Roy Moore has not been convicted
Dec 1, 2017 13:01:59 #
Zemirah wrote:
A "coroner" deals only with the deceased, and I have no idea what "he'll represents, consequently, what you believe you are discussing is in great doubt.
Shirley [sic], you aren't so unfamiliar with online posts, that you can't make out the meaning of a statement despite typos? To help, "corner" and "hell".
Dec 1, 2017 14:54:16 #
SGM B wrote:
I was not criticizing you for your input nor was I... (show quote)
One might be inclined to think, that the 10 Commandments might be more relevant to a Jewish upbringing, whereas Matthew 22:36-40* would be more in keeping with a Christian upbringing.
*
Matthew 22:36-40King James Version (KJV)
36 Master, which is the great commandment in the law?
37 Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.
38 This is the first and great commandment.
39 And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
40 On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.
Dec 1, 2017 15:46:50 #
acknowledgeurma wrote:
One might be inclined to think, that the 10 Comman... (show quote)
One might at that, however even tho we as Christians understand we are now covered by grace and no longer under the curse of the law, the 10 Commandments are still relative in our daily lives. Even tho it is not possible to keep all the Commandments, (if we are guilty of 1, we are guilty of them all) they are still words to live by.
SGM B out.
Dec 2, 2017 00:09:12 #
acknowledgeurma wrote:
Shirley [sic], you aren't so unfamiliar with online posts, that you can't make out the meaning of a statement despite typos? To help, "corner" and "hell".
I agree with Zemirah. If the Desperate One expects respect for his opinion, he should communicate at a level above that of a fifth grader. When I read such garbled abuse of the English language, I think that the writer doesn't have enough cognizant involvement with the subject to have any meaningful understanding. His input cannot be anything more that pointless drivel.
Online posting does not give one a license to communicate like a blithering idiot.
Dec 2, 2017 01:07:31 #
EconomistDon wrote:
I agree with Zemirah. If the Desperate One expects respect for his opinion, he should communicate at a level above that of a fifth grader. When I read such garbled abuse of the English language, I think that the writer doesn't have enough cognizant involvement with the subject to have any meaningful understanding. His input cannot be anything more that pointless drivel.
Online posting does not give one a license to communicate like a blithering idiot.
Online posting does not give one a license to communicate like a blithering idiot.
And now who is an elitist?
Dec 2, 2017 03:40:04 #
acknowledgeurma wrote:
Shirley [sic], you aren't so unfamiliar with online posts, that you can't make out the meaning of a statement despite typos? To help, "corner" and "hell".
Well, how kind you are.
desparado wrote:
They will set him in a coroner and shun him there's a special place in he'll for Moore and those who support him
They will set him in a coroner and shun him there's a special place in he'll for Moore and those who support him
His post was in response to mine, in which desparado assigned me to "a special place in hell," and of course I understood that; however, I chose to overlook it, chiding him instead for his misuse of English.
May I suggest you extend that same magnanimous kindness to teach our mutual friend English.
These weren't typos. A typo, according to my dictionary, is "a mistake in printed matter resulting from mechanical failures of some kind."
One was a misspelling, through the addition of an extra consonant, the other the insertion of an apostrophe creating the contraction of two words instead of the one intended, i.e., "'won't' is a contraction of 'will not'"; "'o'clock' is a contraction of 'of the clock, and he'll is a contraction of he will.'
There is a built-in misspelling advisory on OPP in red, intended to warn the writer of a misspelling, which calls for an online spell check.
Thank you again for your extreme kindness, however you are lacking insight in comprehending the dynamics of the verbal exchange you chose to critique.
Dec 2, 2017 17:23:51 #
Zemirah wrote:
His post was in response to mine, in which despara... (show quote)
One of the many great things about having access to the internet, is that one can easily find definitions for words. Of the three definitions I looked at:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/typo
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/typo
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/typo
none mention "mechanical failures". By your definition, are you saying his "errors" are not typos because they aren't mechanical failures (failures of a machine)? If so, then I believe most things commonly called typos don't fit your definition.
As for OPP's online spell check, both coroner and corner pass, as do he'll and hell, but it doesn't like OPPs or OPP's.
As for my "lacking insight in comprehending the dynamics of the verbal exchange you chose to critique", I think I understood very well your attempts to belittle desparado by focusing on form in the post, rather than the substance of whether there is a special corner of hell reserved for him and his supporters. I am one who does not believe in hell (except for maybe the many levels here on earth); I choose not to believe in a God who would condemn Its children to hell. So his imagery of hell, I took to be an expression of extreme dislike for Roy Moore and his supporters. I think the corner of hell Moore's headed for is commonly called the US Senate; can you imagine having to work with that many ambitious ego, many of whom are lawyers?
