SOTU ADDRESS!!! (Page 10): maximus, if you will use QUOTE REPLY instead of QUOTE, we will know who you are REPLYING to. You're not the first one to be ask this. Mike...

teabag09

maximus, if you will use QUOTE REPLY instead of QUOTE, we will know who you are REPLYING to. You're not the first one to be ask this. Mike

maximus wrote:

I read your post. I am not college educated ( from what I see of college students today, thank God), but I read well and have an IQ just a bit over average, so I feel well qualified to comment on your post.
What a load of doo doo. Do we even live on the same planet? Your post sounds like Munchausen syndrome to me. Nothing you said is true, you seem to be living in your own reality which is different from everyone else's.

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

teabag09 wrote:

maximus, if you will use QUOTE REPLY instead of QUOTE, we will know who you are REPLYING to. You're not the first one to be ask this. Mike

Hey Mikey!!!

teabag09

Please use "QUOTE REPLY" so we may know who you are replying to. Thank you , Mike

maximus wrote:

I read your post. I am not college educated ( from what I see of college students today, thank God), but I read well and have an IQ just a bit over average, so I feel well qualified to comment on your post.
What a load of doo doo. Do we even live on the same planet? Your post sounds like Munchausen syndrome to me. Nothing you said is true, you seem to be living in your own reality which is different from everyone else's.

maximus Loc: Chattanooga, Tennessee

proud republican wrote:

Who are you talking to???

Sorry...permafrost on page 3

straightUp Loc: California

proud republican wrote:

So what did you guys think about President's speech??I thought it was spot on!! I thought it was great!!! Not one Democrat stood up or applause!!! They all were stoned face!!

My wife and I found the blatant lies and the gloating too revolting so after a few minutes we turned the TV off for an hour then tuned back in for the responses and analysis afterwards. So, obviously my opinion is very different than yours.

I'm sure folks here have already disputed the talking points (and I'm sure no minds have been changed), so I'll skip the cherry-picked stats and feel-good stories for now and point out what I think is the bigger message...

Ever since policies and proceedings have been made available through every day media, the State of the Union address has devolved into a tradition of executive bragging. Even Obama's State of the Union addresses were a collection of cherry-picked stats and feel-good stories - I only watched them because I respected him as a president. Still, there is one thing that the State of the Union is still good for and that's how it functions as a barometer for how divided the Union is and I think the latest address really shows that we are more divided than ever.

The stoned faces were the sober faces of concern, worn by people who are desperately trying to stick to the rules, but as I heard someone say on the radio today, we are for all intents and purposes in a civil war. So while people like Nancy Pelosi are trying to stick to the rules saying we have to rely on due process and on the choices people make because that's how democracy works, the other side is basically taking advantage of the broken down state of our democracy where a president can be elected by a minority.

It really is a shame to see the people divided like this... but the inescapable truth is that we simply don't want the same things. For instance, some of us want all people to be treated equally, while others want to categorize people into classes of varying privilege with "ragheads", "wetbacks" and "niggers" at the bottom. These are irreconcilable differences that won't EVER be resolved through compromise and if 24% of the American people refuse to support equality and freedom of movement, I don't want to share a government with them.

Jakebrake Loc: Broomfield, CO

straightUp wrote:

My wife and I found the blatant lies and the gloating too revolting so after a few minutes we turned the TV off for an hour then tuned back in for the responses and analysis afterwards. So, obviously my opinion is very different than yours.

I'm sure folks here have already disputed the talking points (and I'm sure no minds have been changed), so I'll skip the cherry-picked stats and feel-good stories for now and point out what I think is the bigger message...

Ever since policies and proceedings have been made available through every day media, the State of the Union address has devolved into a tradition of executive bragging. Even Obama's State of the Union addresses were a collection of cherry-picked stats and feel-good stories - I only watched them because I respected him as a president. Still, there is one thing that the State of the Union is still good for and that's how it functions as a barometer for how divided the Union is and I think the latest address really shows that we are more divided than ever.

The stoned faces were the sober faces of concern, worn by people who are desperately trying to stick to the rules, but as I heard someone say on the radio today, we are for all intents and purposes in a civil war. So while people like Nancy Pelosi are trying to stick to the rules saying we have to rely on due process and on the choices people make because that's how democracy works, the other side is basically taking advantage of the broken down state of our democracy where a president can be elected by a minority.

