One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Cuba is 100% literate
Page <<first <prev 12 of 15 next> last>>
Apr 24, 2017 13:43:02   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
BigMike wrote:
That is a fair point, although I have a few caveats. I'm all for public education...as long as it's kept local and schools are financially responsible, neither of which is the case now.


Agree!!!

Reply
Apr 24, 2017 13:51:21   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
lindajoy wrote:
Very true son!! It is as if it never took place now..Then it was a horrific injustice everyone was at first upset about and then as Castro closed off communication and everyone went their separae ways what no one knew about was to also give up on those people and their way of life..The embargo of everything simply made Cuba, in theory, just disappear..Castro as evil as they come did unmerciful things to his own people...Fleeing the only means for many to survive......

THE CIA?? A joke that is..They weren't trying to murder in reality, had they been they would have!!! All those supposed attempts of the CIA and exiles?? some pretty stupid stuff they tried from what I've read... keeping Castro sanctions in place is what caused the people to suffer not Castro and he didn't care as long as his power was in force....many enemies because he played everyone else.....Even Russia finally had enough of him and quit usurping the embargo/sanctions etc...

His brother just as bad only more cunning about how he is a revolunist and going to bring Cuba back..I still wonder what deal he struck with BO !!! Talk about another of BOs fine moments boy thats one of them!!

The left has a long history of lionizing Cuba's education and health, while ignoring or downplaying the island's poverty and dictatorship. They may be skilled in basic education but they still die earlier!! May well be that a literate population is relatively highly valued by both dictatorial and democratic government. When newspapers are tightly controlled by the government, having the populace read the government propaganda seem like a good thing. But when it comes to life expectancy—an excellent proxy for the standard of living in general and health of the populace in particular—dictatorships can't hold a candle to democracies.
Very true son!! It is as if it never took place no... (show quote)


A dictatorship in a third world country is a miniature of what the world government these "progressives" think would be so great will turn into in a very short time.

The problem with the concentration of power is that those who end up with that power inevitably come to believe themselves to be God.

Reply
Apr 24, 2017 13:52:30   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
lindajoy wrote:
Agree!!!


Affirmation! How nice!

Did our mutual friend show up OK?

Reply
Apr 24, 2017 14:09:47   #
QuestGirl Loc: Jayhawk Country
 
lindajoy wrote:
Looking at those countries would not be a fiar assessment~~Finland, Japan and South Korea, have relatively smaller and much more homogeneous populations, making it easier to maintain a consistent standard....

This country is so diverse in its populace makeup there are inherently more obstacles to over come...

Complacency and inefficiency, reflective of lower priorities in education, and inconsistencies among the various school systems contributed to our decline..Right along with the development of Common Core which brought its decline, rapidly..Evidenced by what we see graduating now, with an abilty to barely read and forget math or Science..Just 20 years ago we were number one and common core came on board 2009 solidifying its decline...Our children lost, our Nation lost and thirteen other countries far exceed our standards now...

If I had my way I'd shut down the Dept. of Education and give it back to the states where it belongs along with a uniform standard of achievement, not going the other way just so everyone can can pass, stupid.......
Looking at those countries would not be a fiar ass... (show quote)


Me too. I recently learned Common Core came as early as 1996. I think Bush just re-named it No Child Left Behind and a disaster too. Touch Point Math had my child adding 20+5 = 7. Zero has no "touch point". Also, no grades throughout grade school. This started under Bush in 2001 or 2002. My daughter graduated in 2012.

Reply
Apr 25, 2017 11:26:17   #
Morgan
 
I will say this again and again and again, common core is simply a bar, and a low one at that, it has nothing to do with teaching techniques, it is simply a standard guide line. Schools for the most part are academically, structured and controlled locally, how they are taught is a wide girth under the conjoint effort of the local school board, the school and individual teacher, this is one reason why there are such variances in schools. Why one in one neighborhood is so different and may not be maintaining a good level even though they are in the same county, while others are excelling.

Reply
Apr 25, 2017 11:50:10   #
Morgan
 
lindajoy wrote:
Looking at those countries would not be a fiar assessment~~Finland, Japan and South Korea, have relatively smaller and much more homogeneous populations, making it easier to maintain a consistent standard....

This country is so diverse in its populace makeup there are inherently more obstacles to over come...

