BigMike Loc: yerington nv

If China puts the screws to that little screw I wouldn't be surprised if he turned his nukes on them! His future ain't too bright without China's protection and he just might feel betrayed enough to want a little revenge.

When the shit goes down in the Euphrates River Valley I expect a coordinated, world-wide terror attack and while we're busy a lot of old scores will be settled elsewhere. That's what happens in every world-war.

Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere

Could well be but I don't see a WW over 2 Fat. He just doesn't represent enough gain to anybody to offset the potential losses associated with a WW.

I believe it more likely that China would take him out and invade and take over N. Korea. Any superpower can cancel his ticket and at the same time neutralize his retaliation ability.

If 2 Fat doesn't zip his mouth shut he'll find out the hard way that it's writing a check he can't cover. In fact, if he doesn't cool his jets pretty soon his military brass may take him out to avoid what would be coming.

Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere

And the fact that Trump called in the entire Senate to the WH for a N. Korea briefing today indicates something may be brewing. For all we know he has Intel that shows we need to hit 2 Fat now. We'll see what's up soon I think.

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

A single pistol shot is credited with starting WWI. While we both know there was a lot more to it than that, the point is that there's no telling what the spark will be, only that the conflagration that follows will be the worst we have ever seen.

Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere

If it begins, yes. But times have changed. In all previous world wars all sides thought they could win. Today, with the addition of nukes, no one wins and everyone knows it.

That is why in my opinion when a mad man such as 2 Fat gains or approaches nuke capability he will be allowed to remain a threat for only so long and if it is determined that he will actually launch, at that point he will be taken out. To do otherwise is to risk global nuclear disaster.

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

Today the world is full of fanatics. Don't think common sense or self preservation will mean diddly in what's to come. They won't and it's coming...and coming soon

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Too bad for some people. This life is all they have, and they have little idea what is coming down.
Ow well.

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

If I hadn't read the end of the story I'd be worried. We're in for it, though. No avoiding it.

Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere

All I can say is I believe you are wrong and pray that you are. I will admit that today's world is less stable than even during the cold war.

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

I wish I was wrong but I'm not. At the 6th Trumpet in Revelation, four bound spirits are loosed from the Euphrates River and a war that kills a third of the planet ensues. There aren't enough people living there to make that many casualties, but we're there and we have nukes, the Russians are there, Iran is making endless trouble and they want nukes in addition to the "dirty" bombs they probably already have. Israel is there (sorta) and they have nukes. Probably a bunch and if anyone has good reason to go out in a blaze o glory it's the Israelis. They, most likely, will not let Iran get a deliverable nuke, so we're already on a ticking clock. Assad is there, ISIS is there, Hezbollah is there, Al Qaeda is there, a dozen or so fringe groups are there, the Kurds are there, the Iraqis are there and now the Turks are there. We're on a ticking time clock, as I said, but what are the odds something happens to speed that clock up? Meanwhile...China wants to be the world trade currency. Bad! It's their number one goal They also want the gold Chang Kai Chek took with him to Taiwan. Economically and militarily they can't quite go toe to toe yet, but that's because we're the world trade currency. China is poised to surpass us economically and militarily because they have something we don't...a huge population. Do we deal with them now or later when their hand is stronger? What a stark question! Neither choice is good. You can bet the pointy heads at the Pentagon are making plans. When you add up the instability we see everywhere, and it's far worse than reporting can convey because there's simply too much of it, we're well on our way to WWIII. They're not moving all these pieces around for nothing. Some folks say we're already in WWIII. Maybe, but I think when it's enjoined we'll all know. I sort of expect a coordinated world-wide terror attack to announce WWIII.

Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere

If a third of the world population is lost, we certainly would be part of that number.

Regardless who launches first, the early warning shield allows time for a retaliatory launch. There would be massive loss on both sides of the ocean.

I understand your position. My comment is that the same prediction has been put forth many times. Same ending but different details as time has gone on. We are nearer to being able to fulfill it now than ever before and thanks to our politicians we have given an instrument of massive death to more than one lunatic.

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

Part of it, at least.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

World War III - Who Will Be Blamed?
If you want to start a to war, the unwashed masses must be convinced to send their brothers, sons and fathers to die on the front lines. The specter of an external enemy must be etched into their collective mind through trauma, exaggeration and repetition. History must be whitewashed, twisted and cherry picked down to a politicized nursery rhyme. At no point should the real motives or consequences of such an endeavor be discussed.
https://youtu.be/hvcq3OpX8qQ

Big Bass

I hope you're wrong, but I fear you are right.

Carol Kelly

All the bad ones. Even death wouldn't remove Obama from our landscape. Same with the Clintons,the Waters, Schumer, Pelosi. I hate Communism and Communists, but compared to some of our politicians and newsmen, Putin looks angelic.