One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Sessions: the pasty little rat-man is a direct threat to our Country and Constitution
Page <<first <prev 8 of 15 next> last>>
Sep 6, 2017 21:47:32   #
Iamdjchrys Loc: Decatur, Texas
 
G1ReconBravo wrote:
Wow. What a thread. It's getting hot up in here! Emily is center of mass on this one. Dead center. My only criticism would be that the target was already down, as in this is old news. Sessions was and continues to be the WORST appointent in the admin. He represents the type of law enforcement that conjures images of the jackbooted thugs that were the Chicago police in the late 60's. Now I'm no fan of the hippies, but I'm less of a fan of tyrants especially ones with badges. He is out of touch with the people, the president, and the priorities he was appointed to aggressively pursue. I couldn't believe my ears when I heard he was the pick, but I gave him a chance because he HAS gone after those involved in human trafficking and child exploitation. But these are still low level players and numbers in the larger context of the #1 problem in the world. And then he wants to go after states who have passed laws on marijuana? And restart the engine of the prison industrial complex? My patience has run out. So has Trumps. Check his tweets. Roger Stone has not been wrong on ANY of his predictions thus far. So I'm betting he knows something more than us that has him predicting Sessions is next to go, and I hope he is right as usual. It is a tricky thing to do though. I will leave just 1 link. I expect people to do their own Research not Googlesearch. Big difference.

Ok gotta get it off my chest... What's up with all the conservatives on this thread getting all emocucked and crybaby over the truth about Sessions. Is he your beloved grandpa? You owe that neocon asshole your personal allegiance because he has a R next to his name on TV? He's a blowhard faggotfuck corporate shill and it's not your fault. You sound like triggered snowflakes. It's very unbecoming of men... Emily, is this how you get your kicks?

OK sorry. It's my second day here. Im seeing familiar "faces" and lots of new ones and taking things 1 post at a time. I'm obviously not hip to all the infighting going between longtime users that no doubt has developed over time and words being thrown like cyber punches. Happens on all forums especially political ones. So I'm not in a click yet. Probably won't be. I tend to make "less than friends" on both sides as the hegellian dialectic of the 2 party system does not allow for much thinking outside the box that is the majority of Americans political ideology. I hate boxes. And so did and do the creators and gate-masters of the socioeconomic C2 system that we all know and hate, left and right. But can't ever seem to get around. My next post goes into that. Think I'll get back to that. I lied. Here's 2 links.

http://thefederalistpapers.org/us/jeff-sessions-increase-asset-forfeiture
https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2017/07/19/Jeff-Sessions-Justice-Department-reinstates-asset-forfeitures/3761500483502/
Wow. What a thread. It's getting hot up in here!... (show quote)

Reply
Sep 6, 2017 21:51:48   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
You certainly have opinions. Just curious; when and where did you serve?

Reply
Sep 6, 2017 22:02:21   #
slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
 
Loki wrote:
You certainly have opinions. Just curious; when and where did you serve?

Perhaps in the Army of The Duchy of Grand Fenwick

Reply
 
 
Sep 6, 2017 22:10:09   #
son of witless
 
slatten49 wrote:
Perhaps in the Army of The Duchy of Grand Fenwick



Reply
Sep 6, 2017 23:24:27   #
EmilyStrode
 
proud republican wrote:
If you think you right, why to call our AG names?? If war on drugs on was lost before it began why blame AG Sessions When he is trying to stop drug dealers infesting our country??At least he is trying to do something useful


Never called him names, lol.

Reply
Sep 6, 2017 23:28:53   #
Wolf counselor Loc: Heart of Texas
 
EmilyStrode wrote:
Never called him names, lol.


Yes, you did.

You called him "the pasty little rat-man"

Reply
Sep 6, 2017 23:29:20   #
EmilyStrode
 
JFlorio wrote:
Nah! But congrats. You've earned my contempt. Go away troll.


Fucking open your eyes and read, numnutz. Stop being an automaton. You showed yourself to be better than this nonsense. Wake up!

Reply
 
 
Sep 6, 2017 23:31:30   #
EmilyStrode
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Emily is not lying, before one can lie about something she has to know WTF she is talking about. What Emily has done is overdosed on Obama koolade. That's some potent shit.


