannot stand.
Mark Twain once said: "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled."
To be born a free man is an accident;
To live one a responsibility;
To die one an obligation.
The following article was sent to me by a good fri... (
show quote)
Thanks for posting this. Two thumbs up!
hprinze wrote:
The following article was sent to me by a good friend, and although there are spelling errors and typos, it's a great essay. Thought you might enjoy it.
The Democrats are right, there are two Americas. The America that works, and the America that doesn't.
The America that contributes, and the America that doesn't.
It's not the haves and the have not's, it's the dos and the don'ts. Some people do their duty as Americans, obey the law, support themselves, contribute to society, and others don't. That's the divide in America.
It's not about income inequality, it's about civic irresponsibility. It's about a political party that preaches hatred, greed and victimization in order to win elective office. It's about a political party that loves power more than it loves its country. That's not invective, that's truth, and it's about time someone said it.
The politics of envy was on proud display a couple weeks ago and also in his State of the Union Address, when President Obama pledged the rest of his term to fighting "income inequality." He noted that some people make more than other people, that some people have higher incomes than others, and he says that's not just. That is the rationale of thievery. The other guy has it, you want it, Obama will take it from you. Vote Democrat.
That is the philosophy that produced Detroit. It is the electoral philosophy that is destroying America.
It conceals a fundamental deviation from American values and common sense because it ends up not benefiting the people who support it, but a betrayal. The Democrats have not empowered their followers, they have enslaved them in a culture of dependence and entitlement, of victimhood and anger instead of ability and hope.
The president's premise - that you reduce income inequality by debasing the successful - seeks to deny the successful the consequences of their choices and spare the unsuccessful the consequences of their choices.
Because, by and large, income variations in society is a result of different choices leading to different consequences. Those who choose wisely and responsibility have a far greater likelihood of success, while those who choose foolishly and irresponsibly have a far greater likelihood of failure. Success and failure usually manifest themselves in personal and family income.
You choose to drop out of high school or to skip college and you are apt to have a different outcome than someone who gets a diploma and pushes on with purposeful education. You have your children out of wedlock and life is apt to take one course, you have them within a marriage and life is apt to take another course.
Most often in life our destination is determined by the course we take. My doctor, for example, makes far more than I do. There is significant income inequality between us. Our lives have had an inequality of outcome, but our lives also have had an inequality of effort. While my doctor went to college and then devoted his young adulthood to medical school and residency, I got a job in a restaurant. He made a choice, I made a choice, and our choices led us to different outcomes. His outcome pays a lot better than mine.
Does that mean he cheated and Barack Obama needs to take away his wealth?
No, it means we are both free men in a free society where free choices lead to different outcomes. It is not inequality Barack Obama intends to take away, it is freedom. The freedom to succeed, and the freedom to fail. There is no true option for success if there is no true option for failure.
The pursuit of happiness means a whole lot less when you face the punitive hand of government if your pursuit brings you more happiness than the other guy. Even if the other guy sat on his ass and did nothing. Even if the other guy made a lifetime's worth of asinine and shortsighted decisions. Barack Obama and the Democrats preach equality of outcome as a right, while completely ignoring inequality of effort.
The simple Law of the Harvest - as ye sow, so shall ye reap - is sometimes applied as, "The harder you work, the more you get." Obama would turn that upside down. Those who achieve are to be punished as enemies of society and those who fail are to be rewarded as wards of society. Entitlement will replace effort as the key to upward mobility in American society if Barack Obama gets his way. He seeks a lowest common denominator society in which the government besieges the successful and productive to foster equality through mediocrity.
He and his party speak of two Americas and their grip on power is based on using the votes of one to sap the productivity of the other. America is not divided by the differences in our outcomes, it is divided by the differences in our efforts. It is a false philosophy to say one man's success comes about unavoidably as the result of another man's victimization.
What Obama offers is not a solution, but separatism. He foments division and strife, pitting one set of Americans against another for his own political benefit. That's what socialists offer. Marxist class warfare wrapped up with a bow.
Two Americas, coming closer each day to proving the truth to Lincoln's maxim that a house divided against itself cannot stand.
Mark Twain once said: "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled."
