One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Senators
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
Jul 18, 2017 08:46:13   #
Morgan
 
Randy131 wrote:
According to the Democrats, they are the same, just listen to them.

Obamacare is access to what was promised as affordable healthcare insurance from a private supplier, and if you liked your own healthcare insurance policy, you could keep it. But for those deemed to poor to afford the healthcare insurance, even with the federal government stipend, they are given free access to medicaid, a public supplier, which is the governments of state and federal together paying for your healthcare, which is access to healthcare without having to pay for it by making healthcare insurance payments.

The problem with Obamacare health insurance is that you don't have a choice to buy only what you want and/or need, but have to buy what the government requires you to buy in healthcare insurance, such as maternity insurance for unmarried men, and also for people beyond the child-bearing age.

The government needs to quit telling the people what to do, and allow the people to make their own choices, which is what is called your Creator's unalienable endowed Right of your 'Pursuit of Happiness', where you get to choose what is best for you, whether it truly be or not, instead of some bureacratic elitist deciding for you what is best for you, then forcing you to accept their choice, instead of allowing you to make your own choice.
According to the Democrats, they are the same, jus... (show quote)




Show that to me...where "the government requires you to buy in healthcare insurance covering what you don't need or want." That has to do with your insurance provider and their policies, not the government. It's called packages, just like what cable companies do with your TV packages. It basically balances out in insurances as not every body needs everything, for example where a man doesn't need maternity a woman doesn't need erectile dysfunction. It washes out, your basically crying over petty things, go bitch to your insurance company. Insurance company's have to find ways to spread the cost, and not create an endless tedious amount of custom made policies, its simply not practical. Grow up. Try blaming the Democrats for something else, I'm sure you will, that's all you do.

Reply
Jul 18, 2017 08:53:01   #
PeterS
 
buffalo wrote:
I think is was back in 2012 when the mandate kicked in, I went on the healthcare.gov website that people were having so much trouble with and breezed right through the process, no problems. I was not poor enough to qualify for a subsidy, am single and the ONLY plans offered me were BCBS Bronze or Silver plan. The Silver plan's monthly premiums were $378.98 with a $6,000.00 deductible and only paid 60% after the deductible was met. What kind of fucked up rip off is that? Do the math. Say If I had the no good shit for 2 years I would have paid $9,000.00 in premiums. Then I suddenly had a $30,000.00 medical bill, emergency or illness, whatever. I still would have had to pay the $6,000.00 deductible, $9,000.00 in premiums I had paid and then the sorry shit would have only paid $14,000.00 of the $24,000.00 left after the $6,000.00 deductible. So, I would have been out $25,000.00 to get $14,000.00 payment for health CARE from private, for profit a health INSURANCE corporation. the Bronze plan would have been worse! You tell me.....

Health INSURANCE and health CARE are not the same thing. Many, many middle class and working poor people forego health CARE because they cannot afford what health INSURANCE WILL NOT PAY and the high deductibles.

Medicare for ALL would solve that problem instantly and save 95% of taxpayers money. Only the the rich would be required to chip in a little more. Health INSURANCE is a profit extracting ripoff. I say eliminate the $500 BILLION they extract in profits annually, increase Medicare tax on wages to, say, 5%, on gross incomes below $150,000 and 7.5% on incomes above that, tax annual stock increases, investment and interest incomes and capital gains the same 7.5% and combine the Medicaid and VA budgets into a Medicare for All. And, YES it would be affordable. Doctors would still be in private practices, that is those that have not gone to work in hospitals for salaries as hospitalist because of the overhead of dealing with 150 different private, for profit health INSURANCE corporations and hospitals would still be privately owned. Medicare for Alll would be no more socialistic than the current Medicare system for the elderly and disabled. It would NOT BE FREE except for the very poor that get it free now.

Out of 11 so-called wealthy nations, the US is the ONLY one that does not have single payer, universal health CARE. The others that do did not go to single payer because it was going to cost more, nor are any of them considering do away with their health CARE systems. Health CARE is a right!
I think is was back in 2012 when the mandate kicke... (show quote)

Look, until people actually get hit in the pocket book they will never support anything. Trouble is, someone in your position is better to use the emergency room. Pay a few dollars a month and there is nothing they can do. Cheaper then healthcare, even paying the fine, but you lose followup care unless you once again have an emergency. I think a single payer the best way to go. Everyone chips in; the wealthy will pay the most...

