One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Redistribution of wealth,socialism, and two Russian goats
Page <<first <prev 4 of 9 next> last>>
Jan 27, 2017 14:19:24   #
HedgeHog
 
Big Bass wrote:
I just had a glance. I'll read again shortly. It looks interesting, and I also am interested why Trump was invited to participate, and not Obama the Obsequious.


Because Ovomit is the instigator, the cause of the problem, not anywhere close to the solution.

Assad's armed opposition thinks that instead of a civil war in Syria, there has been a "foreign proxy war".

The reason for that belief is not just because Ovomit and his administration continued to demand Assad step down, but because Tillerson and Mattis (and others) while in front of congress has continually asserted that Russia is the threat.

http://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-92226-1.html "Tillerson Before Congress".

America has not made it easy for the rest of the world to help Syria, under Putin's leadership, regain stability.

Reply
Jan 27, 2017 14:58:44   #
theotts
 
There is no thesis. It is brute fact grocery store software will not permit the use of program chits to buy a very long list of items. Even if there were a hack, the grocery store would not be able to redeem the vouchers. Food aid recipients do not buy luxury goods with their assistance vouchers because they can't.

Reply
Jan 27, 2017 15:07:55   #
HedgeHog
 
theotts wrote:
There is no thesis. It is brute fact grocery store software will not permit the use of program chits to buy a very long list of items. Even if there were a hack, the grocery store would not be able to redeem the vouchers. Food aid recipients do not buy luxury goods with their assistance vouchers because they can't.


How do they get cash with their EBT cards, which they use to buy cigarettes, alcohol or weed? Is that not abuse?

Reply
 
 
Jan 27, 2017 15:12:18   #
theotts
 
Big Bass wrote:
Now how is this puerile statement germane to the topic? Also, I never even mentioned food-subsidy cheats.
Your stupid has been proved beyond a shadow of a doubt.


Then why did you "respond" to my post about it? You're an abortion survivor aren't you?

Reply
Jan 27, 2017 15:15:52   #
HedgeHog
 
theotts wrote:
Then why did you "respond" to my post about it? You're an abortion survivor aren't you?


He has a problem understanding that one really can't teach Liberals. He'll learn soon enough, just keep on doing and thinking just what you are doing and thinking. He'll learn.

Reply
Jan 27, 2017 15:20:50   #
theotts
 
HedgeHog wrote:
How do they get cash with their EBT cards, which they use to buy cigarettes, alcohol or weed? Is that not abuse?


There's a well-known underground trade in these vouchers. Clients are paid pennies on the dollar for their benefits. The program cards will not buy liquor, cigarettes, etc. What you describe is abuse, but the violator, having surrendered his/her voucher will have to find cash for food. Therefor, such abuse is vanishing small.

Reply
Jan 27, 2017 15:34:48   #
theotts
 
HedgeHog wrote:
He has a problem understanding that one really can't teach Liberals. He'll learn soon enough, just keep on doing and thinking just what you are doing and thinking. He'll learn.


If a progressive became irrational and became a Repugnican, he'd raise the average IQ of both parties.
There is no aspect of ethics, morals, or intellect in which even the least intelligent progressive is not vastly superior to any rightie. I've flunked dozens of righties because s/he didn't like a particular philosopher and therefor concluded that their own opinions ought to posit for answers to exam questions. . Now that's not getting it on an epic scale, isn't it?

Reply
 
 
Jan 27, 2017 15:48:42   #
valkyrierider Loc: "Land of Trump"
 
Dr.Dross wrote:
So those in need and desperate in our society--such as poor children, the disabled, and elderly (not just "welfare queens" and "young bucks")--are mean-spirited goat-owners? We should leave them to their misery because somehow they deserve it or a new dress is more important than someone, our neighbor, going cold and hungry? And the millions who through no fault of their own were ruined by the greed of Banks and Wall Street in 2008 should not be given aid by their government, through taxes, for its misfeasance? Being compassionate and taking care of the less fortunate of our fellow citizens is a horror of redistribution? Paying taxes to build and maintain a park in our neighborhood is worthwhile but feeding the hungry in our nation is not?
So those in need and desperate in our society--suc... (show quote)


Re-read the frigging story in the first post. If you can understand it. Ivan was a goat f_ _ ker and abused his goat. On top of that he was frigging lazy so you need to go to his aid and give him half of what you make to help him out. That is the Democrats way. LMFAO

Reply
Jan 27, 2017 17:14:24   #
HedgeHog
 
theotts wrote:
There's a well-known underground trade in these vouchers. Clients are paid pennies on the dollar for their benefits. The program cards will not buy liquor, cigarettes, etc. What you describe is abuse, but the violator, having surrendered his/her voucher will have to find cash for food. Therefor, such abuse is vanishing small.


