One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Trump Screws the 99%
Page <<first <prev 30 of 50 next> last>>
Mar 13, 2017 18:37:59   #
Progressive One
 
Big Bass wrote:
As usual, you make all these outrageously ludicrous claims, and you never provide irrefutable proof. Have you not yet learned that smart people do not believe in fiction?


watch what the CBO report says......don't believe shit I say or present...........you people want to believe only what you want to be true.............stay stupid!!!

Reply
Mar 14, 2017 08:38:18   #
Bevos
 
Big Bass wrote:
They should make these snowflakes personally fiscally responsible for any losses this puerile behavior causes


VOTE THEM O.U.T. OF OFFICE!!!

Reply
Mar 14, 2017 08:40:57   #
Bevos
 
Progressive One wrote:
Among those hit the hardest under the current House bill are 60-year-olds with annual incomes of $30,000. In nearly 1,500 counties nationwide, such a person stands to lose more than $6,000 a year in federal insurance subsidies. Ninety percent of those counties backed

Trump, the analysis shows.
And 68 of the 70 counties where these consumers would suffer the largest losses supported Trump in November.
Most affected by the Republican health plan would be parts of Alaska, Arizona, Nebraska, Tennessee and Oklahoma, where Obamacare insurance subsidies have been crucial in making high-priced insurance affordable. All five states went for Trump. Also hit hard would be parts of key swing states that backed Trump, including Pennsylvania, North Carolina and Michigan.

NONE of this is true!! In Fact, just the opposite of MOST of it was on the news this morning!!!

Meanwhile, higher-income, younger Americans — many of whom live in urban areas won by Democrat Hillary Clinton — stand to get more assistance in the Republican legislation.
Faring best would be the nation’s wealthiest residents, who would see a substantial tax cut with the elimination under the House GOP bill of two levies on high-income taxpayers. These taxes — on individuals making more than $200,000 and couples making more than $250,000 — were included in Obamacare to help offset the cost of assisting lower-income Americans.
Among those hit the hardest under the current Hous... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Mar 14, 2017 08:43:08   #
Bevos
 
Progressive One wrote:
Among those hit the hardest under the current House bill are 60-year-olds with annual incomes of $30,000. In nearly 1,500 counties nationwide, such a person stands to lose more than $6,000 a year in federal insurance subsidies. Ninety percent of those counties backed

Trump, the analysis shows.
And 68 of the 70 counties where these consumers would suffer the largest losses supported Trump in November.
Most affected by the Republican health plan would be parts of Alaska, Arizona, Nebraska, Tennessee and Oklahoma, where Obamacare insurance subsidies have been crucial in making high-priced insurance affordable. All five states went for Trump. Also hit hard would be parts of key swing states that backed Trump, including Pennsylvania, North Carolina and Michigan.



Meanwhile, higher-income, younger Americans — many of whom live in urban areas won by Democrat Hillary Clinton — stand to get more assistance in the Republican legislation.
Faring best would be the nation’s wealthiest residents, who would see a substantial tax cut with the elimination under the House GOP bill of two levies on high-income taxpayers. These taxes — on individuals making more than $200,000 and couples making more than $250,000 — were included in Obamacare to help offset the cost of assisting lower-income Americans.
Among those hit the hardest under the current Hous... (show quote)


NONE of this is TRUE!!! In fact, just the OPPOSITE was in the news this morning!!! But, try again!!!

Reply
Mar 14, 2017 09:44:27   #
Progressive One
 
Bevos wrote:
NONE of this is TRUE!!! In fact, just the OPPOSITE was in the news this morning!!! But, try again!!!


Post your source that says the opposite since this has been news everywhere......try something other than right wing manufactured bullshit. Where did you see the opposite because now 24 million will be off of coverage by 2020....this is a ploy to destroy ObamaCare as a political victory and leave poor red-staters to die....you people are pieces of dog shit.........

