One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The Myth of Economic Prosperity Through Mass Immigration
Nov 8, 2017 08:27:47   #
pafret Loc: Northeast
 
The Myth of Economic Prosperity Through Mass Immigration
Rachel Marsden

The Myth of Economic Prosperity Through Mass Immigration

PARIS -- Those of us living in Western democracies keep hearing it over and over again from our politicians: To compete economically, we must submit to mass immigration. It's long past time to dispel this destructive myth.

The mass immigration con is typically peddled for the same reason that you need an accountant to help do your taxes. By tying the issue to economics, politicians are trying to make it too complex for laypeople to know when they're being scammed.

While they're exploiting your human decency with their spiel about the greater economic good, these government pickpockets are reaching into your trousers (or into your bank account) for more cash. Hey, man, a gubmint's gotta eat!

U.S. President Donald Trump isn't buying it, though. I have yet to hear Trump proclaim that the recipe for American greatness is more immigration. So far, he's one of the few Western leaders to have taken any action, proposing to cut legal immigration by half in ten years.

British Prime Minister Theresa May has also taken an anti-immigration stance, but her actions have yet to match her words.

French President Emmanuel Macron has talked up diversity in the past but seems to have been mugged by reality. Or maybe he just went for a walk in Paris one day. You can't stroll through the streets of this city without noticing that it has three major problems: chain-smokers, kids prone to public tantrums, and an immigration/integration disconnect.

In September, Macron announced that French immigration laws require a total revamping and that failing to make sweeping changes to the system will only empower anti-immigration extremists.



Meanwhile, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's immigration minister, Ahmed Hussen, announced last week that Canada aims to welcome a million new immigrants by 2020, increasing the number of newcomers by up to 40,000 per year. His justification? Canadian companies and their labor needs.

Nice try. We've been told for a long time that Western nations simply aren't reproducing at an adequate labor-replacement rate, and therefore we have to import new workers. Apparently, overpopulated countries are the the gold standard in social and economic excellence. Basic principles of population ecology help explain why so many millennials have chosen to invest in career and personal development rather than contribute to the further overpopulation of the planet. Did it ever occur to these governments that maybe people just like their space? Why do we all have to live on top of each other?

I'd really like to know which companies are complaining that they can't find workers willing to accept jobs at a fair wage. Funny how we never get to see any such company representatives alongside government officials when they make announcements about boosting the number of imported workers. You'd think that both the government and the company would welcome the opportunity to sell the idea to citizens, and maybe the company would even get a few more resumes out of the free "we're hiring" publicity.

If governments are anticipating future labor needs, have they not considered that we're well into an era of increased automation? In fact, we're often warned about the threats that artificial intelligence might pose toward mankind. It's not so much about robots becoming self-aware and evil, the way they do in science-fiction movies, but more about their potential to wipe out entire swaths of the workforce.

Robots are already beginning to take over the jobs of supermarket cashiers, and they have a growing presence in the construction, retail, transportation, health care and manufacturing sectors. One of the candidates in this year's French presidential elections, Benoit Hamon of the Socialist Party, proposed a universal basic income to help offset the eventuality that robots will be taking away livelihoods. Hamon also wanted to tax robot revenues, since he expected robots to reduce the workforce by at least nine percent. (He still rejected immigration quotas, however.)

The idea that more immigration will increase economic productivity runs counter to the facts of technological advancement. We're seeing an untenable increase in both automation and immigration. What are all the new arrivals going to do as the labor market shrinks?

Governments are still encouraging 20th-century immigration despite 21st-century technology. If they're worried about diversity -- a term that so many Western politicians always have on the tip of their tongues -- they should invest in the education of their own people to foster diversity of thought. But then again, a better-educated public might realize that the idea of economic prosperity through mass immigration is a total scam.

Reply
Nov 8, 2017 08:50:10   #
debeda
 
pafret wrote:
The Myth of Economic Prosperity Through Mass Immigration
Rachel Marsden

The Myth of Economic Prosperity Through Mass Immigration

PARIS -- Those of us living in Western democracies keep hearing it over and over again from our politicians: To compete economically, we must submit to mass immigration. It's long past time to dispel this destructive myth.

The mass immigration con is typically peddled for the same reason that you need an accountant to help do your taxes. By tying the issue to economics, politicians are trying to make it too complex for laypeople to know when they're being scammed.