That's pie in the sky wishful thinking. In the Springs, after people have used up both food stamps and cash from their EBT, they just go to the soup kitchen.

People will always be fed, after spending food stamps on food, (and you can't believe what kind of food they buy), cigarettes, alcohol, weed and other drugs. The Libs won't let them go hungry. I can see you don't get around much.

And besides that, you are simple minded.

Reply
Jan 27, 2017 17:15:04   #
HedgeHog
 
theotts wrote:
If a progressive became irrational and became a Repugnican, he'd raise the average IQ of both parties.
There is no aspect of ethics, morals, or intellect in which even the least intelligent progressive is not vastly superior to any rightie. I've flunked dozens of righties because s/he didn't like a particular philosopher and therefor concluded that their own opinions ought to posit for answers to exam questions. . Now that's not getting it on an epic scale, isn't it?


Was I talking to you?

Reply
Jan 28, 2017 01:36:20   #
QuestGirl Loc: Jayhawk Country
 
theotts wrote:
The story was all artifice, shallow as Trump, and absolutely vacuous. It resembles nothing in the real world. People and societies do not fit in your thoughtless categories.
About the only generalization that seems to be true is that righties are stupid and abnormal.


At least us "righties" are smart enough to know how to use "Quote Reply". You're just talkin' to yourself, thus irrelevant.

Reply
 
 
Jan 28, 2017 01:38:06   #
QuestGirl Loc: Jayhawk Country
 
rebob14 wrote:
The gov't used extortion to pressure banks to loan to people who could not afford to repay in order to broaden their base of voters.


You're other god Clinton was the reason that happened.

Reply
Jan 28, 2017 01:40:31   #
QuestGirl Loc: Jayhawk Country
 
theotts wrote:
First, don't use words you can't spell.
As to food assistance programs allowing the purchase of items "... [you] can't afford," you might have had a look at the rules governing their use: if anyone is so abusing the use of food subsidies, they are doing so with the complicity of whoever programmed the software on the check-out machines and of the clerk using them. That's about as likely as you getting a clue.
Having made a ruin of your credibility, you make your fantasy world even more fantastic with the other palaver you write. To paraphrase Yosemite Sam: "righties is so stupid."
A reply lacking some explanation of how your putative welfare cheats are able to defeat the programming on cash registers will, of course underscore your fecklessness.
First, don't use words you can't spell. br As to ... (show quote)


What are they buying that's not food? They can't even buy toilet paper on food stamps.

Reply
Jan 28, 2017 01:58:06   #
bilordinary Loc: SW Washington
 
Life is hard, and a bunch harder when you're stupid.
He's been schooled on the use of the quote reply button.
He stated he understood, I guess not smart enough to know he
lacked understanding. He apparently has a pretty good thesaurus!
Liberal and lost!

QuestGirl wrote:
At least us "righties" are smart enough to know how to use "Quote Reply". You're just talkin' to yourself, thus irrelevant.

Reply
Jan 28, 2017 02:00:38   #
QuestGirl Loc: Jayhawk Country
 
HedgeHog wrote:
How do they get cash with their EBT cards, which they use to buy cigarettes, alcohol or weed? Is that not abuse?


Those who receive cash assistance receive it on their SNAP cards. When checking out, two option buttons, cash or food.

Only those w/child(ren) receive cash assistance. Back in 1996, single with one child in my state was $352 cash plus $185 in food stamps. Food allotment may be higher today, but cash assistance remains at $352, for household of 2. I utilized the system for about 18 months.

The only exception to "w/child" is for those in the process of applying for disability. Again, my state, $100/month.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 9 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.