One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Why Not Libertarian?
Page <<first <prev 5 of 13 next> last>>
Feb 18, 2014 12:07:40   #
typhoon
 
"Meet me on the battlefield of the mind" - George Washington

Details not name calling. On that battlefield Homestead blew some people away. Run for office, I would vote for you.

Reply
Feb 18, 2014 13:19:27   #
Brian Devon
 
Homestead wrote:
Your an idiot and clueless.

The communist have already taken over the major Labour Unions. The communist have been running the politics of this country for decades now. This is a list of the goals the communist set out for themselves in 1963.

See how many of them have been successfully executed.

For an entity that is not a political threat, they sure got a lot done, to the detriment of the United States of America.

Maybe you should pay close attention to goals 15, 17 and 36.

Then maybe you should check out "Common Core." The mandatory school requirements, hidden in the Stimulus Package, when it was signed into law.

1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.

2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.

3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.

4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.

5. Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet satellites.

6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.

7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N.

8. Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev's promise in 1955 to settle the German question by free elections under supervision of the U.N.

9. Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the United States has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress.

10. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the U.N.

11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.)

12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.

13. Do away with all loyalty oaths.

14. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent Office.

15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.

16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.

17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.

18. Gain control of all student newspapers.

19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack.

20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policymaking positions.

21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.

22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms."

23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. "Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art."

24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.

25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.

26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."

27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity which does not need a "religious crutch."

28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of "separation of church and state."

29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old- fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.

30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."

31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the "big picture." Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.

32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.

33. Eliminate all laws or procedures which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus.

34. Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities.

35. Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI.

36. Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.

37. Infiltrate and gain control of big business.

38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand [or treat].

39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.

40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.

41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.

42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use ["]united force["] to solve economic, political or social problems.

43. Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government.

44. Internationalize the Panama Canal.

45. Repeal the Connally reservation so the United States cannot prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction [over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction] over nations and individuals alike.

You will find the Ten Planks of the Communist Manifesto interesting at this point. Here they are:
In the early '60's during the days of the "former" Soviet Union, Russian Premier Nikita Kruschev pounded his shoe on the podium of the United Nations and shouted to the West, "We will bury you!" Fearing an invasion from the Reds, America proceeded to build the most awesome military machine in history. Unfortunately, we forgot to guard our political homefront from being taken over by socialist - communist - liberal activists who would gain office and destroy American law by process of gradually installing the Communist agenda within our legal system and seperate branches of government. The Communist program from the start has been one which sees their revolution of 1917 succesful only upon total domination of the world.

Americans, being the most naive people among the nations, now believe that Communism is dead because the Berlin Wall and the Iron Curtain have been removed. The ironic truth is that Communism has just switched names to become more "politically correct". Today it is called international democracy. The reason that the Berlin Wall came crashing down is not because Communism is dead but because they have achieved the planned agenda to communize the West, including America. Washington D.C. has indeed become part of the New World Order of atheist governments. With the last vestiges of Christian law having been removed from "American government" over the last twenty years, there is no longer a threat of resistance against world Communism. In reality, "American government" became part of the Iron Curtain, thus there was no more need for the likes of a Berlin Wall.

Once again, in their foolishness, the American public has believed the lies of their "leaders" who applaud "the fall of Communism", while they have sold out the country to anti-Christian, anti-American statutes and regulations on the federal, state, and local levels. Posted below is a comparison of the original ten planks of the Communist Manifesto written by Karl Marx in 1848, along with the American adopted counterpart of each of the planks, The American people have truly been "buried in Communism" by their own politicians of both the Republican and Democratic parties. One other thing to remember, Karl Marx was stating in the Communist Manifesto that these planks will test whether a country has become commmunist or not. If they are all in effect and in force the country IS communist. Communism, but by any other name...??

1. Abolition of private property and the application of all rent to public purpose.
The 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (1868), and various zoning, school & property taxes. Also the Bureau of Land Management.

2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
Misapplication of the 16th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, 1913, The Social Security Act of 1936.; Joint House Resolution 192 of 1933; and various State "income" taxes. We call it "paying your fair share".

3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
We call it Federal & State estate Tax (1916); or reformed Probate Laws, and limited inheritance via arbitrary inheritance tax statutes.

4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
We call in government seizures, tax liens, Public "law" 99-570 (1986);
Executive order 11490, sections 1205, 2002 which gives private land to the Department of Urban Development; the imprisonment of "terrorists" and those who speak out or write against the "government" (1997 Crime/Terrorist Bill); or the IRS confiscation of property without due process.