Reply
Jul 18, 2017 09:00:31   #
Morgan
 
steve66613 wrote:
So, most "working people", over the past 30 years, had "group health insurance" as a benefit, through their employer.....right? The "free enterprise system"; more commonly known as capitalism was working just fine.

I paid ZERO per month for health insurance.....for my ENTIRE family. A doctor visit (to my chosen doctor) usually cost a co-pay of maybe $15. Same with my dentist. Six-month dental checkups cost zero. Of course, none of the cost was actually "nothing", it was a part of my wages. A major medical event might cost a few hundred dollars....after all, a box of tissues might not be included at $60 per box.

Thus, out-of-pocket = $400 for the whole family after 2 years. This includes deductibles for drug coverage. A catastrophic illness might increase the total to maybe $1000 total.

Tell me again how, having the federal government in the health insurance business, is a better system!!!!!! The argument that "other industrialized [wealthy?]nations have single payer insurance", doesn't mean anything......there is a whole world out there which has maybe more/maybe less, than what we have here in the U.S.

We haven't been "doing socialism". (Sure, we have plenty of socialism. Ex: social security.) How's that working in those countries? I'll stay here. Clearly, the ACA didn't work; don't fix it; throw it out!

Insurance, of any kind, is a privilege; just like any other property or possession. In THIS society, one works to own something. Under, socialism/communism, individuals own nothing...including insurance.

Any questions?
So, most "working people", over the past... (show quote)


Soooo let me get this straight, what personally happened to you, happened with everybody else, is that right? And since that worked great for you it was working great for everybody. That really is quite the perspective...if you lived in a tunnel. Insurance isn't a privilege! My god man when you pay for something it is never a privilege! It is a money making product, that is all. Get off your dumbass communism diatribe once and for all, you don't know what your talking about.

Reply
 
 
Jul 18, 2017 09:12:29   #
CodyCoonhound Loc: Redbone Country
 
Just go to this link. This is for the required individual mandate. However the ACA (Obamacare) is explained.
https://obamacare.net/obamacare-individual-mandate/

Reply
Jul 18, 2017 09:20:01   #
Cmac
 
buffalo wrote:
I think is was back in 2012 when the mandate kicked in, I went on the healthcare.gov website that people were having so much trouble with and breezed right through the process, no problems. I was not poor enough to qualify for a subsidy, am single and the ONLY plans offered me were BCBS Bronze or Silver plan. The Silver plan's monthly premiums were $378.98 with a $6,000.00 deductible and only paid 60% after the deductible was met. What kind of fucked up rip off is that? Do the math. Say If I had the no good shit for 2 years I would have paid $9,000.00 in premiums. Then I suddenly had a $30,000.00 medical bill, emergency or illness, whatever. I still would have had to pay the $6,000.00 deductible, $9,000.00 in premiums I had paid and then the sorry shit would have only paid $14,000.00 of the $24,000.00 left after the $6,000.00 deductible. So, I would have been out $25,000.00 to get $14,000.00 payment for health CARE from private, for profit a health INSURANCE corporation. the Bronze plan would have been worse! You tell me.....

Health INSURANCE and health CARE are not the same thing. Many, many middle class and working poor people forego health CARE because they cannot afford what health INSURANCE WILL NOT PAY and the high deductibles.

Medicare for ALL would solve that problem instantly and save 95% of taxpayers money. Only the the rich would be required to chip in a little more. Health INSURANCE is a profit extracting ripoff. I say eliminate the $500 BILLION they extract in profits annually, increase Medicare tax on wages to, say, 5%, on gross incomes below $150,000 and 7.5% on incomes above that, tax annual stock increases, investment and interest incomes and capital gains the same 7.5% and combine the Medicaid and VA budgets into a Medicare for All. And, YES it would be affordable. Doctors would still be in private practices, that is those that have not gone to work in hospitals for salaries as hospitalist because of the overhead of dealing with 150 different private, for profit health INSURANCE corporations and hospitals would still be privately owned. Medicare for Alll would be no more socialistic than the current Medicare system for the elderly and disabled. It would NOT BE FREE except for the very poor that get it free now.

