I assume your comment has been directed at me, since you must have hit the 'REPLY' button, instead of the 'QUOTE REPLY' button, that automatically sends your comment to the person you have responded to.
Reading your comment, I find what you say to be very truthful and accurate, except with the ACLU always winning their lawsuits, which in the last 10 years they have been getting their asses kicked in court by these free Christian law firms that help those that the ACLU attacks that can't afford defending themselves, and that includes many cities, counties, churches, and even aiding some states, as well as just individuals, all across the USA, and I'm sorry that I can't come up with their names right off the top of my head, but I know there are at least three major ones and many others, and I don't believe they have lost to the ACLU yet.
I too detest what the white supremist, KKK, and alt-right stand for, but I also detest just as much, and maybe a little bit more, because I am white and don't want to be murdered because of their racism and bigotry, the BLM and Antifa, and the 1%er group is just as bad.
I have to agree with you, those so called 'Far Right Groups' are too well organized to start an incident, but they have a chip on their shoulder, and want others to knock it off in order for them to take actions to release all their frustrations of constantly being called haters, which many are not, but just hold to the principle of seperation of the races, not necesarily hating the other races, but want the purity of thier race to be kept, as GOD warned in the Bible about keeping the purity of the ten tribes of Israel, by His warning to the Israelites not to marry foreigners.
Think about this for a minute. If everyone kept calling you a hater, and constantly accused you of being full of hatred, when you only want to live by your beliefs, and really would like everyone else to just accept those beliefs do the same, wouldn't that cause a self-prophetic-incident in your psychic, making you to actually become what you're constantly accused of being?
Back in the 1950s and before, they did attack first, but since the 1960s, when the 'Civil Right Act' became law, that tactic was curtailed, because too many of them were spending too much time in prison. Today they are much more disciplined, restrained, and much more well organized, and are constantly ordered and warned not to throw the first punch, through their well organized groups. That's why it has been many decades since any of these far right groups have been accused of starting anything by throwing the first punch.
Haven't you noticed in this Charlottesville incident that they have not been accused of starting the incident by harming anyone first, but of only being haters, and because of their hate they automatically instigate violence, which means they didn't start it, but just by being who and what they are, and by just being there, they caused the violence in others to occur. If you listen carefully to everything that is said, you'll find this to be true of all their accusers, not one being able to claim truthfully that they started any violence, but they instigated it by just being there, because of who and what they are, which most of them are not haters, but have a cause that they deeply believe in, and are willing to fight for it if they are attacked or assaulted first.
But now lets talk about the 'Far Left Groups'. They are not nearly as well organized, and consist of real rabid haters, for who else would call for the murder of police officers and white people (which many of them have done through horrible assasinations of our police officers, that weren't expecting someone to sneak up on them and kill them while nothing was going on), and they are individual cowboys and loose cannons, and do whatever they feel is right at the time that they get an itch to do it. When they're wearing masks to hide their identities, and are armed with a weapon, the itch grows great in them, and they go off without anyone giving them the order to do so, and that is why both the BLM and Antifa have never participated in any event that didn't turn into a riot where many people got hurt and much property was destroyed or stolen.
So those are the groups that came together in Charlottesville, one lawfully permitted for a rally march, while the other coming, reportedly without a permit, to protest and confront the rally marchers, many of the rally marchers really not being members of the groups who organized the rally march, but wanted to stand-up to support the preservation of our historical statues and monuments, and got caught in the middle of one far out group attacking the other far out group, which then agressively defended itself, with all those innocents being in the middle of both far out groups.
So the important questions that need to be asked to determine who actaully started the violence are these:
1.) Why would one set of groups go out of their way to make sure a rally, not a protest, was set up far in advance and completely legal, having to apply twice for a permit before one was issued, and in doing all this, just break the law and incite violence in a peaceful town. For if their goal was to do that, they would need not pay all that money, and take up all their time to do what they did legally, but only would need to just show up at a designated time, and start the violence that would be illegal and get them thrown into jail?
2.) Why would another set of groups, who claimed they were just having a protest march, show up at a designated time, wearing masks and armed with weapons, and was reported not to have obtained a permit to have a protest march, do all this to confront rally marchers that proclaimed they only were there to rally support for the preservation of our historical statues and monuments, and not to confront anyone about anything.
3.) So which ever set of groups started the violence, the other set of groups defended themselves, and progressed into defending themselves agressively. So which set of groups should be blamed and be held responsible for all this violence, which President Trump proclaimed both set of groups were guilty of the violence perpetrated on the other set of groups, which to me was very astute and precise, without having to mentioned who started it all, the one set of groups for just showing up, of the other set of groups for confronting them for showing up?
I'm sorry Huck, you'll have to make that decission for yourself, but the liberal biased mainstream media have already made that decision for you, and they are supporting and promoting the innocence of their liberal progressive, and Democratic Party advocates, and you know who that is by just listening to or watching the news, the ones that wore the masks to hide their identities and came to their wanted confrontation armed.
Huck wrote:
StraightUp –
I want to start by telling you that you have written a very accurate and comprehensive piece that I agree with totally. Now comes the However part: What you don’t say is that the ACLU always wins because they take cases that are constitutionally right, but always favors the left. Oh yes, they have their token right wing cases to claim impartiality, but they are basically considered a left wing organization and I believe rightly so.
In order to ask you the next question I have to express my despicable hatred For the KKK and all White Supremacy organizations in order not to be accused of supporting them and hopefully you’ll believe me. However, I need to ask if you can document a time in recent history when either these two or any other rightwing organization that were marching and demonstrating legally wherever - threw the first punch? I’ve watched many of these protests that have erupted into violence and yet to see the radical, so-called rightwing group, start the fight. As hated as they are they had every right to protest legally whatever without hindrance from radical leftwing groups, but for reasons you should know well, they are always given the blame.
Regardless of how we feel personally about these groups, right or left, the blame has to be honestly placed where it belongs. The stupid sap that ran over and killed a lady happened after a long day of rioting and did not cause the initial eruption. Do you know who started it?
Overall StraightUp, your post appears to have an overall slightly blue haze surrounding it. Hopefully I’m wrong.
Huck
StraightUp – br I want to start by telling you th... (
show quote)