It really is a shame to see the people divided like this... but the inescapable truth is that we simply don't want the same things. For instance, some of us want all people to be treated equally, while others want to categorize people into classes of varying privilege with "ragheads", "wetbacks" and "niggers" at the bottom. These are irreconcilable differences that won't EVER be resolved through compromise and if 24% of the American people refuse to support equality and freedom of movement, I don't want to share a government with them.

My wife and I found the blatant lies and the gloat... (show quote)

Your household and mine certainly had different takes on the SOTU. Yours obviously coming from the lib point of view, straight out of the dimocrat playbook, and mine coming from a conservative stand point. Watching Schumer and Pelosi with their dour expressions and grimaces was priceless. After the 8 year reign of the halfrican, they are not getting their way, so they have become petulant little children and refuse to act like intelligent legislators. It's always what the dim's do.

I still find it amusing how libs constantly refer to the popular vote in the last election but I have news for ya Einstein. That's not how Presidential Elections work, so quit whining about it.

From your post, These are irreconcilable differences that won't EVER be resolved through compromise and if 24% of the American people refuse to support equality and freedom of movement, I don't want to share a government with them. I have a solution for you, and that's move to a country with a government you like because if you don't you will most likely be unhappy and miserable for the next 7 years.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

straightUp wrote:

My wife and I found the blatant lies and the gloating too revolting so after a few minutes we turned the TV off for an hour then tuned back in for the responses and analysis afterwards. So, obviously my opinion is very different than yours.

I'm sure folks here have already disputed the talking points (and I'm sure no minds have been changed), so I'll skip the cherry-picked stats and feel-good stories for now and point out what I think is the bigger message...

Ever since policies and proceedings have been made available through every day media, the State of the Union address has devolved into a tradition of executive bragging. Even Obama's State of the Union addresses were a collection of cherry-picked stats and feel-good stories - I only watched them because I respected him as a president. Still, there is one thing that the State of the Union is still good for and that's how it functions as a barometer for how divided the Union is and I think the latest address really shows that we are more divided than ever.

The stoned faces were the sober faces of concern, worn by people who are desperately trying to stick to the rules, but as I heard someone say on the radio today, we are for all intents and purposes in a civil war. So while people like Nancy Pelosi are trying to stick to the rules saying we have to rely on due process and on the choices people make because that's how democracy works, the other side is basically taking advantage of the broken down state of our democracy where a president can be elected by a minority.

It really is a shame to see the people divided like this... but the inescapable truth is that we simply don't want the same things. For instance, some of us want all people to be treated equally, while others want to categorize people into classes of varying privilege with "ragheads", "wetbacks" and "niggers" at the bottom. These are irreconcilable differences that won't EVER be resolved through compromise and if 24% of the American people refuse to support equality and freedom of movement, I don't want to share a government with them.

My wife and I found the blatant lies and the gloat... (show quote)

"The stoned faces were the sober faces of concern, worn by people who are desperately trying to stick to the rules, but as I heard someone say on the radio today, we are for all intents and purposes in a civil war. ** So while people like Nancy Pelosi are trying to stick to the rules saying we have to rely on due process and on the choices people make because that's how democracy works, the other side is basically taking advantage of the broken down state of our democracy where a president can be elected by a minority." ** - straightUp
You typed this with a straight face sUp?
Have you heard about the memo being released today?
Are you aware of the issues being addressed for over a year now?
Apparently you are unaware of the racism within the Democratic Party.
LBJ was a doozy!
More minorities are awakening to the hypocrisy of the Democratic "leadership".

debeda

proud republican wrote:

The other day ICE arrested 2 so called "Dream... (show quote)

Well law of the jungle maybe

1ProudAmerican

straightUp wrote:

My wife and I found the blatant lies and the gloating too revolting so after a few minutes we turned the TV off for an hour then tuned back in for the responses and analysis afterwards. So, obviously my opinion is very different than yours.

I'm sure folks here have already disputed the talking points (and I'm sure no minds have been changed), so I'll skip the cherry-picked stats and feel-good stories for now and point out what I think is the bigger message...