Out of 11 so-called wealthy nations, the US is the ONLY one that does not have single payer, universal health CARE. The others that do did not go to single payer because it was going to cost more, nor are any of them considering do away with their health CARE systems. Health CARE is a right!
I think is was back in 2012 when the mandate kicke... (show quote)
where in the constitution does it say that is a right??i don't want my money to go to your RIGHT,get some kind of plan and pay it your self!!!there will come a day when we loose every thing and it's coming soon,so get ready!

Reply
Jul 18, 2017 09:34:53   #
Bevos
 
cold iron wrote:
In my many years I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame,
two is a law firm, and three or more is a congress.

Giving money and power to
government is like giving whiskey
and car keys to teenage boys.

The sad part is we have very bad memory's and keep putting the A holes back in.


I quit giving them ANY MONEY!!! I read an article by Kelliegh Nielson and she has a GOOD idea. It is on Newswithviews. QUIT sending them ANY money and change your affiliation to INDEPENDENT and then NOTIFY them that you have done so. You are NO LONGER SUPPORTING them until they start LISTENING to what you are SAYING TO THEM!!! Until they start BACKING the MAN that WE ELECTED to POTUS!!! HIT THEM WHERE IT HURTS MOST!!!

Reply
Jul 18, 2017 09:41:36   #
Bevos
 
Morgan wrote:
Soooo let me get this straight, what personally happened to you, happened with everybody else, is that right? And since that worked great for you it was working great for everybody. That really is quite the perspective...if you lived in a tunnel. Insurance isn't a privilege! My god man when you pay for something it is never a privilege! It is a money making product, that is all. Get off your dumbass communism diatribe once and for all, you don't know what your talking about.


It WORKED that way for a HELL OF A LOT OF YEARS!!! Health Ins. IS A "PRIVILEGE" and NOT A RIGHT!!! Just like HOME- OWNERSHIP, car-OWNERSHIP, clothing OWNERSHIP, COLLEGE, etc. It depends on WHAT you, YOURSELF want to WORK FOR!!!

Reply
 
 
Jul 18, 2017 09:41:40   #
Cmac
 
Bevos,,,,it will mean jail time ,and many people are there now.taxes are a evil thing but don't go against them or there coming to your house soon

Reply
Jul 18, 2017 09:43:03   #
CodyCoonhound Loc: Redbone Country
 
SCOTUS ruled it is a tax, which is in the constitution.
I agree with you that it should never have been ruled constitutional. It was presented under the amendment "for the good of all". That was unconstitutional, but SCOTUS then said it is legal as a tax. That threw it back to the voters to vote it out thru representation. So far that is not working. Senate either needs 60 votes or change the rules to 51 to manage all day to day business.
But, that also explains the reason for difficulty to repeal all of the law. The Senate rules would require a full 60 votes to repeal the funding and the rules of the law. Reconciliation, with 51 votes, would allow the funding to be repealed. That is why the Senate bill has the long term fix with medicaid as part of the bill that appears to have failed.
Thus, it appears we will be stuck with this law and required to pay to avoid tax penalties and jail.

Reply
Jul 18, 2017 10:23:01   #
PeterS
 
Cmac wrote:
where in the constitution does it say that is a right??i don't want my money to go to your RIGHT,get some kind of plan and pay it your self!!!there will come a day when we loose every thing and it's coming soon,so get ready!

Conservatives have long held that life is right. If that is the case then saying it isn't sort of defeats your argument...

Reply
Jul 18, 2017 10:40:41   #
bahmer
 
proud republican wrote:
Get of your ass and start working on REPEAL AND REPLACE YOU NEED TO CANCEL YOUR WHOLE AUGUST VACATION,NOT JUST 2 WEEKS.. DO YOUR DAMN JOB!!!


We need term limits and unfortunately almost all of our members of the house and senate are long overdue to be kicked out do to their term being up.