You must have been breathing the fumes.

Reply
Sep 6, 2017 23:35:40   #
EmilyStrode
 
JFlorio wrote:
I was just throwing the troll label back at you. From what I've seen from Sessions is a good honest man. Will research further. Believe me ,
insulting the GOP doesn't bother me a bit.


Insulting poor or bad policy should be our duty. Sessions is a total scumbag, just my opinion. And I can back that up.

Reply
Sep 7, 2017 00:03:15   #
G1ReconBravo Loc: Sonoran Desert
 
straightUp wrote:
Read? Emily, are you asking a Trump supporter to "read"? LOL.

I think we all know the deal here Emily. The people on the alt-right are racists, so you can't challenge them with rational arguments even if they could read beyond the 3rd grade level, because they will only shut it out. They HAVE to remain fixed on these patriotic "cupcakes" like how Sessions is trying to "protect" people. LOL.

They wouldn't be playing these charades if they could be honest and just say they like Sessions and Trump because they hate minorities and that it's all emotional. To be honest, I'd have a lot more respect for them if they could at least be honest about their bigotry. The problem is (and this is funny) many of them were brought up (to some extent) as Christians and the Christian ideology is very clear on treating others as you would treat yourself. So on some level they know their bigotry is wrong but their will is so weak that they can't abide by their own Christian principals. So, they're conflicted and what do they do about it? They lie. They pretend that what they really want is equality and freedom and justice and all the symbols they see being revered in American culture. "Yeah, that's the ticket!"

But anyone can see through the actions and declarations of that "pasty little rat-man" (excellent description btw) that he is doing everything possible to create a police state and that's just what the Trump supporters are asking for... A police state that favors white people. Like an apartheid system. That is what they don't have the guts to tell you.
Read? Emily, are you asking a Trump supporter to &... (show quote)


Stand back and enjoy as I dissect this fools brain

I'll just break it down into its awful segments.

1. "The people on the alt-right are racists."
This is probably the most accurate statement you made, but falls very short due to your over-generalization of all Trump supporters being nothing but the 4chan/pol shitposters and Reddit basement dwellers known as the alt-right. I would say 95%Trump supporters I meet in the street have no clue what the fuck that term means or where it comes from. And yet they are all too aware of their negative association with it.

2. "so you can't challenge them with rational arguments even if they could read beyond the 3rd grade level."
You are just doubling down on your overgeneralization. Want to challenge me on reading ability and comprehension skills? Try your luck at an honest to goodness debate? Trust me you dont.

3. "They HAVE to remain fixed on these patriotic "cupcakes" like how Sessions is trying to "protect" people"
Now you are speaking my language but in a different tongue that nobody on the right will give an ear to. Why not just speak to the fact he was/is a poor choice for AG. I have said many times his style of law enforcement should bring to mind the jackbooted tactics of the Chicago police ala 1968. But understand that most who support/ed him did and still do with an expectation that his awareness of child trafficking and exploitation on an industrial scale, and obvious crimes commited by HRC and CF not to mention countless others, would dominate the priorities of the AG for the next 4 years. He has done the bare minimum. And he will be gone soon.

4. "They wouldn't be playing these charades if they could be honest and just say they like Sessions and Trump because they hate minorities and that it's all emotional".
I for one have never met ANYONE on the right who feels that way. I don't know where this kind of bullshit info comes from. But I must point out that most people on the right (99+%) would base their descision on a candidate on a coin toss before they let emotions be a factor in their pick. Emotional voting is 100% Cuck. My own mother understands and taught me this and has stated many times that she would be more than willing and happy to give up her right to vote if it meant keeping stupid emotionally vunerable women from ruining this country at the polls, which is WAAAY more extreme than my own beliefs. But then my mother is a TRUE conservative with ideology based on facts, and understanding the destructive power of the self absorbed emo vote. Her power comes from accepting her natural gender role in life and sacrificing anything and everything in order to better raise self sufficient humans who take personal responsibily for their own lives, instead of running around with her tits out and a pussy hat on screaming about percieved inequality. Now that's true feminism at work!

5. "I'd have a lot more respect for them if they could at least be honest about their bigotry"
No you wouldn't. And shouldn't.