Reply
Mar 14, 2017 11:45:04   #
Big Bass
 
Progressive One wrote:
Post your source that says the opposite since this has been news everywhere......try something other than right wing manufactured bullshit. Where did you see the opposite because now 24 million will be off of coverage by 2020....this is a ploy to destroy ObamaCare as a political victory and leave poor red-staters to die....you people are pieces of dog shit.........


Always a gutter-snipe, eh, prog 1?

Reply
Mar 14, 2017 11:48:03   #
Progressive One
 
Progressive One wrote:
Post your source that says the opposite since this has been news everywhere......try something other than right wing manufactured bullshit. Where did you see the opposite because now 24 million will be off of coverage by 2020....this is a ploy to destroy ObamaCare as a political victory and leave poor red-staters to die....you people are pieces of dog shit.........

Reply
 
 
Mar 14, 2017 12:10:32   #
Progressive One
 
Bevos wrote:
NONE of this is TRUE!!! In fact, just the OPPOSITE was in the news this morning!!! But, try again!!!


again you idiot...in the paper today

Uninsured would rise by 24 million, analysis says
House GOP health plan would hit poorer and older Americans hardest, a nonpartisan agency estimates.
By Noam N. Levey and Lisa Mascaro
WASHINGTON — Twenty-four million fewer Americans would have health coverage over the next decade under the House Republican plan to replace the Affordable Care Act, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated Monday in an analysis that threatens the GOP legislative campaign.
Fourteen million fewer would be insured by next year alone, dramatically reversing the coverage expansion made possible by the 2010 healthcare law, often called Obamacare.
At the same time, millions of consumers would see skimpier health coverage and higher deductibles under the GOP plan, the budget office projected.
And although average premiums for those who buy their own insurance are projected to be lower after 2020 than under Obamacare — partly because plans will cover less — many consumers will pay more over the next few years than they would under the current law.
Hardest hit in the long run will be lower-income Americans and those nearing retirement, according to the budget office, which estimates that over the next decade, the GOP legislation would cut about $1 trillion in federal healthcare assistance to low- and moderate-income Americans.
The much-anticipated independent analysis from the budget office, which lawmakers from both parties rely on to gauge the potential impact of legislation, undercuts key promises by President Trump and senior Republican lawmakers that no one would be harmed if Obamacare is repealed and replaced.
And it provides potent ammunition to critics of the House GOP plan, just as Republican leaders are scrambling to get it to a vote next week.
“Coverage matters when it comes to preventing disease and ensuring health and well-being,” said Dr. Georges C. Benjamin, executive director of the American Public Health Assn. “Unfortunately, this bill, as written, will result in more people losing coverage they desperately need.… We know that the absence of health insurance translates into premature death for many.”
The current law is credited with extending coverage to more than 20 million previously uninsured Americans and driving the nation’s uninsured rate to the lowest levels ever recorded.
In the first nine months of 2016, just 8.8% of U.S. residents lacked health coverage, survey data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention show. That was down from 16% in 2010, when President Obama signed the healthcare law.
Under the House GOP plan, the percentage of uninsured would jump to 19% by 2026, higher than before Obamacare, according to the CBO. That is in part because consumers would no longer be required to have insurance and in part because millions of Americans would lose financial assistance to get coverage.
Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price disputed the CBO conclusions, saying they failed to take into account other changes Republicans are planning to make through the regulatory process and in subsequent legislation.
“We strenuously disagree with the report,” he told reporters outside the White House. “It’s just not believable.”
Congressional Republicans defended the healthcare legislation and even praised the CBO report, focusing on the estimated savings and the promise of lower premiums, while glossing over the coverage losses.
“Our plan is not about forcing people to buy expensive, one-size-fits-all coverage,” said House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.). “It is about giving people more choices and better access to a plan they want and can afford.”