Complacency and inefficiency, reflective of lower priorities in education, and inconsistencies among the various school systems contributed to our decline..Right along with the development of Common Core which brought its decline, rapidly..Evidenced by what we see graduating now, with an abilty to barely read and forget math or Science..Just 20 years ago we were number one and common core came on board 2009 solidifying its decline...Our children lost, our Nation lost and thirteen other countries far exceed our standards now...

If I had my way I'd shut down the Dept. of Education and give it back to the states where it belongs along with a uniform standard of achievement, not going the other way just so everyone can can pass, stupid.......
Looking at those countries would not be a fiar ass... (show quote)



Again we've been declining for decades, possibly centuries, read the writings of our founders and this is plainly apparent. If you choose to make this a political stance we will never get to the real issues, maybe that's why we've been on a continued decline. The schools have always been under state control. The federal government has little to do with them or what they learn.

My opinion, the top countries success has nothing to do with the issues you speak of, it is about technique and what is being taught. I was brought up in a catholic school my father, mother and I went to, which expanded three different decades. Which also had 50, yes 50 kids to a class and we al received a good education. Techniques can be adjusted easily to size of class, especially in todays day and age with computers. We were also graded without a curve or A,B,C,D"s Strictly straight forward numerically. You got exactly what you got, whether 63,72,86 or 98. I personally like this way because it is so accurate.

We are failing our children, which in turns brings us down as a whole. My point... was to look at techniques that have been proven successful which can certainly be a multitude of them and begin to make these improvements... record what does work... and embrace it.

Reply
Apr 25, 2017 11:56:41   #
Morgan
 
QuestGirl wrote:
Me too. I recently learned Common Core came as early as 1996. I think Bush just re-named it No Child Left Behind and a disaster too. Touch Point Math had my child adding 20+5 = 7. Zero has no "touch point". Also, no grades throughout grade school. This started under Bush in 2001 or 2002. My daughter graduated in 2012.


When people are referring to common core it is referring to a standard, you don't learn common core unless you were taught with a curriculum course set called "Common Core", which is where this gets confusing. Were you taught with this set of books called Common Core(one book per grade level)? They were used often with home school students and possibly some private or charter schools.

Reply
Apr 25, 2017 17:13:27   #
QuestGirl Loc: Jayhawk Country
 
Morgan wrote:
When people are referring to common core it is referring to a standard, you don't learn common core unless you were taught with a curriculum course set called "Common Core", which is where this gets confusing. Were you taught with this set of books called Common Core(one book per grade level)? They were used often with home school students and possibly some private or charter schools.


No, not me. I graduated from public school in 1975. My daughter however, entered public schools in 1999, graduating in 2012. She went to live with her dad in 2010, and entered a different school district in the same state, one county over. Had she stayed with me, I do not believe she would have graduated.

Example: Had the "system" been passing out grades in grade school, instead of passing with "participation" medals, my daughter was failing 5th grade math. Her teacher put an F on a paper of her's at the end of the year. I had anmunition now, to bitch at the district. Now, as I type this, I wonder if I got the teacher fired?

Her grade school was nothing more than a glorified babysitter. Thank God she loves to read and with high comprehension. I say that, for her accelerated reading (grade school) in passing 10 tests covering 10 books with only one answer wrong out of 100 total. I collected books, for a reason, and she was surrounded by them. I'm not an avid reader beyond "current events". The same as my mother read.

My father was (known to read more than one book at a time) and my two older brothers are (I can only assume they are both still alive), but I missed that era without a father in the home at the age of 13, due to death. Life changed for me exponentially upon his death. The parent who cared properly for the "well being" of another beyond the physical facade, had ceased to exist. My non-sociopathic parent had ceased to exist.

My daughter began to get into trouble in 2008, during her 8th grade year. (A new girl had moved to town, my daughter brought her home from school and she stayed for two weeks. For reasons blatantly obvious to me, she could stay with us at any time.) My daughter had made the Honor Roll in 7th grade, which I attribute to two of her teachers and that particular school's administration. I loved Mr W, while the kids all hated him. He did his job, properly, in my opinion. The only school worth its salt in the town we lived.

