eagleye13 Loc: Fl

You better believe it.
The CONiving anti-Trump culprits are there to witness.

Crayons Loc: St Jo, Texas

the trumpy lives rent free inside of agonized libs heads((laugh))
TDS

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Yep; oh the pain of it all;
Most UPSET Reactions to Donald Trump Winning Election Against Hillary
https://youtu.be/XnTnpN2H34A

peter11937 Loc: NYS

Yes, I did, the question becomes where did the appropriation go? Nice to know where that money was squandered, surely not for desalinization facilities, was it?

Bigmac495 Loc: Indiana

How did you know??

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

How Government Agents Troll Online to Divide and Confuse
Source: The Daily Bell | By Joe Jarvis
http://republicbroadcasting.org/news/how-government-agents-troll-online-to-divide-and-confuse/

The real story of online deception isn’t about the Russians. Sure, the Russians certainly have their own programs to disrupt and steer online discourse. But how quickly the public has forgotten about the U.S. government’s own internet troll program.
Edward Snowden leaked documents used by the “Five Eyes” alliance of governments. The United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, New Zealand, and Australia–basically Oceania from 1984–get together to spy on each other’s citizens. That’s how they cleverly get around laws against spying on their own citizens.
The leaked documents included a presentation about how government agents should disrupt online discourse.
There is a lot of overlap between these tactics, and often more than one are used simultaneously. For example, there has been a big push by the media to convince you that the end of net neutrality is a bad thing. They are masking the true nature of net neutrality–it really gives the government power to regulate aspects of the internet. And then they repackage net neutrality as necessary for freedom and open access to the internet.
When deploying government sponsored trolls online, the agents will mimic real commenters in order to sound more believable. They gain credibility since people are more likely to trust those they perceive as similar to them.
Sometimes government agents invent a crazy story and attribute it to a movement. This discredits the movement. Think Flat Earth Theory. Those primed to believe conspiracy theories get sucked in. Then all the true conspiracies are grouped in with the bogus one.
If a true conspiracy theory comes out, they invent 100 others to obscure the real one. In order for the truth to be lost among the falsities, they invent various levels of “conspiracy theories” from the slightly believable, to the absurd.
Hillary Clinton really is a corrupt psychopath. But she is not a shape-shifting reptilian alien.
From the evidence, it seems the United States government was in some way involved in the 2001 attacks on the twin towers. But did they use holograms of the planes, and fire a laser into the towers? Probably not.
The conspiracies become too unbelievable to some, and they throw the truth out with the government manufactured lies. For those that do believe the false details of a true conspiracy, they walk away with an inflated sense of how powerful and all knowing the government really is.
This also works to the government’s benefit. The over-the-top conspiracy theories become the decoy. They can then exploit those beliefs to create cognitive stress, which is another tactic of control.

Raylan Wolfe Loc: earth

peter11937 Loc: NYS

True, just look at the CO2 idiocy. People are hysterical about CO2 increasing to 400 ppm and think it caused the current inter glacial warm period. It like looking out the window and seeing a sunny day with pedestrians without umbrellas, then , later, looking out and seeing a storm threatening sky and pedestrians carrying furled umbrellas, then later seeing it raining and pedestrians with opened umbrellas over them and still later looking out and seeing high winds and many umbrellas turned inside out, than concluding carrying an umbrella causes overcast, opening an umbrella causes rain and turning an open umbrella inside out causes high winds with rain.... CO2 increases AFTER warming occurs with a lapse of about 800 years..... yet any insist that the human action caused the warming by burning fuel which is completely false.

https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=yoy+tube+globa+warming+hoax+for+dummies&view=detail&mid=8D373A5601E5F484462A8D373A5601E5F484462A&FORM=VIRE

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Great funny toon, peter; https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=yoy+tube+globa+warming+hoax+for+dummies&view=detail&mid=8D373A5601E5F484462A8D373A5601E5F484462A&FORM=VIRE
The umbrella analogy is awesome, and right on.
Guess what?
The MSM Talking Heads are still pushing Man Made Climate Change. We remember it started out as Man Made Global Warming; then we had a cold spell. OOOOPs!
Are they bona fide air heads or highly paid stooges just reading scripts?

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Speaking of bona fide airheads, the Loon continues his run

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Raylan Wolfe Loc: earth

NASA global warming is a fact!

https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

peter11937 Loc: NYS

Evidence of what. If the graph is factual, it clearly shows that climate is insensitive to CO2 content , which it is. The current earth temp. is lower that the Holocene Optimum when CO2 content was LOWER than at present. Read... https://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/12/21/the-holocene-thermal-optimum/ there's more, read the Lake Vostok Ice Core graphs and note that as the earth warms, 600 to 800 years later CO2 rises.

http://joannenova.com.au/global-warming-2/ice-core-graph/ Do yourself a favor anr reaad facts before spouting off. Or is that too much to hope for.

Raylan Wolfe Loc: earth

Let's see, who to believe, NASA or 'whatsupwiththat' and 'joanne nova" both right wing conspiracists????????????

peter11937 Loc: NYS

That is not a rational response. More CO2 is a good not bad thing. https://climatenewsnetwork.net/plant-growth-surges-as-co2-levels-rise/