The CBO estimates that some Americans may see less expensive health insurance plans under the House Republican bill.
By 2026, budget analysts said, average premiums for consumers who buy health coverage on their own rather than getting it from an employer would be 10% lower than under the current law.
But that reduction would be driven in part by the increasing prevalence of health plans with high deductibles, which would be made possible by provisions in the GOP legislation that loosen requirements on health plans.
Also making health insurance cheaper on average, according to the CBO, would be the departure from the market of some older consumers who could no longer afford health plans. Older consumers have higher medical costs, which drive up premiums for everyone.
The GOP plan provides less assistance to older, low-income Americans while allowing insurers to charge older customers up to five times as much as younger consumers, compared with three times as much under Obamacare. That change is expected to benefit younger, healthier consumers.
At the same time, the GOP legislation would produce a historic retrenchment in Medicaid, the government safety-net health program for the poorest Americans.
Obamacare made billions of dollars in federal aid available to states, which allowed a major expansion of coverage to low-income childless adults, a population that traditionally was not covered by Medicaid.
The House GOP plan would scrap that aid and cap future federal support for Medicaid, delivering $880 billion in savings over the next decade, the budget office estimates.
The retrenchment would force states to dramatically scale back their safety nets, the budget office concluded. And it probably would result in 14 million fewer poor people covered by Medicaid by 2026.
The Medicaid cutbacks, coupled with other cutbacks, would help the GOP legislation reduce federal deficits by $337 billion over the next decade, according to the CBO report.
The safety-net cuts also allow for a series of major tax cuts, including the elimination of two taxes on high-income Americans that were used to fund Obamacare’s coverage expansion.
Democrats seized on the budget report Monday to renew their attacks on the Republican legislation.
“The CBO’s estimate makes clear that Trumpcare will cause serious harm to millions of American families,” Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) said. “Tens of millions will lose their coverage, and millions more, particularly seniors, will have to pay more for healthcare.”
But it was unclear whether the new report would slow down the GOP’s push to advance the bill through the House by as soon as next week.
Ryan has warned lawmakers they face a “binary choice” between keeping the Republican promise to end Obamacare or sticking with the status quo.
And a group aligned with his leadership is running TV ads urging 30 of the most conservative House Republicans to join Trump and back the bill.
“This is historic. And it’s significant,” Ryan said over the weekend. “The beautiful thing about this plan that we’re proposing, it is more freedom, it is more choices, it is more markets, it’s lower prices, which gets us better access.”
Opposition, though, is mounting from almost all sides in Congress, including from Senate Republicans whose support will be needed to send the bill to the president.
Centrist Republicans worry constituents in their state will lose health coverage. A recent Times analysis found those hardest hit by the GOP plan live in counties that voted for Trump.
More conservative members of the House and Senate deride the bill as “Obamacare lite” and are furious with Ryan’s strong-arm approach.
Trump for now appears to be sending Congress mixed messages, signaling his support for the House bill, but also leaving con- servatives with the impression he is open to negotiation.
Members of the conservative House Freedom Caucus have been invited to go bowling Tuesday night at the White House, and those lawmakers are increasingly bypassing congressional leadership to talk directly with the administration. Many are expected to join Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) at a Wednesday rally against the bill.
Trump, meanwhile, is planning to travel to Kentucky next week for a rally in support of the Obamacare repeal push.
noam.levey@latimes.com
lisa.mascaro@latimes.com

Reply
Mar 14, 2017 12:34:43   #
Big Bass
 
Bevos wrote:
NONE of this is TRUE!!! In fact, just the OPPOSITE was in the news this morning!!! But, try again!!!


Truth isn't needed by the loony left, just hatred and racism.