5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the State, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.
We call it the Federal Reserve which is a credit/debt system nationally organized by the Federal Reserve act of 1913. All local banks are members of the Fed system, and are regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).

6. Centralization of the means of communication and transportation in the hands of the State.
We call it the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and Department of Transportation (DOT) mandated through the ICC act of 1887, the Commissions Act of 1934, The Interstate Commerce Commission established in 1938, The Federal Aviation Administration, Federal Communications Commission, and Executive orders 11490, 10999, as well as State mandated driver's licenses and Department of Transportation regulations.

7. Extention of factories and instruments of production owned by the State, the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
We call it corporate capacity, The Desert Entry Act and The Department of Agriculture. As well as the Department of Commerce and Labor, Department of Interior, the Evironmental Protection Agency, Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Reclamation, Bureau of Mines, National Park Service, and the IRS control of business through corporate regulations.

8. Equal liablity of all to labor. Establishment of Industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
We call it the Social Security Administration and The Department of Labor. The National debt and inflation caused by the communal bank has caused the need for a two "income" family. Woman in the workplace since the 1920's, the 19th amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, assorted Socialist Unions, affirmative action, the Fedral Public Works Program and of course Executive order 11000.

9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the population over the country.
We call it the Planning Reorganization act of 1949 , zoning (Title 17 1910-1990) and Super Corporate Farms, as well as Executive orders 11647, 11731 (ten regions) and Public "law" 89-136.

10. Free education for all children in government schools. Abolition of children's factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, etc. etc.
People are being taxed to support what we call 'public' schools, which train the young to work for the communal debt system. We also call it the Department of Education, the NEA and Outcome-Based "Education" .
Your an idiot and clueless. br br The communist h... (show quote)






Number 1 is all you need to know about the far right. These folks believe nuclear war is preferable to peaceful co-existence. Is it any wonder that the American people won't let them near the levers of American power. These folks don't care if the planet is rubble........as long as they get their "rapture" and get to ride to Jesus in a gold hummer driven by Jimmy Swaggart or Pat Robertson.

Reply
Feb 18, 2014 13:40:50   #
Homestead
 
typhoon wrote:
"Meet me on the battlefield of the mind" - George Washington

Details not name calling. On that battlefield Homestead blew some people away. Run for office, I would vote for you.


Thank you for that sentiment, but, I'm too old to run for any major office and the general public would never vote for me, because, I tell them what they need to hear, not what they want to hear and I know how to say NO and mean it.

But, a person doesn't have to be in office to lead.

Like many people, I've joined my local Tea Party chapter and I am a member of several others across the country. It takes a lot and the progress is slow, but, this is a nation born of the people, by the people and for the people and by God it will be again.

We have people coming up behind us that are young and ready to take on the challenges this country is facing. What's needed now is an educated public that understands what's going on and what we've lost.

They will not succeed if we are not educated and ready to support and defend them.

Don't ever forget that this is a peoples republic, run by people's law, our representatives are our employees, they work for us, NOT us for them. They have forgotten their place. It's up to each of us to remind them where that place is and who the bosses are.

I intend to do my part.

Reply
Feb 18, 2014 13:52:30   #
Guardian
 
I totally agree with the Libertarian Platform. If you studied our country's history, you would realize that is exactly what our Founding Fathers believed. That is why we fought the British to achieve our Independence and Freedom. Americans were strong believers in these tenets...we still are. However our government has transformed and people have become greedy and power hungry, not to mention having a president that totally wants to trash our Constitution and is doing so at every opportunity.

But that isn't where the issue lies. The reason this government has become so powerful is because the masses have been dumbed down...less intelligent, less learned, less education. Just because a person gets a degree doesn't mean they are wise in their choices. Wisdom comes with experience and life. Until our masses become more informed about their Rights, receive better education (not just passed on to the next grade even if they cannot read) and want to contribute to our American Society, the division between the two political parties will only widen. You have to admit, Conservatives work hard to make a better life and provide for their families while Liberals want to "take care" of every last person by giving everyone else's money to even the slackers. No wonder the division widens daily. If you look at many of the liberals, you will see they come from money or have had money all their lives so they do not know what it is to really work hard to make a living. So what's the big deal taking money from someone else to give away? Personally, if all the Liberals became bankrupt and had to start all over again, I bet their attitudes about taking money from those that work so hard to get it, would change drastically.

Don't get me wrong. I have friends and family on both sides of the political table, but I have noticed that some of the liberals are gradually moving to the other side. Perhaps their glorious "savior" in the White House has disappointed them or perhaps obamacausticcare is bankrupting them too.

