President Obamas Kansas speech is a remarkable document. In calling for more government controls, more taxation, more collectivism, he has two paragraphs that give the show away. Take a look at them.
Obama said this:
"There is a certain crowd in Washington who, for the last few decades, have said, lets respond to this economic challenge with the same old tune. The market will take care of everything, they tell us. If we just cut more regulations and cut more taxesespecially for the wealthyour economy will grow stronger. Sure, they say, there will be winners and losers. But if the winners do really well, then jobs and prosperity will eventually trickle down to everybody else. And, they argue, even if prosperity doesnt trickle down, well, thats the price of liberty.
Now, its a simple theory. And we have to admit, its one that speaks to our rugged individualism and our healthy skepticism of too much government. Thats in Americas DNA. And that theory fits well on a bumper sticker. (Laughter.) But heres the problem: It doesnt work. It has never worked. (Applause.) It didnt work when it was tried in the decade before the Great Depression. Its not what led to the incredible postwar booms of the 50s and 60s. And it didnt work when we tried it during the last decade. (Applause.) I mean, understand, its not as if we havent tried this theory."
Thats the political philosophy on which Obama is trying to hang the blame for the recent financial crisis and every other social ill. But ask yourself, are we few radical capitalists in charge? Have radical capitalists been in charge at any time in the last, oh, say 100 years?
I pick 100 years deliberately, because it was exactly 100 years ago that a gigantic anti-capitalist measure was put into effect: the Federal Reserve System. For 100 years, government, not the free market, has controlled money and banking. Hows that worked out? Hows the value of the dollar held up since 1913? Is it worth one-fiftieth of its value then or only one-one-hundredth? You be the judge. How did the dollar hold up over the 100 years before this government take-over of money and banking? It actually gained slightly in value. In 1913 a coin was minted, it was $20.00 gold coin. That coin today is worth $1400.00 plus. Same coin.
Even you, dear reader, are probably wondering how on earth anyone could challenge things like Social Security, government schools, and the FDA. But thats not the point. The point is: these statist, anti-capitalist programs exist and have existed for about a century. The point is: Obama is pretending that the Progressive PGR -0.95% Era, the New Deal, and the Great Society were repealed, so that he can blame the financial crisis on capitalism. Hes pretending that George Bush was George Washington.
By raising that question, we uncover the fundamental: the meaning of capitalism and the meaning of government controls. Capitalism means freedom. Government means force.
Suddenly, the whole issue comes into focus: Obama is saying that freedom leads to poverty and force leads to wealth. Hes saying: Look, we tried leaving you free to live your own life, and that didnt work. You have to be forced, you have to have your earnings seized by the state, you have to work under our directionsunder penalty of fines or imprisonment. You dont deserve to be free.
As a bit of ugly irony, this is precisely what former white slave-owners said after the Civil War: The black man cant handle freedom; we have to force him for his own good. The innovation of the Left is to extend that viewpoint to all races.
I cant believe how mind numbingly stupid and brain dead the village idiot is. Hey Obastard, why don't you go to Africa and rally them to your ridiculous crybaby theories, I am sooooooooo sick of this POS, he could disappear and I would breathe a deep sigh of relief. Obama, you are so UnAmerican its almost hilarious, please go to Africa and organize those communities, you have no business in this country, let alone hold office of POTUS. You and your trans wife are the laughing stock of the world and an utter embarrassment to US citizens, plus your mother was a $2 whore and didn't even want him as a baby. How does he live with himself? HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
cold iron wrote:
President Obamas Kansas speech is a remarkable document. In calling for more government controls, more taxation, more collectivism, he has two paragraphs that give the show away. Take a look at them.
Obama said this:
"There is a certain crowd in Washington who, for the last few decades, have said, lets respond to this economic challenge with the same old tune. The market will take care of everything, they tell us. If we just cut more regulations and cut more taxesespecially for the wealthyour economy will grow stronger. Sure, they say, there will be winners and losers. But if the winners do really well, then jobs and prosperity will eventually trickle down to everybody else. And, they argue, even if prosperity doesnt trickle down, well, thats the price of liberty.
Now, its a simple theory. And we have to admit, its one that speaks to our rugged individualism and our healthy skepticism of too much government. Thats in Americas DNA. And that theory fits well on a bumper sticker. (Laughter.) But heres the problem: It doesnt work. It has never worked. (Applause.) It didnt work when it was tried in the decade before the Great Depression. Its not what led to the incredible postwar booms of the 50s and 60s. And it didnt work when we tried it during the last decade. (Applause.) I mean, understand, its not as if we havent tried this theory."
Thats the political philosophy on which Obama is trying to hang the blame for the recent financial crisis and every other social ill. But ask yourself, are we few radical capitalists in charge? Have radical capitalists been in charge at any time in the last, oh, say 100 years?
I pick 100 years deliberately, because it was exactly 100 years ago that a gigantic anti-capitalist measure was put into effect: the Federal Reserve System. For 100 years, government, not the free market, has controlled money and banking. Hows that worked out? Hows the value of the dollar held up since 1913? Is it worth one-fiftieth of its value then or only one-one-hundredth? You be the judge. How did the dollar hold up over the 100 years before this government take-over of money and banking? It actually gained slightly in value. In 1913 a coin was minted, it was $20.00 gold coin. That coin today is worth $1400.00 plus. Same coin.
Even you, dear reader, are probably wondering how on earth anyone could challenge things like Social Security, government schools, and the FDA. But thats not the point. The point is: these statist, anti-capitalist programs exist and have existed for about a century. The point is: Obama is pretending that the Progressive PGR -0.95% Era, the New Deal, and the Great Society were repealed, so that he can blame the financial crisis on capitalism. Hes pretending that George Bush was George Washington.
By raising that question, we uncover the fundamental: the meaning of capitalism and the meaning of government controls. Capitalism means freedom. Government means force.
Suddenly, the whole issue comes into focus: Obama is saying that freedom leads to poverty and force leads to wealth. Hes saying: Look, we tried leaving you free to live your own life, and that didnt work. You have to be forced, you have to have your earnings seized by the state, you have to work under our directionsunder penalty of fines or imprisonment. You dont deserve to be free.
As a bit of ugly irony, this is precisely what former white slave-owners said after the Civil War: The black man cant handle freedom; we have to force him for his own good. The innovation of the Left is to extend that viewpoint to all races.
President Obamas Kansas speech is a remarkable do... (
show quote)
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.