Reply
Mar 14, 2017 12:35:50   #
Progressive One
 
Big Bass wrote:
Truth isn't needed by the loony left, just hatred and racism.


again you idiot...in the paper today

Uninsured would rise by 24 million, analysis says
House GOP health plan would hit poorer and older Americans hardest, a nonpartisan agency estimates.
By Noam N. Levey and Lisa Mascaro
WASHINGTON — Twenty-four million fewer Americans would have health coverage over the next decade under the House Republican plan to replace the Affordable Care Act, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated Monday in an analysis that threatens the GOP legislative campaign.
Fourteen million fewer would be insured by next year alone, dramatically reversing the coverage expansion made possible by the 2010 healthcare law, often called Obamacare.
At the same time, millions of consumers would see skimpier health coverage and higher deductibles under the GOP plan, the budget office projected.
And although average premiums for those who buy their own insurance are projected to be lower after 2020 than under Obamacare — partly because plans will cover less — many consumers will pay more over the next few years than they would under the current law.
Hardest hit in the long run will be lower-income Americans and those nearing retirement, according to the budget office, which estimates that over the next decade, the GOP legislation would cut about $1 trillion in federal healthcare assistance to low- and moderate-income Americans.
The much-anticipated independent analysis from the budget office, which lawmakers from both parties rely on to gauge the potential impact of legislation, undercuts key promises by President Trump and senior Republican lawmakers that no one would be harmed if Obamacare is repealed and replaced.
And it provides potent ammunition to critics of the House GOP plan, just as Republican leaders are scrambling to get it to a vote next week.
“Coverage matters when it comes to preventing disease and ensuring health and well-being,” said Dr. Georges C. Benjamin, executive director of the American Public Health Assn. “Unfortunately, this bill, as written, will result in more people losing coverage they desperately need.… We know that the absence of health insurance translates into premature death for many.”
The current law is credited with extending coverage to more than 20 million previously uninsured Americans and driving the nation’s uninsured rate to the lowest levels ever recorded.
In the first nine months of 2016, just 8.8% of U.S. residents lacked health coverage, survey data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention show. That was down from 16% in 2010, when President Obama signed the healthcare law.
Under the House GOP plan, the percentage of uninsured would jump to 19% by 2026, higher than before Obamacare, according to the CBO. That is in part because consumers would no longer be required to have insurance and in part because millions of Americans would lose financial assistance to get coverage.
Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price disputed the CBO conclusions, saying they failed to take into account other changes Republicans are planning to make through the regulatory process and in subsequent legislation.
“We strenuously disagree with the report,” he told reporters outside the White House. “It’s just not believable.”
Congressional Republicans defended the healthcare legislation and even praised the CBO report, focusing on the estimated savings and the promise of lower premiums, while glossing over the coverage losses.
“Our plan is not about forcing people to buy expensive, one-size-fits-all coverage,” said House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.). “It is about giving people more choices and better access to a plan they want and can afford.”
The CBO estimates that some Americans may see less expensive health insurance plans under the House Republican bill.
By 2026, budget analysts said, average premiums for consumers who buy health coverage on their own rather than getting it from an employer would be 10% lower than under the current law.
But that reduction would be driven in part by the increasing prevalence of health plans with high deductibles, which would be made possible by provisions in the GOP legislation that loosen requirements on health plans.
Also making health insurance cheaper on average, according to the CBO, would be the departure from the market of some older consumers who could no longer afford health plans. Older consumers have higher medical costs, which drive up premiums for everyone.
The GOP plan provides less assistance to older, low-income Americans while allowing insurers to charge older customers up to five times as much as younger consumers, compared with three times as much under Obamacare. That change is expected to benefit younger, healthier consumers.
At the same time, the GOP legislation would produce a historic retrenchment in Medicaid, the government safety-net health program for the poorest Americans.
Obamacare made billions of dollars in federal aid available to states, which allowed a major expansion of coverage to low-income childless adults, a population that traditionally was not covered by Medicaid.
The House GOP plan would scrap that aid and cap future federal support for Medicaid, delivering $880 billion in savings over the next decade, the budget office estimates.
The retrenchment would force states to dramatically scale back their safety nets, the budget office concluded. And it probably would result in 14 million fewer poor people covered by Medicaid by 2026.
The Medicaid cutbacks, coupled with other cutbacks, would help the GOP legislation reduce federal deficits by $337 billion over the next decade, according to the CBO report.
The safety-net cuts also allow for a series of major tax cuts, including the elimination of two taxes on high-income Americans that were used to fund Obamacare’s coverage expansion.
Democrats seized on the budget report Monday to renew their attacks on the Republican legislation.
“The CBO’s estimate makes clear that Trumpcare will cause serious harm to millions of American families,” Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) said. “Tens of millions will lose their coverage, and millions more, particularly seniors, will have to pay more for healthcare.”
But it was unclear whether the new report would slow down the GOP’s push to advance the bill through the House by as soon as next week.
Ryan has warned lawmakers they face a “binary choice” between keeping the Republican promise to end Obamacare or sticking with the status quo.
And a group aligned with his leadership is running TV ads urging 30 of the most conservative House Republicans to join Trump and back the bill.
“This is historic. And it’s significant,” Ryan said over the weekend. “The beautiful thing about this plan that we’re proposing, it is more freedom, it is more choices, it is more markets, it’s lower prices, which gets us better access.”
Opposition, though, is mounting from almost all sides in Congress, including from Senate Republicans whose support will be needed to send the bill to the president.
Centrist Republicans worry constituents in their state will lose health coverage. A recent Times analysis found those hardest hit by the GOP plan live in counties that voted for Trump.
More conservative members of the House and Senate deride the bill as “Obamacare lite” and are furious with Ryan’s strong-arm approach.
Trump for now appears to be sending Congress mixed messages, signaling his support for the House bill, but also leaving con- servatives with the impression he is open to negotiation.
Members of the conservative House Freedom Caucus have been invited to go bowling Tuesday night at the White House, and those lawmakers are increasingly bypassing congressional leadership to talk directly with the administration. Many are expected to join Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) at a Wednesday rally against the bill.
Trump, meanwhile, is planning to travel to Kentucky next week for a rally in support of the Obamacare repeal push.
noam.levey@latimes.com
lisa.mascaro@latimes.com