Reply
 
 
Jul 18, 2017 12:11:38   #
CodyCoonhound Loc: Redbone Country
 
Or, as President Trump just broadcast, the 60 vote rule is absurd. It means that 8 democrats control the Senate. He says go to the same as House- 51 votes to pass any legislation. McConnell can do this with 50 votes from Republicans and one from VP. Let us see what happens.

Reply
Jul 18, 2017 12:12:43   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
Cmac wrote:
where in the constitution does it say that is a right??i don't want my money to go to your RIGHT,get some kind of plan and pay it your self!!!there will come a day when we loose every thing and it's coming soon,so get ready!


I will. In about 10 months get Medicare and PAY FOR IT just like I have been for nearly 50 years. It's called Medicare taxes and they turn into premiums at 65. What the hell are you going to do? Why does the right to health CARE have to be in the Constitution?

Reply
Jul 18, 2017 12:23:08   #
Cherokee38 Loc: Atlanta
 
buffalo wrote:
I think is was back in 2012 when the mandate kicked in, I went on the healthcare.gov website that people were having so much trouble with and breezed right through the process, no problems. I was not poor enough to qualify for a subsidy, am single and the ONLY plans offered me were BCBS Bronze or Silver plan. The Silver plan's monthly premiums were $378.98 with a $6,000.00 deductible and only paid 60% after the deductible was met. What kind of fucked up rip off is that? Do the math. Say If I had the no good shit for 2 years I would have paid $9,000.00 in premiums. Then I suddenly had a $30,000.00 medical bill, emergency or illness, whatever. I still would have had to pay the $6,000.00 deductible, $9,000.00 in premiums I had paid and then the sorry shit would have only paid $14,000.00 of the $24,000.00 left after the $6,000.00 deductible. So, I would have been out $25,000.00 to get $14,000.00 payment for health CARE from private, for profit a health INSURANCE corporation. the Bronze plan would have been worse! You tell me.....

Health INSURANCE and health CARE are not the same thing. Many, many middle class and working poor people forego health CARE because they cannot afford what health INSURANCE WILL NOT PAY and the high deductibles.

Medicare for ALL would solve that problem instantly and save 95% of taxpayers money. Only the the rich would be required to chip in a little more. Health INSURANCE is a profit extracting ripoff. I say eliminate the $500 BILLION they extract in profits annually, increase Medicare tax on wages to, say, 5%, on gross incomes below $150,000 and 7.5% on incomes above that, tax annual stock increases, investment and interest incomes and capital gains the same 7.5% and combine the Medicaid and VA budgets into a Medicare for All. And, YES it would be affordable. Doctors would still be in private practices, that is those that have not gone to work in hospitals for salaries as hospitalist because of the overhead of dealing with 150 different private, for profit health INSURANCE corporations and hospitals would still be privately owned. Medicare for Alll would be no more socialistic than the current Medicare system for the elderly and disabled. It would NOT BE FREE except for the very poor that get it free now.

Out of 11 so-called wealthy nations, the US is the ONLY one that does not have single payer, universal health CARE. The others that do did not go to single payer because it was going to cost more, nor are any of them considering do away with their health CARE systems. Health CARE is a right!
I think is was back in 2012 when the mandate kicke... (show quote)


Since you have more legal experience than I, please list where it is stated "health care is a right??" Personally, we keep talking about rich and poor people. What is the dollar line that puts someone in either class? Do people not buy insurance because they feel alright now, or they don't see the benefit to pay for something there is no immediate benefit? They still smoke, drink and do drugs but I need to pay for their health insurance? Please name me one, just one program the government has run successfully financially! Still trying to locate one? Congress is not good money managers, and according to USA personal debt neither are our citizens. How do you elect someone to spend your money correctly, when even you don't know what that looks like!! The problem is when they get a high medical bill and don't have insurance then they scream for help. No one is there to bail me out when I make bad CHOICES, I have to live with the consequences. It is called learning. Giving money and power to congress, is like giving whiskey and car keys to a teen aged boy!!

Reply
Jul 18, 2017 12:35:10   #
Candace Grugel
 
Whoa. I just had another brilliant. Let Ovomit care die under its intended weight. Then, since the lowlives in government know everything, let them pony up and pay for the coverage of these sycophants who want Oscummy care. Hell, either way it US taxpayer money picking up the tab.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.