While they're exploiting your human decency with their spiel about the greater economic good, these government pickpockets are reaching into your trousers (or into your bank account) for more cash. Hey, man, a gubmint's gotta eat!

U.S. President Donald Trump isn't buying it, though. I have yet to hear Trump proclaim that the recipe for American greatness is more immigration. So far, he's one of the few Western leaders to have taken any action, proposing to cut legal immigration by half in ten years.

British Prime Minister Theresa May has also taken an anti-immigration stance, but her actions have yet to match her words.

French President Emmanuel Macron has talked up diversity in the past but seems to have been mugged by reality. Or maybe he just went for a walk in Paris one day. You can't stroll through the streets of this city without noticing that it has three major problems: chain-smokers, kids prone to public tantrums, and an immigration/integration disconnect.

In September, Macron announced that French immigration laws require a total revamping and that failing to make sweeping changes to the system will only empower anti-immigration extremists.



Meanwhile, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's immigration minister, Ahmed Hussen, announced last week that Canada aims to welcome a million new immigrants by 2020, increasing the number of newcomers by up to 40,000 per year. His justification? Canadian companies and their labor needs.

Nice try. We've been told for a long time that Western nations simply aren't reproducing at an adequate labor-replacement rate, and therefore we have to import new workers. Apparently, overpopulated countries are the the gold standard in social and economic excellence. Basic principles of population ecology help explain why so many millennials have chosen to invest in career and personal development rather than contribute to the further overpopulation of the planet. Did it ever occur to these governments that maybe people just like their space? Why do we all have to live on top of each other?

I'd really like to know which companies are complaining that they can't find workers willing to accept jobs at a fair wage. Funny how we never get to see any such company representatives alongside government officials when they make announcements about boosting the number of imported workers. You'd think that both the government and the company would welcome the opportunity to sell the idea to citizens, and maybe the company would even get a few more resumes out of the free "we're hiring" publicity.

If governments are anticipating future labor needs, have they not considered that we're well into an era of increased automation? In fact, we're often warned about the threats that artificial intelligence might pose toward mankind. It's not so much about robots becoming self-aware and evil, the way they do in science-fiction movies, but more about their potential to wipe out entire swaths of the workforce.

Robots are already beginning to take over the jobs of supermarket cashiers, and they have a growing presence in the construction, retail, transportation, health care and manufacturing sectors. One of the candidates in this year's French presidential elections, Benoit Hamon of the Socialist Party, proposed a universal basic income to help offset the eventuality that robots will be taking away livelihoods. Hamon also wanted to tax robot revenues, since he expected robots to reduce the workforce by at least nine percent. (He still rejected immigration quotas, however.)

The idea that more immigration will increase economic productivity runs counter to the facts of technological advancement. We're seeing an untenable increase in both automation and immigration. What are all the new arrivals going to do as the labor market shrinks?

Governments are still encouraging 20th-century immigration despite 21st-century technology. If they're worried about diversity -- a term that so many Western politicians always have on the tip of their tongues -- they should invest in the education of their own people to foster diversity of thought. But then again, a better-educated public might realize that the idea of economic prosperity through mass immigration is a total scam.
The Myth of Economic Prosperity Through Mass Immig... (show quote)


EXCELLENT PIECE!! Thank you for sharing.

Reply
Nov 8, 2017 09:26:53   #
boatbob2
 
HOW/WHY,would We take an individual,with no education,,that doesnt speak english,with NO skills,and wipes his butt with his hand,( no paper) and want them to immigrate into AMERICA?????

Reply
 
 
Nov 8, 2017 09:55:32   #
Oldsailor65 Loc: Iowa
 
pafret wrote:
The Myth of Economic Prosperity Through Mass Immigration
Rachel Marsden

The Myth of Economic Prosperity Through Mass Immigration

PARIS -- Those of us living in Western democracies keep hearing it over and over again from our politicians: To compete economically, we must submit to mass immigration. It's long past time to dispel this destructive myth.

The mass immigration con is typically peddled for the same reason that you need an accountant to help do your taxes. By tying the issue to economics, politicians are trying to make it too complex for laypeople to know when they're being scammed.

While they're exploiting your human decency with their spiel about the greater economic good, these government pickpockets are reaching into your trousers (or into your bank account) for more cash. Hey, man, a gubmint's gotta eat!

