Connecticut Violation of Second Amendment: In Connecticut, the states new gun laws have gone into effect, and there have been reports of long lines of people registering...

ldsuttonjr Loc: ShangriLa

In Connecticut, the states new gun laws have gone into effect, and there have been reports of long lines of people registering semi-automatic rifles and high-capacity magazines.
Anything the state considered to be an assault weapon (as opposed to a non-assault weapon?) or a high capacity magazine had to be registered before January 1st in order to be legally possessed.
The Germans passed the Law on Firearms and Ammunition of April 13, 1928, and it was strengthened under the Nazis in 1938. Eerily, historical research suggests that the Nazi Weapons Law of 1938 was drawn upon in Congress rush to pass gun control measures after the assassinations of Martin Luther King, Jr. and Robert F. Kennedy in 1968.
The Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership consulted a legal scholar, who found that the NWL was sought out and added to the U.S. Congressional record by Thomas J. Dodd of Connecticut (the first Senator censured in the U.S. Senate and father of disgraced Senator Chris Dodd of Dodd-Frank fame).
The NWL 38 was added to the record just four months before the Gun Control Act of 1968 was passed. The GCA 68 strengthened the U.S. Federal Firearms Act of 1938.
WSFB-TV in Connecticut reported that none of the people the network spoke with in the gun registration lines thinks that the measure is going to reduce gun violence. They believe its only hurting law abiding citizens. Scott Boccio, who registered guns, told WFSB-TV in Connecticut, I understand why theyre doing it, but I dont think its constitutional.
In Canada and in England, registration preceded confiscation. If gun control doesnt hinder crime, then firearms registration is not a harmless thing that good citizens do just because the government says so.
Furthermore, the Second Amendment was passed specifically with a mind to organized civilian defense. Civilian ownership of guns transcends even the Constitutions guarantees; it is a fundamental right for innocent citizens to be able to defend themselves.
by Kyle Becker
99.995% of Firearms Not Used for Gun Homicides Each Year

73STNGLKABEE

Well put.......................happy new year.

ldsuttonjr wrote:

In Connecticut, the states new gun laws have gone into effect, and there have been reports of long lines of people registering semi-automatic rifles and high-capacity magazines.
Anything the state considered to be an assault weapon (as opposed to a non-assault weapon?) or a high capacity magazine had to be registered before January 1st in order to be legally possessed.
The Germans passed the Law on Firearms and Ammunition of April 13, 1928, and it was strengthened under the Nazis in 1938. Eerily, historical research suggests that the Nazi Weapons Law of 1938 was drawn upon in Congress rush to pass gun control measures after the assassinations of Martin Luther King, Jr. and Robert F. Kennedy in 1968.
The Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership consulted a legal scholar, who found that the NWL was sought out and added to the U.S. Congressional record by Thomas J. Dodd of Connecticut (the first Senator censured in the U.S. Senate and father of disgraced Senator Chris Dodd of Dodd-Frank fame).
The NWL 38 was added to the record just four months before the Gun Control Act of 1968 was passed. The GCA 68 strengthened the U.S. Federal Firearms Act of 1938.
WSFB-TV in Connecticut reported that none of the people the network spoke with in the gun registration lines thinks that the measure is going to reduce gun violence. They believe its only hurting law abiding citizens. Scott Boccio, who registered guns, told WFSB-TV in Connecticut, I understand why theyre doing it, but I dont think its constitutional.
In Canada and in England, registration preceded confiscation. If gun control doesnt hinder crime, then firearms registration is not a harmless thing that good citizens do just because the government says so.
Furthermore, the Second Amendment was passed specifically with a mind to organized civilian defense. Civilian ownership of guns transcends even the Constitutions guarantees; it is a fundamental right for innocent citizens to be able to defend themselves.
by Kyle Becker
99.995% of Firearms Not Used for Gun Homicides Each Year

In Connecticut, the states new gun laws have gone... (show quote)

Michael Nestorick Loc: Northeastern Pa.

Subject: NEVER TRUST A DEMOCRAT WITH A GUN---10 STAR RATING

Gun control?

In 1865 a Democrat shot and killed Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States ...

In 1881 a left wing radical Democrat shot James Garfield, President of the United States who later died from the wound.

In 1963 a radical left wing socialist shot and killed John F. Kennedy, President of the United States .

In 1975 a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at Gerald Ford, President of the United States .

In 1983 a registered Democrat shot and wounded Ronald Reagan, President of the United States .

In 1984 James Hubert, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 22 people in a McDonalds restaurant.