Reply
Mar 14, 2017 12:36:29   #
Big Bass
 
Progressive One wrote:
again you idiot...in the paper today

Uninsured would rise by 24 million, analysis says
House GOP health plan would hit poorer and older Americans hardest, a nonpartisan agency estimates.
By Noam N. Levey and Lisa Mascaro
WASHINGTON — Twenty-four million fewer Americans would have health coverage over the next decade under the House Republican plan to replace the Affordable Care Act, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated Monday in an analysis that threatens the GOP legislative campaign.
Fourteen million fewer would be insured by next year alone, dramatically reversing the coverage expansion made possible by the 2010 healthcare law, often called Obamacare.
At the same time, millions of consumers would see skimpier health coverage and higher deductibles under the GOP plan, the budget office projected.
And although average premiums for those who buy their own insurance are projected to be lower after 2020 than under Obamacare — partly because plans will cover less — many consumers will pay more over the next few years than they would under the current law.
Hardest hit in the long run will be lower-income Americans and those nearing retirement, according to the budget office, which estimates that over the next decade, the GOP legislation would cut about $1 trillion in federal healthcare assistance to low- and moderate-income Americans.
The much-anticipated independent analysis from the budget office, which lawmakers from both parties rely on to gauge the potential impact of legislation, undercuts key promises by President Trump and senior Republican lawmakers that no one would be harmed if Obamacare is repealed and replaced.
And it provides potent ammunition to critics of the House GOP plan, just as Republican leaders are scrambling to get it to a vote next week.
“Coverage matters when it comes to preventing disease and ensuring health and well-being,” said Dr. Georges C. Benjamin, executive director of the American Public Health Assn. “Unfortunately, this bill, as written, will result in more people losing coverage they desperately need.… We know that the absence of health insurance translates into premature death for many.”
The current law is credited with extending coverage to more than 20 million previously uninsured Americans and driving the nation’s uninsured rate to the lowest levels ever recorded.
In the first nine months of 2016, just 8.8% of U.S. residents lacked health coverage, survey data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention show. That was down from 16% in 2010, when President Obama signed the healthcare law.
Under the House GOP plan, the percentage of uninsured would jump to 19% by 2026, higher than before Obamacare, according to the CBO. That is in part because consumers would no longer be required to have insurance and in part because millions of Americans would lose financial assistance to get coverage.
Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price disputed the CBO conclusions, saying they failed to take into account other changes Republicans are planning to make through the regulatory process and in subsequent legislation.
“We strenuously disagree with the report,” he told reporters outside the White House. “It’s just not believable.”
Congressional Republicans defended the healthcare legislation and even praised the CBO report, focusing on the estimated savings and the promise of lower premiums, while glossing over the coverage losses.
“Our plan is not about forcing people to buy expensive, one-size-fits-all coverage,” said House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.). “It is about giving people more choices and better access to a plan they want and can afford.”
The CBO estimates that some Americans may see less expensive health insurance plans under the House Republican bill.
By 2026, budget analysts said, average premiums for consumers who buy health coverage on their own rather than getting it from an employer would be 10% lower than under the current law.
