People may be forced to make wiser choices. I am sure there would be carve outs for food and necessities. Not sure how they'd do it but no politician can be seen as hurting the poor. I've worked with a lot of low income people., In the great scheme of things many seem too lack education, individual responsibility, and have an "I am a victim" mentality. Not all of course, but many and it's getting worse. Remember growing up how your parents or people they knew would rather be caught dead than using food stamps? Parents used to pass that on. Never take a handout, work. Not getting what you want work harder. Being poorer didn't use to be something to be ashamed of as long as you worked hard and were a good person. Now people (especially this millennial bunch) judge people solely on what they own. I was volunteering at the jail a few years back. I'll never forget, the news was on in the common room and the newscaster announced that Mitt Romney was leading in the latest polls. The inmates all started bitching they would lose their Obama phones and other goodies if Obama lost.
working class stiff wrote:
I tend to agree that everyone should have skin in the game, as far as supporting the US gov't, even if it's just a dollar.
And while I do think we 'over consume' as a society (as opposed to production), I'm not sure how a flat tax would help those on the lower rungs of the economic ladder. Those lower rungs would have to consume a larger portion of their income, and so pay a larger portion of their income in taxes, which almost by definition would hurt them more.
Since I'm neither an economist or tax specialist, wiser heads than mine will have to figure this out....
I tend to agree that everyone should have skin in ... (
show quote)