6. "The problem is (and this is funny) many of them were brought up (to some extent) as Christians"
Christianity is not the problem. And there is no extent. You are. Or are not. The teaching of false doctrine is the problem. And it is a problem for sure. For we all sin and no sin is better or worse than another. And as christian sinners, we have no place to judge.

7. "Christian ideology is very clear on treating others as you would treat yourself." Wrong. Love all as you would your brother. No room or place for self absorption.

8. "on some level they know their bigotry is wrong but their will is so weak that they can't abide by their own Christian principals."
Maybe. But who are you to make such claims? Again the over generalization and self rightous holier-than-thou tone takes away any impact you might have had. Those whose hearts and minds you might have had any influence on or helped see things your way are gone and see you as worthless

9. "They pretend that what they really want is equality and freedom and justice and all the symbols they see being revered in American culture. "Yeah, that's the ticket!".
Again I can't speak for every right leaning American, but there is no pretending that Freedom and Liberty are by far without a doubt the two most important American virtues that are demanded to be respected in minds of the average American and Trump supporter. We love Freedom. And Liberty. Any reverence to or love for "symbols" is cuckfaggotry. Liberty is whats at the center of the Tootsie Pop.

10. I love how you saved the best (WORST) for last. "he is doing everything possible to create a police state and that's just what the Trump supporters are asking for... A police state that favors white people"

This last one is so stupid, so retarted, I mean medical diagnosis level retarded, and based on who knows what the fuck kind of vcr manual translated propaganda, coming from what
HAS TO BE some suburban white kid or a foreigner. Nobody FROM the hood would say some dumb shit like that.
If you knew shit about shit you would know that:

A. The police state doesn't need to be created. Its well established and its been around for at least 30 years. Modified and upgraded exponentially in the last 8 years by that lover of humanity ex prez. But single worst thing ever done was by Nixon and his declaration of the War on Drugs.
Trump has nothing to do with it. Might even legalize the bud if given a fucking chance.

B. Where the fuck is the rock you are just now crawling out from under? It has always favored white people. Even black cops favor white people under most circumstances. This is nothing new, or even racist. Just the reality of the dangers of daily life in the hood...

I mean no personal ill will towards you. You probably mean well and recognize there is a serious problem in this world. I do to. We have the same enemy and you either cant see it yet, or refuse to even look around. Take a good hard look at your beliefs. Who are you? Who are your parents? Who is your creator? Your ideas, are they truly your own? What has shaped them? Where do they come from? These are real questions everybody should ask. I bet you want to be something more in this world than just a pawn used to complete somebody elses political objectives. Break free. Dont be a Rep or a Dem. Be you. The real you. Stop being cucked, and called out, and ultimately turned out. Peace.

Reply
Sep 7, 2017 02:46:39   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
G1ReconBravo wrote:
You obviously are not an American history archivist or very astute reader and observer of American history or current events if: 8 months into a Presidential term that goes mostly unreported on*, And would barely be enough time for ANY government action to be seen and felt by citizens at street level, is enough to influence your highly regarded and respected opinion of 44 men with a combined total of 236 years in an office with more archived information and documentation available for public research including popularity polling and op-eds than you could digest in a lifetime.
You obviously are not an American history archivis... (show quote)

Well, well, well... what have got here? Good point about 8 months not being long enough for any government to affect the streets. Most of your buddies can't seem to figure that out when they lavish their attention on all of Trump's "accomplishments". LOL...

But that doesn't mean it's too early to judge his presidency. If you're as smart as you want me to believe, you would't be so limited in your assessment. Specifically, it's the economic policies that take more than 8 months to hit the streets. Other policies can have immediate results ...and so can behavior. And uh... there's been plenty of both.

G1ReconBravo wrote:

So maybe you work part time at McDonalds or Starbucks? Or you are a powerful sorcerer?

nah... I'm just not an idiot.

G1ReconBravo wrote:

Please sir, I'm just a poor man of very limited means becoming aged in my years I know, but I too wish to have such wonderous powers of insight and historical reference that you seem to possess. And would gladly indenture myself to you for the remainder of my years if you could find the place in your heart and time to maybe EXPLAIN YOUR EITHER ABSOLUTELY FUCKING RIDICULOUS OR MIRACULOUSLY PROFOUND OBSERVATION. I'm sure I can't be the only one wondering...