But that reduction would be driven in part by the increasing prevalence of health plans with high deductibles, which would be made possible by provisions in the GOP legislation that loosen requirements on health plans.
Also making health insurance cheaper on average, according to the CBO, would be the departure from the market of some older consumers who could no longer afford health plans. Older consumers have higher medical costs, which drive up premiums for everyone.
The GOP plan provides less assistance to older, low-income Americans while allowing insurers to charge older customers up to five times as much as younger consumers, compared with three times as much under Obamacare. That change is expected to benefit younger, healthier consumers.
At the same time, the GOP legislation would produce a historic retrenchment in Medicaid, the government safety-net health program for the poorest Americans.
Obamacare made billions of dollars in federal aid available to states, which allowed a major expansion of coverage to low-income childless adults, a population that traditionally was not covered by Medicaid.
The House GOP plan would scrap that aid and cap future federal support for Medicaid, delivering $880 billion in savings over the next decade, the budget office estimates.
The retrenchment would force states to dramatically scale back their safety nets, the budget office concluded. And it probably would result in 14 million fewer poor people covered by Medicaid by 2026.
The Medicaid cutbacks, coupled with other cutbacks, would help the GOP legislation reduce federal deficits by $337 billion over the next decade, according to the CBO report.
The safety-net cuts also allow for a series of major tax cuts, including the elimination of two taxes on high-income Americans that were used to fund Obamacare’s coverage expansion.
Democrats seized on the budget report Monday to renew their attacks on the Republican legislation.
“The CBO’s estimate makes clear that Trumpcare will cause serious harm to millions of American families,” Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) said. “Tens of millions will lose their coverage, and millions more, particularly seniors, will have to pay more for healthcare.”
But it was unclear whether the new report would slow down the GOP’s push to advance the bill through the House by as soon as next week.
Ryan has warned lawmakers they face a “binary choice” between keeping the Republican promise to end Obamacare or sticking with the status quo.
And a group aligned with his leadership is running TV ads urging 30 of the most conservative House Republicans to join Trump and back the bill.
“This is historic. And it’s significant,” Ryan said over the weekend. “The beautiful thing about this plan that we’re proposing, it is more freedom, it is more choices, it is more markets, it’s lower prices, which gets us better access.”
Opposition, though, is mounting from almost all sides in Congress, including from Senate Republicans whose support will be needed to send the bill to the president.
Centrist Republicans worry constituents in their state will lose health coverage. A recent Times analysis found those hardest hit by the GOP plan live in counties that voted for Trump.
More conservative members of the House and Senate deride the bill as “Obamacare lite” and are furious with Ryan’s strong-arm approach.
Trump for now appears to be sending Congress mixed messages, signaling his support for the House bill, but also leaving con- servatives with the impression he is open to negotiation.
Members of the conservative House Freedom Caucus have been invited to go bowling Tuesday night at the White House, and those lawmakers are increasingly bypassing congressional leadership to talk directly with the administration. Many are expected to join Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) at a Wednesday rally against the bill.
Trump, meanwhile, is planning to travel to Kentucky next week for a rally in support of the Obamacare repeal push.
noam.levey@latimes.com
lisa.mascaro@latimes.com
again you idiot...in the paper today br br Uninsu... (show quote)

The LA Times. HMMMMMMMMMMMM!! The LA Times. It must be true.
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! (Derision font turned off.)