U.S. President Donald Trump isn't buying it, though. I have yet to hear Trump proclaim that the recipe for American greatness is more immigration. So far, he's one of the few Western leaders to have taken any action, proposing to cut legal immigration by half in ten years.

British Prime Minister Theresa May has also taken an anti-immigration stance, but her actions have yet to match her words.

French President Emmanuel Macron has talked up diversity in the past but seems to have been mugged by reality. Or maybe he just went for a walk in Paris one day. You can't stroll through the streets of this city without noticing that it has three major problems: chain-smokers, kids prone to public tantrums, and an immigration/integration disconnect.

In September, Macron announced that French immigration laws require a total revamping and that failing to make sweeping changes to the system will only empower anti-immigration extremists.



Meanwhile, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's immigration minister, Ahmed Hussen, announced last week that Canada aims to welcome a million new immigrants by 2020, increasing the number of newcomers by up to 40,000 per year. His justification? Canadian companies and their labor needs.

Nice try. We've been told for a long time that Western nations simply aren't reproducing at an adequate labor-replacement rate, and therefore we have to import new workers. Apparently, overpopulated countries are the the gold standard in social and economic excellence. Basic principles of population ecology help explain why so many millennials have chosen to invest in career and personal development rather than contribute to the further overpopulation of the planet. Did it ever occur to these governments that maybe people just like their space? Why do we all have to live on top of each other?

I'd really like to know which companies are complaining that they can't find workers willing to accept jobs at a fair wage. Funny how we never get to see any such company representatives alongside government officials when they make announcements about boosting the number of imported workers. You'd think that both the government and the company would welcome the opportunity to sell the idea to citizens, and maybe the company would even get a few more resumes out of the free "we're hiring" publicity.

If governments are anticipating future labor needs, have they not considered that we're well into an era of increased automation? In fact, we're often warned about the threats that artificial intelligence might pose toward mankind. It's not so much about robots becoming self-aware and evil, the way they do in science-fiction movies, but more about their potential to wipe out entire swaths of the workforce.

Robots are already beginning to take over the jobs of supermarket cashiers, and they have a growing presence in the construction, retail, transportation, health care and manufacturing sectors. One of the candidates in this year's French presidential elections, Benoit Hamon of the Socialist Party, proposed a universal basic income to help offset the eventuality that robots will be taking away livelihoods. Hamon also wanted to tax robot revenues, since he expected robots to reduce the workforce by at least nine percent. (He still rejected immigration quotas, however.)

The idea that more immigration will increase economic productivity runs counter to the facts of technological advancement. We're seeing an untenable increase in both automation and immigration. What are all the new arrivals going to do as the labor market shrinks?

Governments are still encouraging 20th-century immigration despite 21st-century technology. If they're worried about diversity -- a term that so many Western politicians always have on the tip of their tongues -- they should invest in the education of their own people to foster diversity of thought. But then again, a better-educated public might realize that the idea of economic prosperity through mass immigration is a total scam.
The Myth of Economic Prosperity Through Mass Immig... (show quote)

**********************************************************************************
Very good information
Immigration didn't make America Great
Assimilation did

Reply
Nov 8, 2017 10:13:27   #
Radiance3
 
pafret wrote:
The Myth of Economic Prosperity Through Mass Immigration
Rachel Marsden

The Myth of Economic Prosperity Through Mass Immigration

PARIS -- Those of us living in Western democracies keep hearing it over and over again from our politicians: To compete economically, we must submit to mass immigration. It's long past time to dispel this destructive myth.

The mass immigration con is typically peddled for the same reason that you need an accountant to help do your taxes. By tying the issue to economics, politicians are trying to make it too complex for laypeople to know when they're being scammed.

While they're exploiting your human decency with their spiel about the greater economic good, these government pickpockets are reaching into your trousers (or into your bank account) for more cash. Hey, man, a gubmint's gotta eat!

U.S. President Donald Trump isn't buying it, though. I have yet to hear Trump proclaim that the recipe for American greatness is more immigration. So far, he's one of the few Western leaders to have taken any action, proposing to cut legal immigration by half in ten years.

British Prime Minister Theresa May has also taken an anti-immigration stance, but her actions have yet to match her words.