Ever since policies and proceedings have been made available through every day media, the State of the Union address has devolved into a tradition of executive bragging. Even Obama's State of the Union addresses were a collection of cherry-picked stats and feel-good stories - I only watched them because I respected him as a president. Still, there is one thing that the State of the Union is still good for and that's how it functions as a barometer for how divided the Union is and I think the latest address really shows that we are more divided than ever.

The stoned faces were the sober faces of concern, worn by people who are desperately trying to stick to the rules, but as I heard someone say on the radio today, we are for all intents and purposes in a civil war. So while people like Nancy Pelosi are trying to stick to the rules saying we have to rely on due process and on the choices people make because that's how democracy works, the other side is basically taking advantage of the broken down state of our democracy where a president can be elected by a minority.

It really is a shame to see the people divided like this... but the inescapable truth is that we simply don't want the same things. For instance, some of us want all people to be treated equally, while others want to categorize people into classes of varying privilege with "ragheads", "wetbacks" and "niggers" at the bottom. These are irreconcilable differences that won't EVER be resolved through compromise and if 24% of the American people refuse to support equality and freedom of movement, I don't want to share a government with them.

My wife and I found the blatant lies and the gloat... (show quote)

Too bad you turned your TV off because NOW you are just as ignorant as you were before you turned it off....nothing like burying your head in the sand and singing "la...la...la...la...la".

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

1ProudAmerican wrote:

Too bad you turned your TV off because NOW you are just as ignorant as you were before you turned it off....nothing like burying your head in the sand and singing "la...la...la...la...la".

"Too bad you turned your TV off because NOW you are just as ignorant as you were before you turned it off....nothing like burying your head in the sand and singing "la...la...la...la...la".:

That is the liberal way. They use the 3 monkey approach.

straightUp Loc: California

Jakebrake wrote:

Your household and mine certainly had different takes on the SOTU. Yours obviously coming from the lib point of view, straight out of the dimocrat playbook,

No playbook... just a passion for liberty and justice for all. You conservatives don't seem to know what that means anymore.

Jakebrake wrote:

Watching Schumer and Pelosi with their dour expressions and grimaces was priceless. After the 8 year reign of the halfrican, they are not getting their way, so they have become petulant little children and refuse to act like intelligent legislators. It's always what the dim's do.

Oh, I see... they aren't laughing or cheering so therefore they are being petulant little children. Yeah, gloating is an interesting thing; especially when its coming from people that couldn't get their way for eight years.

Jakebrake wrote:

I still find it amusing how libs constantly refer to the popular vote in the last election but I have news for ya Einstein. That's not how Presidential Elections work, so quit whining about it.

You might be amused but your missing the point. We KNOW this is how it works which is why we are NOT disputing the legitimacy of the current president. Maybe after eight years of disputing the legitimacy of the previous president on the basis of a birth certificate, you're inclined to think we behave the same way. We don't.

The point of bringing up the popular vote is to point out the dysfunction made obvious by the fact that the candidate that lost actually got three million more votes than the candidate that won. I'm sure you think this is all about the Electoral College but it's not... It's about representation which is not the same thing today as it was when the Electoral College was established hundreds of years ago when there wasn't even three million people in the entire country.

...I'm not expecting you to understand any of this... So, I'll move on.

Jakebrake wrote:

From your post, These are irreconcilable differences that won't EVER be resolved through compromise and if 24% of the American people refuse to support equality and freedom of movement, I don't want to share a government with them. I have a solution for you, and that's move to a country with a government you like because if you don't you will most likely be unhappy and miserable for the next 7 years.

I've thought of that. I've lived in Europe for a few years and it was awesome. But California is my home, it's where I grew up and raised a family. So I have a better idea. I'm going to stay right here and fight for freedom and equality, which for me is an uplifting experience. Besides, the numbers are on my side and the Electoral College won't be there to help you in 2018. ;)

straightUp Loc: California

1ProudAmerican wrote:

Too bad you turned your TV off because NOW you are just as ignorant as you were before you turned it off....nothing like burying your head in the sand and singing "la...la...la...la...la".

This may shock you but TV isn't the only source of information. Of course, it helps to be literate. (that means, having he ability to read) ;)

Loki Loc: Georgia

straightUp wrote:

My wife and I found the blatant lies and the gloating too revolting so after a few minutes we turned the TV off for an hour then tuned back in for the responses and analysis afterwards. So, obviously my opinion is very different than yours.