In 1986 Patrick Sherrill, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 15 people in an Oklahoma post office.

In 1990 James Pough, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 10 people at a GMAC office.

In 1991 George Hennard, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 23 people in a Luby's cafeteria.

In 1995 James Daniel Simpson, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 5 coworkers in a Texas laboratory.

In 1999 Larry Asbrook, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 8 people at a church service.

In 2001 a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at the White House in a failed attempt to kill George W. Bush, President of the US .

In 2003 Douglas Williams, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people at a Lockheed Martin plant.

In 2007 a registered Democrat named Seung - Hui Cho, shot and killed 32 people in Virginia Tech.

In 2010 a mentally ill registered Democrat named Jared Lee Loughner, shot Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and killed 6 others.

In 2011 a registered Democrat named James Holmes, went into a movie theater and shot and killed 12 people.

In 2012 Andrew Engeldinger, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people in Minneapolis .

In 2013 a registered Democrat named Adam Lanza, shot and killed 26 people in a school.

As recently as Sept 2013, an angry Democrat shot 12 at a Navy ship yard.
One could go on, but you get the point, even if the media does not. Clearly, there is a problem with Democrats and guns.

No NRA member, Tea Party member, or Republican conservatives were involved.

SOLUTION: It should be illegal for Democrats to own guns.
It seems to me that we should ban Democrats instead of banning guns. We need Democrat control, not gun control

clarkwv Loc: west virginia

ldsuttonjr wrote:

In Connecticut, the states new gun laws have gone into effect, and there have been reports of long lines of people registering semi-automatic rifles and high-capacity magazines.
Anything the state considered to be an assault weapon (as opposed to a non-assault weapon?) or a high capacity magazine had to be registered before January 1st in order to be legally possessed.
The Germans passed the Law on Firearms and Ammunition of April 13, 1928, and it was strengthened under the Nazis in 1938. Eerily, historical research suggests that the Nazi Weapons Law of 1938 was drawn upon in Congress rush to pass gun control measures after the assassinations of Martin Luther King, Jr. and Robert F. Kennedy in 1968.
The Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership consulted a legal scholar, who found that the NWL was sought out and added to the U.S. Congressional record by Thomas J. Dodd of Connecticut (the first Senator censured in the U.S. Senate and father of disgraced Senator Chris Dodd of Dodd-Frank fame).
The NWL 38 was added to the record just four months before the Gun Control Act of 1968 was passed. The GCA 68 strengthened the U.S. Federal Firearms Act of 1938.
WSFB-TV in Connecticut reported that none of the people the network spoke with in the gun registration lines thinks that the measure is going to reduce gun violence. They believe its only hurting law abiding citizens. Scott Boccio, who registered guns, told WFSB-TV in Connecticut, I understand why theyre doing it, but I dont think its constitutional.
In Canada and in England, registration preceded confiscation. If gun control doesnt hinder crime, then firearms registration is not a harmless thing that good citizens do just because the government says so.
Furthermore, the Second Amendment was passed specifically with a mind to organized civilian defense. Civilian ownership of guns transcends even the Constitutions guarantees; it is a fundamental right for innocent citizens to be able to defend themselves.
by Kyle Becker
99.995% of Firearms Not Used for Gun Homicides Each Year

In Connecticut, the states new gun laws have gone... (show quote)

So in this case big national government should have the upper hand over state rights?

rumitoid

Michael Nestorick wrote:

Subject: NEVER TRUST A DEMOCRAT WITH A GUN---10 ST... (show quote)

This thing again. Too Funny. One example: "In 2007 a registered Democrat named Seung - Hui Cho, shot and killed 32 people in Virginia Tech." VA doesn't register by party affiliation.

Brian Devon

Michael Nestorick wrote:

Subject: NEVER TRUST A DEMOCRAT WITH A GUN---10 ST... (show quote)

Do you know what cherry picking means? It is one of the major forms of propaganda. It used to be called "card stacking". Your little treatise is exhibit "A".

rjoeholl

Hey, Brian, you have a keyboard. Offer up some instances where a republican went on a rampage. We'll wait for them.

Brian Devon wrote:

Do you know what cherry picking means? It is one of the major forms of propaganda. It used to be called "card stacking". Your little treatise is exhibit "A".