When my daughter entered high school, by Thanksgiving of her 9th grade year, I received a letter claiming "truancy". I, being the parent, knew this was not true. I had to point out to the school that she was in ISS, sitting in their office ISS 'space' on the days that they had counted her as "absent" without an excuse. Much to my dismay, she went to go live with her dad the following semester. I knew it was the only way she would graduate high school, and she did, from the same public school I had graduated, nearly 40 years prior.

Our public schools are in shambles, unless you are rich. We lived in a "rich" county, but we, and I still am poor. We are counted as insignificant in THEIR collective big picture, even though the county itself is very wealthy, with many districts.

I moved back to my 'hometown' in 2013, spending the following 4 years basically, homeless, with two stints in the local "homeless shelter" for approximately 7 months per stint. Frankly, I kinda liked it, being among my own kind, that being "of the poor". A community, if you will. A sort of FEMA camp prototype, as I called it. Given that, I got nothin' to worry about in my future, in the future of our world.

Also, one might be amazed to learn the "genius" level of humanity living amongst the homeless. Because no one cared, properly, while they were growing up. As sociopaths are bred among the wealthy and arise to run governments and the like, many are left behind. Is that understandable? How, or rather why, does that happen?

Generally, "sociopaths" are considered the "dregs of society" and belong in jail. "Children of delinquent parents", my father would call them. What does that say about all those wealthy sociopaths? And their offspring?

It is my belief we are "most" all born amoral. (I say most because of God's few.) Someone along the way neglected to teach morals, values and ethics to their offspring. Money buys choices. Morals, values and ethics have been tossed aside for the mighty $$$ and will never reverse, even in the Utopian world.

Only God can bring about Paradise. Utopia is a false sense to Paradise and will never be achieved, try as man might. Utopia vs Paradise? I choose Paradise. Regardless of man's concerted efforts to achieve Utopia.

Footnote: Concerning my daughter. At one point in time (I believe she was still in grade school) I applied (seen it on Oprah, but not her $$$) and received a 50% private scholarship to a private school of my choosing. I was unable to acquire the remaining balance (churches required of membership status to apply) and even if I had found the money, I still faced at least a 30 mile round trip commute twice a day, or else move. Both take $$$, of which I had little to none. It is a shame I had not the "wherewithal" to homeschool my daughter my own self. But, probably, could not have afforded to homeschool within my own home.

I realize the above is a bit mixed in subject matter as well as paragraph arrangement. That's just tough, I guess, for those reading. I work here, through a phone. I'm sending this now, before it disappears off my screen and lost forever into the bowels of technology.

To answer your question, no homeschooling in my family. None, couldn't afford it. Aren't ya' glad you asked?

Reply
Apr 25, 2017 21:20:57   #
Morgan
 
QuestGirl wrote:
No, not me. I graduated from public school in 1975. My daughter however, entered public schools in 1999, graduating in 2012. She went to live with her dad in 2010, and entered a different school district in the same state, one county over. Had she stayed with me, I do not believe she would have graduated.

Example: Had the "system" been passing out grades in grade school, instead of passing with "participation" medals, my daughter was failing 5th grade math. Her teacher put an F on a paper of her's at the end of the year. I had anmunition now, to bitch at the district. Now, as I type this, I wonder if I got the teacher fired?

Her grade school was nothing more than a glorified babysitter. Thank God she loves to read and with high comprehension. I say that, for her accelerated reading (grade school) in passing 10 tests covering 10 books with only one answer wrong out of 100 total. I collected books, for a reason, and she was surrounded by them. I'm not an avid reader beyond "current events". The same as my mother read.

My father was (known to read more than one book at a time) and my two older brothers are (I can only assume they are both still alive), but I missed that era without a father in the home at the age of 13, due to death. Life changed for me exponentially upon his death. The parent who cared properly for the "well being" of another beyond the physical facade, had ceased to exist. My non-sociopathic parent had ceased to exist.

My daughter began to get into trouble in 2008, during her 8th grade year. (A new girl had moved to town, my daughter brought her home from school and she stayed for two weeks. For reasons blatantly obvious to me, she could stay with us at any time.) My daughter had made the Honor Roll in 7th grade, which I attribute to two of her teachers and that particular school's administration. I loved Mr W, while the kids all hated him. He did his job, properly, in my opinion. The only school worth its salt in the town we lived.