To be born a free man is an accident;
To live one a responsibility;
To die one an obligation.
The following article was sent to me by a good fri... (
show quote)
There are two Americas. One that is capable of adapting to changing demographics and honoring the needs of minorities and young women. They watch Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert, and Saturday Night Live.
There is the other America, that is skilled at not adapting to changes in their environment and losing presidential elections. Their favorite TV viewing is watching Fox and re-runs of "Great White Father Knows Best."
Even one of your own,Senator Lindsay Graham, has warned the Republican party that they are not making angry white males as fast as they used to.
Brian Devon wrote:
There are two Americas. One that is capable of adapting to changing demographics and honoring the needs of minorities and young women. They watch Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert, and Saturday Night Live.
There is the other America, that is skilled at not adapting to changes in their environment and losing presidential elections. Their favorite TV viewing is watching Fox and re-runs of "Great White Father Knows Best."
Even one of your own,Senator Lindsay Graham, has warned the Republican party that they are not making angry white males as fast as they used to.
There are two Americas. One that is capable of ada... (
show quote)
You keep trying to prove how stupid you are. If you keep it up I will be convinced.
[quote=Brian Devon]There are two Americas. One that is capable of adapting to changing demographics and honoring the needs of minorities and young women. They watch Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert, and Saturday Night Live.
There is the other America, that is skilled at not adapting to changes in their environment and losing presidential elections. Their favorite TV viewing is watching Fox and re-runs of "Great White Father Knows Best."
Even one of your own,Senator Lindsay Graham, has warned the Republican party that they are not making angry white males as fast as they used to.[/quo
all you do is be critical of every thing .you must be a welfare queen,to not see the truth in that article .
hprinze wrote:
The following article was sent to me by a good friend, and although there are spelling errors and typos, it's a great essay. Thought you might enjoy it.
The Democrats are right, there are two Americas. The America that works, and the America that doesn't.
The America that contributes, and the America that doesn't.
It's not the haves and the have not's, it's the dos and the don'ts. Some people do their duty as Americans, obey the law, support themselves, contribute to society, and others don't. That's the divide in America.
It's not about income inequality, it's about civic irresponsibility. It's about a political party that preaches hatred, greed and victimization in order to win elective office. It's about a political party that loves power more than it loves its country. That's not invective, that's truth, and it's about time someone said it.
The politics of envy was on proud display a couple weeks ago and also in his State of the Union Address, when President Obama pledged the rest of his term to fighting "income inequality." He noted that some people make more than other people, that some people have higher incomes than others, and he says that's not just. That is the rationale of thievery. The other guy has it, you want it, Obama will take it from you. Vote Democrat.
That is the philosophy that produced Detroit. It is the electoral philosophy that is destroying America.
It conceals a fundamental deviation from American values and common sense because it ends up not benefiting the people who support it, but a betrayal. The Democrats have not empowered their followers, they have enslaved them in a culture of dependence and entitlement, of victimhood and anger instead of ability and hope.
The president's premise - that you reduce income inequality by debasing the successful - seeks to deny the successful the consequences of their choices and spare the unsuccessful the consequences of their choices.
Because, by and large, income variations in society is a result of different choices leading to different consequences. Those who choose wisely and responsibility have a far greater likelihood of success, while those who choose foolishly and irresponsibly have a far greater likelihood of failure. Success and failure usually manifest themselves in personal and family income.
You choose to drop out of high school or to skip college and you are apt to have a different outcome than someone who gets a diploma and pushes on with purposeful education. You have your children out of wedlock and life is apt to take one course, you have them within a marriage and life is apt to take another course.
Most often in life our destination is determined by the course we take. My doctor, for example, makes far more than I do. There is significant income inequality between us. Our lives have had an inequality of outcome, but our lives also have had an inequality of effort. While my doctor went to college and then devoted his young adulthood to medical school and residency, I got a job in a restaurant. He made a choice, I made a choice, and our choices led us to different outcomes. His outcome pays a lot better than mine.
Does that mean he cheated and Barack Obama needs to take away his wealth?