There will always be opposites in our world, Yin and Yang, black and white, good and bad, etc. We just need to be willing to work together occasionally to achieve a good solution. And perhaps to reread the Libertarian Platform because that was what this country was founded on. That is what made America successful and a good place to live -- Freedom of Choice! Now this government wants to take away those Freedoms. Perhaps we need to send a copy of the Libertarian Platform to the White House as a HUGE reminder of what America stands for?!

Reply
Feb 18, 2014 14:11:49   #
Homestead
 
Brian Devon wrote:
Number 1 is all you need to know about the far right. These folks believe nuclear war is preferable to peaceful co-existence. Is it any wonder that the American people won't let them near the levers of American power. These folks don't care if the planet is rubble........as long as they get their "rapture" and get to ride to Jesus in a gold hummer driven by Jimmy Swaggart or Pat Robertson.


Your a Moron, stuck with a one world view and one way of looking at anything.

Iran has almost developed it's nuclear weapons, where do you think that knowledge came from and have you studied what they intend to do with it.

Jackass!

Reply
Feb 18, 2014 14:12:29   #
Don DeHoff
 
I am pleased of oblige. True, the libertarians have many good points and ideas but you neglect to reveal they are adamant in bringing our military and state department personnel "home" (circling the wagons). If we do that, those bombs now going off in overseas shopping malls, train stations and airports will be going off on our very doorsteps. They refuse to acknowledge we inherited the roll of being the world's "peace keeper" after WW-II. And while we have not be 100% perfect in that regard, if it were not for the U.S. this planet would now be under a NWO or Muslim dictatorship. The libertarians refuse to acknowledge the tactical and strategic advantages of having our military and embassies stationed throughout the world. Those "time and distance" factors give us a 30 or 40 minutes of time to react in event some aspiring or rogue group or nation attacks us or one of our allies. Those factors alone by far, offset the good ideas and concepts Libertarians may have.

Reply
Feb 18, 2014 14:13:17   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
Homestead wrote:
Fortunately, people are smartening up, so we are not totally screwed yet.
People have realized that we have to nominated the people we want in the primaries. That is the first fight.

If we don't get the right people nominated, then we have some decisions to make.

They involve one of two hard decisions. First we may have to support who ever is not a Democrat. The Democrats must be taught a lesson, so they cannot win if at all possible.

But, we have a bunch of entrenched RINO traitors in the Republican Party. This is more dangerous than having to fight a Democrat, because as the song, "Smiling Faces," states, "your enemies can do you no wrong, because, you know where they're coming from."

Depending on the results of individual primaries we may need to lose to a Democrat in the general election, if it's the only way of getting rid of some of these RINOs within the Republican Party. To save the country and the Republican Party we may have to destroy the Republican Party until it wises up and gets back to it's founding principles.

It's big boy pants time for America. To get the people back in control of their government is going to take more than a couple of election cycles.

The first step in getting our government representatives to respect the average American citizen is to demonstrate that the average American citizen can make a difference in the elections.

If that difference is not going to be the ability to get their man elected, then let it be the ability to get specific representatives fired. Once the people are organized enough to target individuals and get them removed from office, it's not a very big step to get a little more organized and choose their replacements.
Fortunately, people are smartening up, so we are n... (show quote)


Sorry, we've been voting for whoever isn't a Democrat for a number of election cycles now. I'm afraid it's the Republicans who need to be taught a lesson. As long as we reelect them they suffer from DLS (don't learn shit) and once elected it's hard as hell to get them out of office. There's nothing simple about canning a congress person. It's completely different than a state representative.

Reply
Feb 18, 2014 14:16:05   #
Guardian
 
There is one huge issue with having 3 parties. It divides the vote and a strong candidate from one of the two main parties can lose the election because the people who would normally vote for him have left that party to join a smaller and less effective party. Personally, I like the Libertarian Party because it defines what America is about. But we had major discussions in American History about just this scenario...and it always turned out the same. The candidate that was most suited to win, did not because the votes went to another "third" political party.

So how is being a third (or even Fourth Party) party member if in the long run, you still can't vote in your own candidate and you weaken the chances of a more qualified person winning the election? THIS is the issue with having more than two political parties.

Still, the Conservatives have left a lot to be desired, especially Speaker Boehner. There are a few that stand out and have pushed back for our American rights, but only a few. However, they do have the majority of the House and perhaps will also get control of the Senate this year, at which point the man in the White House will find his hands tied. When part of Congress is weak, the American people lose control because it gives too much power to the president, no matter how unknowledgeable or arrogant he may be...power goes to one's head when it is given unconditionally. We have a run away train in the White House that needs to be stopped, no matter which Party chooses to do this...Conservatives, Libertarians, or Liberals. Everyone is tired of having their Rights stomped on, just because he thinks he can do that. There is nothing American about how he is acting. He took office to "change" America -- everyone thought they knew what his "change" was all about. Surprise!! You didn't know because he lied! So "How's that change for you now?"