When my daughter entered high school, by Thanksgiving of her 9th grade year, I received a letter claiming "truancy". I, being the parent, knew this was not true. I had to point out to the school that she was in ISS, sitting in their office ISS 'space' on the days that they had counted her as "absent" without an excuse. Much to my dismay, she went to go live with her dad the following semester. I knew it was the only way she would graduate high school, and she did, from the same public school I had graduated, nearly 40 years prior.

Our public schools are in shambles, unless you are rich. We lived in a "rich" county, but we, and I still am poor. We are counted as insignificant in THEIR collective big picture, even though the county itself is very wealthy, with many districts.

I moved back to my 'hometown' in 2013, spending the following 4 years basically, homeless, with two stints in the local "homeless shelter" for approximately 7 months per stint. Frankly, I kinda liked it, being among my own kind, that being "of the poor". A community, if you will. A sort of FEMA camp prototype, as I called it. Given that, I got nothin' to worry about in my future, in the future of our world.

Also, one might be amazed to learn the "genius" level of humanity living amongst the homeless. Because no one cared, properly, while they were growing up. As sociopaths are bred among the wealthy and arise to run governments and the like, many are left behind. Is that understandable? How, or rather why, does that happen?

Generally, "sociopaths" are considered the "dregs of society" and belong in jail. "Children of delinquent parents", my father would call them. What does that say about all those wealthy sociopaths? And their offspring?

It is my belief we are "most" all born amoral. (I say most because of God's few.) Someone along the way neglected to teach morals, values and ethics to their offspring. Money buys choices. Morals, values and ethics have been tossed aside for the mighty $$$ and will never reverse, even in the Utopian world.

Only God can bring about Paradise. Utopia is a false sense to Paradise and will never be achieved, try as man might. Utopia vs Paradise? I choose Paradise. Regardless of man's concerted efforts to achieve Utopia.

Footnote: Concerning my daughter. At one point in time (I believe she was still in grade school) I applied (seen it on Oprah, but not her $$$) and received a 50% private scholarship to a private school of my choosing. I was unable to acquire the remaining balance (churches required of membership status to apply) and even if I had found the money, I still faced at least a 30 mile round trip commute twice a day, or else move. Both take $$$, of which I had little to none. It is a shame I had not the "wherewithal" to homeschool my daughter my own self. But, probably, could not have afforded to homeschool within my own home.

I realize the above is a bit mixed in subject matter as well as paragraph arrangement. That's just tough, I guess, for those reading. I work here, through a phone. I'm sending this now, before it disappears off my screen and lost forever into the bowels of technology.

To answer your question, no homeschooling in my family. None, couldn't afford it. Aren't ya' glad you asked?
No, not me. I graduated from public school in 1975... (show quote)


I am sorry to hear of your past strife and you've shown yourself to be a real fighter. I know the rules for home schooling has gotten stricter which makes me wonder about that too.

One thing we all agree on that the schools, for our children need a real make over, I'm for public schools, otherwise children...millions will fall through the cracks and we'll be moving backward toward child labor once again and only the privilege affording an education, this will only weaken our country, and we'll watch more foreigners come in and take our professional jobs.

With that said I also believe at retirement, seniors, should have a cut in taxes from school taxes. Maybe as early as 55. and if not having any children at home.

Reply
Apr 25, 2017 21:35:17   #
QuestGirl Loc: Jayhawk Country
 
Morgan wrote:
I am sorry to hear of your past strife and you've shown yourself to be a real fighter. I know the rules for home schooling has gotten stricter which makes me wonder about that too.

One thing we all agree on that the schools, for our children need a real make over, I'm for public schools, otherwise children...millions will fall through the cracks and we'll be moving backward toward child labor once again and only the privilege affording an education, this will only weaken our country, and we'll watch more foreigners come in and take our professional jobs.

With that said I also believe at retirement, seniors, should have a cut in taxes from school taxes. Maybe as early as 55. and if not having any children at home.
I am sorry to hear of your past strife and you've ... (show quote)


We are in a mess, no doubt.

Thank you for your kind words.

Reply
Apr 25, 2017 21:48:40   #
Harpooner1
 
I think the thread has gone a bit off the rails......It happens. But, I thought we were talking about Cuba?

Reply
Apr 25, 2017 21:51:45   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
Harpooner1 wrote:
I think the thread has gone a bit off the rails......It happens. But, I thought we were talking about Cuba?


It always happens...and usually it's good.

