President Trump extracts the USA from another Obama tar pit. The UN is unhappy.
S. Maturin wrote:
http://www.dailywire.com/news/24293/trump-administration-officially-pulls-us-out-un-emily-zanotti
United Nations Ambassador Nikki Haley announced, over the weekend, that the Trump Administration has decided to pull the U.S. out of a non-binding U.N. agreement calling for a global response to the international flow of migrants.
Ambassador Haley made the decision final on Monday.
I didn't see any reaction quotes from the UN. Where does it express their 'unhappiness'?
Kevyn wrote:
The pumpkinfurher is surrendering the United States decades long leadership role all over the world, it is pathetic.
I find it interesting that depending on the progressive liberal that you ask, and what time of day you ask them, America needs to stay out of the worlds business and take care of our own needs, or they need to take care of the worlds problems and be a “leader” of the world. If we try to lead we are told we are imperialists and trying to impose our worldview on everyone else and we are bad. If we look to our own problems then we are abandoning our position as the world leader and we are bad. The common thread I get from liberals is that it really doesn’t matter what America does or says they can find the negative in it. I choose to be optimistic and believe that there is good in America and I will continue to believe that as long as we are free then we are a beacon of hope to the rest of the worlds people that want to be free.
Highlander66 wrote:
I find it interesting that depending on the progressive liberal that you ask, and what time of day you ask them, America needs to stay out of the worlds business and take care of our own needs, or they need to take care of the worlds problems and be a “leader” of the world. If we try to lead we are told we are imperialists and trying to impose our worldview on everyone else and we are bad. If we look to our own problems then we are abandoning our position as the world leader and we are bad. The common thread I get from liberals is that it really doesn’t matter what America does or says they can find the negative in it. I choose to be optimistic and believe that there is good in America and I will continue to believe that as long as we are free then we are a beacon of hope to the rest of the worlds people that want to be free.
I find it interesting that depending on the progre... (
show quote)
You are a little bit right. We need to stop meddling in so many countries, trying to protect business interests of the globalists instead of supporting the people of those countries.
Larry the Legend wrote:
I didn't see any reaction quotes from the UN. Where does it express their 'unhappiness'?
Who cares about the 'happiness' of the scrubs at the anti-American mob HQ, the UN?
moldyoldy wrote:
You are a little bit right. We need to stop meddling in so many countries, trying to protect business interests of the globalists instead of supporting the people of those countries.
Help in what way?..Send more tax payers dollars to them... we've already sent too much money down the rat hole, rats that only like us when we're paying,... This United States needs first and foremost to get our own fiscal house in order... Moldy, I have a non political question for you or anyone for that matter... Let's say someone poor or homeless asks you for assistance and you , yourself are in horrible debt and without capital... would you borrow to loan to the poor...
byronglimish wrote:
Would you think that letting people into America, that have the likely hood to get everything free from working tax payers..is that good leadership?...maybe we could have carrot farms and the like for them to work and live on...if they're thoroughly vetted...which should take about two years or so...we could make them compete with the Mexicans for jobs...but to your leadership idea of allowing another entity mandate who we take in...piss on that idea...
You're talking Kevin here. Of course he thinks that the taxpayers should give free, free, free and subsidized goods to everyone. He's a socialist.
Semper Fi
byronglimish wrote:
Help in what way?..Send more tax payers dollars to them... we've already sent too much money down the rat hole, rats that only like us when we're paying,... This United States needs first and foremost to get our own fiscal house in order... Moldy, I have a non political question for you or anyone for that matter... Let's say someone poor or homeless asks you for assistance and you , yourself are in horrible debt and without capital... would you borrow to loan to the poor...
Supporting the people of other countries does not mean financial, but rather keep them from being ripped off and natural resources taken by others.
GmanTerry wrote:
You're talking Kevin here. Of course he thinks that the taxpayers should give free, free, free and subsidized goods to everyone. He's a socialist.
Semper Fi
Just ask him what happens when he runs out of other peoples' money.
S. Maturin wrote:
http://www.dailywire.com/news/24293/trump-administration-officially-pulls-us-out-un-emily-zanotti
United Nations Ambassador Nikki Haley announced, over the weekend, that the Trump Administration has decided to pull the U.S. out of a non-binding U.N. agreement calling for a global response to the international flow of migrants.
Ambassador Haley made the decision final on Monday.
===============
Thank you president Trump for protecting us.
UN must be very unhappy. They are hoping for a global government with Obama as the head.
In Europe, reports recently indicated that there are about 6 million to 7 million migrants coming from AFRICA nations to settle in Europe.
I hope that does not happen in the US. We must be grateful that president Trump was elected. Now, he is protecting us from invasion of those criminals, radical Islam, and all kinds of CROOKS to taking away our land.
Mr. Obama must be very unhappy. UN has been working for a ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT with Mr. Obama as the head of that world. Then Islam his religion of peace could take over.
S. Maturin wrote:
http://www.dailywire.com/news/24293/trump-administration-officially-pulls-us-out-un-emily-zanotti
United Nations Ambassador Nikki Haley announced, over the weekend, that the Trump Administration has decided to pull the U.S. out of a non-binding U.N. agreement calling for a global response to the international flow of migrants.
Ambassador Haley made the decision final on Monday.
One more step in the right direction.
Now get the UN troops off of US soil.
We can keep the UN vehicles we paid for, and make better use of them.
oldroy
Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
snowbear37 wrote:
The next thing that should happen is to throw the U.N. out.
Agreed. We can surely destroy the UN buildings that we built for them if we can destroy unused football stadiums.
oldroy
Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
moldyoldy wrote:
Supporting the people of other countries does not mean financial, but rather keep them from being ripped off and natural resources taken by others.
I just can't make out what this post means, other than maybe we should keep on distributing our wealth to them. Remember that part of Obama's opening desires?
moldyoldy wrote:
Supporting the people of other countries does not mean financial, but rather keep them from being ripped off and natural resources taken by others.
This strikes a cord, should we take care of others natural resources and sell ours to a Russian interest...like the Uranium One Scandal??
Radiance3 wrote:
===============
Thank you president Trump for protecting us.
UN must be very unhappy. They are hoping for a global government with Obama as the head.
In Europe, reports recently indicated that there are about 6 million to 7 million migrants coming from AFRICA nations to settle in Europe.
I hope that does not happen in the US. We must be grateful that president Trump was elected. Now, he is protecting us from invasion of those criminals, radical Islam, and all kinds of CROOKS to taking away our land.
Mr. Obama must be very unhappy. UN has been working for a ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT with Mr. Obama as the head of that world. Then Islam his religion of peace could take over.
=============== br Thank you president Trump for p... (
show quote)
Yes, Obama as head. He came to them multi-national, dark-skinned (not white), socialist/Marxist muslim, loose of morals, and grossly ignorant. Perfect for UN leadership.
Perfect.
byronglimish wrote:
This strikes a cord, should we take care of others natural resources and sell ours to a Russian interest...like the Uranium One Scandal??
Just try to imagine of what America would be today with Hillary ready to celebrate her first year of running Obama II.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.