I'm sure folks here have already disputed the talking points (and I'm sure no minds have been changed), so I'll skip the cherry-picked stats and feel-good stories for now and point out what I think is the bigger message...

Ever since policies and proceedings have been made available through every day media, the State of the Union address has devolved into a tradition of executive bragging. Even Obama's State of the Union addresses were a collection of cherry-picked stats and feel-good stories - I only watched them because I respected him as a president. Still, there is one thing that the State of the Union is still good for and that's how it functions as a barometer for how divided the Union is and I think the latest address really shows that we are more divided than ever.

The stoned faces were the sober faces of concern, worn by people who are desperately trying to stick to the rules, but as I heard someone say on the radio today, we are for all intents and purposes in a civil war. So while people like Nancy Pelosi are trying to stick to the rules saying we have to rely on due process and on the choices people make because that's how democracy works, the other side is basically taking advantage of the broken down state of our democracy where a president can be elected by a minority.

It really is a shame to see the people divided like this... but the inescapable truth is that we simply don't want the same things. For instance, some of us want all people to be treated equally, while others want to categorize people into classes of varying privilege with "ragheads", "wetbacks" and "niggers" at the bottom. These are irreconcilable differences that won't EVER be resolved through compromise and if 24% of the American people refuse to support equality and freedom of movement, I don't want to share a government with them.

My wife and I found the blatant lies and the gloat... (show quote)

So you believe that foreign criminals who sneak into our country and break our laws should be treated exactly the same as citizens and LEGAL aliens?

Loki Loc: Georgia

straightUp wrote:

I've thought of that. I've lived in Europe for a few years and it was awesome. But California is my home, it's where I grew up and raised a family. So I have a better idea. I'm going to stay right here and fight for freedom and equality, which for me is an uplifting experience. Besides, the numbers are on my side and the Electoral College won't be there to help you in 2018. ;)

Do you know something about the Electoral College that we don't? You thought you did in 2016, if my memory serves.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

straightUp wrote:

This may shock you but TV isn't the only source of information. Of course, it helps to be literate. (that means, having he ability to read) ;)

"This may shock you but TV isn't the only source of information. Of course, it helps to be literate. (that means, having he ability to read)" - sUp
Time you utilized that skill, sUp.
A bit of wisdom would help also.

Nancy Pelosi’s Backstabbing Plan For The State of The Union (she’s lost it!)
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi just announced her plan to fill the House gallery with illegal immigrants during President Donald Trump’s first State of the Union address.

Following in Pelosi’s footsteps are 24 other House Democrats that also plan to bring illegals to watch the Tuesday night speech.

Previously, these seats were occupied by military heroes, law-abiding taxpayers and America’s best. Now we can look forward to ‘Dreamers’ and liberals ruining Trump’s big night.

The ever-so thoughtful liberals have turned the U.S. Capitol into a safe haven for illegal aliens.

Democrats have decided that they would rather turn their allegiances to foreign invaders rather than honor those who have risked their lives for their freedom of Americans.

These ignorant liberals think that by bringing illegal aliens to the speech, they will be sending a message to Trump, but in actuality they will be sending a message to all of America. Their message is straight-forward — these Democrats that are supposed to be representing Americans only care about their own agenda, which is to protect immigrants who came to this nation illegally.

As of Monday, a total of 9 Democrats have announced that they will be boycotting Trump’s State of the Union. The liberals planning to attend will be taking a cue from Hollywood celebrities and will wear all black as a symbol against sexual harassment.

“I want to be clear: DREAMers are Americans,” said Rep. Nita Lowey, D-N.Y. Lowey will be bringing a ‘Dreamer’ that came to the U.S. from El Salvador at the age of 15. “They contribute to our economy, our communities and our strength and stability as a nation.”

If these idiotic Democrats want to demonstrate their protests against Trump during his address then he needs to take matters into his own hands.

Trump should invite ICE agents to his address to put an end to this nonsense.

Aren’t Pelosi and these other Democrats breaking the law by harboring illegal aliens?

–The Horn Editorial Team.

http://thehornnews.com/46457-2/