One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Gun owners should be strictly liable for damages caused by their guns
Page <<first <prev 5 of 16 next> last>>
May 25, 2017 16:41:31   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
So who is using radical Islam? The thugs.

Top Illuminati Grand Wizard: “We Control Islam and We'll Use It to Destroy the West.” (WW3)
https://youtu.be/0dXD2H0m74g
(For the root of the planning, go to minute 6)

Inside this ''Illuminati Temple'' will shock you! (R$E)
https://youtu.be/uuT_4XElXOU

Study the Bilderberg Group


bggamers wrote:
Thats what liberals want to take the guns away then this country will go under . I believe its one of the reasons we have not had to many attacks .Every time we do more people buy guns and are more apt to shoot any thing that look like a muslim and at this point any body who shoots their mouth off with liberal BS. If you notice most all the countrys that are being attacked the citizens have had their guns taken away and are the ones where muslims are being pushed in to almost take over numbers. If they did that here it would be a one hell of a war on the streets. But here they are building armys right under the goverments nose and the stupid dems say thats their right. Hell no its not to allow an enemy to build fighting forces in your own country is treason and down right stupid
Thats what liberals want to take the guns away the... (show quote)

Reply
May 25, 2017 17:00:48   #
Worried for our children Loc: Massachusetts
 
Straight out of a James Bond film, fingerprint guns are activated by your fingerprint alone.

Fingerprint-access gun technology allows user-authentication to be instantaneous, effortless, and accurate. Fingerprint gun and fingerprint handgun technology is already widely in use in other tech devices, and offers a high-tech solution to prevent others from using your firearm. When an authorized user presses their finger to a fingerprint scanner on a fingerprint gun, the scanner compares the print to its internal database, finds a match, and allows the user full access to the firearm. Unauthorized users cannot access the firearm. This emerging technology can be programmed for a virtually unlimited number of users, allowing gun owners to give friends and family access to their firearm, or police departments to authorize an entire police force on the same firearm.

"You know that once you register that weapon it belongs to you."
– Muscogee County Marshal Greg Countryman

Fingerprint-access innovations.

Learn more about innovator Tom Lynch’s fingerprint-access retrofit kit. The Safe Gun Technology fingerprint access retrofit solution gives firearms owners peace of mind by making it impossible for anyone except authorized users to fire the weapon.

Learn more about innovator Omer Kiyani’s IDENTILOCK, a biometric gunlock that reads the shooter’s fingerprint before unlocking to leave the trigger open for firing. It fits directly over the trigger of any firearm and once authorized, detaches from the firearm within seconds.

Learn more about innovator Kai Kloepfer’s fingerprint-access handgun. Kai is integrating a fingerprint scanner that can be programmed for a virtually unlimited number of users and boasts a 99.99% accurate recognition rate, onto a live firearm. It could prevent unauthorized discharge of a firearm by children, people attempting to commit suicide, and people untrained to use the weapon.

https://smarttechfoundation.org/

My question I guess is; these devices need to be powered, presumably by some sort of battery, what does one do if the battery dies? The gun becomes as good as a rock. I also noticed (and put in bold) that in the beginning of the article it was "instantaneous", but by the end, it changed to "within seconds". Well that's comforting when split seconds count.

Reply
May 25, 2017 17:23:56   #
zillaorange
 
ron vrooman wrote:
You are to ignorant for this conversation.


To begin with it's spelled too. What's ignorant about stating gun owners should be responsible ? What's ignorant about questioning why those who supply criminals with fire arms should be held responsible ?

Reply
 
 
May 25, 2017 17:25:47   #
zillaorange
 
zillaorange wrote:
To begin with it's spelled too. What's ignorant about stating gun owners should be responsible ? What's ignorant about questioning why those who supply criminals with fire arms should be held responsible ?


Loki got it right on the nose !

Reply
May 25, 2017 17:29:17   #
zillaorange
 
ron vrooman wrote:
You are to ignorant for this conversation.


where'd you go von ?

Reply
May 25, 2017 17:31:23   #
Worried for our children Loc: Massachusetts
 
zillaorange wrote:
Loki got it right on the nose !


That's habit for him.

Reply
May 25, 2017 17:32:53   #
zillaorange
 
Worried for our children wrote:
That's a habit for him.


I know !

Reply
 
 
May 25, 2017 17:34:21   #
cesspool jones Loc: atlanta
 
Chocura750 wrote:
If someone breaks into your house and steals it and does damage with it, yes you should be liable. You should have had it secured better.


You are looney tunes.

