One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Well this cinches it.
Page <prev 2 of 2
Jan 31, 2014 17:28:25   #
Hungry Freaks
 
The Dutchman wrote:
hemorrhoid far from it, What happened pictur forty years ago were not just conservatives but most of the people from those areas and it was about racial bigotry, the queer thing today is all about the immoral deviance of sick perverts....


Hemorriod (sic) -again that anal fixation. Is there no end to it? What EXACTLY is your problem? Or should I even ask.

Yeah, back in the day there were black folk strung up for race mixing. Sorry if you can't remember it, casting doubt on exactly when it was you tried to enlist.

Maybe you should go into ANALysis, talk out this anal fixation of yours.

Reply
Jan 31, 2014 19:16:56   #
The Dutchman
 
Hungry queer Freaks wrote:
Hemorriod (sic) -again that anal fixation. Is there no end to it? What EXACTLY is your problem? Or should I even ask.

Yeah, back in the day there were black folk strung up for race mixing. Sorry if you can't remember it, casting doubt on exactly when it was you tried to enlist.

Maybe you should go into ANALysis, talk out this anal fixation of yours.


I don't give a rats ass if you doubt exactly when it was I enlisted.
And No way in hell am I explaining anything to immoral perverts.
And Hemorrhoid game about a long time ago because he was such a pain in the ass. Back then there was him and queenie and now their is you and a couple more but you deviates still are a very small majority in here.
You sure have a queer way!!

Reply
Jan 31, 2014 19:42:01   #
rumitoid
 
Hungry Freaks wrote:
Hemorriod (sic) -again that anal fixation. Is there no end to it? What EXACTLY is your problem? Or should I even ask.

Yeah, back in the day there were black folk strung up for race mixing. Sorry if you can't remember it, casting doubt on exactly when it was you tried to enlist.

Maybe you should go into ANALysis, talk out this anal fixation of yours.


Confused.

Reply
 
 
Jan 31, 2014 21:44:46   #
Seabird
 
Brian Devon wrote:
You actually keep tabs on how many times President Obama has used the word "gay". Really??? Sounds like you are having a great deal of difficulty repressing your "manly-man" Larry Craig Republican urges. Surely there is an airport bathroom in your state that will enable you to satisfy your impulses.

Good luck America.


:XD: :thumbup: :-D :lol: :roll: :XD:

Reply
Jan 31, 2014 21:49:46   #
Seabird
 
Retired669 wrote:
How's life on BrokeBack Mountain with your partner? :mrgreen:
So he's a cattleman hey? I knew a cowboy yearsago. He said when he was out there on the range with those little doggies he got all the free stuff he wanted. Get along little doggie,get along

Reply
Jan 31, 2014 22:15:45   #
The Dutchman
 
Retired669 wrote:
How's life on BrokeBack Mountain with your partner?

Seabird wrote:
So he's a cattleman hey? I knew a cowboy yearsago. He said when he was out there on the range with those little doggies he got all the free stuff he wanted. Get along little doggie,get along


This retarded669 sure seems to be hung up on this broke back mountain crap and you must be of the same persuasion EH?

Reply
Feb 1, 2014 08:13:35   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
The Dutchman wrote:
Now we know why she marine, retired669, miss brian and a few others are so found of this parasite....

Obama Uses This Telling Word More Than Any Other President

It is obvious by listening to almost any speech by Barack Obama that he is obsessed with himself. Frequent mentions of “I” and “me” pepper each address, perpetuating the common belief that he is ruling more as a dictator than as an elected public servant.

While his egocentrism is abundantly evident, there is another word that has found its way into Obama’s vocabulary more times than any other president in recorded history. For a man Newsweek magazine called America’s “first gay president,” it might not be surprising to learn he has used the word ‘gay’ with greater frequency in five years than any other president – even those who served two full terms.

According to a study by the Human Rights Campaign, Obama has used the word publicly at least 272 times. Furthermore, he has mentioned sexually descriptive adjectives such as ‘transgender,’ ‘bisexual,’ and ‘lesbian’ another 149 times.

