Kevyn wrote:
the swat team wouldn’t know who was who and would likely shoot the teacher. It is asinine to put armed guards in every school in the country the cost would be enormous and steel valuable funds from instruction. The solution is to make it much more difficult for nuts to get ahold of weapons.
No, they wouldn't, because the shooting would be over long before the cops arrived. Here's how it goes:
Bad guy shows up at school intending to do some shooting.
Teacher sees bad guy loading up.
Teacher draws sidearm and takes control of bad guy.
Cops show up and take bad guy into custody.
Teacher gets award for saving many lives just by having a gun handy.
Alternative scenario:
Bad guy shows up at school and starts shooting.
Teacher draws sidearm and shoots bad guy.
Cops show up and call coroner.
Teacher gets award for saving many lives just by having gun handy.
Current scenario;
Bad guy goes on rampage across school, once again, and shoots anyone in sight.
Cops show up after the shootings, once again, and ask what happened.
News media pick up the story and, once again, the headlines sell papers.
Good people across the nation, once again, are shocked by the carnage.
Talking heads, once again, go on TV to highlight the evils of firearms.
Politicians, once again, float the possibilities of 'common sense gun controls' because 'the children'.
Sensible people, once again, point out that if just one of those victims had been armed, this would not have been permitted to happen, while pointing at the
Target rich environment 'Gun Free Zone' signs across the campus.
Nobody listens.
Repeat 'current scenario' ad nauseum.
That's what really happens.