Reply
Feb 18, 2014 14:18:37   #
Don DeHoff
 
Sir, keep you remarks civil. Nothing is to be gained by off-subject personal one-on-one gutter talk (mental masturbation), other than to suggest, while you desperately want to comment, you really have nothing valid and on-subject to say.

Reply
Feb 18, 2014 14:29:16   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
saltwind 78 wrote:
I think that the Tea Party will cost the Republican Party the next presidential election. You remind me of good old machine gunner Joe MCarthy. He also accused everybody to the left of Hitler of being a Communist, and look what happened to him. Communism was never a political threat in this country. It never had any appeal to American workers. One reason why is they had their labor unions. Now that the right wing of the Republican Party is destroying one of the few protections that ordinary workers had, I wouldn't be surprised if Marxism rose from the dead in the future, and the tea party and right wing politicians will be to blame!!
I think that the Tea Party will cost the Republica... (show quote)


I suggest you do a little research on Fabian Socialism and its tactics and goals. Then look around and see if you can detect some familiar patterns. You might be surprised. Fabian Socialism differs from Communism only in the method it uses to achieve its goals.

Reply
Feb 18, 2014 14:32:33   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
Guardian wrote:
There is one huge issue with having 3 parties. It divides the vote and a strong candidate from one of the two main parties can lose the election because the people who would normally vote for him have left that party to join a smaller and less effective party. Personally, I like the Libertarian Party because it defines what America is about. But we had major discussions in American History about just this scenario...and it always turned out the same. The candidate that was most suited to win, did not because the votes went to another "third" political party.

So how is being a third (or even Fourth Party) party member if in the long run, you still can't vote in your own candidate and you weaken the chances of a more qualified person winning the election? THIS is the issue with having more than two political parties.

Still, the Conservatives have left a lot to be desired, especially Speaker Boehner. There are a few that stand out and have pushed back for our American rights, but only a few. However, they do have the majority of the House and perhaps will also get control of the Senate this year, at which point the man in the White House will find his hands tied. When part of Congress is weak, the American people lose control because it gives too much power to the president, no matter how unknowledgeable or arrogant he may be...power goes to one's head when it is given unconditionally. We have a run away train in the White House that needs to be stopped, no matter which Party chooses to do this...Conservatives, Libertarians, or Liberals. Everyone is tired of having their Rights stomped on, just because he thinks he can do that. There is nothing American about how he is acting. He took office to "change" America -- everyone thought they knew what his "change" was all about. Surprise!! You didn't know because he lied! So "How's that change for you now?"
There is one huge issue with having 3 parties. It ... (show quote)


Boehner a conservative? If by conservative you mean wholly dedicated to the same old shit I guess I'd agree with you.

Reply
 
 
Feb 18, 2014 14:33:26   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
Homestead wrote:
Your a Moron, stuck with a one world view and one way of looking at anything.

Iran has almost developed it's nuclear weapons, where do you think that knowledge came from and have you studied what they intend to do with it.

Jackass!


It came via the same method the Soviets did. By theft, which means spying. Did anyone besides me marvel at the USSR's coincidental introduction of new aircraft? By coincidental, I mean near identical planes at almost the same time. Even their space shuttle looked like a copy of ours.

We have spent more time, effort and money running other countries ( or trying to ), that we have neglected our own. Our intellectual property is being stolen as fast as it's created and our response? "Please stop", what kind of shit is that?

New roads, bridges, water treatment plants, sewage treatment plants, hospitals, schools, power plants, power distribution systems and more, has been built OVERSEAS with our money, than has been built HERE in the last ten years.

This didn't happen overnight, nor did it happen in the last 5 years. Now, suddenly, the very people who allowed this to happen have become experts in what's wrong with this country and how to fix it. Since both the Dems and Repubs have controlled the Gov. for as long as I can remember, they are ALL responsible. Trying to convince someone that "they know better now" is laughable.