No, it means we are both free men in a free society where free choices lead to different outcomes. It is not inequality Barack Obama intends to take away, it is freedom. The freedom to succeed, and the freedom to fail. There is no true option for success if there is no true option for failure.
The pursuit of happiness means a whole lot less when you face the punitive hand of government if your pursuit brings you more happiness than the other guy. Even if the other guy sat on his ass and did nothing. Even if the other guy made a lifetime's worth of asinine and shortsighted decisions. Barack Obama and the Democrats preach equality of outcome as a right, while completely ignoring inequality of effort.
The simple Law of the Harvest - as ye sow, so shall ye reap - is sometimes applied as, "The harder you work, the more you get." Obama would turn that upside down. Those who achieve are to be punished as enemies of society and those who fail are to be rewarded as wards of society. Entitlement will replace effort as the key to upward mobility in American society if Barack Obama gets his way. He seeks a lowest common denominator society in which the government besieges the successful and productive to foster equality through mediocrity.
He and his party speak of two Americas and their grip on power is based on using the votes of one to sap the productivity of the other. America is not divided by the differences in our outcomes, it is divided by the differences in our efforts. It is a false philosophy to say one man's success comes about unavoidably as the result of another man's victimization.
What Obama offers is not a solution, but separatism. He foments division and strife, pitting one set of Americans against another for his own political benefit. That's what socialists offer. Marxist class warfare wrapped up with a bow.
Two Americas, coming closer each day to proving the truth to Lincoln's maxim that a house divided against itself cannot stand.
Mark Twain once said: "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled."
To be born a free man is an accident;
To live one a responsibility;
To die one an obligation.
The following article was sent to me by a good fri... (
show quote)
Excellent post :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
cold iron wrote:
You keep trying to prove how stupid you are. If you keep it up I will be convinced.
He no longer needs to try and prove it. The evidence is already overwhelming.
Brian Devon wrote:
There are two Americas. One that is capable of adapting to changing demographics and honoring the needs of minorities and young women. They watch Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert, and Saturday Night Live.
There is the other America, that is skilled at not adapting to changes in their environment and losing presidential elections. Their favorite TV viewing is watching Fox and re-runs of "Great White Father Knows Best."
Even one of your own,Senator Lindsay Graham, has warned the Republican party that they are not making angry white males as fast as they used to.
There are two Americas. One that is capable of ada... (
show quote)
There are two Americas. One composed of people with and IQ over 80. And the other is Brian Devon.
madshark wrote:
There are two Americas. One composed of people with and IQ over 80. And the other is Brian Devon.
You must be feeling generous today and have graded him on the curve.
hprinze wrote:
The following article was sent to me by a good friend, and although there are spelling errors and typos, it's a great essay. Thought you might enjoy it.
The Democrats are right, there are two Americas. The America that works, and the America that doesn't.
The America that contributes, and the America that doesn't.
It's not the haves and the have not's, it's the dos and the don'ts. Some people do their duty as Americans, obey the law, support themselves, contribute to society, and others don't. That's the divide in America.
It's not about income inequality, it's about civic irresponsibility. It's about a political party that preaches hatred, greed and victimization in order to win elective office. It's about a political party that loves power more than it loves its country. That's not invective, that's truth, and it's about time someone said it.
The politics of envy was on proud display a couple weeks ago and also in his State of the Union Address, when President Obama pledged the rest of his term to fighting "income inequality." He noted that some people make more than other people, that some people have higher incomes than others, and he says that's not just. That is the rationale of thievery. The other guy has it, you want it, Obama will take it from you. Vote Democrat.
That is the philosophy that produced Detroit. It is the electoral philosophy that is destroying America.
It conceals a fundamental deviation from American values and common sense because it ends up not benefiting the people who support it, but a betrayal. The Democrats have not empowered their followers, they have enslaved them in a culture of dependence and entitlement, of victimhood and anger instead of ability and hope.
The president's premise - that you reduce income inequality by debasing the successful - seeks to deny the successful the consequences of their choices and spare the unsuccessful the consequences of their choices.
Because, by and large, income variations in society is a result of different choices leading to different consequences. Those who choose wisely and responsibility have a far greater likelihood of success, while those who choose foolishly and irresponsibly have a far greater likelihood of failure. Success and failure usually manifest themselves in personal and family income.