Well, like I said... In these 8 months there's been plenty of non-economic policy and behavior from which to draw some basic conclusions.

For instance, no other president elect in history had to settle a lawsuit for before being sworn in, much less two class-actions suites and a civil law suit for a total of $25 million. And these were for fraud! (No fucking shit.) For the first time (as far as I know) the American people actually elected a known fraudster. That's like hiring a known pedophile to babysit your kids.

He is also the first president in history not to have ANY political or military experience. This by itself doesn't mean anything... In fact, he *could* have bucked the system if he was a natural leader, but he's not. He's just a spoiled brat who's always had the money to be the boss and that shit doesn't fly in the public sector, especially if you don't even have any experience in anything related to the presidency. (Except maybe riding in limousines).

So, far we're only seconds into his term and already... things are weird.

I'm going to FF, otherwise I'll be here all day...

8 months in, he has set some notable precedents... For one, his popularity is the lowest of any president since 1953 when they started looking at president’s average net approval rating during his first month vs. 175 days in, according to the FiveThirtyEight aggregate. Don't worry about the technical details, the point it he is exceedingly unpopular and a lot of that is because of a series of setbacks (many of his own making) that have led to a steady flow of negative news coverage.

He's the first president I know of that lies so much it's becoming normal.
He's the first president I know of that's constantly insulting people and often lying about them.
He is the first president I know of with a reputation for making statements that conflict with his own state department.
He is the first American president to refuse to visit the UK because the people there don't like him.
He is the first American president that caused sovereign governments like the Republic of Ireland to consider banning his presence.
He is the first U.S. president to actually encourage North Korea to step up their nuclear program. Which proves they don't take Trump seriously.
He is the ONLY president since China became a major trading partner to be stupid enough to actually threaten China with a cut-off on trade. China didn't even bother to respond because they know we can't do that without totally fucking ourselves. I guess they can't take Trump seriously either.

It's not just the precedents he sets... Even more importantly, Trump has burned too many bridges and now it's doubtful he can advance any agenda at all. No president has ever been a one-man band. Presidents have to be good at building coalitions, Trump has probably already screwed that up and that's probably why he doesn't even HAVE an agenda. His actions have all been driven by undoing whatever Obama did. So thing's like DACA. But unlike Trump, Obama also pushed things through legislation, so things like the ACA, which Trump FAILED to repeal.

So, I'd say there's enough there to warrant my humorous little dialog.

:)

Reply
 
 
Sep 7, 2017 02:57:23   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
G1ReconBravo wrote:
Stand back and enjoy as I dissect this fools brain

I'll just break it down into its awful segments.

1. "The people on the alt-right are racists."
This is probably the most accurate statement you made, but falls very short due to your over-generalization of all Trump supporters being nothing but the 4chan/pol shitposters and Reddit basement dwellers known as the alt-right. I would say 95%Trump supporters I meet in the street have no clue what the fuck that term means or where it comes from. And yet they are all too aware of their negative association with it.

2. "so you can't challenge them with rational arguments even if they could read beyond the 3rd grade level."
You are just doubling down on your overgeneralization. Want to challenge me on reading ability and comprehension skills? Try your luck at an honest to goodness debate? Trust me you dont.

3. "They HAVE to remain fixed on these patriotic "cupcakes" like how Sessions is trying to "protect" people"
Now you are speaking my language but in a different tongue that nobody on the right will give an ear to. Why not just speak to the fact he was/is a poor choice for AG. I have said many times his style of law enforcement should bring to mind the jackbooted tactics of the Chicago police ala 1968. But understand that most who support/ed him did and still do with an expectation that his awareness of child trafficking and exploitation on an industrial scale, and obvious crimes commited by HRC and CF not to mention countless others, would dominate the priorities of the AG for the next 4 years. He has done the bare minimum. And he will be gone soon.

