One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Another Benghazi Fact
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Jan 16, 2014 18:18:30   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
ElAku wrote:
QUOTING from the link: "On January 15, 2014, the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence released a bipartisan review of its findings in an investigation of the September 11, 2012, attacks on an American diplomatic facility in Benghazi, Libya. Much of the report dispels myths perpetuated by Fox News over the last sixteen months."

The damned lie FLY in that ointment is U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence as the entire U.S. Senate has ZERO credibility!
QUOTING from the link: "On January 15, 2014, ... (show quote)


The real lie in that statement is using the word bi-partisan when we all know that the membership of committees is determined by majority-minority. If one of the minority people votes with the majority Democrats would call that bi-partisan.

Reply
Jan 16, 2014 18:37:43   #
texancoach
 
Ricko, any disaster is 'preventable' as long as the monetary means are available to support the physical security necessary to avert such an attempt. With your argument, I suppose Bush/Cheney is directly responsible for 9/11.

The senate intelligence committee also shot down every Fox News talking point concerning Benghazi plus emphatically stressed there was no cover-up involved.

Lest we not forget, there were no senate intelligence committee investigations on the 13 killed at the 54 embassy terrorist attacks under Bush/Cheney, but if there was, ya could guarantee that they would have come to the same conclusion that they were all preventable as well, but the thing is...as long as the Republican house keeps insisting on defunding embassy security as they have even post Benghazi...more of embassy soft sites, such as consulates are going to be terrorized and attacked than not.

Been good yakin' at ya Ricko...

Reply
Jan 16, 2014 18:40:40   #
Retired669
 
RetNavyCWO wrote:
Why do you just make up stuff?

Don't you know that GEN Ham was in the Pentagon when the Benghazi attack occurred? He personally briefed the CJCS and SECDEF about it, and all three of them went to the WH to brief the president. He never gave any order to "stand down". In fact, he did the opposite.

From a FOX News report:
Gen. Ham said on Friday that WITHIN HOURS after the attack, it became CLEARER that it was not a demonstration and could be a terrorist attack.

He did not address reports that he was pushed into retirement after Benghazi. He also said a QUICK RESPONSE WAS NOT POSSIBLE AND DEFENDED THE DECISION NOT TO ASSEMBLE FIGHTER JETS. “IN MY MILITARY JUDGMENT, IT WAS NOT A NECESSITY AND THERE WAS NOT A CLEAR PURPOSE IN DOING SO.
http://foxnewsinsider.com/2013/07/22/gen-carter-ham-benghazi-attack-says-anti-islam-video-clearly-not-blame

This goes exactly counter to your and others' claims that he was relieved on the spot by his deputy on Obama's orders, for insisting on sending military support. IT NEVER HAPPENED! COMPLETE FABRICATION!

Moreover, GEN Ham was not fired, and it is disgraceful for people like you to sully this man's distinguished military career. His retirement was announced and his successor was named almost 6 months before HAM retired from his post at AFRICOM.
Why do you just make up stuff? br br Don't you kn... (show quote)


Thank You for a great and factual post. I'm sure you know that it will fall on the deaf and dumb around here since it doesn't match what faux has been feeding them since this attack happened.

My youngest son was Stationed at Norfolk during his 4 years in the Navy. He was in the Beach Masters and he was gone over seas probably 2/3rds of the time. He's 29 now and a broker in the trucking industry. His wife works at Crane Naval Base in Indiana which is southwest of Bloomington...We try and fish Lake Greenwood which is 800 or so acres and on the base a couple of times every year. .....Thanks for your service.

My next door neighbors son is a CWO and I believe he's in Millington, Tn. right now getting reading to go to Bahrain.

Reply
 
 
Jan 16, 2014 18:44:53   #
vernon
 
ElAku wrote:
Except for personal addresses (in SOME cases) there isn't any difference between the Bastards That Be in either House of Congress, Administration or Supreme SOCIALIST Court; patriotically or morally. NONE! ZERO! ZIP! Unfortunately for the Nation THAT also applies to the States and Territories: Governors, Legislatures, County Sheriffs with damned few exceptions, and cities across the board.

Now we KNOW the problem and the source of the problem. The great question is, "How many miles of rope will be required to correct both?"
Except for personal addresses (in SOME cases) ther... (show quote)


reagan didnt tell the troops to stand down they were hit by terrorist and thats the difference and dont let guys like navy say that its all a lie that crap is coming from the dnc

Reply
Jan 16, 2014 18:46:56   #
vernon
 
Retired669 wrote:
Thank You for a great and factual post. I'm sure you know that it will fall on the deaf and dumb around here since it doesn't match what faux has been feeding them since this attack happened.

My youngest son was Stationed at Norfolk during his 4 years in the Navy. He was in the Beach Masters and he was gone over seas probably 2/3rds of the time. He's 29 now and a broker in the trucking industry. His wife works at Crane Naval Base in Indiana which is southwest of Bloomington...We try and fish Lake Greenwood which is 800 or so acres and on the base a couple of times every year. .....Thanks for your service.

My next door neighbors son is a CWO and I believe he's in Millington, Tn. right now getting reading to go to Bahrain.
Thank You for a great and factual post. I'm sure y... (show quote)


you both are lying and spreading bs

Reply
Jan 16, 2014 20:19:06   #
ElAku
 
vernon wrote:
reagan didnt tell the troops to stand down they were hit by terrorist and thats the difference and dont let guys like navy say that its all a lie that crap is coming from the dnc

Correct. In Reagan's day the Office of President still had a modicum of credibility .. but none since ...

