UncleJesse Loc: Hazzard Co, GA

It's one of those points that is good insight when it is expressed the way you wrote it but that becomes ostracized by most folks when it is written dramatically like was done in the article. Then if someone is skeptical and looks up the referenced congressional act and do not find anything, it just makes it even harder to lend an ear. On the other hand, if a headline and article don't grab attention, few will take the time to be informed.

I think the new world order, (greater government intrusion and control) will occur but not by some purposeful plan by Obama or some cabals. It will be a slow transition over time with the intent of national interests or a greater cause for the benefit of society. To me, we are far from the new world order but it's important to keep a watchful eye as it could happen quickly.

Floyd Brown Loc: Milwaukee WI

I have to agree to it with the way you put it.

bdamage Loc: My Bunker

85 individuals have more wealth than more than 3 billion people on the planet combined.
Whose controlling the world?

http://osnetdaily.com/2014/01/understanding-eugenics-globalist-war-on-the-99/

Floyd Brown Loc: Milwaukee WI

As with most new ideas it is how things are carried out that make all the difference.

Urban sprawl is not the best use of much land.

How going about making the cities run better is of great importance to making life better for many.

I have been thinking about this issue for some time now.
I live in a city & work in maintaining housing.
I have to drive to different areas to work . Living in a northern city with the snow & ice damage to the streets & pipes breaking in the winter. The roads are full of potholes
The bus system is not good.

Cities every where are becoming more crowded & less livable.

The people are there now & the task is to make them more livable. Most people seem to like being around others.

Only though planing & zoning can we really make cities more livable.

What is needed is master planning of what & how cities need to change.

The best way to to that is to expand up rather than out.
To much space is set aside for cars.

If things were closer the need for cars & the space need for them will go down.

So I am all for putting more people in to less area & increasing the open areas around them.

The thing to do is think in cubic area instead of square area.
Lets have a master plan of just how many people with the services they need in to smaller area

Not that we would ever build it but to use as a guide line as the most that would ever be done.

There is a building 1/2 mile high now. Inter connect several buildings at various levels. Keep them as far apart as you can & still be connected.

Inter connect them completely at ground level. Add as many things need to be a complete city with all of the services needed.

Make sure that there is a generous area between other like groupings.

My thought is to look at it as using a cubic mile. It need not be square. There pack as many people in to it as possible.

It would only be used as a plan to see what is possible.

The ideas put down would be used in planing new cities or use ideas in adapting cities to the idea.

Buildings in cities need to be looked as being a utility.
Planning & control for the best results is important.

Now it is for us to see just how that can be done in the best interest for the most people. Just remember that it is happening any way.

I know many like to live a part from others but only by making it better for more people to live closer together will you ease the pressure from urban sprawl.

Floyd Brown Loc: Milwaukee WI

While I am for a one world government I sure don't want one with the expanded control over it from the monied interests.

If we are to survive the coming changes we as the average citizens of the US need to come together & look to using our voices & votes as well as we can to fight for our rights as citizens.

We will not be able to stop it. But we need to to impart our support for the things that will save as much of our individual freedoms as we can.

Floyd Brown Loc: Milwaukee WI

This to me is an issue that should be on the top of our thoughts & posts.

For if we cannot come together as one in speaking out about the monied issues we will all be subjected to the wishes of them.

UncleJesse Loc: Hazzard Co, GA

Thank you Floyd. You know, my thought about your recent post (below) is that any new law or regulation to protect citizens is usually late, after the problem occurs. There are few 'proactive' laws. In particular, the anti-trust laws of 1914 passed after some in the oil and tobacco industries created a monopoly and they were broken up for the purpose of fair trade for citizens. To me, any law that restricts the power and influence of the hyper-wealthy will be after they have successfully controlled masses for their own purpose. I wonder if it will be too late?

bdamage Loc: My Bunker

A one-world gov will make the US Constitution obsolete and since the US is such a small part of the world in general, well I'm afraid we won't have that much of an impact on our freedoms once the NWO is established.
It will be GAME_OVER.
Where would you like your micro-chip sir?

http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2013/10/nbc-predicts-all-americans-will-receive-a-microchip-implant-in-2017-per-obamacare-videos-2797326.html

Don't take the chip sheeple!

Floyd Brown Loc: Milwaukee WI

For the few to completely control the masses they need help of many from the masses in doing so.

The cost of keeping enough people from the masses happy to do the dirty work for them will not come cheap.

To always look for some one to go the work cheaper will mean sending a current worker back in to the masses as an unhappy person who may well find ways to get even.

To keep a mass of people doing the dirty work they will have to share the wealth with them or the system then in place will fail as this one is failing.

But I guess if you follow the thinking of many here they would be glad to wipe the backsides of the few.

mongo Loc: TEXAS

Are you serious, a one world government? If it wasn't for the diversity of different cultures we would truly be screwed. I figure you are assuming that it would create peace and equality across the line. But, it would have the exact opposite effect. And laws would be enacted to keep citizens from protesting change. It would be like living in Nazi run Germany!

Floyd Brown Loc: Milwaukee WI

The first line of my Post: "While I am for a one world government I sure don't want one with the expanded control over it from the monied interests."

If a small group like us on this forum can not find any agreement on how to solve our problems just how are we going to stop the one world government from being.

mongo Loc: TEXAS

I'm not trying to disrespect your views, just playing devils advocate if you will. Maybe I am not following your train of thought the way you meant readers to. There are many variables to compacting the world under one government. For one, our constitution is one of the best written in the world. If we entered a one world govt. system, most of it would go away, along with our bill of rights. Citizens of this country are witness to law-makers amending or re-writing both, mostly for their own agendas. In essence, it gives them more authority over our daily lives in the guise of safety and protection. In reality, we are being put under heal.

Floyd Brown Loc: Milwaukee WI

The way this country is going we will have very little to say what will go on with a new world order.

Just how good is or country where at each turn of events there are more poor people.

The US has lost it's power & is in sad disarray. We are a country divided. As you can see with how things get said on this forum there is little hope of ever changing that fact.

We can get our act together & be United again or we can sit on our hands & wait for the rest of the world to tell us where to go. At that time our Constitution will just be a piece of paper.

mongo Loc: TEXAS

The success of this country has always been not following other countries political beliefs. Our constitution was written for the people so they would never be treated as a third-world country as england had treated them. By losing any part of of our law of the land it leaves an opening for suppressors to step in and control the people. That is what is happening in our government today. Politicians are trying to control the people with more and more un-constitutional laws that are causing civil unrest. I hope and pray in 2016 the people of this country don't vote for a candidate that has been endorsed by either party. They should do research on the candidates records in order to vote the best qualified to lead this country into office.

Armageddun Loc: The show me state

The New Word order, the UN, the world Bank, The devaluation of the dollar, The world council of churches are straight from the pits of hell.