Anyone who thinks Cuba is 100% literate to begin with took way too much acid in the 60s!



Reply
Apr 25, 2017 22:15:03   #
Harpooner1
 
BigMike wrote:
It always happens...and usually it's good.

Anyone who thinks Cuba is 100% literate to begin with took way too much acid in the 60s!


Been there with my Cuban Girlfriend. A couple years ago. Yeah, it's nice if you like the nostalgic rundown scenes in past movies. Nice.
Castro spent all his money, the money he didn't keep, on Havana, and central Havana at that.
It still looks like something from the 50's.....because that is what it is. You go anywhere out side the city, with the exception of the tourist resorts, which Cubans can't go, it's a shithole! Mexico is better!
Foreigners who come can get pretty much whatever they want.....Cubans can't. It's not that they can't afford it...They are not allowed.
Seriously, a cab driver who ferries tourists makes more in a day than a doctor in a month. Everyone works for the government for 25 bucks a month. You get electricity most of the time, but, not every day of the week, same with water....Same with food. A person cannot even fish in the ocean without a penalty.
All this is true. I saw and heard it from the Cubans. But, they have gotten used to this.....Yeah....Because they saw the people that didn't get used to it disappear.
Yeah, that's the way they work.....No opposition.
yet, the liberals seem to love the Castro's because of free housing, free medical, free education........

It is a joke. When Castro got sick, he didn't stay in Cuba...No, he went to Spain.

Cuba is a beautiful country and has tremendous potential in tourism, agriculture, and other significant economic markets.
But, they have absolutely no infrastructure...None. The fertile Land yields little for the people. It's sad watching people scramble once a week in the markets for food that is no where near the quality of the average supermarket. Meat with flies on it, fish with no refrigeration or ice.......Disgusting...And that is in Havana.....

Literacy is one thing...Communist literacy is quite another.

Reply
Apr 25, 2017 22:49:34   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
Harpooner1 wrote:
Been there with my Cuban Girlfriend. A couple years ago. Yeah, it's nice if you like the nostalgic rundown scenes in past movies. Nice.
Castro spent all his money, the money he didn't keep, on Havana, and central Havana at that.
It still looks like something from the 50's.....because that is what it is. You go anywhere out side the city, with the exception of the tourist resorts, which Cubans can't go, it's a shithole! Mexico is better!
Foreigners who come can get pretty much whatever they want.....Cubans can't. It's not that they can't afford it...They are not allowed.
Seriously, a cab driver who ferries tourists makes more in a day than a doctor in a month. Everyone works for the government for 25 bucks a month. You get electricity most of the time, but, not every day of the week, same with water....Same with food. A person cannot even fish in the ocean without a penalty.
All this is true. I saw and heard it from the Cubans. But, they have gotten used to this.....Yeah....Because they saw the people that didn't get used to it disappear.
Yeah, that's the way they work.....No opposition.
yet, the liberals seem to love the Castro's because of free housing, free medical, free education........

It is a joke. When Castro got sick, he didn't stay in Cuba...No, he went to Spain.

Cuba is a beautiful country and has tremendous potential in tourism, agriculture, and other significant economic markets.
But, they have absolutely no infrastructure...None. The fertile Land yields little for the people. It's sad watching people scramble once a week in the markets for food that is no where near the quality of the average supermarket. Meat with flies on it, fish with no refrigeration or ice.......Disgusting...And that is in Havana.....

Literacy is one thing...Communist literacy is quite another.
Been there with my Cuban Girlfriend. A couple year... (show quote)


I was an adult tutor while I was in the joint and I can tell you, 100% literacy is a crock. You can bet the dyslexics and tactile learners ain't doing well in Cuba.

Reply
Apr 26, 2017 02:26:01   #
Harpooner1
 
BigMike wrote:
I was an adult tutor while I was in the joint and I can tell you, 100% literacy is a crock. You can bet the dyslexics and tactile learners ain't doing well in Cuba.


Oh!, You should see the gap between those who are educated there and those who are not. And they engage in segregation by racial makeup. If you are more black, you are doomed to poverty unless you can pitch a baseball or boxing.
Because no one is full black in Cuba.....they don't allow this.
I asked my girlfriend, " And you lived this way?"......She said, "No, it wasn't like this...."
Creeping ruin.
That is what the left offers.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 12 of 15 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.