You choose to drop out of high school or to skip college and you are apt to have a different outcome than someone who gets a diploma and pushes on with purposeful education. You have your children out of wedlock and life is apt to take one course, you have them within a marriage and life is apt to take another course.
Most often in life our destination is determined by the course we take. My doctor, for example, makes far more than I do. There is significant income inequality between us. Our lives have had an inequality of outcome, but our lives also have had an inequality of effort. While my doctor went to college and then devoted his young adulthood to medical school and residency, I got a job in a restaurant. He made a choice, I made a choice, and our choices led us to different outcomes. His outcome pays a lot better than mine.
Does that mean he cheated and Barack Obama needs to take away his wealth?
No, it means we are both free men in a free society where free choices lead to different outcomes. It is not inequality Barack Obama intends to take away, it is freedom. The freedom to succeed, and the freedom to fail. There is no true option for success if there is no true option for failure.
The pursuit of happiness means a whole lot less when you face the punitive hand of government if your pursuit brings you more happiness than the other guy. Even if the other guy sat on his ass and did nothing. Even if the other guy made a lifetime's worth of asinine and shortsighted decisions. Barack Obama and the Democrats preach equality of outcome as a right, while completely ignoring inequality of effort.
The simple Law of the Harvest - as ye sow, so shall ye reap - is sometimes applied as, "The harder you work, the more you get." Obama would turn that upside down. Those who achieve are to be punished as enemies of society and those who fail are to be rewarded as wards of society. Entitlement will replace effort as the key to upward mobility in American society if Barack Obama gets his way. He seeks a lowest common denominator society in which the government besieges the successful and productive to foster equality through mediocrity.
He and his party speak of two Americas and their grip on power is based on using the votes of one to sap the productivity of the other. America is not divided by the differences in our outcomes, it is divided by the differences in our efforts. It is a false philosophy to say one man's success comes about unavoidably as the result of another man's victimization.
What Obama offers is not a solution, but separatism. He foments division and strife, pitting one set of Americans against another for his own political benefit. That's what socialists offer. Marxist class warfare wrapped up with a bow.
Two Americas, coming closer each day to proving the truth to Lincoln's maxim that a house divided against itself cannot stand.
Mark Twain once said: "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled."
To be born a free man is an accident;
To live one a responsibility;
To die one an obligation.
The following article was sent to me by a good fri... (
show quote)
There's another reality involved. There are fewer Doctors, not because there are fewer capable people, but because it takes a Doctor about 15 years to pay off medical school loans.
Making broad statements from incomplete data is, as Mark Twain would describe, trying to fool everybody.
madshark wrote:
There are two Americas. One composed of people with and IQ over 80. And the other is Brian Devon.
:thumbup: :thumbup: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
madshark wrote:
There are two Americas. One composed of people with and IQ over 80. And the other is Brian Devon.
That's the kind of weak minded crap we can do without.
Dave
Loc: Upstate New York
Brian Devon wrote:
There are two Americas. One that is capable of adapting to changing demographics and honoring the needs of minorities and young women. They watch Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert, and Saturday Night Live.
There is the other America, that is skilled at not adapting to changes in their environment and losing presidential elections. Their favorite TV viewing is watching Fox and re-runs of "Great White Father Knows Best."
Even one of your own,Senator Lindsay Graham, has warned the Republican party that they are not making angry white males as fast as they used to.
There are two Americas. One that is capable of ada... (
show quote)
Nice way to reinforce the validity of the essay - to folks like you it is all about identity politics - nothing about common good and common values - skin color, gender, sexual preference all very important to you folks - the true haters - white men are bad unless they are gay in your world.
Dave
Loc: Upstate New York
lpnmajor wrote:
There's another reality involved. There are fewer Doctors, not because there are fewer capable people, but because it takes a Doctor about 15 years to pay off medical school loans.
Making broad statements from incomplete data is, as Mark Twain would describe, trying to fool everybody.
In other words, whether you realize it or not, there are less doctors becuase in this case too there are insufficient rewards for those who strive and achieve.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