Reply
Feb 18, 2014 14:51:16   #
Homestead
 
Don DeHoff wrote:
I am pleased of oblige. True, the libertarians have many good points and ideas but you neglect to reveal they are adamant in bringing our military and state department personnel "home" (circling the wagons). If we do that, those bombs now going off in overseas shopping malls, train stations and airports will be going off on our very doorsteps. They refuse to acknowledge we inherited the roll of being the world's "peace keeper" after WW-II. And while we have not be 100% perfect in that regard, if it were not for the U.S. this planet would now be under a NWO or Muslim dictatorship. The libertarians refuse to acknowledge the tactical and strategic advantages of having our military and embassies stationed throughout the world. Those "time and distance" factors give us a 30 or 40 minutes of time to react in event some aspiring or rogue group or nation attacks us or one of our allies. Those factors alone by far, offset the good ideas and concepts Libertarians may have.
I am pleased of oblige. True, the libertarians hav... (show quote)


There is nothing wrong with bringing our troops home. They were left around the world, after World War II, in an effort to stop further wars. It didn't work.

It also disrespects a nation's sovereignty and creates problems of it's own.
John Adams specifically said that America needs to stay out of the problems of Europe and should not let itself get dragged into their conflicts.

The biggest problem is this attitude that keeping them abroad or bringing them home is a solution in and of itself. Most of America's history happened. with American Armies in America. When that was the case, America spent much more time and effort on diplomacy and was much more aware of what was happening in the world.

Now we have our troops located all around the world and the average student can't tell you where Iraq is located.

Reply
Feb 18, 2014 14:59:06   #
Homestead
 
Guardian wrote:
There is one huge issue with having 3 parties. It divides the vote and a strong candidate from one of the two main parties can lose the election because the people who would normally vote for him have left that party to join a smaller and less effective party. Personally, I like the Libertarian Party because it defines what America is about. But we had major discussions in American History about just this scenario...and it always turned out the same. The candidate that was most suited to win, did not because the votes went to another "third" political party.

So how is being a third (or even Fourth Party) party member if in the long run, you still can't vote in your own candidate and you weaken the chances of a more qualified person winning the election? THIS is the issue with having more than two political parties.

Still, the Conservatives have left a lot to be desired, especially Speaker Boehner. There are a few that stand out and have pushed back for our American rights, but only a few. However, they do have the majority of the House and perhaps will also get control of the Senate this year, at which point the man in the White House will find his hands tied. When part of Congress is weak, the American people lose control because it gives too much power to the president, no matter how unknowledgeable or arrogant he may be...power goes to one's head when it is given unconditionally. We have a run away train in the White House that needs to be stopped, no matter which Party chooses to do this...Conservatives, Libertarians, or Liberals. Everyone is tired of having their Rights stomped on, just because he thinks he can do that. There is nothing American about how he is acting. He took office to "change" America -- everyone thought they knew what his "change" was all about. Surprise!! You didn't know because he lied! So "How's that change for you now?"
There is one huge issue with having 3 parties. It ... (show quote)


In this day and age we are so focussed on parties that we forget that this government was not based on the party system, but, the system of precincts. We need to get back the basics and the problems of parties will be put into perspective.

The "True Business of the Precincts" Part 1
http://www.unitedprecinctsofamerica.org/content/true-business-precincts-part-1

The "True Business of the Precincts" Part 2
http://www.unitedprecinctsofamerica.org/content/true-business-precincts-part-2



This is the actual web site that is trying to unite all of the precincts across America. The purpose is to give the American citizen another tool in his civic duty tool belt.

Welcome to United Precincts of America!
Are you ready to accept the challenge and be American?
The U.S. Constitution is irrelevant without the means of enforcement. The means of enforcement is the Precinct Strategy... the True Business of the Precincts. The Enforcer..? We the People! &#8213; Phil Glass
http://www.unitedprecinctsofamerica.org/

Reply
Feb 18, 2014 14:59:27   #
Guardian
 
Sadly, those military bases within 30 to 40 minutes didn't save our Americans in Benghazi because we had a negligent Secretary of State and President...too busy to check their own fax machines or care about those 4 American lives. That is "Dereliction of Duty" and they need to be held accountable. Have you seen the pics of the torture they did to our Ambassador? It will make you throw up.

So, I do understand how important it is to have Military presence throughout the World, but at the same time we need a STRONG President that doesn't subjugate himself to any Saudi King, etc. Our reputation in this World has been downgraded because of this sitting president, and that's exactly what he wanted. The One World Order doesn't like to have any country stronger or greater than another, so their objective is to destroy everything and anything about that country...including its reputation. Without a strong, decisive, Constitutionally driven President, our country is up for grabs...thus the chaos in Congress, etc.
The issue with the status of our America falls right in obama's lap. His actions have landed us right where we are at...and that's exactly what his intentions were. I only wish that people were a better judge of character, because if they were, obama would never have made it into the Presidency, Black or not.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 13 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.