Reply
 
 
Mar 14, 2017 12:38:17   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
This is a public service announcement:
Made possible by loser Prog One and other Street People;
Why do liberals side with a Billionaire elitist like George "Giorgi" Soros?
PO; do you believe this should be what guides America?
“This system to be controlled in a feudalistic fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences.” - Insider, Professor Carroll Quigley – ‘Tragedy and Hope’,( p. 324)

10 Things You Didn't Know About "Giorgi" George Soros
https://youtu.be/tfBHYxEojZk
SOROS ROTHSCHILD RACE WAR PROPAGANDA EXPOSED
https://youtu.be/lhqqz3QFQKE

Reply
Mar 14, 2017 12:50:34   #
Progressive One
 
Big Bass wrote:
The LA Times. HMMMMMMMMMMMM!! The LA Times. It must be true.
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! (Derision font turned off.)


laugh at this you dumb ass backwoods hillbilly. This is the same exact thing from the NEW YOURK TIMES & WALL STREET JOURNAL.....

are you motherfkers really that stupid that you think national newspapers will print your fake news and lie like trump? It is a waste to try and educate people who act like little children and try to create their own truths....now stupid fk....laugh at those two newspapers...show how really fking stupid you are.
Politics

Health Bill Would Add 24 Million Uninsured but Save $337 Billion, Report Says
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/13/us/politics/affordable-care-act-health-congressional-budget-office.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0

CBO Sees 24 Million More Uninsured, $337 Billion Deficit Cut in Coming Decade With GOP Health Plan
https://www.wsj.com/articles/cbo-estimates-14-million-more-uninsured-next-year-under-gop-plan-1489436927

Reply
Mar 14, 2017 12:58:25   #
Progressive One
 
The CBO says as many as 24 million more Americans could be uninsured under 'Trumpcare'
http://www.businessinsider.com/cbo-congressional-budget-office-score-ahca-trumpcare-2017-3

FROM THE CBO ITSELF YOU CONSERVATIVE DUMBASSES:

•The number of people who are uninsured would increase by 18 million in the first new plan year following enactment of the bill. Later, after the elimination of the ACA’s expansion of Medicaid eligibility and of subsidies for insurance purchased through the ACA marketplaces, that number would increase to 27 million, and then to 32 million in 2026.
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/52371

Reply
Mar 14, 2017 13:08:35   #
Big Bass
 
Progressive One wrote:
laugh at this you dumb ass backwoods hillbilly. This is the same exact thing from the NEW YOURK TIMES & WALL STREET JOURNAL.....

are you motherfkers really that stupid that you think national newspapers will print your fake news and lie like trump? It is a waste to try and educate people who act like little children and try to create their own truths....now stupid fk....laugh at those two newspapers...show how really fking stupid you are.
Politics

Health Bill Would Add 24 Million Uninsured but Save $337 Billion, Report Says
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/13/us/politics/affordable-care-act-health-congressional-budget-office.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0

CBO Sees 24 Million More Uninsured, $337 Billion Deficit Cut in Coming Decade With GOP Health Plan
https://www.wsj.com/articles/cbo-estimates-14-million-more-uninsured-next-year-under-gop-plan-1489436927
laugh at this you dumb ass backwoods hillbilly. T... (show quote)


I'm being derisive, ghetto denizen. That is all you are worth. BTW: how does Trump lie? Nothing like your fake newspapers, I bet.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 30 of 50 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.