Trump's Tough Act Against Terror, After Obama Refused to Act.....
Trump's Tough Act Against Terror, After Obama Refused to Act
03/29/2017 Source: HotAir by: Jazz Shaw
Trump's Tough Act Against Terror, After Obama Refused to Act
Back in 2003 Iyman Faris was convicted of a rather scatterbrained plot to take down the Brooklyn Bridge by cutting the structure’s support cables. He was planning to do this in collusion with Al Qaeda as part of a possible second wave of attacks against the United States. He was given a rather lengthy jail term but he’s due to be released in December 2020. So what happens then? He’s a naturalized citizen of Pakistani birth, but the Justice Department is now looking to change that situation by stripping him of said citizenship and ejecting him from the country. (Associated Press)
The Department of Justice has taken the rare step of seeking to strip a convicted terrorist of his U.S. citizenship as he serves the last several years of a 20-year prison sentence for plotting to destroy New York’s Brooklyn Bridge.
Some national security experts suggested Tuesday the move might signal a new, tougher line under President Donald Trump.
The case involves Iyman Faris, 47 and born in Pakistan, who was sentenced in 2003 for aiding and abetting the al-Qaida terrorist group with his plan to cut through cables that support the iconic bridge. At the time, it was among the highest profile terrorism cases in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks that killed nearly 3,000 people.
Source: HotAir
http://www.ttn45.com Obama supported every action terrorists did, then when he left office, he has made it even harder for Trump rid us of all this insanity, and Hell. Trump has his hands full, and it is getting worse as the years go by. Obama created Trouble for this country, by not fixing it. Now what do y'all think that we shall do?
That is a lot of hot air, trying hard to blame Obama. The guy was locked up during bush years, and will be released during trump years, but blame Obama. Do you see the irony?
moldyoldy wrote:
That is a lot of hot air, trying hard to blame Obama. The guy was locked up during bush years, and will be released during trump years, but blame Obama. Do you see the irony?
That would be a negative. Anyone who can say with a straight face that Obama supported terrorists is too vested in illusion to be taken seriously.
moldyoldy wrote:
That is a lot of hot air, trying hard to blame Obama. The guy was locked up during bush years, and will be released during trump years, but blame Obama. Do you see the irony?
YEAH!!!! I do!!!It's the Pits!!!
atomikmom wrote:
Trump's Tough Act Against Terror, After Obama Refused to Act
03/29/2017 Source: HotAir by: Jazz Shaw
Trump's Tough Act Against Terror, After Obama Refused to Act
Back in 2003 Iyman Faris was convicted of a rather scatterbrained plot to take down the Brooklyn Bridge by cutting the structure’s support cables. He was planning to do this in collusion with Al Qaeda as part of a possible second wave of attacks against the United States. He was given a rather lengthy jail term but he’s due to be released in December 2020. So what happens then? He’s a naturalized citizen of Pakistani birth, but the Justice Department is now looking to change that situation by stripping him of said citizenship and ejecting him from the country. (Associated Press)
The Department of Justice has taken the rare step of seeking to strip a convicted terrorist of his U.S. citizenship as he serves the last several years of a 20-year prison sentence for plotting to destroy New York’s Brooklyn Bridge.
Some national security experts suggested Tuesday the move might signal a new, tougher line under President Donald Trump.
The case involves Iyman Faris, 47 and born in Pakistan, who was sentenced in 2003 for aiding and abetting the al-Qaida terrorist group with his plan to cut through cables that support the iconic bridge. At the time, it was among the highest profile terrorism cases in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks that killed nearly 3,000 people.
Source: HotAir
http://www.ttn45.com Obama supported every action terrorists did, then when he left office, he has made it even harder for Trump rid us of all this insanity, and Hell. Trump has his hands full, and it is getting worse as the years go by. Obama created Trouble for this country, by not fixing it. Now what do y'all think that we shall do?
