One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Democrat Luis Gutierrez Threatens War If Trump Enforces Immigration Law
Page <<first <prev 8 of 9 next>
Nov 17, 2016 23:24:55   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
archie bunker wrote:
No, but we have canyons, and critters. I would hate to make the critters sick though.......😞


Well give those poor critters some tums and then something very rewarding, ok, huh, huh, pallleaseeee....🤗

Reply
Nov 18, 2016 04:41:24   #
Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere
 
lindajoy wrote:
Respectfully disagree...Trump can and should withhold federal funds from U.S. cities that say they will guard illegal immigrants from deportation...

I think Trump would be within his rights to withhold funds, and he should..... The Democrats would be making a big bet, and a bad one, if they decide to defy the federal government and what seems to be common sense in controlling "your borders."...Think about that for a minute...

I know Rahm Emanuel, who declared the Illinois city a sanctuary city, said he did not believe Trump would cut funding....
But he also doesn't know Trump either!

The cost in caring for illegals far outweighs what it would lose in income genersted, believe me...I'm sure you've seen the numbers...But that's not the issue...if illegals have no place to go protected, shielded etc they aren't as apt to try to get past the borders to begin with....if not vetted coming in there are enough laws already in place with the Federal laws that do supercede State laws on the issue..

The Dems were just tolerant of the sanctuary cities for the obvious reason...

I didn't see the Fox commentator but do want to see what was said...
Respectfully disagree...Trump can and should withh... (show quote)


Oh I agree. It was a FOX news email. I'd cut funding off at tge state level and.let the state.put the city back in order.

Reply
Nov 18, 2016 08:26:56   #
VladimirPee
 
I believe these cities would eventually cave in but the bill was already passed in the House but blocked in Senate this year.

lindajoy wrote:
Respectfully disagree...Trump can and should withhold federal funds from U.S. cities that say they will guard illegal immigrants from deportation...

I think Trump would be within his rights to withhold funds, and he should..... The Democrats would be making a big bet, and a bad one, if they decide to defy the federal government and what seems to be common sense in controlling "your borders."...Think about that for a minute...

I know Rahm Emanuel, who declared the Illinois city a sanctuary city, said he did not believe Trump would cut funding....
But he also doesn't know Trump either!

The cost in caring for illegals far outweighs what it would lose in income genersted, believe me...I'm sure you've seen the numbers...But that's not the issue...if illegals have no place to go protected, shielded etc they aren't as apt to try to get past the borders to begin with....if not vetted coming in there are enough laws already in place with the Federal laws that do supercede State laws on the issue..

The Dems were just tolerant of the sanctuary cities for the obvious reason...

I didn't see the Fox commentator but do want to see what was said...
Respectfully disagree...Trump can and should withh... (show quote)

Reply
Nov 18, 2016 08:45:07   #
S. Maturin
 
BigMike wrote:
I'll have to research him.

Personally, I think unemployed Americans should harvest the apples and onions, catch the fish and clean the hotel rooms. Prices would go up but so would wages. The economy would rise from the bottom up rather than the other way 'round...which is the way it should be.


Naturally, rising prices is just another way to 'redistribute the wealth', isn't it? With just one not so tiny difference.. those receiving the wealth will actually be earning it... doing something.

Reply
Nov 18, 2016 08:51:27   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
VladimirPee wrote:
I believe these cities would eventually cave in but the bill was already passed in the House but blocked in Senate this year.


Good Morning, Vlad...

Which bill is it you are referring to, please??

Reply
Nov 18, 2016 09:12:50   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
I wonder how much Trump could do legally with EO's?
VladimirPee wrote:
I believe these cities would eventually cave in but the bill was already passed in the House but blocked in Senate this year.

Reply
Nov 18, 2016 10:19:44   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
S. Maturin wrote:
Naturally, rising prices is just another way to 'redistribute the wealth', isn't it? With just one not so tiny difference.. those receiving the wealth will actually be earning it... doing something.


It makes sense...therefore Washington and the media are adamantly against it and never mention it.

Reply
Nov 18, 2016 10:47:08   #
S. Maturin
 
BigMike wrote:
It makes sense...therefore Washington and the media are adamantly against it and never mention it.


Billy 'Big Cigar Daddy' Clinton actually did a wee bit when he instituted 'work for welfare', or something like that, didn't he?

Reply
Nov 18, 2016 11:57:34   #
VladimirPee
 
This one which was blocked Oct 2015

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/10/20/republicans-push-for-sanctuary-city-crackdown-in-key-senate-vote.html




lindajoy wrote:
Good Morning, Vlad...

Which bill is it you are referring to, please??

Reply
Nov 18, 2016 13:03:59   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
S. Maturin wrote:
Billy 'Big Cigar Daddy' Clinton actually did a wee bit when he instituted 'work for welfare', or something like that, didn't he?


Few people get everything wrong!

Reply
Nov 18, 2016 14:00:50   #
VladimirPee
 
lindajoy wrote:
Well give those poor critters some tums and then something very rewarding, ok, huh, huh, pallleaseeee....🤗



Reply
Nov 18, 2016 15:53:03   #
S. Maturin
 
Oh, Good Lord, that's hilarious!!

Reply
Nov 18, 2016 17:42:44   #
Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere
 
S. Maturin wrote:
Naturally, rising prices is just another way to 'redistribute the wealth', isn't it? With just one not so tiny difference.. those receiving the wealth will actually be earning it... doing something.


Awww heck. Let's just cancel money and go.totally to bartering.

Then one would have to work to eat etc.

Reply
Nov 18, 2016 17:44:51   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
Docadhoc wrote:
Awww heck. Let's just cancel money and go.totally to bartering.

Then one would have to work to eat etc.


Time to plant some weed!

Reply
Nov 18, 2016 19:41:50   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
BigMike wrote:
Time to plant some weed!


What will the weed smokers have to trade?

Reply
Page <<first <prev 8 of 9 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.