French President Emmanuel Macron has talked up diversity in the past but seems to have been mugged by reality. Or maybe he just went for a walk in Paris one day. You can't stroll through the streets of this city without noticing that it has three major problems: chain-smokers, kids prone to public tantrums, and an immigration/integration disconnect.

In September, Macron announced that French immigration laws require a total revamping and that failing to make sweeping changes to the system will only empower anti-immigration extremists.



Meanwhile, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's immigration minister, Ahmed Hussen, announced last week that Canada aims to welcome a million new immigrants by 2020, increasing the number of newcomers by up to 40,000 per year. His justification? Canadian companies and their labor needs.

Nice try. We've been told for a long time that Western nations simply aren't reproducing at an adequate labor-replacement rate, and therefore we have to import new workers. Apparently, overpopulated countries are the the gold standard in social and economic excellence. Basic principles of population ecology help explain why so many millennials have chosen to invest in career and personal development rather than contribute to the further overpopulation of the planet. Did it ever occur to these governments that maybe people just like their space? Why do we all have to live on top of each other?

I'd really like to know which companies are complaining that they can't find workers willing to accept jobs at a fair wage. Funny how we never get to see any such company representatives alongside government officials when they make announcements about boosting the number of imported workers. You'd think that both the government and the company would welcome the opportunity to sell the idea to citizens, and maybe the company would even get a few more resumes out of the free "we're hiring" publicity.

If governments are anticipating future labor needs, have they not considered that we're well into an era of increased automation? In fact, we're often warned about the threats that artificial intelligence might pose toward mankind. It's not so much about robots becoming self-aware and evil, the way they do in science-fiction movies, but more about their potential to wipe out entire swaths of the workforce.

Robots are already beginning to take over the jobs of supermarket cashiers, and they have a growing presence in the construction, retail, transportation, health care and manufacturing sectors. One of the candidates in this year's French presidential elections, Benoit Hamon of the Socialist Party, proposed a universal basic income to help offset the eventuality that robots will be taking away livelihoods. Hamon also wanted to tax robot revenues, since he expected robots to reduce the workforce by at least nine percent. (He still rejected immigration quotas, however.)

The idea that more immigration will increase economic productivity runs counter to the facts of technological advancement. We're seeing an untenable increase in both automation and immigration. What are all the new arrivals going to do as the labor market shrinks?

Governments are still encouraging 20th-century immigration despite 21st-century technology. If they're worried about diversity -- a term that so many Western politicians always have on the tip of their tongues -- they should invest in the education of their own people to foster diversity of thought. But then again, a better-educated public might realize that the idea of economic prosperity through mass immigration is a total scam.
The Myth of Economic Prosperity Through Mass Immig... (show quote)


=================
Nice summary. May I add, Europe has turned 180% away from Christianity, now mostly have assimilated into Islam, including their leader Merkel of Germany. Europe I must say has now leaned to more Islamic culture, in addition to explosion of the Muslim population.

Europe was used to be the cradle of Christian civilization since the Middle Ages. One of the factors that brain washed Europeans was the release of Brown's fictional book in 2003, "Da Vinci Code" He wrote the book portrayed as historical, sources of which were falsifications of the real documents of the Old and New Testament of Jesus Christ. Europeans were further convinced by the hatred of Brown towards Christianity, when in 2006, he made a movie out of it. Even most in Hollywood has now been against the Christian faith. Thus their morals had sunk deeper into the drain.

Christians are always attacked in Europe. No one protects them. Those Christian churches with magnificent ancient architectures within few years suddenly became empty. Most Christians brain washed by Browns book have abandoned them.
Now, financially bankrupt, most of them were sold. But the irony was, they were bought by Muslims, who turned them into Mosques.

Londonistan: 423 New Mosques; 500 Closed Churches
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10124/london-mosques-churches
Apr 2, 2017 - St Peter's Church has been converted into the Madina Mosque. ... "In another 20 years there are going to be more active Muslims than there ... a child will be born into a Muslim family than into a Christian one. .... In a different way this has happened in Britain and Europe, and I feel that it will end in civil war.

Reply
Nov 8, 2017 10:28:47   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
pafret wrote:
The Myth of Economic Prosperity Through Mass Immigration
Rachel Marsden

The Myth of Economic Prosperity Through Mass Immigration

PARIS -- Those of us living in Western democracies keep hearing it over and over again from our politicians: To compete economically, we must submit to mass immigration. It's long past time to dispel this destructive myth.