Searching Loc: Rural Southwest VA

Michael Nestorick wrote:

Subject: NEVER TRUST A DEMOCRAT WITH A GUN---10 ST... (show quote)

Yes, well, in 1998, my father, a registered Republican threatened to kill others and took his own life....

hprinze Loc: Central Florida

ldsuttonjr wrote:

In Connecticut, the states new gun laws have gone into effect, and there have been reports of long lines of people registering semi-automatic rifles and high-capacity magazines.
Anything the state considered to be an assault weapon (as opposed to a non-assault weapon?) or a high capacity magazine had to be registered before January 1st in order to be legally possessed.

Why do people refer to defense weapons as "assault" weapons?

Searching Loc: Rural Southwest VA

rumitoid wrote:

This thing again. Too Funny. One example: "In 2007 a registered Democrat named Seung - Hui Cho, shot and killed 32 people in Virginia Tech." VA doesn't register by party affiliation.

First, a disclaimer, because I live in VA and have met victims from VT, the tragedy for them is not to be trivialized, so forgive me here for saying with a twinkle in my eye, cause and effect...

Hmmmm....."perhaps" Republicans have driven Democrats to an unbalanced state. :roll: So, see, one "could" say it IS the Republicans' fault :-( -- all this gun violence. Yes, and before anyone jumps in and says "spoken like a true Democrat" -- I have been a registered Republican since I believe 1968, because in the State of MD, you cannot registered as an Independent, and I truly disliked Johnson.

Michael Nestorick Loc: Northeastern Pa.

Registering of guns leads to confiscation of guns. I t happened before, people never learn. History repeats itself!

SeniorVerdad

ldsuttonjr wrote:

In Connecticut, the states new gun laws have gone into effect, and there have been reports of long lines of people registering semi-automatic rifles and high-capacity magazines.
Anything the state considered to be an assault weapon (as opposed to a non-assault weapon?) or a high capacity magazine had to be registered before January 1st in order to be legally possessed.
The Germans passed the Law on Firearms and Ammunition of April 13, 1928, and it was strengthened under the Nazis in 1938. Eerily, historical research suggests that the Nazi Weapons Law of 1938 was drawn upon in Congress rush to pass gun control measures after the assassinations of Martin Luther King, Jr. and Robert F. Kennedy in 1968.
The Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership consulted a legal scholar, who found that the NWL was sought out and added to the U.S. Congressional record by Thomas J. Dodd of Connecticut (the first Senator censured in the U.S. Senate and father of disgraced Senator Chris Dodd of Dodd-Frank fame).
The NWL 38 was added to the record just four months before the Gun Control Act of 1968 was passed. The GCA 68 strengthened the U.S. Federal Firearms Act of 1938.
WSFB-TV in Connecticut reported that none of the people the network spoke with in the gun registration lines thinks that the measure is going to reduce gun violence. They believe its only hurting law abiding citizens. Scott Boccio, who registered guns, told WFSB-TV in Connecticut, I understand why theyre doing it, but I dont think its constitutional.
In Canada and in England, registration preceded confiscation. If gun control doesnt hinder crime, then firearms registration is not a harmless thing that good citizens do just because the government says so.
Furthermore, the Second Amendment was passed specifically with a mind to organized civilian defense. Civilian ownership of guns transcends even the Constitutions guarantees; it is a fundamental right for innocent citizens to be able to defend themselves.
by Kyle Becker
99.995% of Firearms Not Used for Gun Homicides Each Year

In Connecticut, the states new gun laws have gone... (show quote)

They don't want to take your guns, YET!! That's next.

Searching Loc: Rural Southwest VA

hprinze wrote:

Why do people refer to defense weapons as "assault" weapons?

Perhaps, and I could be wrong, but weren't these "assault" weapons originally designed to be used by the military as killing machines of maximum utility along with those large ammo clips to enhance the ability to take out the maximum number of "the enemy" in the shortest amount of time? Hey, I'd want to have one myself if I knew it was a distinct possibility that my position was about to be overrun by a horde of enemy combatants!!

SeniorVerdad

Searching wrote:

Perhaps, and I could be wrong, but weren't these "assault" weapons originally designed to be used by the military as killing machines of maximum utility along with those large ammo clips to enhance the ability to take out the maximum number of "the enemy" in the shortest amount of time? Hey, I'd want to have one myself if I knew it was a distinct possibility that my position was about to be overrun by a horde of enemy combatants!!

Might be a good idea. That was the intent and reason for the 2nd Amendment. Trouble isn't the enemy without but the enemy within.

ldsuttonjr Loc: ShangriLa

SeniorVerdad wrote:

Might be a good idea. That was the intent and reason for the 2nd Amendment. Trouble isn't the enemy without but the enemy within.

What difference does it really make.....According to Hillary ! We must defend against all enemies Foreign and Domestic!