Reply
Jan 16, 2014 20:27:32   #
texancoach
 
Vernon, it most likely highly appears that you are the one full of the lies and can't handle much truth. What these two observant fellas have stated is pretty much factual head-on. If ya want to ignore it as it doesn't fit your made-up make believe rhetoric...go ahead then, but sensible folks don't trump simple whining over substance...

Reply
 
 
Jan 16, 2014 21:34:24   #
vernon
 
texancoach wrote:
Vernon, it most likely highly appears that you are the one full of the lies and can't handle much truth. What these two observant fellas have stated is pretty much factual head-on. If ya want to ignore it as it doesn't fit your made-up make believe rhetoric...go ahead then, but sensible folks don't trump simple whining over substance...


coach go back to school and molest the little boys

Reply
Jan 16, 2014 22:37:25   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
Fox News Benghazi Myths Dispelled by Non-Partisan Review

01/15/2014

http://mediamatters.org/research/2014/01/15/fox-benghazi-myths-dispelled-by-new-bipartisan/197609

The Benghazi conspiracy has been put to rest!


I just read Raylan's wildly off base post again and like usual was reminded of where he gets all the Pelosi he spreads around. Media Matters was created a few years ago by George Soros and with one matter in mind, destruction of Fox News and Rush Limbaugh. Media Matters is not a non-partisan site and certainly is far left. You fools who allow MM to be your source of facts are going to wake up wondering what in hell happened when some truth comes out about Benghazi. Only Fox has reported anything about that one the last year and the lefty media has been trying to keep it covered up for a long time.

You say the Senate committee is a non-partisan one and the majority of the people on it are Democrats. In reading the fools on this thread I have become very unhappy how they have been had by the left and keep on throwing Pelosi around like they do.

Reply
Jan 16, 2014 22:44:15   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
RetNavyCWO wrote:
Why do you just make up stuff?

Don't you know that GEN Ham was in the Pentagon when the Benghazi attack occurred? He personally briefed the CJCS and SECDEF about it, and all three of them went to the WH to brief the president. He never gave any order to "stand down". In fact, he did the opposite.

From a FOX News report:
Gen. Ham said on Friday that WITHIN HOURS after the attack, it became CLEARER that it was not a demonstration and could be a terrorist attack.

He did not address reports that he was pushed into retirement after Benghazi. He also said a QUICK RESPONSE WAS NOT POSSIBLE AND DEFENDED THE DECISION NOT TO ASSEMBLE FIGHTER JETS. “IN MY MILITARY JUDGMENT, IT WAS NOT A NECESSITY AND THERE WAS NOT A CLEAR PURPOSE IN DOING SO.
http://foxnewsinsider.com/2013/07/22/gen-carter-ham-benghazi-attack-says-anti-islam-video-clearly-not-blame

This goes exactly counter to your and others' claims that he was relieved on the spot by his deputy on Obama's orders, for insisting on sending military support. IT NEVER HAPPENED! COMPLETE FABRICATION!

Moreover, GEN Ham was not fired, and it is disgraceful for people like you to sully this man's distinguished military career. His retirement was announced and his successor was named almost 6 months before HAM retired from his post at AFRICOM.
Why do you just make up stuff? br br Don't you kn... (show quote)


Would just the opposite be go get them boys? It sure seems to me that it would and what would have happened with those opposite orders you speak of?

Reply
Jan 16, 2014 23:15:42   #
texancoach
 
Oldroy ol' Boy...Fox News and Rush Limbaugh don't need anyone to destroy their rhetoric...they pretty much are self destructing on their own. Of course ya won't believe that, but care to discuss some Fox News and Limbaugh Rant and let's just find out for ourselves...

Reply
 
 
Jan 17, 2014 00:04:40   #
67p5065
 
ElAku wrote:
Correct. In Reagan's day the Office of President still had a modicum of credibility .. but none since ...


I agree U S troops would never leave one their own in harms way willingly and a stand down order comes from the top plus a drone was over head doing a live feed to WH sit room so help could have been gotten into place to protect these people

Reply
Jan 17, 2014 10:15:58   #
RetNavyCWO Loc: VA suburb of DC
 
vernon wrote:
reagan didnt tell the troops to stand down they were hit by terrorist and thats the difference and dont let guys like navy say that its all a lie that crap is coming from the dnc


Vern! I quoted General Ham's comments that were publishedby FOX News! How is that "coming from the dnc."?

Reply
Jan 17, 2014 10:17:41   #
RetNavyCWO Loc: VA suburb of DC
 
67p5065 wrote:
I agree U S troops would never leave one their own in harms way willingly and a stand down order comes from the top plus a drone was over head doing a live feed to WH sit room so help could have been gotten into place to protect these people


None of that happened. Read the rest of the thread. Even GEN Ham, CINC of Africom, said there was no military rescue options possible, and that was published by FOX News back in July of last year. You have been duped for a long time now. Wake up!

Reply
Jan 17, 2014 10:20:55   #
RetNavyCWO Loc: VA suburb of DC
 
oldroy wrote:
Would just the opposite be go get them boys? It sure seems to me that it would and what would have happened with those opposite orders you speak of?


I screwed up that wording. Sorry. There was never an order by anybody to send in a military rescue team, so there was never an order to "stand down." GEN Ham is quoted as saying that a military rescue operation was not feasible.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.