The mass immigration con is typically peddled for the same reason that you need an accountant to help do your taxes. By tying the issue to economics, politicians are trying to make it too complex for laypeople to know when they're being scammed.

While they're exploiting your human decency with their spiel about the greater economic good, these government pickpockets are reaching into your trousers (or into your bank account) for more cash. Hey, man, a gubmint's gotta eat!

U.S. President Donald Trump isn't buying it, though. I have yet to hear Trump proclaim that the recipe for American greatness is more immigration. So far, he's one of the few Western leaders to have taken any action, proposing to cut legal immigration by half in ten years.

British Prime Minister Theresa May has also taken an anti-immigration stance, but her actions have yet to match her words.

French President Emmanuel Macron has talked up diversity in the past but seems to have been mugged by reality. Or maybe he just went for a walk in Paris one day. You can't stroll through the streets of this city without noticing that it has three major problems: chain-smokers, kids prone to public tantrums, and an immigration/integration disconnect.

In September, Macron announced that French immigration laws require a total revamping and that failing to make sweeping changes to the system will only empower anti-immigration extremists.



Meanwhile, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's immigration minister, Ahmed Hussen, announced last week that Canada aims to welcome a million new immigrants by 2020, increasing the number of newcomers by up to 40,000 per year. His justification? Canadian companies and their labor needs.

Nice try. We've been told for a long time that Western nations simply aren't reproducing at an adequate labor-replacement rate, and therefore we have to import new workers. Apparently, overpopulated countries are the the gold standard in social and economic excellence. Basic principles of population ecology help explain why so many millennials have chosen to invest in career and personal development rather than contribute to the further overpopulation of the planet. Did it ever occur to these governments that maybe people just like their space? Why do we all have to live on top of each other?

I'd really like to know which companies are complaining that they can't find workers willing to accept jobs at a fair wage. Funny how we never get to see any such company representatives alongside government officials when they make announcements about boosting the number of imported workers. You'd think that both the government and the company would welcome the opportunity to sell the idea to citizens, and maybe the company would even get a few more resumes out of the free "we're hiring" publicity.

If governments are anticipating future labor needs, have they not considered that we're well into an era of increased automation? In fact, we're often warned about the threats that artificial intelligence might pose toward mankind. It's not so much about robots becoming self-aware and evil, the way they do in science-fiction movies, but more about their potential to wipe out entire swaths of the workforce.

Robots are already beginning to take over the jobs of supermarket cashiers, and they have a growing presence in the construction, retail, transportation, health care and manufacturing sectors. One of the candidates in this year's French presidential elections, Benoit Hamon of the Socialist Party, proposed a universal basic income to help offset the eventuality that robots will be taking away livelihoods. Hamon also wanted to tax robot revenues, since he expected robots to reduce the workforce by at least nine percent. (He still rejected immigration quotas, however.)

The idea that more immigration will increase economic productivity runs counter to the facts of technological advancement. We're seeing an untenable increase in both automation and immigration. What are all the new arrivals going to do as the labor market shrinks?

Governments are still encouraging 20th-century immigration despite 21st-century technology. If they're worried about diversity -- a term that so many Western politicians always have on the tip of their tongues -- they should invest in the education of their own people to foster diversity of thought. But then again, a better-educated public might realize that the idea of economic prosperity through mass immigration is a total scam.
The Myth of Economic Prosperity Through Mass Immig... (show quote)


Mass migration is something that happens during famines and droughts...oh, and wildebeests do it. With humans it's always bad. People have lost all analytical ability. It's emotion or ideology. No room for anything else.

Reply
Nov 10, 2017 00:01:12   #
GmanTerry
 
boatbob2 wrote:
HOW/WHY,would We take an individual,with no education,,that doesnt speak english,with NO skills,and wipes his butt with his hand,( no paper) and want them to immigrate into AMERICA?????


The answer is simple; Multiculturalism. We didn't have people with no education,,that didn't speak english,with NO skills,and wiped his butt with his hand,( no paper) so to be Multicultural, we needed to import lots of them. Those people were under represented. Too damned many whites, we need more of these under represented people... so the Democrats found them and welcomed them in the name of diversity.

Semper Fi

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.