One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
more on climate change
Dec 22, 2016 21:31:22   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
House Committee: Obama Fired Top Scientist Over Climate Change
Image: House Committee: Obama Fired Top Scientist Over Climate Change


By Cathy Burke | Tuesday, 20 Dec 2016 05:49 PM

The Obama administration fired a scientist, intimidated staff at the Department of Energy, and allegedly ordered officials to obstruct Congress – all in order to push its climate change agenda, a House committee report asserted.

The Washington Free Beacon detailed Tuesday a report released by the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, which is chaired by Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, charged senior Obama administration officials retaliated against the scientist, Dr. Noelle Metting, who was manager of a radiation research program, and devised ways to block a congressional inquiry into the radiation research.

"Instead of providing the type of scientific information needed by Congress to legislate effectively, senior departmental officials sought to hide information, lobbied against legislation, and retaliated against a scientist for being forthcoming," Smith said in a statement, the Free Beacon reported.

"In this staff report based on lengthy record before the committee, much has been revealed about how senior level agency officials under the Obama administration retaliated against a scientist who did not follow the party line."

The scathing analysis comes in the wake of a report the Department of Energy refused to turn over to Donald Trump's transition team the names of its staff members who worked on climate change issues for the Obama administration.

The Free Beacon reported the analysis goes into congressional efforts to regulate the Low Dose Radiation Research Program, which aimed to test the impact of radiation on human beings. The program, started in the 1990s, was meant to support research into waste cleanup and the impact of nuclear weapons.

Lawmakers introduced the Low Dose Radiation Act of 2014 late that year to regulate the program and minimize harmful side effects, the Free Beacon noted.

During an October 2014 briefing on the matter, Metting testified, and less than a month later, she was "removed . . . from federal service for allegedly providing too much information in response to questions posed by" Congress during the briefing, the report stated.

Smith's report found congressional investigators determined the removal was in part retaliation against her because she "refused to conform to the predetermined remarks and talking points designed by management to undermine the advancement of "the 2014 radiation act," the Free Beacon reported.

Congress is recommending a full overhaul of the energy department's management structure, the Free Beacon reported.

R

Reply
Dec 22, 2016 22:04:26   #
Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton
 
no propaganda please wrote:
House Committee: Obama Fired Top Scientist Over Climate Change


Absolutely, unbelievably, true! They gave her a list of 'talking points' to stick to and she answered questions honestly and fully instead. Basically told them to go get bent. Didn't go down too well back at the boss' office.

"The report also provides evidence that the Obama administration worked to kill legislation in order to ensure that it could receive full funding for its own hotly contested climate change agenda." Yep. Fired for failing to sufficiently advance a political agenda. Welcome to ObamaWorld! Check your ethics and morals at the door.

Here's the link:

http://freebeacon.com/politics/congress-obama-admin-fired-top-scientist-advance-climate-change-plans/

Reply
Dec 22, 2016 22:10:28   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
Absolutely, unbelievably, true! They gave her a list of 'talking points' to stick to and she answered questions honestly and fully instead. Basically told them to go get bent. Didn't go down too well back at the boss' office.

"The report also provides evidence that the Obama administration worked to kill legislation in order to ensure that it could receive full funding for its own hotly contested climate change agenda." Yep. Fired for failing to sufficiently advance a political agenda. Welcome to ObamaWorld! Check your ethics and morals at the door.

Here's the link:

http://freebeacon.com/politics/congress-obama-admin-fired-top-scientist-advance-climate-change-plans/
Absolutely, unbelievably, true! They gave her a l... (show quote)

Thanks for the update. One Democrat Marxist fraud after another. Does anybody care?

Reply
Dec 22, 2016 23:17:04   #
PeterS
 
no propaganda please wrote:
House Committee: Obama Fired Top Scientist Over Climate Change
Image: House Committee: Obama Fired Top Scientist Over Climate Change


By Cathy Burke | Tuesday, 20 Dec 2016 05:49 PM

The Obama administration fired a scientist, intimidated staff at the Department of Energy, and allegedly ordered officials to obstruct Congress – all in order to push its climate change agenda, a House committee report asserted.

The Washington Free Beacon detailed Tuesday a report released by the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, which is chaired by Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, charged senior Obama administration officials retaliated against the scientist, Dr. Noelle Metting, who was manager of a radiation research program, and devised ways to block a congressional inquiry into the radiation research.

"Instead of providing the type of scientific information needed by Congress to legislate effectively, senior departmental officials sought to hide information, lobbied against legislation, and retaliated against a scientist for being forthcoming," Smith said in a statement, the Free Beacon reported.

"In this staff report based on lengthy record before the committee, much has been revealed about how senior level agency officials under the Obama administration retaliated against a scientist who did not follow the party line."

The scathing analysis comes in the wake of a report the Department of Energy refused to turn over to Donald Trump's transition team the names of its staff members who worked on climate change issues for the Obama administration.

The Free Beacon reported the analysis goes into congressional efforts to regulate the Low Dose Radiation Research Program, which aimed to test the impact of radiation on human beings. The program, started in the 1990s, was meant to support research into waste cleanup and the impact of nuclear weapons.

Lawmakers introduced the Low Dose Radiation Act of 2014 late that year to regulate the program and minimize harmful side effects, the Free Beacon noted.

During an October 2014 briefing on the matter, Metting testified, and less than a month later, she was "removed . . . from federal service for allegedly providing too much information in response to questions posed by" Congress during the briefing, the report stated.

Smith's report found congressional investigators determined the removal was in part retaliation against her because she "refused to conform to the predetermined remarks and talking points designed by management to undermine the advancement of "the 2014 radiation act," the Free Beacon reported.

Congress is recommending a full overhaul of the energy department's management structure, the Free Beacon reported.