4. "They wouldn't be playing these charades if they could be honest and just say they like Sessions and Trump because they hate minorities and that it's all emotional".
I for one have never met ANYONE on the right who feels that way. I don't know where this kind of bullshit info comes from. But I must point out that most people on the right (99+%) would base their descision on a candidate on a coin toss before they let emotions be a factor in their pick. Emotional voting is 100% Cuck. My own mother understands and taught me this and has stated many times that she would be more than willing and happy to give up her right to vote if it meant keeping stupid emotionally vunerable women from ruining this country at the polls, which is WAAAY more extreme than my own beliefs. But then my mother is a TRUE conservative with ideology based on facts, and understanding the destructive power of the self absorbed emo vote. Her power comes from accepting her natural gender role in life and sacrificing anything and everything in order to better raise self sufficient humans who take personal responsibily for their own lives, instead of running around with her tits out and a pussy hat on screaming about percieved inequality. Now that's true feminism at work!

5. "I'd have a lot more respect for them if they could at least be honest about their bigotry"
No you wouldn't. And shouldn't.

6. "The problem is (and this is funny) many of them were brought up (to some extent) as Christians"
Christianity is not the problem. And there is no extent. You are. Or are not. The teaching of false doctrine is the problem. And it is a problem for sure. For we all sin and no sin is better or worse than another. And as christian sinners, we have no place to judge.

7. "Christian ideology is very clear on treating others as you would treat yourself." Wrong. Love all as you would your brother. No room or place for self absorption.

8. "on some level they know their bigotry is wrong but their will is so weak that they can't abide by their own Christian principals."
Maybe. But who are you to make such claims? Again the over generalization and self rightous holier-than-thou tone takes away any impact you might have had. Those whose hearts and minds you might have had any influence on or helped see things your way are gone and see you as worthless

9. "They pretend that what they really want is equality and freedom and justice and all the symbols they see being revered in American culture. "Yeah, that's the ticket!".
Again I can't speak for every right leaning American, but there is no pretending that Freedom and Liberty are by far without a doubt the two most important American virtues that are demanded to be respected in minds of the average American and Trump supporter. We love Freedom. And Liberty. Any reverence to or love for "symbols" is cuckfaggotry. Liberty is whats at the center of the Tootsie Pop.

10. I love how you saved the best (WORST) for last. "he is doing everything possible to create a police state and that's just what the Trump supporters are asking for... A police state that favors white people"

This last one is so stupid, so retarted, I mean medical diagnosis level retarded, and based on who knows what the fuck kind of vcr manual translated propaganda, coming from what
HAS TO BE some suburban white kid or a foreigner. Nobody FROM the hood would say some dumb shit like that.
If you knew shit about shit you would know that:

A. The police state doesn't need to be created. Its well established and its been around for at least 30 years. Modified and upgraded exponentially in the last 8 years by that lover of humanity ex prez. But single worst thing ever done was by Nixon and his declaration of the War on Drugs.
Trump has nothing to do with it. Might even legalize the bud if given a fucking chance.

B. Where the fuck is the rock you are just now crawling out from under? It has always favored white people. Even black cops favor white people under most circumstances. This is nothing new, or even racist. Just the reality of the dangers of daily life in the hood...

I mean no personal ill will towards you. You probably mean well and recognize there is a serious problem in this world. I do to. We have the same enemy and you either cant see it yet, or refuse to even look around. Take a good hard look at your beliefs. Who are you? Who are your parents? Who is your creator? Your ideas, are they truly your own? What has shaped them? Where do they come from? These are real questions everybody should ask. I bet you want to be something more in this world than just a pawn used to complete somebody elses political objectives. Break free. Dont be a Rep or a Dem. Be you. The real you. Stop being cucked, and called out, and ultimately turned out. Peace.
Stand back and enjoy as I dissect this fools brain... (show quote)


LOL... I like you. You put thought into your post.

I have a remote meeting with a team in India in the morning... (actually really late for them, but really early for me...) Anyway, I gotta crash soon. I did scan through your post... read the last paragraph. Yes, we probably do have a common enemy. I never get a chance to really discuss that because so few people can get past the partisan crap. Oh, and I'm not Republican nor have I ever been Democrat. But I do need to set you straight on some bullshit. ;)

Reply
Sep 7, 2017 05:07:20   #
RETW Loc: Washington
 
EmilyStrode wrote:
A Republican can go against our values. I strongly feel you know little or nothing about the policies Sessions is pursuing. If you did, I would earn your respect.

