Respectfully disagree...Trump can and should withhold federal funds from U.S. cities that say they will guard illegal immigrants from deportation...
I think Trump would be within his rights to withhold funds, and he should..... The Democrats would be making a big bet, and a bad one, if they decide to defy the federal government and what seems to be common sense in controlling "your borders."...Think about that for a minute...
I know Rahm Emanuel, who declared the Illinois city a sanctuary city, said he did not believe Trump would cut funding.... But he also doesn't know Trump either!
The cost in caring for illegals far outweighs what it would lose in income genersted, believe me...I'm sure you've seen the numbers...But that's not the issue...if illegals have no place to go protected, shielded etc they aren't as apt to try to get past the borders to begin with....if not vetted coming in there are enough laws already in place with the Federal laws that do supercede State laws on the issue..
The Dems were just tolerant of the sanctuary cities for the obvious reason...
I didn't see the Fox commentator but do want to see what was said...
Respectfully disagree...Trump can and should withh... (show quote)
Oh I agree. It was a FOX news email. I'd cut funding off at tge state level and.let the state.put the city back in order.
I believe these cities would eventually cave in but the bill was already passed in the House but blocked in Senate this year.
lindajoy wrote:
Respectfully disagree...Trump can and should withhold federal funds from U.S. cities that say they will guard illegal immigrants from deportation...
I think Trump would be within his rights to withhold funds, and he should..... The Democrats would be making a big bet, and a bad one, if they decide to defy the federal government and what seems to be common sense in controlling "your borders."...Think about that for a minute...
I know Rahm Emanuel, who declared the Illinois city a sanctuary city, said he did not believe Trump would cut funding.... But he also doesn't know Trump either!
The cost in caring for illegals far outweighs what it would lose in income genersted, believe me...I'm sure you've seen the numbers...But that's not the issue...if illegals have no place to go protected, shielded etc they aren't as apt to try to get past the borders to begin with....if not vetted coming in there are enough laws already in place with the Federal laws that do supercede State laws on the issue..
The Dems were just tolerant of the sanctuary cities for the obvious reason...
I didn't see the Fox commentator but do want to see what was said...
Respectfully disagree...Trump can and should withh... (show quote)
Personally, I think unemployed Americans should harvest the apples and onions, catch the fish and clean the hotel rooms. Prices would go up but so would wages. The economy would rise from the bottom up rather than the other way 'round...which is the way it should be.
Naturally, rising prices is just another way to 'redistribute the wealth', isn't it? With just one not so tiny difference.. those receiving the wealth will actually be earning it... doing something.
Naturally, rising prices is just another way to 'redistribute the wealth', isn't it? With just one not so tiny difference.. those receiving the wealth will actually be earning it... doing something.
It makes sense...therefore Washington and the media are adamantly against it and never mention it.
Naturally, rising prices is just another way to 'redistribute the wealth', isn't it? With just one not so tiny difference.. those receiving the wealth will actually be earning it... doing something.
Awww heck. Let's just cancel money and go.totally to bartering.