it is rather pathetic to watch a group of alter boys act as if the words of an evil orange criminal are about making America great for the working and law abiding..

You grasp the words used for distraction and say not a thing about the words which are dangerous for all Americans who do not flock to praise this sick demented orange crud..

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/01/donald-trump-just-asked-congress-to-end-the-rule-of-law.html?via=recirc_recent..... Slate says it in fine style.

You will not accept these facts. But go back to trumps speach and you wil l find it true..

Donald Trump’s first State of the Union was a deeply dangerous speech.

It was deeply dangerous because he finally followed in the footsteps of European leaders like Hungarian President Viktor Orban who have long ago learned to give an attractive look to authoritarian populism.

Like them, Trump eschewed openly racist remarks in his speech, even emphasizing how much he (supposedly) cares about the fate of Latinos and black Americans. Like them, he called for economic policies, like paid family leave, that would actually benefit ordinary people. And like them, he then cast himself as the only man willing to prioritize the interests of his supporters over those of foreigners and political elites.

It was Bannonism without Bannon’s penchant for shock and awe. And it played shockingly well.

But Trump’s speech was also deeply dangerous for an even more important reason: Under the cover of his soothing rhetoric about unity and bipartisanship, Trump called on Congress to give him unprecedented and unquestionably antidemocratic powers: “Tonight,” he said, “I call on the congress to empower every Cabinet secretary with the authority to reward good workers—and to remove federal employees who undermine the public trust or fail the American people.”

By design, it is easy to overlook the true significance of the second half of that phrase. But dwell on it for a moment, and imagine what this would actually look like in practice. Under Trump’s proposal, any Cabinet secretary could decide that, say, a law enforcement official investigating the president had “undermined the public trust” or “failed the American people”—and fire him on the spot. In other words, Trump is calling for an end to any semblance of independence for the IRS, the FBI, the Department of Justice, or any other federal agency.

To be sure, such legislation is unlikely to pass. While the constant standing ovations for Trump from the Republican benches demonstrate the degree to which the GOP has now embraced the president, they are not yet at the point of dismantling the rule of law quite so brazenly; even if they did, the Supreme Court would be very likely to strike such a law down as unconstitutional.

But the fact that Trump’s authoritarian demand is unlikely to be realized anytime soon does not make it unimportant. In his first State of the Union, the 45th president of the United States asked Congress for the authority to end the rule of law. And that—not Trump’s supposedly unifying policy proposals, much less his supposedly presidential ability to read a speech off a teleprompter—should be the headline of every newspaper tomorrow.

Yeah you were PUNNING young lady and it was spot on. LOL! Speaking of spots, Im wondering if the Democrats shat themselves with all of the TRUTHS they were hearing? Also from what I have read a little earlier from a couple of different articles, is that President Trump ordered the MEMO RELEASED right after the SOTU SPEECH. Maybe thats the reason the Democrats were wearing their invisible vagina hats during the speech?
Semper Fi

You are so right debeda.. I fully expected their reviews and action to be just what you say here.. I heard One complain because he said “ America “some 80 times!!! Can you believe that?? Then read another said he only used I 30 times throughout his speech in comparison to BO using it over 100 times in his first speech... WTH~~ is this so important these news media hacks have to go counting words??

Divisive~~ who sat stone faced stupid~~ dems
Who wouldn't stand for any number of people introduced or in recognition of one accomplishment of Trump~~dems

Their truly pathetic and its no wonder they are imploding.. What a disgrace they are!!!

You are so right debeda.. I fully expected their reviews and action to be just what you say here.. I heard One complain because he said “ America “some 80 times!!! Can you believe that?? Then read another said he only used I 30 times throughout his speech in comparison to BO using it over 100 times in his first speech... WTH~~ is this so important these news media hacks have to go counting words??

Divisive~~ who sat stone faced stupid~~ dems
Who wouldn't stand for any number of people introduced or in recognition of one accomplishment of Trump~~dems

Their truly pathetic and its no wonder they are imploding.. What a disgrace they are!!!