Giving an opinion you disagree with does not make someone a troll. Debate is essentially about disagreement, and not evil Troll intent. My husband is not a troll for wanting to wait on cleaning the dishes after dinner to relax and digest. Neither am I for wanting them done immediately. Here is the standard, and terribly flawed, definition of a Troll: make a deliberately offensive or provocative online post with the aim of upsetting someone or eliciting an angry response from them. ANY disagreement can be taken as being "deliberately offensive or provocative." And disagreements can be upsetting and elicit an angry response. Such is not a Troll. A troll is a person that offers nothing substantive to a discussion and personally attacks another based on nothing more than their dislike of their politics. Like you.
A Republican can go against our values. I strongly... (show quote)








You have just described your self. And that's what trolls have a want to do. You have stated that,

and I will quote you here, " A troll is a person that offers nothing substantive to a discussion and personally attacks another based on nothing more than their dislike of their politics."

It appears you know nothing about the difference between policies and politics. There is no redeeming
substantive value in you posting that Our Attorney General, of the United States of America, is a, and I will quote you here again, " pasty little rat-man. " You post like a ten year old, that is in need of a good old fashion spanking. Grow up child. Come back in about ten years, when you can speak adult.



RETW

Reply
Sep 7, 2017 05:33:33   #
RETW Loc: Washington
 
G1ReconBravo wrote:
Wow. What a thread. It's getting hot up in here! Emily is center of mass on this one. Dead center. My only criticism would be that the target was already down, as in this is old news. Sessions was and continues to be the WORST appointent in the admin. He represents the type of law enforcement that conjures images of the jackbooted thugs that were the Chicago police in the late 60's. Now I'm no fan of the hippies, but I'm less of a fan of tyrants especially ones with badges. He is out of touch with the people, the president, and the priorities he was appointed to aggressively pursue. I couldn't believe my ears when I heard he was the pick, but I gave him a chance because he HAS gone after those involved in human trafficking and child exploitation. But these are still low level players and numbers in the larger context of the #1 problem in the world. And then he wants to go after states who have passed laws on marijuana? And restart the engine of the prison industrial complex? My patience has run out. So has Trumps. Check his tweets. Roger Stone has not been wrong on ANY of his predictions thus far. So I'm betting he knows something more than us that has him predicting Sessions is next to go, and I hope he is right as usual. It is a tricky thing to do though. I will leave just 1 link. I expect people to do their own Research not Googlesearch. Big difference.

Ok gotta get it off my chest... What's up with all the conservatives on this thread getting all emocucked and crybaby over the truth about Sessions. Is he your beloved grandpa? You owe that neocon asshole your personal allegiance because he has a R next to his name on TV? He's a blowhard faggotfuck corporate shill and it's not your fault. You sound like triggered snowflakes. It's very unbecoming of men... Emily, is this how you get your kicks?

OK sorry. It's my second day here. Im seeing familiar "faces" and lots of new ones and taking things 1 post at a time. I'm obviously not hip to all the infighting going between longtime users that no doubt has developed over time and words being thrown like cyber punches. Happens on all forums especially political ones. So I'm not in a click yet. Probably won't be. I tend to make "less than friends" on both sides as the hegellian dialectic of the 2 party system does not allow for much thinking outside the box that is the majority of Americans political ideology. I hate boxes. And so did and do the creators and gate-masters of the socioeconomic C2 system that we all know and hate, left and right. But can't ever seem to get around. My next post goes into that. Think I'll get back to that. I lied. Here's 2 links.

http://thefederalistpapers.org/us/jeff-sessions-increase-asset-forfeiture
https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2017/07/19/Jeff-Sessions-Justice-Department-reinstates-asset-forfeitures/3761500483502/
Wow. What a thread. It's getting hot up in here!... (show quote)






You are not going to make any friends here either. I for one do not enjoy being lumped together with what you call " crybaby, snowflakes. Where do you come off, starting right off calling names.

If that is your want, just go away. None here, wants to put up with any more bull shit from would be know it all's.

RETW


Reply
Sep 7, 2017 05:44:08   #
RETW Loc: Washington
 
kemmer wrote:
Oh look it up your damn self! I'm tired of "debating" with slugs who don't know shit.




Than you really need to stop posting. I don't think you know shit about anything either.


RETW

Reply
Page <<first <prev 8 of 15 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.