His administration has ushered in radical changes in the definition of marriage, due in large part to his incessant demands for gay rights. In addition to Washington, D.C. 17 states now recognize same-sex marriage, a policy Obama only began publicly supporting in 2012 when he apparently saw the shift as politically expedient.

Obama’s frequent use of the word ‘gay’ stands in stark contrast to its usage by recent Republican presidents. George W. Bush used the term a total of two times during his eight years in office, while his father, George H.W. Bush, and Ronald Reagan never found the need to shoehorn it into any public address.

The wide variation between the two parties illustrates the left’s overwhelming desire to separate the nation into groups, with racial and sexual minorities receiving the brunt of its support. Still, even compared to Bill Clinton, Obama’s use of the term is exceptionally high.

Clinton used the word ‘gay’ just 216 times during both of his terms, 56 less times than Obama has in just five years.

The Human Rights Campaign celebrated Obama’s activism, declaring “he has inarguably contributed to the political mainstreaming of marriage equality and the general trend toward LGBT acceptance within American society.”

Unfortunately for the millions of social conservatives in America, though, he has done so by repealing “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” and generally imposing his will through use of the bully pulpit. While individual states should certainly be permitted to change laws as their citizens see fit, Obama and his ilk will not rest until the entire nation is governed by the politically correct ideology they endorse.
Now we know why she marine, retired669, miss brian... (show quote)


What a bunch of stupid posts you put up.. Of course he would use the word a great deal, when you far right goof balls tried to create a political issue out of something that never should have been political, you found out what a small minority of haters and fear filled individuals you really are.. The right attempted to remove the rights of gay people but found the majority of Americans felt that was unjust. It was not that they supported the acts of the gay lifestyle, but that the found your attempts of bigotry toward them to be more hateful by far..The right wing nuts started this foolishness and found that real Americans were not as hate filled as they were...States like Minnesota, which had no political skin in the game first voted down attempts at amendments to ban gay marriage, then in the next opportunity, voted in the rights of gays to marry, Never would have happened if the nut cases had not started it to begin with.. Should never have been a political issue...

Reply
 
 
Feb 1, 2014 12:55:24   #
The Dutchman
 
permafrost wrote:
What a bunch of stupid posts you put up.. Of course he would use the word a great deal, when you far right goof balls tried to create a political issue out of something that never should have been political, you found out what a small minority of haters and fear filled individuals you really are.. The right attempted to remove the rights of gay people but found the majority of Americans felt that was unjust. It was not that they supported the acts of the gay lifestyle, but that the found your attempts of bigotry toward them to be more hateful by far..The right wing nuts started this foolishness and found that real Americans were not as hate filled as they were...States like Minnesota, which had no political skin in the game first voted down attempts at amendments to ban gay marriage, then in the next opportunity, voted in the rights of gays to marry, Never would have happened if the nut cases had not started it to begin with.. Should never have been a political issue...
What a bunch of stupid posts you put up.. Of cours... (show quote)


Simple remedy, Don't like em don't look at em!

Reply
Feb 1, 2014 17:14:13   #
angery american Loc: Georgia
 
The Dutchman wrote:
Simple remedy, Don't like em don't look at em!


You are never going to convince the narrow minded liberals on this site....They are beyond help ...All we can do is pray for them to come to their senses, and go load some more ammunition...

Reply
Feb 1, 2014 18:05:26   #
The Dutchman
 
angery american wrote:
You are never going to convince the narrow minded liberals on this site....They are beyond help ...All we can do is pray for them to come to their senses, and go load some more ammunition...


They cry like the babies they are because there still are intelligent folks that won't buy into their off the wall far out un-American socialist supporting crap.......
And let's not forget the few faggots in here also....

Reply
Feb 1, 2014 20:02:25   #
rickdri
 
Hungry Freaks wrote:
Hemorriod (sic) -again that anal fixation. Is there no end to it? What EXACTLY is your problem? Or should I even ask.

Yeah, back in the day there were black folk strung up for race mixing. Sorry if you can't remember it, casting doubt on exactly when it was you tried to enlist.

Maybe you should go into ANALysis, talk out this anal fixation of yours.