Reply
May 25, 2017 17:35:32   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
zillaorange wrote:
To begin with it's spelled too. What's ignorant about stating gun owners should be responsible ? What's ignorant about questioning why those who supply criminals with fire arms should be held responsible ?


Should you be held responsible if your car is stolen and the thieves had an accident and killed someone while they were joyriding? It is the same principle. Chocura seems to think that if you have a firearm stolen and it is used in a crime you should be held responsible. He seems to think that whoever stole the firearm and used it in commission of a crime is blameless.
If your home was burglarized and someone stole some DRANO to be used in manufacturing Meth, are you responsible?
The problem lies in criminalizing legal firearms ownership.
If you provide someone with access to a firearm knowing that they will use it for criminal activity you are already liable under existing law.

Reply
May 25, 2017 17:43:20   #
ron vrooman Loc: Now OR, born NV
 
your right when you say too! for too hard too fast too ignorant.
obozo and company supplied thousands of guns to criminals. then supplied BLM et al. with guns to provide a standing army of US citizens working for the corporate governance. Did you question the de facto about their illegal unlawful gun running operation?
yes you do not belong in a conversation of consequence involving guns.

as for finger print tech for a hand gun bullshit. It is like air bags. a money grab. if you want auto safety 5 point harness and roll cage. if you want gun safety carry it.

zillaorange wrote:
To begin with it's spelled too. What's ignorant about stating gun owners should be responsible ? What's ignorant about questioning why those who supply criminals with fire arms should be held responsible ?

Reply
May 25, 2017 17:44:55   #
zillaorange
 
Loki wrote:
Should you be held responsible if your car is stolen and the thieves had an accident and killed someone while they were joyriding? It is the same principle. Chocura seems to think that if you have a firearm stolen and it is used in a crime you should be held responsible. He seems to think that whoever stole the firearm and used it in commission of a crime is blameless.
If your home was burglarized and someone stole some DRANO to be used in manufacturing Meth, are you responsible?
The problem lies in criminalizing legal firearms ownership.
If you provide someone with access to a firearm knowing that they will use it for criminal activity you are already liable under existing law.
Should you be held responsible if your car is stol... (show quote)


I didn't say or even suggest the owner of a stolen gun should be held responsible for a criminal using a stolen gun. I pointed out, most, law abiding gun owners are responsible, that's all ! I was asking Chocura why the people who supply criminals were left out ! I believe the supplier should be locked up FOR EVER, no fancy prison, chain gang style ! Those using a firearm to commit a crime should get 15 yrs. just for using it, no parole, statuary sentence. Then whatever other crime should be added to it !!! On the same chain gang !!!

Reply
 
 
May 25, 2017 17:51:38   #
zillaorange
 
ron vrooman wrote:
your right when you say too! for too hard too fast too ignorant.
obozo and company supplied thousands of guns to criminals. then supplied BLM et al. with guns to provide a standing army of US citizens working for the corporate governance. Did you question the de facto about their illegal unlawful gun running operation?
yes you do not belong in a conversation of consequence involving guns.

as for finger print tech for a hand gun bullshit. It is like air bags. a money grab. if you want auto safety 5 point harness and roll cage. if you want gun safety carry it.
your right when you say too! for too hard too fast... (show quote)


You know what they say about opinions, they're like ass holes, everybody has 1. Maybe you should get all the way through a response before you put your foot, feet in your mouth ! I did point out that the criminal & supplier should be prosecuted to the MAX !!!

Reply
May 25, 2017 17:53:23   #
zillaorange
 
zillaorange wrote:
You know what they say about opinions, they're like ass holes, everybody has 1. Maybe you should get all the way through a response before you put your foot, feet in your mouth ! I did point out that the criminal & supplier should be prosecuted to the MAX !!!


Gone again von ?!?

Reply
May 25, 2017 18:01:04   #
ron vrooman Loc: Now OR, born NV
 
still too ignorant.

zillaorange wrote:
I didn't say or even suggest the owner of a stolen gun should be held responsible for a criminal using a stolen gun. I pointed out, most, law abiding gun owners are responsible, that's all ! I was asking Chocura why the people who supply criminals were left out ! I believe the supplier should be locked up FOR EVER, no fancy prison, chain gang style ! Those using a firearm to commit a crime should get 15 yrs. just for using it, no parole, statuary sentence. Then whatever other crime should be added to it !!! On the same chain gang !!!
I didn't say or even suggest the owner of a stolen... (show quote)

Reply
May 25, 2017 18:04:39   #
zillaorange
 
ron vrooman wrote:
still too ignorant.


Specifically point out any ignorant, other than yours, point made.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 16 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.