Trump's Tough Act Against Terror, After Obama Refu... (
show quote)
Not just "refused to act," atomikmom, but actually {against his American and Iraqi General's advice}, TOTALLY EVACUATED Iraq, and allowed {encouraged?}, the Sunni Iraqi Army to exchange/give a trillion - with a "T," TRILLION (D)OLLAR$ worth of the most sophisticated heavy military equipment the world had ever seen, (D)irectly to radical Islamic terrorists, Sunni ISIS!!! Besides, the Benghazi "exchange" area had already been compromised, and only small equipment could be transferred there anyway. Whereas, Iraq was right - sorry, "left" there where it was to be used. No fuss, no muss, no bother. Just (D)rive the fully-loaded and fully-fueled tanks and trucks and half-tracks and Humvees and jeeps and trailers and cannons and rockets and troop and weapons and "canteen" transporters and arms and ammunitions and explosives right - sorry again, "left" there, in front of the "green-zone," leave the keys in the ignition, and run-like-hell back to safety, change uniforms, and ba-da-bing!!! And let the parades begin. And now all the fighting and death due to ISIS taking-back all the towns and villages that "Imperialist" hummmmm, America had already sacrificed untold blood and treasure, up the ying-yang, had to be (R)etaken, because ISIS is now buried so-(D)eep behind the Iraqi elderly, women and children and spread all-over the world, it's almost like WW II, on BOTH fronts, all-in-one, multiplied by 10. Thanks, BHO. Talk about "fundamental transformation!!!" GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO REP. TREY GOWDY (R); and, GOOOOOOOOOO PRESIDENT "45" DONALD J. TRUMP (R); JUST LIKE THE WEATHER!!!
atomikmom wrote:
Trump's Tough Act Against Terror, After Obama Refused to Act
03/29/2017 Source: HotAir by: Jazz Shaw
Trump's Tough Act Against Terror, After Obama Refused to Act
Back in 2003 Iyman Faris was convicted of a rather scatterbrained plot to take down the Brooklyn Bridge by cutting the structure’s support cables. He was planning to do this in collusion with Al Qaeda as part of a possible second wave of attacks against the United States. He was given a rather lengthy jail term but he’s due to be released in December 2020. So what happens then? He’s a naturalized citizen of Pakistani birth, but the Justice Department is now looking to change that situation by stripping him of said citizenship and ejecting him from the country. (Associated Press)
The Department of Justice has taken the rare step of seeking to strip a convicted terrorist of his U.S. citizenship as he serves the last several years of a 20-year prison sentence for plotting to destroy New York’s Brooklyn Bridge.
Some national security experts suggested Tuesday the move might signal a new, tougher line under President Donald Trump.
The case involves Iyman Faris, 47 and born in Pakistan, who was sentenced in 2003 for aiding and abetting the al-Qaida terrorist group with his plan to cut through cables that support the iconic bridge. At the time, it was among the highest profile terrorism cases in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks that killed nearly 3,000 people.
Source: HotAir
http://www.ttn45.com Obama supported every action terrorists did, then when he left office, he has made it even harder for Trump rid us of all this insanity, and Hell. Trump has his hands full, and it is getting worse as the years go by. Obama created Trouble for this country, by not fixing it. Now what do y'all think that we shall do?
Trump's Tough Act Against Terror, After Obama Refu... (
show quote)
==================
The Quran does not allow Muslims to destroy their own fellow Muslims.
Roseland wrote:
==================
The Quran does not allow Muslims to destroy their own fellow Muslims.
ISIS kills more Muslims than any one else.
Roseland wrote:
==================
The Quran does not allow Muslims to destroy their own fellow Muslims.
Muslims are usually the first to go in a Islamic terrorist {ISIS} attack, Rose. There's plenty more where they came from is the radical logic. And the best hiding places for {radical} Islam in cities is always schools and hospitals, knowing full-well if there is an attack, the "schroom" effect amplifies the resentment on the attackers side. And it seems the press is always on the side of the "victim," which has become a brilliant military strategy. All races but Muslims use weapons to protect their citizens. Muslims use their civilians to protect their weapons. No ifs ands or buts, but the Qur'an is very clear; {A}nything is permitted if it forwards {radical} Islam. Anything. And the more "infidels" that are killed in the radical Islamic process, the better. Simple.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.