R
House Committee: Obama Fired Top Scientist Over Cl... (show quote)


The Arctic is 50 degrees above normal in the middle of December so Santa isn't going to have a white Christmas. What more do we need to know about global warming than that?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/north-pole-heat-wave_us_585afe4de4b0d9a594570c03

Reply
Dec 22, 2016 23:53:47   #
Morgan
 
PeterS wrote:
The Arctic is 50 degrees above normal in the middle of December so Santa isn't going to have a white Christmas. What more do we need to know about global warming than that?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/north-pole-heat-wave_us_585afe4de4b0d9a594570c03



They don't believe in the effects man has created to the environment, how is that reasoning even possible? Not to validate it is illogical... there you have'em. As Thomas Jefferson said it's like arguing with the dead.

Reply
Dec 23, 2016 00:10:16   #
Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton
 
PeterS wrote:
The Arctic is 50 degrees above normal in the middle of December so Santa isn't going to have a white Christmas. What more do we need to know about global warming than that?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/north-pole-heat-wave_us_585afe4de4b0d9a594570c03


Oh? Which way is the wind blowing? And yes, that does make a big difference. Also, whose thermometer is it? I wouldn't trust anything coming from Huffington.

Reply
Dec 23, 2016 01:33:08   #
tugboat
 
PeterS wrote:
The Arctic is 50 degrees above normal in the middle of December so Santa isn't going to have a white Christmas. What more do we need to know about global warming than that?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/north-pole-heat-wave_us_585afe4de4b0d9a594570c03


It just snowed in the Sahara desert for the first time in almost 40 years.Strange things happen.

Reply
Dec 23, 2016 04:40:43   #
grace scott
 
Morgan wrote:
They don't believe in the effects man has created to the environment, how is that reasoning even possible? Not to validate it is illogical... there you have'em. As Thomas Jefferson said it's like arguing with the dead.


Humans have desecrated the beautiful planet that God gave us. Our air is not fit to breath. Our water is not fit to drink. our treatment of the oceans is criminal.

Reply
Dec 23, 2016 05:24:14   #
tri-states
 
Lock and load with hog fat lubed ammo, before it's too late!!!

Reply
Dec 23, 2016 11:01:31   #
Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton
 
tugboat wrote:
It just snowed in the Sahara desert for the first time in almost 40 years.Strange things happen.


'Climate Change!' It's getting colder, therefore it's getting warmer! I'll bet there's some 'climate scientist' somewhere who's got a really long and convoluted explanation of how that's possible. It's a new branch of science called... Oh, look, a flock of turtles! See ya later!

Reply
Dec 23, 2016 12:22:55   #
Callan
 
This is a typical reaction by Loony Tunes Liberals who are deathly afraid of an honest debate over the affects of low dosage expose to radiation or human causes Global Warming. Their agenda is all about Power and Control over all of us by increased taxation and increased regulations and has nothing to do with actual science. Radiation exposure is well studied and well understood. Climate Change is one of their cornerstones of misinformation because it identifies a made up problem with convenient made up solution. Since the end our last ice age roughly 10,500 years ago or so the entire world's climate has been much warmer and much colder than it is now long before we had any significant human population existed. Firing an honest scientist because she is not a mixed up and easily lead cool aid drinker is not surprising.

Reply
 
 
Dec 23, 2016 17:45:32   #
Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere
 
Callan wrote:
This is a typical reaction by Loony Tunes Liberals who are deathly afraid of an honest debate over the affects of low dosage expose to radiation or human causes Global Warming. Their agenda is all about Power and Control over all of us by increased taxation and increased regulations and has nothing to do with actual science. Radiation exposure is well studied and well understood. Climate Change is one of their cornerstones of misinformation because it identifies a made up problem with convenient made up solution. Since the end our last ice age roughly 10,500 years ago or so the entire world's climate has been much warmer and much colder than it is now long before we had any significant human population existed. Firing an honest scientist because she is not a mixed up and easily lead cool aid drinker is not surprising.
This is a typical reaction by Loony Tunes Liberals... (show quote)


Have you noticed that many of the CC proponents are on the west coast, where the radiation from the Japanese reactor/tsunami has arrived? Perhaps radiation damage is more insidious than we know? Just sayin'.

Reply
Dec 23, 2016 19:37:36   #
ldsuttonjr Loc: ShangriLa
 
PeterS wrote:
The Arctic is 50 degrees above normal in the middle of December so Santa isn't going to have a white Christmas. What more do we need to know about global warming than that?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/north-pole-heat-wave_us_585afe4de4b0d9a594570c03


Durp! Try truthful sites instead of the shit you read!!!!

Reply
Dec 24, 2016 13:24:27   #
Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere
 
PeterS wrote:
The Arctic is 50 degrees above normal in the middle of December so Santa isn't going to have a white Christmas. What more do we need to know about global warming than that?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/north-pole-heat-wave_us_585afe4de4b0d9a594570c03


Currently the arctic ocean is warmer than usual. That's true, but 50 degrees is asinine and you destroy your credibility posting such nonsense.

If you are going to say such ridiculous things, why should anyone bother to read your.posts? Until.Hillary lost you used to be fair minded but since her loss you have gone off the deep end. I notice the same for many liberals here and around the country.

Did you never consider that political power cycles and with such a division as we currently have in America that you could easily cycle out?

You all act as if you actually believed your own PR. If.you are all that tunnel visioned, it's good all the way around that.you are out. Your predilection for manufacturing information just got.you in big trouble. I suggest you find a way to talk without the obvious overblown statements.

Reply
Dec 24, 2016 18:19:26   #
ldsuttonjr Loc: ShangriLa
 
peter small (s). Has been gored by al Gore!

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.