Dec 3, 2017 00:54:48 #
It requires no effort on my part to belittle anyone; each individual is more than capable of self revelatory behavior.
I have no interest in belittling others, or in your understanding.
As to the ego of an attorney, having spent years in the past married to an attorney, who subsequently became an elected judge, you would be singing to the choir on that one, except the ego of a Judge far surpasses the ego of an attorney.
I have no interest in belittling others, or in your understanding.
As to the ego of an attorney, having spent years in the past married to an attorney, who subsequently became an elected judge, you would be singing to the choir on that one, except the ego of a Judge far surpasses the ego of an attorney.
acknowledgeurma wrote:
One of the many great things about having access t... (show quote)
Dec 3, 2017 08:06:03 #
Zemirah wrote:
It requires no effort on my part to belittle anyon... (show quote)
Yep!
most judges and attorneys aren't people too. They give up humanity by swearing to the Bar.
Roy Moore is an exception. He has to go.
The judge in the rancher's Las Vegas trial is not an exception; She has become part of the prosecution.
**** See how crooked the government is and how they manipulated the jury and even the judge was caught in practicing law on the bench, and the prosecutors and BLM agents lied on the stand.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cr54W-EkpuM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bboDLUHcc-U
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFgudWvLzPw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILdBLJPC5rw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jj5jmfEljhk
Dec 3, 2017 10:36:49 #
Nickolai wrote:
You can rest assured Moor will win because Evangelicals stick with their cult members come hell or high water. They are a formidable voting block that has affected to direction of this country since they leveraged Ronny Raygun into the White House and fundamentally changed America
Perhaps not..I read this morning anyway that Doug?? Name escapes me, has a 3 point favorite over Moore...
Of course I will say I do not believe in poll results.
Dec 3, 2017 14:13:30 #
Nickolai wrote:
You can rest assured Moor will win because Evangelicals stick with their cult members come hell or high water. They are a formidable voting block that has affected to direction of this country since they leveraged Ronny Raygun into the White House and fundamentally changed America
OMG Nick, I didn't realize that Evangelicals are that powerful, to leverage Reagan to a win. Reagan won in a landslide over Carter in 1980, taking 46 states and 489 electoral votes. Then Reagan won in an even bigger landslide over Mondale in 1984, taking 49 states and 525 electoral votes. It appears that we owe Evangelicals a huge thanks for their leveraging in those two elections.
Now I feel way better about Moore taking down a potential swamp rat December 12.
Dec 4, 2017 03:00:27 #
The BLM agents have been a dishonest Nazi like force ever since this entire escapade began several years ago.
I understand Harry Reid's mafia like son wants this land as a broker for the Chinese.
There is no justification for the government attempting to take this family's right to have their cattle on public land, after generations of hard work and effort on their part.
Most of the regional judges across the land are now liberal activists rather than Constitutionalists abiding by precedent as they should.
I understand Harry Reid's mafia like son wants this land as a broker for the Chinese.
There is no justification for the government attempting to take this family's right to have their cattle on public land, after generations of hard work and effort on their part.
Most of the regional judges across the land are now liberal activists rather than Constitutionalists abiding by precedent as they should.
eagleye13 wrote:
Yep! br most judges and attorneys aren't people to... (show quote)
Dec 4, 2017 09:39:30 #
A lot of people are unaware that the BLM was to hold the cattle and return them to the Bundys. Instead the BLM killed the cattle and ripped out the piping and tanks watering the cattle and wild life. Years of work by the ranchers. This is coming out in the trial. More people need to become aware of who the BLM is working for, and their agenda to kick ranchers off the land. We will all be effected by this. America's food supply is being diminished.
Why would that be?
Time to ask.
Why would that be?
Time to ask.
Dec 4, 2017 13:12:03 #
eagleye13 wrote:
A lot of people are unaware that the BLM was to hold the cattle and return them to the Bundys. Instead the BLM killed the cattle and ripped out the piping and tanks watering the cattle and wild life. Years of work by the ranchers. This is coming out in the trial. More people need to become aware of who the BLM is working for, and their agenda to kick ranchers off the land. We will all be effected by this. America's food supply is being diminished.
Why would that be?
Time to ask.
Why would that be?
Time to ask.
Typical!!!!! Ppfffttt
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.