The thing about the black folks being strung up for race mixing. The people doing this were democrats. Remember, the Democrat Governor of Alabama George Wallace tried to stop blacks from being segregated into public school in the early 1960's. That was the view of southern democrats during that time.
Pryor to the 1960's, blacks even Marten Luther King a registered republican, voted mainly republican. President Johnson high jacked the black vote by making blacks believe that big government was their friend. For some reason they still feel this way even after all of these government programs have done nothing to win the war on poverty Johnson started in the mid 1960's. Amazing that so many people let themselves be fooled into thinking government can and will do everything for them.
We do need a safety net to catch those that are truly disabled or can not work. Even to help those that are unemployed and are looking for work. However we have carried welfare way too far.

Reply
 
 
Feb 1, 2014 20:09:56   #
rickdri
 
Hungry Freaks wrote:
Hemorriod (sic) -again that anal fixation. Is there no end to it? What EXACTLY is your problem? Or should I even ask.

Yeah, back in the day there were black folk strung up for race mixing. Sorry if you can't remember it, casting doubt on exactly when it was you tried to enlist.

Maybe you should go into ANALysis, talk out this anal fixation of yours.


One other thing about welfare. We need to stop corporate welfare as well. Maybe even more so! Both parties have their businesses they like to give tax breaks to and all the government help they can. The ones that donate to their election campaigns. They like to scratch each others backs

Reply
Feb 1, 2014 21:19:51   #
The Dutchman
 
Hungry queer Freaks:again babbled on about nothing but it's queer agenda....

rickdri wrote:
The thing about the black folks being strung up for race mixing. The people doing this were democrats. Remember, the Democrat Governor of Alabama George Wallace tried to stop blacks from being segregated into public school in the early 1960's. That was the view of southern democrats during that time.
Pryor to the 1960's, blacks even Marten Luther King a registered republican, voted mainly republican. President Johnson high jacked the black vote by making blacks believe that big government was their friend. For some reason they still feel this way even after all of these government programs have done nothing to win the war on poverty Johnson started in the mid 1960's. Amazing that so many people let themselves be fooled into thinking government can and will do everything for them.
We do need a safety net to catch those that are truly disabled or can not work. Even to help those that are unemployed and are looking for work. However we have carried welfare way too far.
The thing about the black folks being strung up fo... (show quote)


YesSir and it has gotten way out of control and should go back to just issuing commodities. If they want to drink soda pop and eat fast food, pizza, and other unhealthy crap let them get a job.

Reply
Feb 2, 2014 12:33:19   #
Floyd Brown Loc: Milwaukee WI
 
rickdri wrote:
The thing about the black folks being strung up for race mixing. The people doing this were democrats. Remember, the Democrat Governor of Alabama George Wallace tried to stop blacks from being segregated into public school in the early 1960's. That was the view of southern democrats during that time.
Pryor to the 1960's, blacks even Marten Luther King a registered republican, voted mainly republican. President Johnson high jacked the black vote by making blacks believe that big government was their friend. For some reason they still feel this way even after all of these government programs have done nothing to win the war on poverty Johnson started in the mid 1960's. Amazing that so many people let themselves be fooled into thinking government can and will do everything for them.
We do need a safety net to catch those that are truly disabled or can not work. Even to help those that are unemployed and are looking for work. However we have carried welfare way too far.
The thing about the black folks being strung up fo... (show quote)


Well good old George Wallace was a Democrat when he spread his hate about blacks. But he didn't go very far until he became a Republican & hid his hate of the blacks in a push for States Rights.

Reply
Feb 2, 2014 13:10:46   #
rickdri
 
Floyd Brown wrote:
Well good old George Wallace was a Democrat when he spread his hate about blacks. But he didn't go very far until he became a Republican & hid his hate of the blacks in a push for States Rights.


You'll get no argument from me on that. He still didn't get much further. My point is that at the time of the hangings the prevalent mood of the democrats was hatred of the blacks. That's something no one can deny. All you have done is to show that racism exists in both parties.
Today every time a conservative disagrees with Obama's policies the race card is played. The majority of conservatives are not racist. It is ridiculous for democrats to keep claiming racism. The majority of blacks are democrats. Can you say that because they disagreed with Bush they were racist? I won't deny that there is a certain amount of racism that still exists. The overwhelming majority of folks in both parties are not racist.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.